Tatiana's Reviews > Hush, Hush
Hush, Hush (Hush, Hush, #1)
by
by

This book is simply appalling.
I won't lie, my expectations going in about this book were pretty low. But even so, "Hush, Hush" managed to disappoint me.
First, there are many similarities with "Twilight" - you have a regular average girl here, absent parents, a love affair with a dangerous supernatural boyfriend, a final showdown with a villain of his own kind. The mythology, while somewhat unusual (I haven't read anything about fallen angels in YA so far), is paper thin. The characters are shallow and undeveloped (BTW, Vee is the dumbest character I've read about maybe ever).
But this is not even what makes this book a barely tolerable read. This book is just plain silly, and silly not in a cute-and-funny way, but more in it's-pretty-dumb-and-dangerous-to-fall-for-this-crap way. Many things are just so contrived about the story, I got a headache rolling my eyes while reading it. For instance: a bomb threat to steal an empty personal file that nobody investigates later? a biology class which is centered on discussing one uncomfortable and almost harassed student's sexual attractiveness? why would a mother whose husband was murdered leave her 16-year old daughter alone in a remote house for weeks at a time? why would parents of another teenage girl let her go out NEXT DAY after she had surgery following a violent attack on her? dressing up like a hooker to get some dirt on a guy you are investigating? why would an angel fall for loving a human and then get his wings back while loving another human?
And finally, why exactly Patch and Nora are in love? They know nothing about each other. Even more, Nora spends most of the book calling Patch creepy, being scared of him, being roughly pinned by him to various walls in dark places or being at his knife's point, and yet she is full of desire for him? It just makes no sense. As for Patch, I don't know one thing about him or why he loves Nora. My list can go on and on...
But surely enough, teenage girls will eat this story up. You have everything for success here: a fabulous cover and font, and pages and pages of flirtatious banter filled with sexual innuendos (very often bordering on sexual harassment) fit for 30-year olds and not 10-graders.
I am rarely for any kind of censorship of books, but reading nonsense like "Hush, Hush" makes me wonder: what are these writers thinking? In my opinion, YA writers should be held to a higher standard than your usual writers of adults fiction. Why would they want to promote such outright disturbing relationships as normal to impressionable and silly teenage girls? In my book, the relationship between Patch and Nora is not simply shallow, but dangerous. I wish some of the authors exercised better judgment writing their books, otherwise they are setting up many-many girls for a lot of disappointment, because whatever is presented in this book as romantic is disturbing at best in real life.
Well, to sum this tirade up, "Hush, Hush" is pretty much a book that gives YA literature a bad name. Naturally, the sequel is in works, but surely enough, I won't be reading it. I'd rather dedicate my time to something better written and less contrived and misguided.
Reading challenge: #1 - F
I won't lie, my expectations going in about this book were pretty low. But even so, "Hush, Hush" managed to disappoint me.
First, there are many similarities with "Twilight" - you have a regular average girl here, absent parents, a love affair with a dangerous supernatural boyfriend, a final showdown with a villain of his own kind. The mythology, while somewhat unusual (I haven't read anything about fallen angels in YA so far), is paper thin. The characters are shallow and undeveloped (BTW, Vee is the dumbest character I've read about maybe ever).
But this is not even what makes this book a barely tolerable read. This book is just plain silly, and silly not in a cute-and-funny way, but more in it's-pretty-dumb-and-dangerous-to-fall-for-this-crap way. Many things are just so contrived about the story, I got a headache rolling my eyes while reading it. For instance: a bomb threat to steal an empty personal file that nobody investigates later? a biology class which is centered on discussing one uncomfortable and almost harassed student's sexual attractiveness? why would a mother whose husband was murdered leave her 16-year old daughter alone in a remote house for weeks at a time? why would parents of another teenage girl let her go out NEXT DAY after she had surgery following a violent attack on her? dressing up like a hooker to get some dirt on a guy you are investigating? why would an angel fall for loving a human and then get his wings back while loving another human?
And finally, why exactly Patch and Nora are in love? They know nothing about each other. Even more, Nora spends most of the book calling Patch creepy, being scared of him, being roughly pinned by him to various walls in dark places or being at his knife's point, and yet she is full of desire for him? It just makes no sense. As for Patch, I don't know one thing about him or why he loves Nora. My list can go on and on...
But surely enough, teenage girls will eat this story up. You have everything for success here: a fabulous cover and font, and pages and pages of flirtatious banter filled with sexual innuendos (very often bordering on sexual harassment) fit for 30-year olds and not 10-graders.
I am rarely for any kind of censorship of books, but reading nonsense like "Hush, Hush" makes me wonder: what are these writers thinking? In my opinion, YA writers should be held to a higher standard than your usual writers of adults fiction. Why would they want to promote such outright disturbing relationships as normal to impressionable and silly teenage girls? In my book, the relationship between Patch and Nora is not simply shallow, but dangerous. I wish some of the authors exercised better judgment writing their books, otherwise they are setting up many-many girls for a lot of disappointment, because whatever is presented in this book as romantic is disturbing at best in real life.
Well, to sum this tirade up, "Hush, Hush" is pretty much a book that gives YA literature a bad name. Naturally, the sequel is in works, but surely enough, I won't be reading it. I'd rather dedicate my time to something better written and less contrived and misguided.
Reading challenge: #1 - F
Sign into 欧宝娱乐 to see if any of your friends have read
Hush, Hush.
Sign In 禄
Reading Progress
November 5, 2009
– Shelved
Started Reading
November 6, 2009
– Shelved as:
2009
November 6, 2009
– Shelved as:
ya
November 6, 2009
–
Finished Reading
November 25, 2009
– Shelved as:
why-the-hype
April 3, 2010
– Shelved as:
romancelandia
May 30, 2010
– Shelved as:
tres-annoying
Comments Showing 1-50 of 100 (100 new)

I do wish readers would stop comparing everything and anything with a supernatural guy and a human girl to twilight, but I guess I should just suck it up.

I think writers should stop writing the same characters (and story) over and over again.
What did you think of Vee? Isn't she the dumbest girl ever? :)

OMG I couldn't stand Vee. And what kind of best friend would for a guy on their friend knowing said friend was afraid of him and had told her a story that proved her fear had merrit?

I know! And then would go to a party with 2 dudes, one of whom was accused of murder? And that hooker outfit? WTH?

I know! I don't remember the hooker outfit, I'm blanking, when did that happen?


And the funniest thing was she didn't get any answers! What was the point to even write that nonsense?

I thought the reason she wrote that scene was to show that Nora was trying to get answers and in the process we were able to get a better feel for Elliot and Patch even if we didn't get concrete answers.

And no, she wrote it for Patch to follow Nora into the bathrom and pin her to a wall there:)


I guess she knows her audience well:)



Why do you think Patch fell for Nora? I didn't understand that at all.









I have no idea how that title can relate to the plot and I'm fairly creative.
And I agree, she gave away too much of the book by the cover, however, I probably wouldn't have read the book were it not for the cover, so its a double edged sort I guess.





Your review is SPOT ON! I just couldn't believe this could be a bad as it was, and all your points are the very reason I rated this 1 star. I think I was most offended by the way nothing the characters did made any logical sense. It was just thrown in to advance the dumb plot (did I say plot?).

Exactly.
I thought your point about her mom letting her stay at home alone was probably the best one. WTH?? Her husband was murdered (not killed in a car crash or by a disease, but MURDERED) and this woman is going to leave her 16 year old alone for a week or so at a time? Sorry - but that doesn't pass any logic test.
FAIL.
And what's with this trend in scent/smells? Why do authors need to describe not once, mind you, but several times, how a person smells? Patch smells like mint and....earth?? Kinda like a dirt peppermint patty? Ohhh-kay - right.
HH was bad. Really bad. Even my 15 year old (who loves this kind of stuff), suffered major eye-rolls throughout the book. That's kinda why I picked it up, since she kept going on about it (not in a good way).

For me this book was a nonstop eye-roll.
And apparently, you can sell just about any crap, as long as there is a (questionable) hawty in it. How sad...

Are you guys serious!?? The book, was amazing!
There were millions of amazing scenes and the book made complete sense, all the pieces fit together!!! The author did an amazing job too, she described it so vividly I couldn't help myself from thinking I was in the book. The reason why she stays home alone is because her mom needs to pay the mortgage for the farmhouse where they built their whole lives with Nora's dad. Now that he was gone, how could they possibly sell the last thing they had left to remember him? All those memories. Plus, her dad was shot in Portland, they don't live there.
All of you guys are just arrogant jerks when it comes to books because all of you think you could do so much better. Guess what? you can't. The only similarity between twilight and hush hush is the fact that they meet in a biology room.
Twilight is NOT a rip-off!!! It's an amazing story with a million other amazing stories in it to form the history and about a dangerous love triangle because in real life Edward is not supposed to exist, which is why Jacob is Bella's perfect match. Despite that, Bella can't do anything to stop her feelings because her love for Edward is too strong.
So honestly, I can't believe all the bad ratings, isn't there at least one person who agrees?

No, it didn't. A totally paranoid girl who believes everyone is out to get her finds her tires slashed and thinks "I ran over TWO nails?". Do I need to say more?
"The reason why she stays home alone is because her mom needs to pay the mortgage for the farmhouse where they built their whole lives with Nora's dad."
So... a house where your dad used to live in is more important than your daughter's life? That makes no sense.
"Plus, her dad was shot in Portland, they don't live there."
That doesn't matter. No mother should leave her daughter alone in a house for weeks on end. That is practically begging for murderers and rapists to come to your house. Her mom should be extra-paranoid because her husband was murdered. It doesn't matter WHERE she is living.
"All of you guys are just arrogant jerks when it comes to books because all of you think you could do so much better."
Yes, insult people... that should help you make your case. We don't think WE can do better. We just think millions of authors around the world could do better.
"Guess what? you can't."
Who are you to judge our writing capabilities?
"The only similarity between twilight and hush hush is the fact that they meet in a biology room. "
Ahem...
-Girl and boy meet in biology class
-Girl is supposedly smart (but isn't really)
-Boy wants to kill girl, but doesn't (this is apparently romantic)
-Boy is a "bad boy" "Stay away from me- I'm dangerous!"
-Boy is abusive of girl
-Girl stays with boy any ways
-Boy is a member of an evil species
-A member of boy's species tries to kill protagonists
Only one similarity? I think not.
"Twilight is NOT a rip-off!!!"
Ever read the Vampire Diaries?
"It's an amazing story with a million other amazing stories in it"
AH- HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. You should be a comedian.
"In real life Edward is not supposed to exist, which is why Jacob is Bella's perfect match"
Of course... vampires are myth, but werewolves are real. Despite the obvious flaws in this argument- let's assume that this is true. How would this affect a fictional love triangle?
"Her love for Edward"
HAHAHA- sorry. You really should be a comedian though.
Love? Bella and Edward are merely in lust.
She smells scrumptious + he is super hot = lust
"So honestly, I can't believe all the bad ratings, isn't there at least one person who agrees? "
Of course there is one person who agrees with you. In fact, there are MILLIONS of brainwashed fans who agree with you. It is just us who doesn't agree with you.
DISCLAIMER: I have not read HH. All of my information was gathered from reviews. I have (sadly) read Twilight.

Are you guys serious!?? The book, was amazing!
There were millions of amazing scenes and the book made complete sense, all the pieces fit together!!! The author did an amazing job t..."
@JENNA: "All of you guys are just arrogant jerks when it comes to books because all of you think you could do so much better. Guess what? you can't."
Actually, Jenna, you know nothing of literature. And my thirteen year old sister could write something more TOLERABLE than this frivolous, idle, rank stench that calls itself a novel. Their threatening to burn Qurans when they could be burning the words of Becca Fitzpatrick. I understand she "had fun" writing it. But if the majority of her comments are negative, I can only pray she uses this as a sort of brutal writer's work shop, and either stops writing or stops writing badly, about contrived, uninteresting, used up and washed up things. These people actually do know what they are talking about (in this review, at least), and just because you have retched taste, does not mean that you automatically DO know what you're talking about.
Signing off.

No, it didn't. A totally paranoid girl who believes everyone is out to get her finds her tires slashed and thinks "I ran over TWO nails?". Do I need to say more?
"Th..."
Plus, we could seriously do better. LOL.

@Jenna: You're welcome to your own opinion, but to say that "we can't" write a better novel is just rude. Are you questioning our English? How do you know we can't write a better book? And just so you know, your arguments are not up to scratch. So next time, state something true.
@Tatiana: Thanks for the review, great job. You've prevented me from reading what looks like a horrible piece of literature. :P

offensive in terms of women harping on men who are psycho. Patch makes Edward look like a bunny and edward isn't even too bad in my opinion, but Patch was just a hard core jerk. I hate that sort of book trend. It must stop.
"being roughly pinned by him to various walls in dark places ". So true!