欧宝娱乐

Tatiana's Reviews > Hush, Hush

Hush, Hush by Becca Fitzpatrick
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
2250020
's review

did not like it
bookshelves: 2009, ya, why-the-hype, romancelandia, tres-annoying

This book is simply appalling.

I won't lie, my expectations going in about this book were pretty low. But even so, "Hush, Hush" managed to disappoint me.

First, there are many similarities with "Twilight" - you have a regular average girl here, absent parents, a love affair with a dangerous supernatural boyfriend, a final showdown with a villain of his own kind. The mythology, while somewhat unusual (I haven't read anything about fallen angels in YA so far), is paper thin. The characters are shallow and undeveloped (BTW, Vee is the dumbest character I've read about maybe ever).

But this is not even what makes this book a barely tolerable read. This book is just plain silly, and silly not in a cute-and-funny way, but more in it's-pretty-dumb-and-dangerous-to-fall-for-this-crap way. Many things are just so contrived about the story, I got a headache rolling my eyes while reading it. For instance: a bomb threat to steal an empty personal file that nobody investigates later? a biology class which is centered on discussing one uncomfortable and almost harassed student's sexual attractiveness? why would a mother whose husband was murdered leave her 16-year old daughter alone in a remote house for weeks at a time? why would parents of another teenage girl let her go out NEXT DAY after she had surgery following a violent attack on her? dressing up like a hooker to get some dirt on a guy you are investigating? why would an angel fall for loving a human and then get his wings back while loving another human?

And finally, why exactly Patch and Nora are in love? They know nothing about each other. Even more, Nora spends most of the book calling Patch creepy, being scared of him, being roughly pinned by him to various walls in dark places or being at his knife's point, and yet she is full of desire for him? It just makes no sense. As for Patch, I don't know one thing about him or why he loves Nora. My list can go on and on...

But surely enough, teenage girls will eat this story up. You have everything for success here: a fabulous cover and font, and pages and pages of flirtatious banter filled with sexual innuendos (very often bordering on sexual harassment) fit for 30-year olds and not 10-graders.

I am rarely for any kind of censorship of books, but reading nonsense like "Hush, Hush" makes me wonder: what are these writers thinking? In my opinion, YA writers should be held to a higher standard than your usual writers of adults fiction. Why would they want to promote such outright disturbing relationships as normal to impressionable and silly teenage girls? In my book, the relationship between Patch and Nora is not simply shallow, but dangerous. I wish some of the authors exercised better judgment writing their books, otherwise they are setting up many-many girls for a lot of disappointment, because whatever is presented in this book as romantic is disturbing at best in real life.

Well, to sum this tirade up, "Hush, Hush" is pretty much a book that gives YA literature a bad name. Naturally, the sequel is in works, but surely enough, I won't be reading it. I'd rather dedicate my time to something better written and less contrived and misguided.

Reading challenge: #1 - F
374 likes ·  鈭� flag

Sign into 欧宝娱乐 to see if any of your friends have read Hush, Hush.
Sign In 禄

Reading Progress

November 5, 2009 – Shelved
November 5, 2009 –
page 40
10.23%
Started Reading
November 6, 2009 –
page 250
63.94% "I doubt it can get any sillier..."
November 6, 2009 – Shelved as: 2009
November 6, 2009 – Shelved as: ya
November 6, 2009 – Finished Reading
November 25, 2009 – Shelved as: why-the-hype
April 3, 2010 – Shelved as: romancelandia
May 30, 2010 – Shelved as: tres-annoying

Comments Showing 1-50 of 100 (100 new)


Albie46 This is a great review. My favourite line was when you said how she spend a lot of time
"being roughly pinned by him to various walls in dark places ". So true!


Tatiana Thanks Albie. It is true, I lost count of how many times it happened to her:)


Heather Well, I liked your review. Sorry you didn't like it.

I do wish readers would stop comparing everything and anything with a supernatural guy and a human girl to twilight, but I guess I should just suck it up.


message 4: by Tatiana (last edited Nov 09, 2009 08:57AM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Tatiana Thank you

I think writers should stop writing the same characters (and story) over and over again.

What did you think of Vee? Isn't she the dumbest girl ever? :)


Heather Well, even my beloved LJ wrote about humans and immortals who have realtionships with each other, Twilight wasn't the first and it won't be the last.

OMG I couldn't stand Vee. And what kind of best friend would for a guy on their friend knowing said friend was afraid of him and had told her a story that proved her fear had merrit?


Tatiana Well, at least LJS has some imagination to come up with some original scenario and decent mythology. What did you think of the angel lore? I couldn't understand why Patch fell because he was in love with a human girl but then became a guardian angel while loving another? Did I miss something?


I know! And then would go to a party with 2 dudes, one of whom was accused of murder? And that hooker outfit? WTH?


Heather Well, he didn't lose his wings because he was in love with a human, he lost his wings because he chose to fall for said human. He has his wings in the end because despite the fact that he is in love with Nora, he isn't leaving heaven or his duties for her.

I know! I don't remember the hooker outfit, I'm blanking, when did that happen?


Heather Oh wait, you mean the restaraunt so that she could get info. I thought that was laughable too. Working in the field that I do, I could have told her that was a lost cause.


Tatiana What do you mean by "chose to fall for said human"?

And the funniest thing was she didn't get any answers! What was the point to even write that nonsense?


Heather He literally chose to fall out of heaven, that is why he lost his wings. He jumped with the intent to leave heaven forever in hopes of living as a human on earth and that is why he lost his wings, not because he loved a human.

I thought the reason she wrote that scene was to show that Nora was trying to get answers and in the process we were able to get a better feel for Elliot and Patch even if we didn't get concrete answers.


Tatiana I don't remember reading that. Do you remember where it is in the book? I'll look it up.

And no, she wrote it for Patch to follow Nora into the bathrom and pin her to a wall there:)


Heather Well, when Nora touches his scars and sees into his past, we find out through the visions and what he tells her why he fell.


Heather Well, I enjoyed the wall pinning so well played on her part, lol.


Tatiana Heather wrote: "Well, I enjoyed the wall pinning so well played on her part, lol."

I guess she knows her audience well:)


Heather Yup, she sure does, we are huge fans of walls and concrete pillars and motorcycles :)


Tatiana You know, I wonder what you'd think about this book if instead of Patch there was Sam. You'd tear it in shreds, I am sure of it:)


Heather Hmm, probably, characters are very important. If I can't find at least one likable character or if they are so far removed from what I can invision anyone doing, I won't like the book. I liked Patch because I felt as though his actions were feasible for his character, even if he were human. I didn't like Sam because he was clearly a woman in disguise.


Tatiana Sam sure was a woman in disguise:)

Why do you think Patch fell for Nora? I didn't understand that at all.


Heather Well, I think he was intrigued by how different she was from a majority of the others her age. Despite the fact that he is probably thousands of years old, he looks 18, so adult women would be out of the question. Out of the "teenagers" I imagine a lot of them are shallow and silly, worried more about make up than real life. But here Nora is, forced into an early adulthood, intelligent, driven and physically attractive. I think he also likes the fact that she stands up to him.


Tatiana Wow! You have a great imagination, none of it is in the book for sure!:)


message 21: by Heather (last edited Nov 09, 2009 10:24AM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Heather Well some things you have to glean for yourself. For instance, it never says in Graceling why Po loves Katsa... There are lots of books that don't flat out say, and you wouldn't like them if they did, you would say it was too redundant or juvenille.


Heather And all the things that I mentioned are mentioned in the book, Patch says all those things about Nora to Nora in the first bit of the book.


message 23: by Tatiana (last edited Nov 09, 2009 10:49AM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Tatiana I am glad you enjoyed it. Sorry I didn't share your feelings about this one.



Heather No worries, I've disliked things that you've enjoyed. It all evens out. I feel bad for sending this one to you actaully. I think I will avoid sending you my supernatural lurves ;)


message 25: by Tatiana (last edited Nov 09, 2009 11:47AM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Tatiana I don't mind supernatural bad boys. This book just wasn't that good. You wanted to know my opinion about this book from the POV of a person who is not obsessed with bad boys, you got it. Unfortunately, this book doesn't fare well if you remove snarky dialog and abs. I don't regret reading it, I satisfied my curiosity, I just thought it would be better. Oh well, maybe next time.


Heather Well, I gave it three stars and I agree with a lot of your points. I didn't know how to feel about the plot, at times I liked it, other times I didn't. I couldn't stand Vee and I thought that Nora was a bit flat. Her mother's absence felt a bit contrived but I liked the story and Patch enough to say that I enjoyed reading it and I'll leave it at that :)


Tatiana I wonder why they gave away the "angel" bit with the cover though...


Heather I don't know. I wondered that myself. I think this book would have been much much better if we were left wondering what Patch was. I never would have guessed an angel, that's for sure. And I also don't get how the title relates to the book in any way.


Tatiana Yeah, they practically gave away the main mystery of the book. Oh, I read in some review that "Hush, Hush" relates to a secret surrounding Patch's persona, something like that:)


Heather Now that answer require some imagination, lol.

I have no idea how that title can relate to the plot and I'm fairly creative.

And I agree, she gave away too much of the book by the cover, however, I probably wouldn't have read the book were it not for the cover, so its a double edged sort I guess.


message 31: by Tatiana (last edited Nov 09, 2009 01:36PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Tatiana I suppose they decided that the cover would sell more copies rather than enticing and mysterious synopsis: an ordinary girl with absent parents is paired with a mysterious boy in biology class. The boy is dangerous and yet soooo irresistable. She is on a quest to uncover his secret, etc. :)


Heather Hmmm, I don't know why the cover was necessary then, it sounds like a best seller :)


Tatiana Right, a bestseller from 5 year ago. LOL


Heather And every other best seller since :)


Tatiana I know! Amazing...


Heather You know, for a second there I was going to say, but not COB but then I remembered, yeah huh that's the way it starts. Classic theme really :)


Tatiana You see, there is no way to avoid it. Writers really need to put some effort in their stories, show some creativity and originality, otherwise Twilight similarities will always haunt them, no matter how much they themselves pout and deny it.


Heather True. But I have gotten to the point as a reader where everything I read reminds me of something else I've read. Fire reminded me of a childhood favorite, Hero and the Crown by Robin McKinley just a little bit. I don't think you can read as many books as you and I do and find something entirely original.


Hannah T,
Your review is SPOT ON! I just couldn't believe this could be a bad as it was, and all your points are the very reason I rated this 1 star. I think I was most offended by the way nothing the characters did made any logical sense. It was just thrown in to advance the dumb plot (did I say plot?).


Tatiana I know! As mush as Nora was supposedly smart, she was doing the dumbest stuff ever.


message 41: by Hannah (last edited Mar 08, 2010 05:29AM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Hannah Tatiana wrote: "I know! As mush as Nora was supposedly smart, she was doing the dumbest stuff ever."

Exactly.
I thought your point about her mom letting her stay at home alone was probably the best one. WTH?? Her husband was murdered (not killed in a car crash or by a disease, but MURDERED) and this woman is going to leave her 16 year old alone for a week or so at a time? Sorry - but that doesn't pass any logic test.
FAIL.

And what's with this trend in scent/smells? Why do authors need to describe not once, mind you, but several times, how a person smells? Patch smells like mint and....earth?? Kinda like a dirt peppermint patty? Ohhh-kay - right.

HH was bad. Really bad. Even my 15 year old (who loves this kind of stuff), suffered major eye-rolls throughout the book. That's kinda why I picked it up, since she kept going on about it (not in a good way).


Tatiana LOL about a dirt peppermint patty:)

For me this book was a nonstop eye-roll.

And apparently, you can sell just about any crap, as long as there is a (questionable) hawty in it. How sad...


message 43: by Sane (new) - rated it 2 stars

Sane Awesome! I'm proud to say I was one of the first bloggers to give this a negative review!


message 44: by Always (last edited Jul 19, 2010 04:28PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Always oh goshhh.
Are you guys serious!?? The book, was amazing!
There were millions of amazing scenes and the book made complete sense, all the pieces fit together!!! The author did an amazing job too, she described it so vividly I couldn't help myself from thinking I was in the book. The reason why she stays home alone is because her mom needs to pay the mortgage for the farmhouse where they built their whole lives with Nora's dad. Now that he was gone, how could they possibly sell the last thing they had left to remember him? All those memories. Plus, her dad was shot in Portland, they don't live there.


All of you guys are just arrogant jerks when it comes to books because all of you think you could do so much better. Guess what? you can't. The only similarity between twilight and hush hush is the fact that they meet in a biology room.


Twilight is NOT a rip-off!!! It's an amazing story with a million other amazing stories in it to form the history and about a dangerous love triangle because in real life Edward is not supposed to exist, which is why Jacob is Bella's perfect match. Despite that, Bella can't do anything to stop her feelings because her love for Edward is too strong.

So honestly, I can't believe all the bad ratings, isn't there at least one person who agrees?


message 45: by Ravenclaw26 (new)

Ravenclaw26 "The book made complete sense"
No, it didn't. A totally paranoid girl who believes everyone is out to get her finds her tires slashed and thinks "I ran over TWO nails?". Do I need to say more?

"The reason why she stays home alone is because her mom needs to pay the mortgage for the farmhouse where they built their whole lives with Nora's dad."
So... a house where your dad used to live in is more important than your daughter's life? That makes no sense.

"Plus, her dad was shot in Portland, they don't live there."
That doesn't matter. No mother should leave her daughter alone in a house for weeks on end. That is practically begging for murderers and rapists to come to your house. Her mom should be extra-paranoid because her husband was murdered. It doesn't matter WHERE she is living.

"All of you guys are just arrogant jerks when it comes to books because all of you think you could do so much better."
Yes, insult people... that should help you make your case. We don't think WE can do better. We just think millions of authors around the world could do better.

"Guess what? you can't."
Who are you to judge our writing capabilities?

"The only similarity between twilight and hush hush is the fact that they meet in a biology room. "
Ahem...
-Girl and boy meet in biology class
-Girl is supposedly smart (but isn't really)
-Boy wants to kill girl, but doesn't (this is apparently romantic)
-Boy is a "bad boy" "Stay away from me- I'm dangerous!"
-Boy is abusive of girl
-Girl stays with boy any ways
-Boy is a member of an evil species
-A member of boy's species tries to kill protagonists
Only one similarity? I think not.

"Twilight is NOT a rip-off!!!"
Ever read the Vampire Diaries?

"It's an amazing story with a million other amazing stories in it"
AH- HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. You should be a comedian.

"In real life Edward is not supposed to exist, which is why Jacob is Bella's perfect match"
Of course... vampires are myth, but werewolves are real. Despite the obvious flaws in this argument- let's assume that this is true. How would this affect a fictional love triangle?

"Her love for Edward"
HAHAHA- sorry. You really should be a comedian though.
Love? Bella and Edward are merely in lust.
She smells scrumptious + he is super hot = lust

"So honestly, I can't believe all the bad ratings, isn't there at least one person who agrees? "
Of course there is one person who agrees with you. In fact, there are MILLIONS of brainwashed fans who agree with you. It is just us who doesn't agree with you.

DISCLAIMER: I have not read HH. All of my information was gathered from reviews. I have (sadly) read Twilight.


Audrey V This is a great review. You are so right. This book had a lot of loose ends.


message 47: by alex (new)

alex Jenna wrote: "oh goshhh.
Are you guys serious!?? The book, was amazing!
There were millions of amazing scenes and the book made complete sense, all the pieces fit together!!! The author did an amazing job t..."


@JENNA: "All of you guys are just arrogant jerks when it comes to books because all of you think you could do so much better. Guess what? you can't."

Actually, Jenna, you know nothing of literature. And my thirteen year old sister could write something more TOLERABLE than this frivolous, idle, rank stench that calls itself a novel. Their threatening to burn Qurans when they could be burning the words of Becca Fitzpatrick. I understand she "had fun" writing it. But if the majority of her comments are negative, I can only pray she uses this as a sort of brutal writer's work shop, and either stops writing or stops writing badly, about contrived, uninteresting, used up and washed up things. These people actually do know what they are talking about (in this review, at least), and just because you have retched taste, does not mean that you automatically DO know what you're talking about.
Signing off.


message 48: by alex (new)

alex Ravenclaw26 wrote: ""The book made complete sense"
No, it didn't. A totally paranoid girl who believes everyone is out to get her finds her tires slashed and thinks "I ran over TWO nails?". Do I need to say more?

"Th..."


Plus, we could seriously do better. LOL.


message 49: by Gemma (new) - added it

Gemma I haven't even read this book but after reading many negative reviews I think I'll give it a miss.
@Jenna: You're welcome to your own opinion, but to say that "we can't" write a better novel is just rude. Are you questioning our English? How do you know we can't write a better book? And just so you know, your arguments are not up to scratch. So next time, state something true.
@Tatiana: Thanks for the review, great job. You've prevented me from reading what looks like a horrible piece of literature. :P


Spider the Doof Warrior I'm not arrogant. I could probably write a better book. I've been writing several books for 10 years and really cranking in terms of character development. It rankles me that I work so hard on these books and these folks seem to cobble something together that is a bit... well...
offensive in terms of women harping on men who are psycho. Patch makes Edward look like a bunny and edward isn't even too bad in my opinion, but Patch was just a hard core jerk. I hate that sort of book trend. It must stop.


芦 previous 1
back to top