Meg's Reviews > Tsarina
Tsarina
by
by

Tsarina, Tsarina, why wouldn’t you let me love you? I wanted to love this book you guys. It’s imperial Russia at the time of the Russian Revolution. THERE ARE ROMANOVS (according to the blurb which is a complete LIE because there is only a physical Romanov presence in the first chapter). I can’t be the only one who looked at this book and thought

right?
And while there was some of this:

And the teensiest bit of this:

There was mostly this:

Magic. Egg.
Read the full review on .

right?
And while there was some of this:

And the teensiest bit of this:

There was mostly this:

Magic. Egg.
Read the full review on .
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Tsarina.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
November 28, 2013
– Shelved as:
to-read
November 28, 2013
– Shelved
March 13, 2014
– Shelved as:
whyyyyyyyyy
Comments Showing 1-5 of 5 (5 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Michael
(new)
-
added it
Nov 14, 2014 11:27AM

reply
|
flag

Are you kidding? Are you saying that because it's YA, it doesn't need to be good or accurate or make sense? YA is filled with great books. The standard in YA is really high. Meg wanted a great story with history, not "a history book" (by which I assume you mean non-fiction). Your tone is really insulting.
Edited to add: Actually, this IS a historical fiction novel.

Also, are you not aware that young adult fiction is an age classification? It has fantasy, sci-fi, historical, etc. just like adult fiction.

Thank you Rudey McRudepants for this shocking information. I am fully aware it is a YA fiction. It also happens to be historical YA fiction (gasp!) and I was hoping it would go in a different direction than it did. Please go troll somewhere else.