Szplug's Reviews > The Book of Disquiet
The Book of Disquiet
by
by

Humans are social beings, to the extent that those who prefer solitude to the company of others are usually perceived as troubled individuals, outside of the norm; it took me a long time to feel comfortable with being alone, with dampening the guilt that flared up in me every time I begged off going out with a group of friends. It is always a welcome reinforcement when I come across a book penned by a fellow recluse鈥攁nd The Book of Disquiet could be a solitary soul's bible, so powerfully does it speak in the language of single-place table settings, corner-chair cobwebs and bachelor apartments. It has achieved pride of place on my bedside stack, where I can ladle myself servings of Pessoa's wisdom at leisure.
This book's voluntarily alone author is Fernando Pessoa, a Portuguese poet, writer, and polylinguist who invented fully-fleshed out heteronyms鈥攄istinct and separate personalties of differing nationality and gender鈥攊n order to pursue his writing in various idiosyncratic shades and styles. The Book of Disquiet is a collection of the aphoristic prose-poetry musings of one such heteronym, that of Bernardo Soares, assembled from notes, entries, and jottings made over a span of some thirty years and left unpublished at the time of Pessoa's death in 1935. Richard Zenith, the editor and translator of this stunning, haunting, and achingly beautiful paean to the imaginary potentiality of man, has compiled the definitive edition of this tome in a truly outstanding translation that captures the expressive eloquence of Pessoa and his magical, metaphorically rich manner of constructing word images to portray his unique way of life.
There is no finer encomium to the shattering melancholy and bracing affirmation of loneliness and solitude than the five hundred plus entries that make up The Book of Disquiet; and few better descriptions of existential nausea, of the desperate efforts to perceive a reason to continue with the painful disappointments, shadow terrors, and numbing meaninglessness of human existence. As Pessoa鈥攚riting as Soares鈥攓uietly and unassumingly goes about his daily rituals of walking, working as a book-keeper and inhabiting the well-trod spaces of his rented room in the real world, he is living a rich existence within the wildly creative contours of his mind: as a knight errant, a rich merchant, a pirate, a voyager, a lover of countless women, a guide to the cosmos, an inhaler of sunrises and embracer of sunsets, the guiding hand of every drop of Lisbon's morning showers, the leaves shaken by a sudden burst of wind. Having been sentenced to a term of life by an errant universe, Pessoa decided to renounce action and ambitions in what we hold to be real life to pursue a variegated and abundant existence within the realm of dreams. As our life is measured through the archived clippings of one's memory, whether one actually performed the deeds recalled matters less than the detail and substance they contain.
Such, at least, is the defense offered by Pessoa; yet often his solipsistic persuasions are contradictory, defensive; and when the mask slips we can see the depth of pain and loneliness underneath the placid surface of his imaginary life. There is much repetition and mulling over of themes from different angles, but the writing is so expressive and raw and honest that, to myself at least, it never becomes tedious鈥攅ven as the tedium of existence, the stretching of the soul on the rack of time, is one of the principal ideas that populate Pessoa's thoughts and entries. It is as if tedium was experienced as a box of chocolates, each colour and coating, each form and flavour, each taste and texture, mulled over, pondered, drawn out and examined, and then set to paper as a running record to remind of an eccentric daily pleasure.
This is a book to be mused upon and savored, one that can be imbibed in different ways: it can be read straight through鈥攖he way I approached it, drawn into a white heat of blistered enthrallment鈥攐r sparingly sampled over weeks, months, even years. The order the aphorisms are assembled in is purely a construction of Zenith; he stresses such in his introduction and encourages each reader to create their own sequence for the collected entries. However the reader decides to approach The Book of Disquiet, they will be rewarded with the inventive honesty of a hale and wounded man from a work that is truly sui generis.
I've recently picked up the Serpent's Tail Extraordinary Classic edition, which features a translation by Margaret Jull Costa, who performed similar duties for Jos茅 Saramago's last half-dozen books. Distinct from Zenith, obviously, but just as potent and powerful鈥攁nd the differently parsed words and sentences only serve to present Pessoa's incomparable poetry of loneliness in a new light, equally fulgent and searing, just focussed from an alternate angle. A richly marbled interiority of immanent pain and transcendent beauty.
Revisiting the disquietude of early modern Lisbon, I'm reminded anew how this collection of Pessoa's dispassionate passion is one whose title is so perfectly matched to the content within that one can sit there (all by oneself, of course) cushioned within the utter silence of an unvoiced existence, serving as an unexciting urban renewal zone for migratory dust motes and unimpressive highland anchored lethality for predatory silken arachnids, with a nigh sardonic set to the tight-lipped, hesitantly-committed smile of satisfaction that imprints itself upon one's otherwise stoney visage, and marvel at how much one man's textually decanted imaginative impressions and gossamer ruminations running the interior gauntlet of unlived memories, unacted performances, unconsummated affairs, unshed tears, unwatched observations, unwinged flights, ungrounded fears, unfelt kisses, untouched caresses, uninvolved emotions, unexercised exertions, untasted repasts, unliked friendships, unmet acquaintances, untold stories, unpoured libations, undone happenings, unannounced recollections, unlit umbrages, unformed expressions, untraveled journeys, unnoticeable leavenings, unhoused guilts, and unarticulated speechifications resonate, to the fullest extent, with the plucked strings ever aquiver within the utterly empty, lonely, and withdrawn chambers of the mind- and/or house-bound soul.
This book's voluntarily alone author is Fernando Pessoa, a Portuguese poet, writer, and polylinguist who invented fully-fleshed out heteronyms鈥攄istinct and separate personalties of differing nationality and gender鈥攊n order to pursue his writing in various idiosyncratic shades and styles. The Book of Disquiet is a collection of the aphoristic prose-poetry musings of one such heteronym, that of Bernardo Soares, assembled from notes, entries, and jottings made over a span of some thirty years and left unpublished at the time of Pessoa's death in 1935. Richard Zenith, the editor and translator of this stunning, haunting, and achingly beautiful paean to the imaginary potentiality of man, has compiled the definitive edition of this tome in a truly outstanding translation that captures the expressive eloquence of Pessoa and his magical, metaphorically rich manner of constructing word images to portray his unique way of life.
There is no finer encomium to the shattering melancholy and bracing affirmation of loneliness and solitude than the five hundred plus entries that make up The Book of Disquiet; and few better descriptions of existential nausea, of the desperate efforts to perceive a reason to continue with the painful disappointments, shadow terrors, and numbing meaninglessness of human existence. As Pessoa鈥攚riting as Soares鈥攓uietly and unassumingly goes about his daily rituals of walking, working as a book-keeper and inhabiting the well-trod spaces of his rented room in the real world, he is living a rich existence within the wildly creative contours of his mind: as a knight errant, a rich merchant, a pirate, a voyager, a lover of countless women, a guide to the cosmos, an inhaler of sunrises and embracer of sunsets, the guiding hand of every drop of Lisbon's morning showers, the leaves shaken by a sudden burst of wind. Having been sentenced to a term of life by an errant universe, Pessoa decided to renounce action and ambitions in what we hold to be real life to pursue a variegated and abundant existence within the realm of dreams. As our life is measured through the archived clippings of one's memory, whether one actually performed the deeds recalled matters less than the detail and substance they contain.
Such, at least, is the defense offered by Pessoa; yet often his solipsistic persuasions are contradictory, defensive; and when the mask slips we can see the depth of pain and loneliness underneath the placid surface of his imaginary life. There is much repetition and mulling over of themes from different angles, but the writing is so expressive and raw and honest that, to myself at least, it never becomes tedious鈥攅ven as the tedium of existence, the stretching of the soul on the rack of time, is one of the principal ideas that populate Pessoa's thoughts and entries. It is as if tedium was experienced as a box of chocolates, each colour and coating, each form and flavour, each taste and texture, mulled over, pondered, drawn out and examined, and then set to paper as a running record to remind of an eccentric daily pleasure.
This is a book to be mused upon and savored, one that can be imbibed in different ways: it can be read straight through鈥攖he way I approached it, drawn into a white heat of blistered enthrallment鈥攐r sparingly sampled over weeks, months, even years. The order the aphorisms are assembled in is purely a construction of Zenith; he stresses such in his introduction and encourages each reader to create their own sequence for the collected entries. However the reader decides to approach The Book of Disquiet, they will be rewarded with the inventive honesty of a hale and wounded man from a work that is truly sui generis.
I've recently picked up the Serpent's Tail Extraordinary Classic edition, which features a translation by Margaret Jull Costa, who performed similar duties for Jos茅 Saramago's last half-dozen books. Distinct from Zenith, obviously, but just as potent and powerful鈥攁nd the differently parsed words and sentences only serve to present Pessoa's incomparable poetry of loneliness in a new light, equally fulgent and searing, just focussed from an alternate angle. A richly marbled interiority of immanent pain and transcendent beauty.
Revisiting the disquietude of early modern Lisbon, I'm reminded anew how this collection of Pessoa's dispassionate passion is one whose title is so perfectly matched to the content within that one can sit there (all by oneself, of course) cushioned within the utter silence of an unvoiced existence, serving as an unexciting urban renewal zone for migratory dust motes and unimpressive highland anchored lethality for predatory silken arachnids, with a nigh sardonic set to the tight-lipped, hesitantly-committed smile of satisfaction that imprints itself upon one's otherwise stoney visage, and marvel at how much one man's textually decanted imaginative impressions and gossamer ruminations running the interior gauntlet of unlived memories, unacted performances, unconsummated affairs, unshed tears, unwatched observations, unwinged flights, ungrounded fears, unfelt kisses, untouched caresses, uninvolved emotions, unexercised exertions, untasted repasts, unliked friendships, unmet acquaintances, untold stories, unpoured libations, undone happenings, unannounced recollections, unlit umbrages, unformed expressions, untraveled journeys, unnoticeable leavenings, unhoused guilts, and unarticulated speechifications resonate, to the fullest extent, with the plucked strings ever aquiver within the utterly empty, lonely, and withdrawn chambers of the mind- and/or house-bound soul.
Sign into 欧宝娱乐 to see if any of your friends have read
The Book of Disquiet.
Sign In 禄
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
November 29, 2009
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-48 of 48 (48 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Brandi
(new)
-
added it
Jan 07, 2011 09:28PM

reply
|
flag

BTW, as a fellow isolate, I can also point you towards Party of One , in which Anneli Rufus makes the pitch that one should take pride in craving solitude. It's not at the level of Pessoa, mind you, but still an interesting book about a subject that is seldom broached in a positive manner.

In other words, the sooner that one accepts that they are, and always will be, alone in the universe (save for the occasional feeling of connection with someone else) the more profound and beautiful one's own company becomes. I think, that, to a certain degree, Pessoa understood this, more importantly, he put his imaginative self to work creating a world, that seemed far less lonely than his real life; his creative imagination. I dunno, I rambling, but I'm basically just trying to say that loneliness becomes engrossing in the most beautiful way sometimes, in that it's less immediately enjoyable. It's almost like you have to cultivate a healthy relationship with yourself. Or maybe I'm just talking about total solipsism.

Jimmy, what you wrote was beautiful.

Mike: Thanks, Mike. Absolutely you should, as Soares and Reis were but two of the heteronyms - and understanding the former will undoubtedly cast light on what Saramago does with the latter. I've long owned TYOTDORR (surprise!) but shied away from ever reading it; almost like I believe, in my gut, that Saramago will somehow bungle it, will fail to do justice to this beautiful wonder that was a lifelong labour of love for Pessoa. Doubtless unfair to Jos茅, but I gots to have me peculiarities.


Thanks, Natalie.




My own personal feelings toward solitude and isolation are a bit less defined than others' in this thread; or, well, more ambivalent. I personally see value in both singularity and multitude, in separateness and connection. I personally find it difficult to sever one-ness from other-ness. So while reading Book of Disquiet, I had a multi-layered reaction to a lot of it--namely, that I related intensely to a lot of the sensations Pessoa was describing, but I also (and perhaps this is an unwise way to read this particular book) found myself trying to play almost a therapist to Pessoa, to point out to him some of the possible flaws in his logic of solitude, or at least ways in which it's incomplete.
Now what I'm wondering is whether Bernardo Soares simply represented that more heightened sense of fragmentation that Pessoa clearly possessed, and whether other of his heteronyms perhaps represented views that were more accepting of the "Other". Any insight into that, anyone?

I'm finding Pessoa incredibly comforting as of late; makes the solitude and loneliness bearable.






Knig: Thank you. I often wonder if I tend to focus too much upon the beauty to be collected, cradled, and cherished from Pessoa's internal flights of fancy, as opposed to the eternal tedium of the lived moment, and the anguish of being solitary in need amidst a world social in function, and of which, in that chicken or the egg question that underlies his heteronyms, would be my own discerned First Mover. It's still what soaks into me the most, and which being of completely like mind with the great man, in that capacity, certainly serves only to heighten in me that particular inclination...
I wonder if people sometimes learn to love dark side of the life just because they are afraid of change

Could God be thought of as time, or succession? We can only perceive a linear movement forward, but time could operate in reverse to account for the unknown, geometrically for periodicity. Then, perhaps, the Devil would be our own agony of stillness, our essence inflating in a single moment and intuiting eternity, wanting permanence, perdurance, but getting only incessant motion and extension.However, it seems to me, in the reflection of what you pondered above, that this might actually be better explained in a near-reversal, while still allowing that our human essence may be fully permeated by this particular conundrum. When you consider the works of God (or Allah) in their respective scriptures, one is struck by how much of it demands consideration as a permanent/unchanging/eternal aspect鈥攅ven in the Genesis story, the world is brought into being and then proceeds forward, as is, without significant alteration. Perhaps this is part of the reason why the concept of evolution is so repulsive and antagonistic to large parts of the religious community: that man is a creature, of oceanic cellular origin, who has raised himself unto his present dominating tier by means of impermanence, being ever in the process of changing鈥攁lways becoming, never is as a finalized fleshly spiritual vessel鈥攊s a direct challenge to the elevated and perduring conception they deem our species to be. In that vein of seeing, I would imagine a reality of sequential alteration to take on Satanic overtones; to find the Original Sin soaked in the goading driven by that deep-rooted need to know what is, that what is to come be anticipated, perhaps even, in the forewarning, effected to change.
Perchance of a similar vein was the original suggestion that our universe was created during some manner of Big Bang, as opposed to the previous vision of it as a static, infinite entity that had no beginning and anticipated no end; merely is, always was, and forever would be. A universal theater wherein things evolved, of course鈥攂ut at the superstructural level, endowed with a permanence.
Admittedly, that's strayed rather markedly from what you opined above鈥攃ertainly it's the case that I fear change, and I sense a similar bent towards the Herclitean flow in Sr Pessoa. It could very well be that people with a low self-esteem, who lack the capacity to mentally adjust themselves sufficient to keep pace with the charged and changing-tack-on-a-dime environs of human social gatherings鈥攚ho prefer stickiness, that which is (comfortably and/or dreadfully) known to the maelstrom of unknown when those confines are left鈥攁re more prone to finding their cloistered structures falling into the shadows. Yet I wonder if that's less a case of learning to love the dark side than finding such fuligin gloom is a necessary consequence of trying to seal oneself against the turbid change that defines existence in our implementation of spacetime? That is, it might be more a case of (resigned) acceptance of, rather than fervor for, the funereal condition that attends to one's immersion within a coffin鈥攚hat with this state of enduring, the slow grind against the winds of change, readily adapting itself to the metaphor of being buried alive, or at least prematurely.
And yet the wonders, the purely glorious, cerebrally parturient wonders that Pessoa was able to elevate out of that depressed, harrowed state! Withering away on the vine of tediousness, he still envisioned an interior life wherein change was a creative fuel for apperceptions aplenty鈥攖hat most wondrous of evolving conditions, in that, unlike for our purblind cosmic God, all of the variables are controlled and, hence, the rapidity of change is yet conserved safely within a comfortable waveform. The best of all worlds, in a manner of speaking...
Reading your brilliant reply is like reading my own thoughts, only expressed far better than I have been able to express them...

I've been circling about those two differing conceptions鈥擥od as motion, the Devil as our craving, through modal living, for stillness within that impermanence; and God as an eternal, unchanging cosmic theater wherein the Fallen One would be conceived and perceived as the rebellious change ever working upon those set pieces as divinely ordained鈥攁nd think they are actually mirror images of the same spiritual envelopment. That is, we originally endow the permanence, the certainty that we potently crave with godly origins and attributes, that the existential and material state our humanity desires be given divine sanction and hence, through our projection of supernatural mastery over our cosmic environs, a patina of solidity and truth outside of our tergiversating and vacillating nature. However, the actual experience of our brief mortal tenures within a structure so effected is one of continuous change, besetment, discovery, improvisation, etc, such that, beneath the deemed perduring straightness of Godly permanence we perceive that such invariance is actually chimerical; and then our desire for constancy, in origin holy, morphs into something with malevolent undertones, takes on a weight, serves as an anchor sufficient to switch the attributes we had originally bestowed.
Perhaps the macrocosm of what we experience as individuals鈥攊n my case, early on desiring some measure of stability and permanence within a rootless, shiftless life wherein each day was an unknown journey, and a conception of routine and continuity held great appeal, through to where, via a not unimpressive self-discipline and -effort, I've become a routinized creature, bound by the determination to make each day an allotment of time spaces in which I know exactly where I'll be, what I'll be doing, and that which is awaiting next in line. That is, within the maelstrom of change that comprises any existence, I've created an illusory sense of perdurance by means of schedule adherence and environmental control; but this is no less chimerical than the attributes of the same crafted, in heartfelt good intention, upon the religious superstructures noted above. In what seems to me to be an inevitability, it falls into darkness. It serves no longer to comfort, but to distress; no longer frees one from chaos, but enslaves to pattern. It provides not the sturdy measures of safety, but the confines of enhanced fear. It's unnatural, really, and so, being thus an alien state, alienates us, not merely from the world, but, in a certain measure, from ourselves.
As the likes of Pessoa make abundantly clear, these self-constructed labyrinths are no easy thing to disentangle oneself from鈥攑articularly in that, IMO, in both its original golden implementation, and subsequent iron evolution, its essence inheres with our desire to expel responsibility for our present of omniadaptation unto a higher ordered tier; to try and work memes of eternity such that they will become effective in stopping the flow that ever besets us. Of course, there are many people in the world who embrace such unbounded and unknown existence, revel in the newness of each and every moment; but, for that [larger] proportion who don't, it may be that there is this continuous balancing act between that which strengthens and succors through fulgent sunlight, and its lived expression of benighted noose. Whether you are served or strangled depends upon the multitudinous vagaries of unique occurrence鈥攖hough the balance, over time, would seem to me to shift in favor of the latter, what with night ever falls being one truistic instance of the eternity we have discerned and then fashioned.

