Julie's Reviews > Blonde
Blonde
by
by

I have conflicting emotions about this book, and it goes something like this, “The book is about Marilyn, so what is there NOT to like about it, right? Warts and all, it is a powerful book written by a powerful writer.� But the song that keeps playing in my head, the words that keep haunting me, comes from the voice of another writer, This is the story of a rape.
�This is the story of a rape, of the events that led up to it and followed it and of the place in which it happened. There are the action, the people and the place; all of which are interrelated but in their totality incommunicable in isolation from the moral continuum of human affairs.� (Paul Scott, The Jewel in the Crown.)
There is something so ugly and disturbing about Joyce Carol Oates’s interpretation of Marilyn’s life that if one were to take away the author’s name, one would suspect it was written by a loathsome mysogynist, hell-bent on destroying every last vestige of humanity in Marilyn Monroe, movie-queen, and Norma Jeane Baker, innocent dreamer.
I fell into a trance in the first few hundred pages, falling subject to Norma Jeane’s unquenchable spirit. Even tossed about by the vagaries of her early years, the reader sees how Norma Jeane was destined for some kind of greatness. She was an indefatigable optimist; a resilient life force that did battle with her mother’s depression and burgeoning insanity, and from under which she sprang out stronger still. It was only later, after the little fighter had grown into a vibrant woman who had been knocked down one too many times that the inherited depression finally consumed her and dragged her into hell. In the intervening years she fought -- and fought like hell -- to hang onto the dream of “getting out alive� and making something of her life. The reader can’t help but feel an overwhelming sadness, and fatalism, because unlike the young Norma Jeane, we know how the story ends.
So far, so good, despite its all-consuming sadness.
Then, Oates’s fangs come out. She reveals to us her secret loathing for Marilyn, sub-consciously played out in the voice of the men who hated The Blonde Actress: cow, cunt, stupid cunt, mammalian bitch, tramp, slut, WHORE, sucker of cocks, depressed whacko bitch, stupid cunt, stupid cunt, stupid cunt. OK, we hear you. But that’s the point: I don’t hear the voice of the men so much as I hear Oates’s voice in my head: you whore, you bitch, you cunt. The sub-text screams to me so loudly, it’s like a punch in the face by Oates, every slander uttered.
This is nothing but a vile peep show, it occurred to me half way through the novel. Here I am, engaging in the tearing down of the movie-queen, complicit in the act of rape. No one is forcing me to read this book, just like no one forced Oates to write it.
The voyeuristic quality is enhanced by the protracted use of the third person: The Blonde Actress, The Ex-Athlete, The Playwright, The President. We, the readers, are standing in the red light district, leering into the dimly-lit and dirty window where the young woman lies exposed and vulnerable. No one looks away, either out of decency or revulsion. A human being is being torn apart, and we continue to be complicit in her excoriation.
You won’t write about me, will you, Daddy? You won’t write about me, will you? You won’t write about me?
Knowing this -- knowing how much Norma Jeane abhorred being written about in her Marilyn persona -- Oates revels in ignoring her plea. Like the paparazzi who swoop like carrion birds, she licks up every last intimate detail and splatters it luridly for our consumption.
Disturbingly, Oates seems even more obsessed with Marilyn’s body than the raving fans: dwelling, obsessively, on skin and excretions and secretions, ad nauseam. She is pre-occupied with Marilyn’s sexual intimacies and her miscarriages and her womb. She is so consumed by Marilyn’s womb, in fact, that she leaves us with the notion she believes all Marilyn ever was, was a big gaping receptacle of vileness, hungry for as much degradation as she could possibly contain. Over and over again, we hear stupid cunt, hailed as the avenue to the stinking, infertile receptacle. Marilyn’s womb did not bear fruit, after all -- it was simply another secreting, foul failure of our movie-queen.
�I’m always running into people’s unconscious.� Those words, prophetically spoken by Marilyn Monroe in her empty-headed persona, shine quite a light on this fictional biography. Oates seems to have run smack into the middle of her own “unconscious� while trying to explore Marilyn’s.
As much as art can be an exploratory medium to expose the vileness of the world and act as a cathartic force for change, just as often it reveals the vileness or the victim within. It often uncovers our own hidden truths and reveals to us our own failings. When confronted with ourselves, it thus becomes easy to say “this is just art� when we really should be admitting “this is me.�
As much as this was an authoritative book then, it was an equally forceful indictment of the things that should not be said. Certain secrets should not be violated. Add to that, there are some books that should never have been written, despite the truths they hold. This is one of them.
So many will disagree -- because it was written by an influential writer, and it’s art.
�This is the story of a rape, of the events that led up to it and followed it and of the place in which it happened. There are the action, the people and the place; all of which are interrelated but in their totality incommunicable in isolation from the moral continuum of human affairs.� (Paul Scott, The Jewel in the Crown.)
There is something so ugly and disturbing about Joyce Carol Oates’s interpretation of Marilyn’s life that if one were to take away the author’s name, one would suspect it was written by a loathsome mysogynist, hell-bent on destroying every last vestige of humanity in Marilyn Monroe, movie-queen, and Norma Jeane Baker, innocent dreamer.
I fell into a trance in the first few hundred pages, falling subject to Norma Jeane’s unquenchable spirit. Even tossed about by the vagaries of her early years, the reader sees how Norma Jeane was destined for some kind of greatness. She was an indefatigable optimist; a resilient life force that did battle with her mother’s depression and burgeoning insanity, and from under which she sprang out stronger still. It was only later, after the little fighter had grown into a vibrant woman who had been knocked down one too many times that the inherited depression finally consumed her and dragged her into hell. In the intervening years she fought -- and fought like hell -- to hang onto the dream of “getting out alive� and making something of her life. The reader can’t help but feel an overwhelming sadness, and fatalism, because unlike the young Norma Jeane, we know how the story ends.
So far, so good, despite its all-consuming sadness.
Then, Oates’s fangs come out. She reveals to us her secret loathing for Marilyn, sub-consciously played out in the voice of the men who hated The Blonde Actress: cow, cunt, stupid cunt, mammalian bitch, tramp, slut, WHORE, sucker of cocks, depressed whacko bitch, stupid cunt, stupid cunt, stupid cunt. OK, we hear you. But that’s the point: I don’t hear the voice of the men so much as I hear Oates’s voice in my head: you whore, you bitch, you cunt. The sub-text screams to me so loudly, it’s like a punch in the face by Oates, every slander uttered.
This is nothing but a vile peep show, it occurred to me half way through the novel. Here I am, engaging in the tearing down of the movie-queen, complicit in the act of rape. No one is forcing me to read this book, just like no one forced Oates to write it.
The voyeuristic quality is enhanced by the protracted use of the third person: The Blonde Actress, The Ex-Athlete, The Playwright, The President. We, the readers, are standing in the red light district, leering into the dimly-lit and dirty window where the young woman lies exposed and vulnerable. No one looks away, either out of decency or revulsion. A human being is being torn apart, and we continue to be complicit in her excoriation.
You won’t write about me, will you, Daddy? You won’t write about me, will you? You won’t write about me?
Knowing this -- knowing how much Norma Jeane abhorred being written about in her Marilyn persona -- Oates revels in ignoring her plea. Like the paparazzi who swoop like carrion birds, she licks up every last intimate detail and splatters it luridly for our consumption.
Disturbingly, Oates seems even more obsessed with Marilyn’s body than the raving fans: dwelling, obsessively, on skin and excretions and secretions, ad nauseam. She is pre-occupied with Marilyn’s sexual intimacies and her miscarriages and her womb. She is so consumed by Marilyn’s womb, in fact, that she leaves us with the notion she believes all Marilyn ever was, was a big gaping receptacle of vileness, hungry for as much degradation as she could possibly contain. Over and over again, we hear stupid cunt, hailed as the avenue to the stinking, infertile receptacle. Marilyn’s womb did not bear fruit, after all -- it was simply another secreting, foul failure of our movie-queen.
�I’m always running into people’s unconscious.� Those words, prophetically spoken by Marilyn Monroe in her empty-headed persona, shine quite a light on this fictional biography. Oates seems to have run smack into the middle of her own “unconscious� while trying to explore Marilyn’s.
As much as art can be an exploratory medium to expose the vileness of the world and act as a cathartic force for change, just as often it reveals the vileness or the victim within. It often uncovers our own hidden truths and reveals to us our own failings. When confronted with ourselves, it thus becomes easy to say “this is just art� when we really should be admitting “this is me.�
As much as this was an authoritative book then, it was an equally forceful indictment of the things that should not be said. Certain secrets should not be violated. Add to that, there are some books that should never have been written, despite the truths they hold. This is one of them.
So many will disagree -- because it was written by an influential writer, and it’s art.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Blonde.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
December 29, 2013
– Shelved
January 21, 2014
–
Started Reading
January 27, 2014
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 54 (54 new)
message 1:
by
Paul
(new)
Dec 08, 2014 06:52AM

reply
|
flag





It's been a year and a half since I read this book, and your comments today brought back, most vividly, what I felt after reading it. It's like I now have Blonde PTSD.
There's no doubt that Oates is a compelling writer, if, after all this time, I still feel her coercive influence: she really wanted the reader to hate this lonely, troubled young woman. I don't know if I will ever understand why all the vitriol and contempt was poured upon Marilyn's head. Surely the tormented, melancholy spirits of this world deserve our compassion, and not our ridicule. It affected me deeply, and I still think "Bad on you, Joyce." Whether it was Marilyn Monroe, or a nameless someone from Anywhere, she deserved better.
What I am even more puzzled by is those readers who enjoy the book, without once tuning into what is happening before their very eyes.


Perhaps. : ) ... I think I wouldn't waste the pie, though -- it would be such a shame. Good pie is not to be wasted. : )

I couldn't begin to answer that, to be fair, because I don't know enough about JCO, personally, or her work. I loved them when I read it (it seems a hundred years ago!), but I have to say I've never been compelled by anything else she has written. To me, she's much like Margaret Atwood: a lot to write about, but nothing to say.
For the most part, I've discounted and avoided her works, because she doesn't interest me enough. This book was presented to me by a friend who loved it and thought I would too. Ouch! I thought she knew me better. You can imagine the colourful discussion my friend and I had after I read this. We're still friends, but only barely ; )




If I could undo my reading of this, I would certainly take that opportunity, Cindy. I agree with you on your last point -- so bring on the sunshine!

I realize it's almost a year since you posted this, Sandy, ... but I just never saw it until now. I'm very sorry, but for what it's worth I wanted to respond now: like you, I've thought that Oates is a writer I "should" like; and "should" read more -- but when all is said and done, I realize I don't really like what she has to say. I just don't like her mind at all -- and this novel to me is quintessential Oates. Wrapped up in this book, and wrapped up in this review is everything I don't like about what she has to say.
The only book of hers I've remotely liked was Them -- but I read that so long ago, I can't remember why I liked it; and it was also my younger self. She hasn't worn well with time, for me at least. And after this one, I've definitely given up on her books.



That's a good assessment, Greta. I hadn't thought of it in those terms, but now that you say it, it seems so obvious. Zero in on the victim, and go for the jugular: it really was akin to tearing someone apart.

I can't say I'm glad I read it, Lisa. And yet I did. What does it say about me, I suppose is the question I should be asking myself.
I was repulsed by it, and angry at the author; and angry at myself for reading it. Literature shouldn't do that to you, that is, make you hate yourself for participating. But participating in what? It was grotesque. It's been 4 years since I've read it and I still feel the bile rising when I think about it. One could easily lampoon this as exaggeration -- but it's not, believe me!
I've joked in the past about books giving me PTSD, but I think this time it's the real thing.
Greta's comment, above, gave me great pause ..."this technique is used by narcissists and psychopaths." Of course it is, to diminish the victim, and turn her/him into an object, and therefore not human. Poor Marilyn had been turned into a slab of meat in the end -- much more so than by the men who used her.
Stay away if you can -- but if you can't, I know I will be fascinated with your review.



Yes, Mia. That's what I found too.

Thanks Jessaka, and sorry for the long delay -- I just didn't see this til now. Marilyn suffered at the hands of JCO, undoubtedly; and I still can't figure out the motivation behind this book.

You put it so well. The daily news that screams out to us every hour on the hour ALSO is "the Incommunicable, isolated (and insulated) from the moral continuum..."
Bravo!

You put it so well. The daily news that screams out to us every hour on the hour ALSO is "the Incommunicable, isolated (and insulated) from the moral ..."
Thanks Fergus. ... as for the daily news, there is probably no better time than even the last few days, to exemplify exactly that point. On certain days, I can be heard muttering to myself ..." what a world!" ... What a world, Fergus! Honour and decency are circling the drain.


Thanks for reading, and commenting, Stephanie. I certainly can't fault JCO on all the hard work she did on this one -- but it begs the question, "why" if in the end this is the best she could offer on MM. With thoughts this ugly, you'd think the person would want to keep it to themselves.

Thanks so much for your review. Everyone was raving about it and I was beginning to wonder if I was crazy.

I felt the same way, LaToya: everyone was raving. Of course, they could be raving mad, which in the end I didn't discount. : D
Even after all these years of being away from that book, I feel it as a gut punch. I wish this book had never been written. Or at least, that it had never crossed my path.

I've read only one book by Joyce Carol Oates, The Falls, and I suffered through every page. I felt like the characters were heartless sociopaths and I was hoping the whole town would go up in flames and they'd all die, so the story would finally end. I know she has a huge following on here, and I respect the love of authors, but let's just say. . . your review doesn't inspire me to jump back into these waters!

I've read only one book by Joyce Carol Oates, The Falls, and I suffered through every page. I felt li..."
I still don't see the point of this book, Julie. And it still raises a very emotional "Gaaah!" when I think about it -- so much so that I feel I want to wash my hands. Given the times we live in, the sanitizer is always at hand, so it's easy to get her off of them; not so easy to clean the mind of her assassination of M.
JCO is neither "here nor there" for me. I remember reading Them and while I appreciated it, I was never so taken by her that I went back to anything else that she wrote, so I can't comment on her further, having no terms of reference.
If "heartless sociopaths" are her specialty, it seems like a prime time in history for her to gather from real life models again and write another worst bestseller!


Would you like that in copper, silver or gold? : -)
We could create a whole Awards ceremony around this newly minted coin. Like the Academy Awards: a little dross dummy all covered in gold paint for all those wasted-paper books out there.

There is great satisfaction, Fergus, in having one's initial impressions confirmed over time.
There are more than a few authors like JCO that the world swoons over -- and it puzzles me to no end.
I used to think there was some kind of reading chromosome I was missing, or that people were, quite simply, smarter than me. Now I know better. A good shrink once told me, "Sometimes, Julie, it really is the rest of the world." : D
Too many good writers in the world to waste time on the bad stuff.


Good instincts, Kimber. ... and I also agree about Them. I'll never re-read it, for once was enough. I find Oates a problematic writer for my tastes: I'm never convinced that she likes anybody she writes about, or for -- and of course, that's just my hang-up.



I'm a failure at her too, then, Mary. I just can't seem to learn to appreciate her work. I guess every writer is not for every reader ...



Eeeek! I missed this comment of yours, Fionnuala. So sorry to not have replied. Yes, I'm with you on this feeling. A twisted and corrupt interpretation of Shakespeare's "we come to bury Caesar, not to praise him" applies here, I think. Or like the other great philosopher of our time, Popeye, "I yam what I yam and that's all what I yam" ... and so let me be who I yam with no backtalk from anyone! ; )

I have not seen the Netflix release, Patricia, and it does sound as horrendous as this book, from accounts from friends. I would not watch it, repeating the same mistake I did by reading this book. My own moral compass should have stopped me, when the trash talk began. It was a just punishment and a heavy lesson to learn, for this book continues to haunt me almost a decade after having read it.


Thanks for stopping by and for your generous comment, Patrick. As of this date, I am remain blissfully ignorant of the Netflix adaptation and this book serves as my electrified cattle prod: every time I start to sway towards taking a peek at it, I shock myself into reality by re-reading this review. : ) Even after all these years, I remain appalled at what Oates delivered here. Poor Marilyn. Poor anyone who falls under the acid pen of someone who clearly despises them.


Thanks for reading, and commenting, Liz. Yes -- and not surprisingly -- I agree with everything you've written. : )