ŷ

Julie's Reviews > Blonde

Blonde by Joyce Carol Oates
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
14773738
's review


I have conflicting emotions about this book, and it goes something like this, “The book is about Marilyn, so what is there NOT to like about it, right? Warts and all, it is a powerful book written by a powerful writer.� But the song that keeps playing in my head, the words that keep haunting me, comes from the voice of another writer, This is the story of a rape.

This is the story of a rape, of the events that led up to it and followed it and of the place in which it happened. There are the action, the people and the place; all of which are interrelated but in their totality incommunicable in isolation from the moral continuum of human affairs.� (Paul Scott, The Jewel in the Crown.)

There is something so ugly and disturbing about Joyce Carol Oates’s interpretation of Marilyn’s life that if one were to take away the author’s name, one would suspect it was written by a loathsome mysogynist, hell-bent on destroying every last vestige of humanity in Marilyn Monroe, movie-queen, and Norma Jeane Baker, innocent dreamer.

I fell into a trance in the first few hundred pages, falling subject to Norma Jeane’s unquenchable spirit. Even tossed about by the vagaries of her early years, the reader sees how Norma Jeane was destined for some kind of greatness. She was an indefatigable optimist; a resilient life force that did battle with her mother’s depression and burgeoning insanity, and from under which she sprang out stronger still. It was only later, after the little fighter had grown into a vibrant woman who had been knocked down one too many times that the inherited depression finally consumed her and dragged her into hell. In the intervening years she fought -- and fought like hell -- to hang onto the dream of “getting out alive� and making something of her life. The reader can’t help but feel an overwhelming sadness, and fatalism, because unlike the young Norma Jeane, we know how the story ends.

So far, so good, despite its all-consuming sadness.

Then, Oates’s fangs come out. She reveals to us her secret loathing for Marilyn, sub-consciously played out in the voice of the men who hated The Blonde Actress: cow, cunt, stupid cunt, mammalian bitch, tramp, slut, WHORE, sucker of cocks, depressed whacko bitch, stupid cunt, stupid cunt, stupid cunt. OK, we hear you. But that’s the point: I don’t hear the voice of the men so much as I hear Oates’s voice in my head: you whore, you bitch, you cunt. The sub-text screams to me so loudly, it’s like a punch in the face by Oates, every slander uttered.

This is nothing but a vile peep show, it occurred to me half way through the novel. Here I am, engaging in the tearing down of the movie-queen, complicit in the act of rape. No one is forcing me to read this book, just like no one forced Oates to write it.

The voyeuristic quality is enhanced by the protracted use of the third person: The Blonde Actress, The Ex-Athlete, The Playwright, The President. We, the readers, are standing in the red light district, leering into the dimly-lit and dirty window where the young woman lies exposed and vulnerable. No one looks away, either out of decency or revulsion. A human being is being torn apart, and we continue to be complicit in her excoriation.

You won’t write about me, will you, Daddy? You won’t write about me, will you? You won’t write about me?

Knowing this -- knowing how much Norma Jeane abhorred being written about in her Marilyn persona -- Oates revels in ignoring her plea. Like the paparazzi who swoop like carrion birds, she licks up every last intimate detail and splatters it luridly for our consumption.

Disturbingly, Oates seems even more obsessed with Marilyn’s body than the raving fans: dwelling, obsessively, on skin and excretions and secretions, ad nauseam. She is pre-occupied with Marilyn’s sexual intimacies and her miscarriages and her womb. She is so consumed by Marilyn’s womb, in fact, that she leaves us with the notion she believes all Marilyn ever was, was a big gaping receptacle of vileness, hungry for as much degradation as she could possibly contain. Over and over again, we hear stupid cunt, hailed as the avenue to the stinking, infertile receptacle. Marilyn’s womb did not bear fruit, after all -- it was simply another secreting, foul failure of our movie-queen.

I’m always running into people’s unconscious.� Those words, prophetically spoken by Marilyn Monroe in her empty-headed persona, shine quite a light on this fictional biography. Oates seems to have run smack into the middle of her own “unconscious� while trying to explore Marilyn’s.

As much as art can be an exploratory medium to expose the vileness of the world and act as a cathartic force for change, just as often it reveals the vileness or the victim within. It often uncovers our own hidden truths and reveals to us our own failings. When confronted with ourselves, it thus becomes easy to say “this is just art� when we really should be admitting “this is me.�

As much as this was an authoritative book then, it was an equally forceful indictment of the things that should not be said. Certain secrets should not be violated. Add to that, there are some books that should never have been written, despite the truths they hold. This is one of them.

So many will disagree -- because it was written by an influential writer, and it’s art.
225 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Blonde.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

December 29, 2013 – Shelved
January 21, 2014 – Started Reading
January 27, 2014 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-50 of 54 (54 new)


message 1: by Paul (new)

Paul Bryant great review - I was teetering on the edge of reading this. Maybe not now.


message 2: by Julie (new) - added it

Julie Hi Paul -- All I can offer is that if I had to do it over again, I wouldn't. Even now, as I skim my review trying to find something good, I feel queasy about it all. Poor Marilyn -- if this is what posterity offers her, it is better she be left alone. Thank goodness there are others who have treated Marilyn much more respectfully and kindly than Oates did.


Holly Leigher Oh, wow, Julie. All I could think when I finished it was that I felt terrible, and couldn't even muster much of a review because I wasn't exactly sure why. You just gathered my feelings and tied them up in a bow here. Thanks!


Iris Thank you Julie for an accurate review. I read this long ago and when I see the title and the author's name I'm reminded of the repulsion I felt.


message 5: by Sketchbook (new)

Sketchbook MM had more talent in her left toe than JCO has in her lame-brain. JCO is what I call "A pie face." She needs several hurled directly at her...


message 6: by Julie (last edited Jul 15, 2015 05:04PM) (new) - added it

Julie Hi Holly, Hi Iris,

It's been a year and a half since I read this book, and your comments today brought back, most vividly, what I felt after reading it. It's like I now have Blonde PTSD.

There's no doubt that Oates is a compelling writer, if, after all this time, I still feel her coercive influence: she really wanted the reader to hate this lonely, troubled young woman. I don't know if I will ever understand why all the vitriol and contempt was poured upon Marilyn's head. Surely the tormented, melancholy spirits of this world deserve our compassion, and not our ridicule. It affected me deeply, and I still think "Bad on you, Joyce." Whether it was Marilyn Monroe, or a nameless someone from Anywhere, she deserved better.

What I am even more puzzled by is those readers who enjoy the book, without once tuning into what is happening before their very eyes.


Iris I know what you mean Julie about PTSD. Imagine - I read it when it came out in paperback so maybe 2001 and I still get a gut wrenching feeling when I see it popping up here on GR. Do you think JCO is one of those malcontent women who wants to sully what others find pretty? I don't know much about her.


message 8: by Julie (new) - added it

Julie Sketchbook wrote: "MM had more talent in her left toe than JCO has in her lame-brain. JCO is what I call "A pie face." She needs several hurled directly at her..."

Perhaps. : ) ... I think I wouldn't waste the pie, though -- it would be such a shame. Good pie is not to be wasted. : )


message 9: by Julie (last edited Jul 15, 2015 05:31PM) (new) - added it

Julie Iris wrote: "I know what you mean Julie about PTSD. Imagine - I read it when it came out in paperback so maybe 2001 and I still get a gut wrenching feeling when I see it popping up here on GR. Do you think JCO ..."

I couldn't begin to answer that, to be fair, because I don't know enough about JCO, personally, or her work. I loved them when I read it (it seems a hundred years ago!), but I have to say I've never been compelled by anything else she has written. To me, she's much like Margaret Atwood: a lot to write about, but nothing to say.

For the most part, I've discounted and avoided her works, because she doesn't interest me enough. This book was presented to me by a friend who loved it and thought I would too. Ouch! I thought she knew me better. You can imagine the colourful discussion my friend and I had after I read this. We're still friends, but only barely ; )


message 10: by Iris (new) - rated it 3 stars

Iris Like you I read Blonde because of the author and have avoided her since then. Unlike you I didn't have anyone to gripe about it at the time. That is why your review was such a relief - so I'm not crazy - or the only one :)


message 11: by Paul (new)

Paul Bryant I read What I Lived For which I think is brilliant & a top favourite novel; then We were the Mulvaneys which was kind of almost awful (another story where the victim gets blamed); and also Zombie which is her ridiculous riff on jolly Jeffrey Dahmer. This huge Blonde tome is sitting on my real life shelf here in the beautiful suburb of Sherwood. Now I'm thinking I should toss it to Oxfam. I was after one last JCO but maybe this was the worst one to pick.


message 12: by Cindy (new)

Cindy Thank you, for saving me from reading this. I have read about 5 books by Oates, and I take a year or more off between, because her writing is so grim. I have this on my shelf and was going to start it, but wanted to read reviews first, because I was afraid this book would just trample and dehumanize Monroe. I believe you, and I also agree that Oates, while a gifted writer, is a dark soul. Thank you for this review, and sparing me. Life is depressing enough.


message 13: by Julie (new) - added it

Julie Cindy wrote: "Thank you, for saving me from reading this. I have read about 5 books by Oates, and I take a year or more off between, because her writing is so grim. I have this on my shelf and was going to start..."

If I could undo my reading of this, I would certainly take that opportunity, Cindy. I agree with you on your last point -- so bring on the sunshine!


message 14: by Julie (new) - added it

Julie Sandy (CA) wrote: "Such a perceptive review, Julie. Thank you for your insights. Marilyn Monroe does not interest me particularly, but this author does. I have the nagging feeling that I "should" read her work but, i..."

I realize it's almost a year since you posted this, Sandy, ... but I just never saw it until now. I'm very sorry, but for what it's worth I wanted to respond now: like you, I've thought that Oates is a writer I "should" like; and "should" read more -- but when all is said and done, I realize I don't really like what she has to say. I just don't like her mind at all -- and this novel to me is quintessential Oates. Wrapped up in this book, and wrapped up in this review is everything I don't like about what she has to say.

The only book of hers I've remotely liked was Them -- but I read that so long ago, I can't remember why I liked it; and it was also my younger self. She hasn't worn well with time, for me at least. And after this one, I've definitely given up on her books.


message 15: by Greta G (new)

Greta G Wow. The technique of character assassination comes to mind. It says a lot about the author, because this technique is used by narcissists and psychopaths. I guess I'm lucky I don't know the author.


message 16: by Lisa (new)

Lisa I agree with you, Julie! If ignoring the author's name would make both of us suspect Oates' novels were written by a forceful misogynist, that maybe indicates ... well ... that she might actually have a problem with a nuanced description of women. My previous reading of her prevented me from starting on Blonde, which is still collecting dust in my shelf. You confirm what I feared I would discover. I am ure I will pick it up at some point, just not now. There is too much harm in the world, no need for me to wade through Oates' dark mind to get more of it.


message 17: by Julie (new) - added it

Julie Greta wrote: "Wow. The technique of character assassination comes to mind. It says a lot about the author, because this technique is used by narcissists and psychopaths. I guess I'm lucky I don't know the author."

That's a good assessment, Greta. I hadn't thought of it in those terms, but now that you say it, it seems so obvious. Zero in on the victim, and go for the jugular: it really was akin to tearing someone apart.


message 18: by Julie (new) - added it

Julie Lisa wrote: "I agree with you, Julie! If ignoring the author's name would make both of us suspect Oates' novels were written by a forceful misogynist, that maybe indicates ... well ... that she might actually h..."

I can't say I'm glad I read it, Lisa. And yet I did. What does it say about me, I suppose is the question I should be asking myself.

I was repulsed by it, and angry at the author; and angry at myself for reading it. Literature shouldn't do that to you, that is, make you hate yourself for participating. But participating in what? It was grotesque. It's been 4 years since I've read it and I still feel the bile rising when I think about it. One could easily lampoon this as exaggeration -- but it's not, believe me!

I've joked in the past about books giving me PTSD, but I think this time it's the real thing.

Greta's comment, above, gave me great pause ..."this technique is used by narcissists and psychopaths." Of course it is, to diminish the victim, and turn her/him into an object, and therefore not human. Poor Marilyn had been turned into a slab of meat in the end -- much more so than by the men who used her.

Stay away if you can -- but if you can't, I know I will be fascinated with your review.


message 19: by Jessaka (last edited Mar 02, 2018 03:20PM) (new)

Jessaka Fantastic review. I became interested in Marilyn Monroe when she died on my birthday, not when I was born. I read a few biographies


message 20: by Mia (new)

Mia thank you for writing this review. I have listened to half of the audio book of the book and stopped. It simply does not resonate. I like JCO other books. This one just seems like a great deal of projection of the author upon the star that tramples her unnecessarily.


message 21: by Julie (new) - added it

Julie Mia wrote: "thank you for writing this review. I have listened to half of the audio book of the book and stopped. It simply does not resonate. I like JCO other books. This one just seems like a great deal of p..."

Yes, Mia. That's what I found too.


message 22: by Julie (new) - added it

Julie Jessaka wrote: "Fantastic review. I became interested in Marilyn Monroe when she died on my birthday, not when I was born. I read a few biographies"

Thanks Jessaka, and sorry for the long delay -- I just didn't see this til now. Marilyn suffered at the hands of JCO, undoubtedly; and I still can't figure out the motivation behind this book.


Fergus, Weaver of Autistic Webs Loved it, Julie. Glad you stuck to your guns!

You put it so well. The daily news that screams out to us every hour on the hour ALSO is "the Incommunicable, isolated (and insulated) from the moral continuum..."

Bravo!


message 24: by Julie (new) - added it

Julie Fergus wrote: "Loved it, Julie. Glad you stuck to your guns!

You put it so well. The daily news that screams out to us every hour on the hour ALSO is "the Incommunicable, isolated (and insulated) from the moral ..."


Thanks Fergus. ... as for the daily news, there is probably no better time than even the last few days, to exemplify exactly that point. On certain days, I can be heard muttering to myself ..." what a world!" ... What a world, Fergus! Honour and decency are circling the drain.


message 25: by Stephanie (new)

Stephanie Totally agree, Julie. I was really relieved to read your review, because I love JCO, but this felt like a cheap supermarket tabloid treatment of a complex person's life. It was just vicious, ugly and demeaning. I was impressed by the research, but disgusted by the voice. It really does feel like Oates loathes her subject.


message 26: by Julie (new) - added it

Julie Stephanie wrote: "Totally agree, Julie. I was really relieved to read your review, because I love JCO, but this felt like a cheap supermarket tabloid treatment of a complex person's life. It was just vicious, ugly a..."

Thanks for reading, and commenting, Stephanie. I certainly can't fault JCO on all the hard work she did on this one -- but it begs the question, "why" if in the end this is the best she could offer on MM. With thoughts this ugly, you'd think the person would want to keep it to themselves.


LATOYA JOVENA I’m finding this book hard to finish. Marilyn isn’t a whole person in this book. Even calling her a pinup would be an upgrade. She’s a rubber sex doll. In every scene she’s accidentally seducing everyone or having sex. I may not be able to finish it.
Thanks so much for your review. Everyone was raving about it and I was beginning to wonder if I was crazy.


message 28: by Julie (new) - added it

Julie LATOYA wrote: "I’m finding this book hard to finish. Marilyn isn’t a whole person in this book. Even calling her a pinup would be an upgrade. She’s a rubber sex doll. In every scene she’s accidentally seducing ev..."

I felt the same way, LaToya: everyone was raving. Of course, they could be raving mad, which in the end I didn't discount. : D

Even after all these years of being away from that book, I feel it as a gut punch. I wish this book had never been written. Or at least, that it had never crossed my path.


message 29: by Julie (new)

Julie G I'm grateful to LaToya for putting this review back on the feed. I was mesmerized by it, Julie.
I've read only one book by Joyce Carol Oates, The Falls, and I suffered through every page. I felt like the characters were heartless sociopaths and I was hoping the whole town would go up in flames and they'd all die, so the story would finally end. I know she has a huge following on here, and I respect the love of authors, but let's just say. . . your review doesn't inspire me to jump back into these waters!


message 30: by Julie (new) - added it

Julie Julie wrote: "I'm grateful to LaToya for putting this review back on the feed. I was mesmerized by it, Julie.
I've read only one book by Joyce Carol Oates, The Falls, and I suffered through every page. I felt li..."


I still don't see the point of this book, Julie. And it still raises a very emotional "Gaaah!" when I think about it -- so much so that I feel I want to wash my hands. Given the times we live in, the sanitizer is always at hand, so it's easy to get her off of them; not so easy to clean the mind of her assassination of M.

JCO is neither "here nor there" for me. I remember reading Them and while I appreciated it, I was never so taken by her that I went back to anything else that she wrote, so I can't comment on her further, having no terms of reference.

If "heartless sociopaths" are her specialty, it seems like a prime time in history for her to gather from real life models again and write another worst bestseller!


message 31: by Julie (new)

Julie G A worst bestseller. You should coin that expression!


Fergus, Weaver of Autistic Webs SO appropriate to have your review in front of me again, Julie. For the interim has been a time when optimists who resisted the oozing grey sludge of the media were peremptorily judged with abject violence. When I first read Oates in 1968 my aversion to her dispassionate and clinical writing appalled me. And now, 52 years later, I refuse to recant for my reaction!


message 33: by Julie (new) - added it

Julie Julie wrote: "A worst bestseller. You should coin that expression!"

Would you like that in copper, silver or gold? : -)

We could create a whole Awards ceremony around this newly minted coin. Like the Academy Awards: a little dross dummy all covered in gold paint for all those wasted-paper books out there.


message 34: by Julie (new) - added it

Julie Fergus wrote: "SO appropriate to have your review in front of me again, Julie. For the interim has been a time when optimists who resisted the oozing grey sludge of the media were peremptorily judged with abject ..."

There is great satisfaction, Fergus, in having one's initial impressions confirmed over time.

There are more than a few authors like JCO that the world swoons over -- and it puzzles me to no end.

I used to think there was some kind of reading chromosome I was missing, or that people were, quite simply, smarter than me. Now I know better. A good shrink once told me, "Sometimes, Julie, it really is the rest of the world." : D

Too many good writers in the world to waste time on the bad stuff.


Fergus, Weaver of Autistic Webs Wonderful guy, that shrink!👍


message 36: by Kimber (last edited Sep 30, 2022 03:33PM) (new)

Kimber My feeling was that I wasn't going to trust Oates with Marilyn's story, so I haven't read this. "Them" was enthralling though and even with sociopathic characters it haunted me.


message 37: by Julie (new) - added it

Julie Kimber wrote: "My feeling was that I wasn't going to trust Oates with Marilyn's story, so I haven't read this. "Them" was enthralling though and even with sociopathic characters it haunted me."

Good instincts, Kimber. ... and I also agree about Them. I'll never re-read it, for once was enough. I find Oates a problematic writer for my tastes: I'm never convinced that she likes anybody she writes about, or for -- and of course, that's just my hang-up.


message 38: by Mary (new)

Mary I have tried to tolerate Oates but it always ends in failure. I might be so bold to say that she is a grossly overrated writer. Someone who reflects her own self loathing into the icky pages of her books?


message 39: by Kimber (last edited Oct 02, 2022 11:29AM) (new)

Kimber Mary, I feel that Oates is really a brilliant writer but I think you hit onto something with your mention of "self loathing." In her memoir A Widows Tale, she comes across that way.


message 40: by Julie (new) - added it

Julie Mary wrote: "I have tried to tolerate Oates but it always ends in failure. I might be so bold to say that she is a grossly overrated writer. Someone who reflects her own self loathing into the icky pages of her..."

I'm a failure at her too, then, Mary. I just can't seem to learn to appreciate her work. I guess every writer is not for every reader ...


message 41: by Fionnuala (new)

Fionnuala I Unliked this review so I could Like it again, Julie. When will authors and movie makers honor people's stated wish not to have their private lives turned into semi-fictional travesties. People own their own life stories.


message 42: by Patricia (new)

Patricia Smith Today after reading Oats bestseller prior to watching the Netflix release, the books tragic events of Marlyn’s life reinforced my feelings of regret of both. Will they become a catalyst for change in the sorted history of Hollywood’s abuse of women. The lack of any moral compass is just so sad😢


message 43: by Julie (new) - added it

Julie Fionnuala wrote: "I Unliked this review so I could Like it again, Julie. When will authors and movie makers honor people's stated wish not to have their private lives turned into semi-fictional travesties. People ow..."

Eeeek! I missed this comment of yours, Fionnuala. So sorry to not have replied. Yes, I'm with you on this feeling. A twisted and corrupt interpretation of Shakespeare's "we come to bury Caesar, not to praise him" applies here, I think. Or like the other great philosopher of our time, Popeye, "I yam what I yam and that's all what I yam" ... and so let me be who I yam with no backtalk from anyone! ; )


message 44: by Julie (new) - added it

Julie Patricia wrote: "Today after reading Oats bestseller prior to watching the Netflix release, the books tragic events of Marlyn’s life reinforced my feelings of regret of both. Will they become a catalyst for change ..."

I have not seen the Netflix release, Patricia, and it does sound as horrendous as this book, from accounts from friends. I would not watch it, repeating the same mistake I did by reading this book. My own moral compass should have stopped me, when the trash talk began. It was a just punishment and a heavy lesson to learn, for this book continues to haunt me almost a decade after having read it.


Patrick Tekula This is the review I wish I’d written. It expresses everything I’ve felt about this book especially it’s second half. I almost wish I’d seen this review and taken stock in it before embarking on this near 800 page misery fest. Anyone outraged by the recent Netflix adaptation should be cautioned that if you read the source material you’d not be at all surprised by the outcome.


message 46: by Julie (new) - added it

Julie Patrick wrote: "This is the review I wish I’d written. It expresses everything I’ve felt about this book especially it’s second half. I almost wish I’d seen this review and taken stock in it before embarking on th..."

Thanks for stopping by and for your generous comment, Patrick. As of this date, I am remain blissfully ignorant of the Netflix adaptation and this book serves as my electrified cattle prod: every time I start to sway towards taking a peek at it, I shock myself into reality by re-reading this review. : ) Even after all these years, I remain appalled at what Oates delivered here. Poor Marilyn. Poor anyone who falls under the acid pen of someone who clearly despises them.


message 47: by JenaMac (new)

JenaMac This is the best review I've ever read


message 48: by Julie (new) - added it

Julie JenaMac wrote: "This is the best review I've ever read"

Thanks very much for reading!


message 49: by Liz (new)

Liz I agree with you completely. I enjoyed her story at the beginning but then I thought the author took a turn and started to tear Marilyn down instead of being sympathetic to her. I think Marilyn had a sad life and was just so naive she believed in the good in sometimes bad people and got destroyed because of it. She was exploited and didn’t know how to cope except to be “Marilyn� and be onstage instead of just being a genuine person. I wish the author had been kinder in her depiction of Marilyn.


message 50: by Julie (new) - added it

Julie Liz wrote: "I agree with you completely. I enjoyed her story at the beginning but then I thought the author took a turn and started to tear Marilyn down instead of being sympathetic to her. I think Marilyn had..."

Thanks for reading, and commenting, Liz. Yes -- and not surprisingly -- I agree with everything you've written. : )


« previous 1
back to top