William2's Reviews > Solaris
Solaris
by
by

This is the classic gothic horror haunted house story revisited with an SF twist. It's a testament to the obtuseness of mankind, particularly unemotional, Cold-War era, scientific man. Three scientists on the remote planet Solaris seek contact with the lone enormous creature occupying it -- the ocean. All sorts of experiments are tried over a century or more, but the planet and the humans never achieve, at least to the humans' satisfaction, adequate evidence of a measurable intellectual exchange. The ocean busies itself morphing into these massive shapes -- geometic, organic, and otherwise -- which strike the reader as expressive, but which are nevertheless inarticulate in human terms. When the scientists start bombarding the ocean with xrays, for lack of a better idea, the planet sends to each of them a visitor from an emotionally charged period of their own lives. The simulacra are derived from their memories and dreams. Kris Kelvin has just arrived on the planet. In his case, the simulacrum assumes the identical physical appearance and personality of his late wife, Rheya, who took her own life years before. The simulacra obviously constitute contact of a very high order, an enormously rich opportunity, it seems to me, to communicate one on one with the entity. But the horrified scientists never see that. They never talk to their visitors. They never come clean. Their fear drives them, purely fear, so all they can think of is a way to destroy the visitors. Therefore, they miss their chance. How sick and sad is that? This reader came to understand what was necessary after about page 100 or so. Yet the book drones on for another hundred pages. The novel is imaginative, certainly, but it runs out of ideas far too soon. The scientists never get it. One grows disgusted with them. The book never seems to end.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Solaris.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
February 5, 2014
– Shelved as:
to-read
February 5, 2014
– Shelved
February 8, 2014
–
Started Reading
February 8, 2014
– Shelved as:
20-ce
February 8, 2014
– Shelved as:
fiction
February 8, 2014
– Shelved as:
poland
February 10, 2014
– Shelved as:
translation
February 10, 2014
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-17 of 17 (17 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
[deleted user]
(new)
Feb 10, 2014 07:08PM
Please explain why this book warrants a mere two stars. I'm told it's a monument of science-fiction.
reply
|
flag

It is not. See review.

Of three other Lems I've read, I liked them all better than this one, so I hope you try more (if you haven't already).



However, I don't think the simulacra could give any breakthrough insights. They were effectively humans with amnesia. All you could derive from them were emotional assessments on how a human would feel if they found out they didn't have a personal history until recently, rather like androids.
I don't get the comment about length. Almost all books could be reduced in size without suffering a huge blow to their plots and ideas. I thought the length was utilised well here to flesh out the setting, explore some non-central ideas, and let the reader ruminate on the subject.

I think it was for this reason exactly that I felt conflicted about how to rate the book, and I see that I haven't rated it at all. The more on and on it went, the main core idea got diluted ( for the lack of better word ) for me . Maybe I need to revisit this book in a different mood, after watching the movie adaptations.
