Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

William2's Reviews > Solaris

Solaris by Stanisław Lem
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
4684009
's review

it was ok
bookshelves: 20-ce, fiction, poland, translation

This is the classic gothic horror haunted house story revisited with an SF twist. It's a testament to the obtuseness of mankind, particularly unemotional, Cold-War era, scientific man. Three scientists on the remote planet Solaris seek contact with the lone enormous creature occupying it -- the ocean. All sorts of experiments are tried over a century or more, but the planet and the humans never achieve, at least to the humans' satisfaction, adequate evidence of a measurable intellectual exchange. The ocean busies itself morphing into these massive shapes -- geometic, organic, and otherwise -- which strike the reader as expressive, but which are nevertheless inarticulate in human terms. When the scientists start bombarding the ocean with xrays, for lack of a better idea, the planet sends to each of them a visitor from an emotionally charged period of their own lives. The simulacra are derived from their memories and dreams. Kris Kelvin has just arrived on the planet. In his case, the simulacrum assumes the identical physical appearance and personality of his late wife, Rheya, who took her own life years before. The simulacra obviously constitute contact of a very high order, an enormously rich opportunity, it seems to me, to communicate one on one with the entity. But the horrified scientists never see that. They never talk to their visitors. They never come clean. Their fear drives them, purely fear, so all they can think of is a way to destroy the visitors. Therefore, they miss their chance. How sick and sad is that? This reader came to understand what was necessary after about page 100 or so. Yet the book drones on for another hundred pages. The novel is imaginative, certainly, but it runs out of ideas far too soon. The scientists never get it. One grows disgusted with them. The book never seems to end.
108 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Solaris.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

February 5, 2014 – Shelved as: to-read
February 5, 2014 – Shelved
February 8, 2014 – Started Reading
February 8, 2014 – Shelved as: 20-ce
February 8, 2014 – Shelved as: fiction
February 8, 2014 – Shelved as: poland
February 10, 2014 – Shelved as: translation
February 10, 2014 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-17 of 17 (17 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by [deleted user] (new)

Please explain why this book warrants a mere two stars. I'm told it's a monument of science-fiction.


William2 Benjamin wrote: "Please explain why this book warrants a mere two stars. I'm told it's a monument of science-fiction."

It is not. See review.


message 3: by Nobody (new)

Nobody LOL


William2 Green Troll wrote: "LOL"

:-)


Michael I agree completely with your assessment about the shortage of ideas. Perhaps he just wanted to rub the tragedy of broken communication in, or as you pegged it, the "horror." As with "Waiting for Godot", I would have been happier with shorter. It was even more of a challenge to make a full length movie out of it, of which the Russian one did better at the attempt.

Of three other Lems I've read, I liked them all better than this one, so I hope you try more (if you haven't already).


William2 Yes, Michael, he could've done it in 120 pages. It would've been beautiful. Instead of padded out as it is.


Milan You apparently read first English translation (which is translation of French version) which is infamously very bad. (You mentioned name "Rhea" which is only in this translation.) New English translation (1st ever direct from original language) came up in 2011. No idea if there's any paper book with 2011 English version. I know about audiobook and E-book of 2011 version.


Andrey Davydov I also found the aversion of the scientists towards the simulacra a little odd. Sure, there are many factors working against clear thinking, but is it an excuse to feel so dramatic and anguished?

However, I don't think the simulacra could give any breakthrough insights. They were effectively humans with amnesia. All you could derive from them were emotional assessments on how a human would feel if they found out they didn't have a personal history until recently, rather like androids.

I don't get the comment about length. Almost all books could be reduced in size without suffering a huge blow to their plots and ideas. I thought the length was utilised well here to flesh out the setting, explore some non-central ideas, and let the reader ruminate on the subject.


William2 Belated thanks, Andrey. Excellent commentary.


message 10: by rahul (new) - added it

rahul The book never seems to end.
I think it was for this reason exactly that I felt conflicted about how to rate the book, and I see that I haven't rated it at all. The more on and on it went, the main core idea got diluted ( for the lack of better word ) for me . Maybe I need to revisit this book in a different mood, after watching the movie adaptations.


William2 Thank you, rahul


message 12: by Poseur (new)

Poseur spot on


Haley Oh my goodness, I just (finally!) finished this book. Listened to the direct-to-English translation used for the Audible version. Had to come on here and see if I was the only one who struggled so much with this book. It went on and on. What should have been a fascinating history of a fictional new field of scientific research felt like I was listening instead to some droning lecture from a professor who didn't understand how fascinating the subject matter could be. And if the main purpose of your research is to establish contact with the ocean, why then, when faced with evidence of a (semi-)sentient being whose only explanation for existence points back to the ocean, would your first (and second, and third, etc) reactions be to banish or destroy said being??? Trying to gather my thoughts here to go write my own review, but I appreciate that I'm not the only one baffled by this book and why it is supposedly held up as a pillar of science-fiction writing.


William2 And yet Will Self lionizes it. Go figure.


GreyAtlas I cannot disagree enough with your review.


Killer of Dreams I agree that this book could have been shorted considerably.


William2 Thanks for the feedback, Kremlin and Killer of Dreams!!


back to top