Violet wells's Reviews > Invisible Cities
Invisible Cities
by
by

...A five star review...
I hate flying. The claustrophobia of it. So usually when I return to Italy after visiting London I catch the train to Paris and then the night train to Venice. That鈥檚 my little extravagance. I catch the night train to Venice and not Florence for one moment. The moment of walking out of the station of Santa Lucia and beholding the Grand Canal. I sit on the steps and let all the activity on the canal wash through me. I鈥檓 not sure why this moment means so much to me. It鈥檚 not a moment I can or even want to explain. I remember a line from a novel I read where a character gazing out at the Grand Canal says, 鈥淚 keep wondering when all this will happen to me.鈥� Perhaps that鈥檚 it, Venice articulates some deep desire we all have or evokes a memory of something that has never quite happened.
Reading this for a second time is a bit like visiting Venice for a second time. A little bit of the magic fades but in compensation you notice lots of wonders you missed the first time. I read it in English this time. Now and again the writing seemed a bit clunky 鈥� 鈥淭he inferno of the living is not something that will be; if there is one, it is what is already here.鈥� That 鈥渋f there is one鈥� is a bit of an eyesore. But it鈥檚 no less clunky in Italian - L'inferno dei viventi non 猫 qualcosa che sar脿; se ce n'猫 uno 鈥� you can鈥檛 blame the translator for translating it word for word instead of trying to improve the fluency of Calvino鈥檚 prose. .
This is probably the greatest book ever written about tourism, about the urge to escape the confines of where we live. Essentially Marco Polo is a tourist. And we all as tourists need an audience to show the images of our travels to. Kublai Khan is the audience, the vicarious tourist. He鈥檚 also a warlord, and by inference every warlord intent on conquering new territory is a tourist and every tourist is a warlord in embryo. We all want to conquer new lands. We鈥檙e all hungry for new discoveries, new exotic possessions. But we all eventually have to go home. Calvino is constantly making the point that every city is essentially what we bring to it. He鈥檚 brilliant at capturing the deep division of perspective between the tourist and long term inhabitant. Florentines are famous for never looking at the city鈥檚 monuments. It鈥檚 become how they distinguish themselves from the tourist. They turn a blind eye. They stare at their phones while walking across Piazza della Signoria. Venice has almost been turned into a romance theme park 鈥� it鈥檚 called upon to provide a standard collection of microwaved emotions as efficiently as an atm provides cash. One of the wonders of Venice now is the people who live there. You need them to understand something of the true nature of the city. To get behind the postcard fa莽ade. There are times when it鈥檚 much more rewarding to watch a man bump a barrow down the steps of a nondescript bridge than gaze blankly at the fa莽ade of San Marco. Sometimes it鈥檚 these kinds of details that bring a place alive for us. Calvino鈥檚 deployment of these telling details is probably this book鈥檚 most stellar achievement and what makes it such a joy to read.
...An alternative four star review...
Calvino is one of the sacred cows of literature. He鈥檚 one of those writers who we鈥檙e tempted to pretend to like more than we really do, like Proust and Joyce, for fear of revealing some intellectual inadequacy. Interestingly for me, Virginia Woolf still isn鈥檛 one of these scared cows. When people don鈥檛 like Woolf they have more of a license to vent their scorn. It still hasn鈥檛 been officially recognised that Woolf is a great writer, by men at any rate. Often when there鈥檚 a list of the best novels ever written Woolf won鈥檛 feature at all, or if she does it鈥檒l be her lesser but easier books like Mrs Dalloway or A Room of One's Own that makes the list. (To be fair her genius is recognised in Italy and France; it鈥檚 in the UK she tends to divide opinion.)
So Invisible Cities vs The Waves. Invisible Cities is absolutely brilliant and inspired for the first fifty pages. But then it wanes a bit, gets a bit repetitive. Seems odd to say about a book of only 145 pages but might it have been better had it been a bit shorter? The contents page has the appearance of some mathematical formula, like a star map, so perhaps there鈥檚 some hidden genius in the design of this book. But if there is I didn鈥檛 get it and nor did anyone else judging by the few reviews I鈥檝e read. It felt to me like the number of invisible cities we get was random and some were uninspired. If you took a single page out of The Waves it would collapse. You could take ten pages out of Invisible Cities without it being noticed. Also now and again Calvino is perhaps guilty of the kind of vacuous platitudes you鈥檒l find strewn throughout the pages of The Alchemist. 鈥淔alsehood is never in words; it is in things.鈥� That kind of thing. Looks great if you skim read it; becomes only a half-truth if you stop to think about it. So for me, The Waves wins over Invisible Cities in a heavyweight wrestling match.
...Back to tourism...
Once upon a time the world was getting smaller. Now it鈥檚 getting bigger again as terrorism creates more and more no go areas. You could say terrorism is a war on tourism. It鈥檚 diminishing one of the biggest cultural phenomenon of our times. That鈥檚 probably the most significant change terrorism is making to the world. It鈥檚 making us think twice about travelling. I watched a heartbreaking report from Aleppo last night 鈥揳 once magical town that none of us will ever see again. How long before it becomes one of Calvino鈥檚 Invisible Cities?
I hate flying. The claustrophobia of it. So usually when I return to Italy after visiting London I catch the train to Paris and then the night train to Venice. That鈥檚 my little extravagance. I catch the night train to Venice and not Florence for one moment. The moment of walking out of the station of Santa Lucia and beholding the Grand Canal. I sit on the steps and let all the activity on the canal wash through me. I鈥檓 not sure why this moment means so much to me. It鈥檚 not a moment I can or even want to explain. I remember a line from a novel I read where a character gazing out at the Grand Canal says, 鈥淚 keep wondering when all this will happen to me.鈥� Perhaps that鈥檚 it, Venice articulates some deep desire we all have or evokes a memory of something that has never quite happened.
Reading this for a second time is a bit like visiting Venice for a second time. A little bit of the magic fades but in compensation you notice lots of wonders you missed the first time. I read it in English this time. Now and again the writing seemed a bit clunky 鈥� 鈥淭he inferno of the living is not something that will be; if there is one, it is what is already here.鈥� That 鈥渋f there is one鈥� is a bit of an eyesore. But it鈥檚 no less clunky in Italian - L'inferno dei viventi non 猫 qualcosa che sar脿; se ce n'猫 uno 鈥� you can鈥檛 blame the translator for translating it word for word instead of trying to improve the fluency of Calvino鈥檚 prose. .
This is probably the greatest book ever written about tourism, about the urge to escape the confines of where we live. Essentially Marco Polo is a tourist. And we all as tourists need an audience to show the images of our travels to. Kublai Khan is the audience, the vicarious tourist. He鈥檚 also a warlord, and by inference every warlord intent on conquering new territory is a tourist and every tourist is a warlord in embryo. We all want to conquer new lands. We鈥檙e all hungry for new discoveries, new exotic possessions. But we all eventually have to go home. Calvino is constantly making the point that every city is essentially what we bring to it. He鈥檚 brilliant at capturing the deep division of perspective between the tourist and long term inhabitant. Florentines are famous for never looking at the city鈥檚 monuments. It鈥檚 become how they distinguish themselves from the tourist. They turn a blind eye. They stare at their phones while walking across Piazza della Signoria. Venice has almost been turned into a romance theme park 鈥� it鈥檚 called upon to provide a standard collection of microwaved emotions as efficiently as an atm provides cash. One of the wonders of Venice now is the people who live there. You need them to understand something of the true nature of the city. To get behind the postcard fa莽ade. There are times when it鈥檚 much more rewarding to watch a man bump a barrow down the steps of a nondescript bridge than gaze blankly at the fa莽ade of San Marco. Sometimes it鈥檚 these kinds of details that bring a place alive for us. Calvino鈥檚 deployment of these telling details is probably this book鈥檚 most stellar achievement and what makes it such a joy to read.
...An alternative four star review...
Calvino is one of the sacred cows of literature. He鈥檚 one of those writers who we鈥檙e tempted to pretend to like more than we really do, like Proust and Joyce, for fear of revealing some intellectual inadequacy. Interestingly for me, Virginia Woolf still isn鈥檛 one of these scared cows. When people don鈥檛 like Woolf they have more of a license to vent their scorn. It still hasn鈥檛 been officially recognised that Woolf is a great writer, by men at any rate. Often when there鈥檚 a list of the best novels ever written Woolf won鈥檛 feature at all, or if she does it鈥檒l be her lesser but easier books like Mrs Dalloway or A Room of One's Own that makes the list. (To be fair her genius is recognised in Italy and France; it鈥檚 in the UK she tends to divide opinion.)
So Invisible Cities vs The Waves. Invisible Cities is absolutely brilliant and inspired for the first fifty pages. But then it wanes a bit, gets a bit repetitive. Seems odd to say about a book of only 145 pages but might it have been better had it been a bit shorter? The contents page has the appearance of some mathematical formula, like a star map, so perhaps there鈥檚 some hidden genius in the design of this book. But if there is I didn鈥檛 get it and nor did anyone else judging by the few reviews I鈥檝e read. It felt to me like the number of invisible cities we get was random and some were uninspired. If you took a single page out of The Waves it would collapse. You could take ten pages out of Invisible Cities without it being noticed. Also now and again Calvino is perhaps guilty of the kind of vacuous platitudes you鈥檒l find strewn throughout the pages of The Alchemist. 鈥淔alsehood is never in words; it is in things.鈥� That kind of thing. Looks great if you skim read it; becomes only a half-truth if you stop to think about it. So for me, The Waves wins over Invisible Cities in a heavyweight wrestling match.
...Back to tourism...
Once upon a time the world was getting smaller. Now it鈥檚 getting bigger again as terrorism creates more and more no go areas. You could say terrorism is a war on tourism. It鈥檚 diminishing one of the biggest cultural phenomenon of our times. That鈥檚 probably the most significant change terrorism is making to the world. It鈥檚 making us think twice about travelling. I watched a heartbreaking report from Aleppo last night 鈥揳 once magical town that none of us will ever see again. How long before it becomes one of Calvino鈥檚 Invisible Cities?
Sign into 欧宝娱乐 to see if any of your friends have read
Invisible Cities.
Sign In 禄
Quotes Violet Liked

“Arriving at each new city, the traveler finds again a past of his that he did not know he had: the foreignness of what you no longer are or no longer possess lies in wait for you in foreign, unpossessed places.”
― Invisible Cities
― Invisible Cities

“Cities, like dreams, are made of desires and fears, even if the thread of their discourse is secret, their rules are absurd, their perspectives deceitful, and everything conceals something else.”
― Invisible Cities
― Invisible Cities

“You reach a moment in life when, among the people you have known, the dead outnumber the living. And the mind refuses to accept more faces, more expressions: on every new face you encounter, it prints the old forms, for each one it finds the most suitable mask.”
― Invisible Cities
― Invisible Cities

“For those who pass it without entering, the city is one thing; it is another for those who are trapped by it and never leave. There is the city where you arrive for the first time; and there is another city which you leave never to return. Each deserves a different name; perhaps I have already spoken of Irene under other names; perhaps I have spoken only of Irene.”
― Invisible Cities
― Invisible Cities

“With cities, it is as with dreams: everything imaginable can be dreamed, but even the most unexpected dream is a rebus that conceals a desire or, its reverse, a fear. Cities, like dreams, are made of desires and fears, even if the thread of their discourse is secret, their rules are absurd, their perspectives deceitful, and everything conceals something else.”
― Invisible Cities
― Invisible Cities

“A description of Zaira as it is today should contain all Zaira鈥檚 past. The city, however, does not tell its past, but contains it like the lines of a hand, written in the corners of the streets, the gratings of the windows, the banisters of the steps, the antennae of the lightning rods, the poles of the flags, every segment marked in turn with scratches, indentations, scrolls.”
― Invisible Cities
― Invisible Cities

“When a man rides a long time through wild regions he feels the desire for a city. Finally he comes to Isidora, a city where the buildings have spiral staircases encrusted with spiral seashells, where perfect telescopes and violins are made, where the foreigner hesitating between two women always encounters a third, where cockfights degenerate into bloody brawls among the bettors. He was thinking of all these things when he desired a city. Isidora, therefore, is the city of his dreams: with one difference. The dreamed-of city contained him as a young man; he arrives at Isidora in his old age. In the square there is the wall where the old men sit and watch the young go by; he is seated in a row with them. Desires are already memories.”
― Invisible Cities
― Invisible Cities

“It is pointless trying to decide whether Zenobia is to be classified among happy cities or among the unhappy. It makes no sense to divide cities into these two species, but rather into another two: those that through the years and the changes continue to give their form to desires, and those in which desires either erase the city or are erased by it.”
― Invisible Cities
― Invisible Cities

“The Great Khan tried to concentrate on the game: but now it was the game鈥檚 reason that eluded him. The end of every game is a gain or a loss: but of what? What were the real stakes? At checkmate, beneath the foot of the king, knocked aside by the winner鈥檚 hand, nothingness remains: a black square, or a white one. By disembodying his conquests to reduce them to the essential, Kublai had arrived at the extreme operation: the definitive conquest, of which the empire鈥檚 multiform treasures were only illusory envelopes; it was reduced to a square of planed wood.”
― Invisible Cities
― Invisible Cities
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-50 of 109 (109 new)
message 1:
by
Violet
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Sep 11, 2016 03:58AM

reply
|
flag


Thanks Uday. I don't have to pretend to enjoy Calvino either. I've stopped pretending to like Joyce and only recently have admitted to myself that Proust bores me as much as he thrills me! That said, without his and Joyce's groundbreaking work writers like Woolf and Nabokov might have struggled more to find their voice.


Thanks Cheryl. I don't think I would ever have thought of a tourist as a warlord either before reading this but it's Calvino who equates the two and now I can see what he's getting at. I'm sure the residents of Venice think of tourists as a conquering army at times and face a battle to defend their understanding of their city against the projections of the incoming army. The book raises lots of fascinating questions about territorial and ethnic rights. Asks the question, who does a city belong to? There are no glib answers but so much food for thought. Fingers crossed you make it to Venice (and Florence!) soon.

Thanks Dianne. I think the first fifty or sixty pages should be compulsory reading!



Thanks Paromjit. Some reviews you just love writing more than others and this was one I really enjoyed writing.

Thanks Marc. But damn! I might have to eat my words. Perhaps ten pages couldn鈥檛 be removed without noticing it. I have to confess I鈥檓 a complete dimwit where math is concerned. I loved the questing intellectual spirit of your graphic without really understanding it. I felt it was more likely to be a kind of post-modernist joke 鈥� a sophisticated pretence of a hidden order which in reality is utterly spurious. I see someone agrees with this in the link you posted. But then you get the kind of academic highfalutin Nabokov sent up so brilliantly in Pale Fire - Angela M. Jeannet claims that 鈥渢hrough the intricate pattern of numbers, words, lines, and blank spaces Calvino is hunting for the food that feeds another human hunger, the need to make sense of the world.鈥� What?
Very happy to hear Woolf is taught in schools in the US. Still baffles me that in the UK we鈥檙e prouder of the achievements of Graham Greene and Evelyn Waugh than Virginia.

Huge thanks Agnieszka.

Four stars for the actual reading experience. Five stars for how much stimulating thought it provided within hours of finishing it.

But Calvino...oh well, he was a dreamer, an idealist and an irreverent writer; so your four-five stars review fits his playful creativity like a glove, Violet.



She might have been a bit bitchy, Dolors! That was her usual response to contemporary writers who weren't her friends. I suspect though she would have admired this and Winter Night especially.

Thanks Cheri. I've plagiarised you and Elyse a bit by weaving in a personal story!

Yep, this is a ghost of a book; it continues to haunt. Other books i love to bits while reading and then almost immediately forget them.



For what I have learnt from Woolf's A Writer's Diary, in spite of all her vanity, at least she applied the same harsh standards to her own writing...

Perhaps from now on I'll try to slip a personal anecdote into all my reviews! I've just discovered Mark Kozelek whose songs are all like diary entries. I could copy him.

Thanks Glenn. There is a possibility I might be given a novel to translate soon - I've become the understudy of a well known translator: when he doesn't have the time to translate a book it'll be given to me. Won't be translating anything as lofty as Calvino though.

Thanks Karen. For me there are few things as exciting as an Italian train station - up on the boards there are all these magical place names: Roma, Venezia, Firenze, Napoli, Genoa, Siena, Ferrara, Perugia - the list of possibilities is endless.

Very true, Dolors. Also she wasn't alone in this bitchiness back in those days. If writers in the 1920s, 30s and 40s were so competitively bitchy it makes you wonder how sincere is the love-in between contemporary writers. Do they really think what they often write for back cover blurbs?

The occasional clunky prose is something I also noticed reading Calvino, but some element of that is often present in translated works, so I assumed it was just that. Very interesting to learn that the translation is so literal!


Thanks Edward. Your review made me realise that I could have read this at a different moment in my life and responded very differently. Same is true of The Waves. I couldn't have read that book at a time when I was more primed for it. And the sad thing is I'll never be able to repeat the exhilaration it afforded me no matter how many times I reread it. Good luck with your Italian.

I can visualize that moment for you - the connection with the sentence in the book with your own experience....
.....just smiling - ear to ear here. love that yo..."
As i said to Cheri couldn't have done it without your fabulous example! Your reviews remind me of Mark Kozelek's songs. Do you know him? I've just discovered him.

I don't think I could have done a one or two star review, Fi. Maybe a three star but I'd never be able to rival Paul Bryant's - /review/show...

The fact that Woolf gave much more credit to criticism than to boneless adulation might have a direct correlation to the quality of her judgement and possibly, her writing. Thus, a weighty reason to read more classics than contemporary authors!

Yep, from what i recall her criticisms of the likes of Joyce, Lawrence and even Proust though sometimes harsh were well-considered and always coupled with praise. Ironically she tended to be somewhat Victorian in her literary criticism - daddy's girl. The classics were her benchmark.

Oh, for the moment (currently going through the 1936 entries) she raves about Proust (considers him sensitive and tenacious) and also respects Flaubert and his obsession to find le mote juste, but scoffs Joyce (calls him a callow board school boy, hah!), Hardy (the man lacked imagination) and Lawrence (whom she describes as an incompetent writer with an admirable conviction)...
I am actually greatly enjoying these witty rants and find myself smiling more often than not, for there is a certain degree of truth in her bickering, isn't there? No wonder her great love was Shakespeare, with all the bantering and jesting of his most memorable characters...


Me too. I love her sniping at other writers. Wish there was more. She's often accused of arrogance but I reckon it was often more the insecurity of being a woman in a male world that made her so defensive. She expected harsh criticism, even anticipated some of the criticisms aimed at her. Criticising the likes of Joyce and Lawrence was perhaps her way of convincing herself she was at least their equal; mocking Wells and Bennett her way of convincing herself she was their better.

Grazie Esil.

Thanks Glenn. Th..."
Fantastic news, Violet! I suspect once you translate one novel, more will come your way, which will lead to even greater literary opportunities.