ŷ

Glenn Sumi's Reviews > Howards End

Howards End by E.M. Forster
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
28854579
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: classics, 1900-1960, modern-library-100, guardian-1000

Howards End is a chatty, witty, philosophical novel about the state of England in the years leading up to the first world war.

There’s a sharp sense of place (Howards End, the estate, was modelled after Forster’s childhood home), and by focusing on three separate families, you certainly understand the social hierarchy of Edwardian England. The book’s famous epigraph (“Only connect...�) refers to the need for humans to empathize with others, cutting across boundaries of class, culture, geography and the sins of the past. This theme comes through vividly.

The characters often feel a little thin, however, and the plot slightly contrived. Forster’s omniscient narrator can be wonderfully casual, as in the relaxed, conversational opening: “One may as well begin with Helen’s letters to her sister.�

But we never get too deep into anyone’s consciousness, so occasionally characters� actions seem perplexing. Sometimes you can feel Forster overworking his symbols, not letting them emerge organically. A few passages are so densely poetic that they require several readings to grasp. And the climax � in which all three families� fates intersect irrevocably � seems forced.

But you get the sense throughout that Forster is trying to root out deep human truths and question the basis of charity, forgiveness, duty and mercy. Noble goals. And there are passages of great beauty and intelligence.

Despite its period setting, the themes still feel relevant. In light of the recent economic crisis, and things like the Occupy movement, Forster's examination of the haves and the have-nots hits home powerfully.
49 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Howards End.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

March 1, 2014 – Started Reading
March 1, 2014 – Shelved
March 2, 2014 –
page 94
26.7%
March 4, 2014 –
page 122
34.66%
March 5, 2014 –
page 202
57.39%
March 7, 2014 – Finished Reading
January 29, 2015 – Shelved as: classics
January 29, 2015 – Shelved as: 1900-1960
April 26, 2015 – Shelved as: modern-library-100
May 5, 2015 – Shelved as: guardian-1000

Comments Showing 1-5 of 5 (5 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Cecily Occupy - yes, Forster was ahead of his time.


Jason Koivu Very nice review, Glenn.


Glenn Sumi Thanks Jason! That means a lot coming from you. I just read your review: "witty clouds" - ha! So true. His books do seem to dissipate from my memory, leaving a pleasant feeling. But is that enough?


Richard (on hiatus) I read this for my A Level English exam when I was 17 :)
I liked it enough to tell myself I would definitely read it again ‘for fun�. 41 years later it’s probably about time! Great review :)


Glenn Sumi Richard wrote: "I read this for my A Level English exam when I was 17 :)
I liked it enough to tell myself I would definitely read it again ‘for fun�. 41 years later it’s probably about time! Great review :)"


Thanks, Richard. I've been revisiting a few books I read as a youth (To Kill A Mockingbird, Lord Of The Flies). It's been a fascinating exercise.


back to top