Joel's Reviews > Boneshaker
Boneshaker (The Clockwork Century, #1)
by
by

Joel's review
bookshelves: 2010, 52-in-2010, library-books, sci-fi-fantasy, book-club, zzzz, clockworks, wssfbc
Jan 28, 2010
bookshelves: 2010, 52-in-2010, library-books, sci-fi-fantasy, book-club, zzzz, clockworks, wssfbc
I really wanted to like this one - my first real foray into steampunk, which I've always found aesthetically amusing, at least - but somehow, it just didn't do it for me.
I mean, it's bursting with cool stuff and sounds like it should be really fun to read: a brilliant mad scientist, an inventor of a clockwork horror that ravaged a city; an isolated alternate Seatlle surrounded by a giant wall that keeps in a deadly gas; said gas turns people into flesh-hungry zombies; the only way to get over said wall is via a Final Fantasy-style airship; a collection of hardscrabble survivalists like the gruff lady bartender with the mechanical arm and the giant enforcer covered head to toe in elaborate armor.
But somehow, none of this really grabbed me. I just kept reading, looking out for the next cool idea (the villain's lair is an interconnected series of train cars, buried underground!), but not getting involved in the story, which includes a fairly pedestrian mystery (who is the evil mad scientist?) and two dull leads (a mother's quest to save her son can probably be an interesting structure upon which to hang a zombie airship novel, but it would require interesting characters).
I don't quite get it. Priest is a fine writer, and the plot clips along, but I just found a lot of it tedious, and the "solution" to the central mystery really fizzles.
Plus I have no idea what I'm going to say when we discuss this in book club. It's not exactly deep in any sense of the word, just a fun (or not so fun, sadly) adventure.
I mean, it's bursting with cool stuff and sounds like it should be really fun to read: a brilliant mad scientist, an inventor of a clockwork horror that ravaged a city; an isolated alternate Seatlle surrounded by a giant wall that keeps in a deadly gas; said gas turns people into flesh-hungry zombies; the only way to get over said wall is via a Final Fantasy-style airship; a collection of hardscrabble survivalists like the gruff lady bartender with the mechanical arm and the giant enforcer covered head to toe in elaborate armor.
But somehow, none of this really grabbed me. I just kept reading, looking out for the next cool idea (the villain's lair is an interconnected series of train cars, buried underground!), but not getting involved in the story, which includes a fairly pedestrian mystery (who is the evil mad scientist?) and two dull leads (a mother's quest to save her son can probably be an interesting structure upon which to hang a zombie airship novel, but it would require interesting characters).
I don't quite get it. Priest is a fine writer, and the plot clips along, but I just found a lot of it tedious, and the "solution" to the central mystery really fizzles.
Plus I have no idea what I'm going to say when we discuss this in book club. It's not exactly deep in any sense of the word, just a fun (or not so fun, sadly) adventure.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Boneshaker.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
January 28, 2010
– Shelved
May 11, 2010
– Shelved as:
52-in-2010
May 11, 2010
– Shelved as:
2010
May 11, 2010
– Shelved as:
library-books
May 11, 2010
– Shelved as:
sci-fi-fantasy
May 11, 2010
– Shelved as:
book-club
Started Reading
May 19, 2010
–
Finished Reading
June 1, 2010
– Shelved as:
zzzz
July 2, 2010
– Shelved as:
clockworks
March 31, 2011
– Shelved as:
wssfbc
Comments Showing 1-18 of 18 (18 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Jasmine
(new)
Jan 25, 2011 10:59AM

reply
|
flag

some people REALLY like it.

I"m really enjoying this one
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/72...
although honestly I'm a little lost in the explanations about how steam power works.

I was generally just saying I trusted you. I mean I've discussed mieville with you. I know where you are coming from with sci fi.

if that makes sense.


I never heard of it until I saw these books, and I haven't bothered to look it up yet. Haven't bothered? I've been working more than any normal person should. Haven't gotten the chance is probably a better explanation.

usually not much effort goes into explaining how this all developed. it is really more of an aesthetic than anything else. basically, it is what the future would look like as imagined by someone living in the 1850s...
.