MJ Nicholls's Reviews > Pale Fire
Pale Fire
by
by

MJ Nicholls's review
bookshelves: novels, borscht-and-kvass, tortured-artists, penguin-classics, second-read
Jan 29, 2010
bookshelves: novels, borscht-and-kvass, tortured-artists, penguin-classics, second-read
Read 2 times. Last read November 1, 2012 to November 2, 2012.
Pale Fire presents a 999-line poem from murdered poet John Shade, followed by an unreliable commentary (and earlier intro) from his stalker and apparent chum Charles Kimbote. The commentator takes an arch tone to his union with shade, exaggerating and distorting his position in the poet’s life, and uses the space to expand on the history of his homeland Zembla in lieu of discussing the poem’s content. Upon a first reading I found the book something of an extended academic titterfest, albeit larded with the usual Nabokovian puzzles for militant close readers, and upon a second read, my opinion hasn’t changed much. The digressions on Zemblan kings and princes are (intentionally, but so what?) long-winded and dreary, and the line-by-line commentary, although amusing in places, doesn’t particularly dazzle except as a series of Vlad set-pieces, like a looser Pnin, albeit with more formal ingenuity. The poem isn’t supposed to be a spoof of bad poetry, according to Vlad biographer Brian Boyd in this boxset special edition. It ain’t half bad, that poem.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Pale Fire.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
January 29, 2010
– Shelved
October 30, 2010
– Shelved as:
novels
July 30, 2011
– Shelved as:
borscht-and-kvass
January 24, 2012
– Shelved as:
tortured-artists
July 9, 2012
– Shelved as:
penguin-classics
November 1, 2012
–
Started Reading
November 2, 2012
–
Finished Reading
October 10, 2021
– Shelved as:
second-read
Comments Showing 1-33 of 33 (33 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Nathan "N.R."
(last edited Nov 02, 2012 09:54AM)
(new)
-
added it
Nov 02, 2012 09:53AM

reply
|
flag

Sontag said what about an erotics of literature? Can't argue with iambs.

Sontag said what about an erotics of literature? Can't argue with iambs."
Which essay was that, Nathan?

Against Interpretation. I can only go so far with her on her thesis. Puma brought it to my (re)attention.

I wondered how you could rate it so low, but if you're anything like me, you rate books relative to other books by the author in question. Nabokov certainly has better books, and I'm betting you've read more of them than I have, so your rating makes sense to both of us.

Nabokov, like (Martin) Amis, varies from book to book, and always uses highly erudite, arch narrators in his novels, which can get tiresome. (Unlike Amis, who is tiresome anyway).


Not sure I follow why Brits find certain Nabokovs, i.e. this one, tedious (although Paul certainly is not helping dispel that myth).

But hey, the idea of a reissued box set of a novel is nice - with all the outtakes and alt mixes and demos. The box set for Ulysses would have to be a crate.

The box set (hyper-texted) of The Wake is currently being prepared--all of the notebooks, etc, will be linked from within the text. I suspect that there is more than one box set of Ulysses being prepared at Universities across the world.

There was the Gabler box, but Kidd took it down for a 10 count:
Now Kidd's own box set looks like it has been indefinitely delayed due to lose of "plays well with others" skills:
Meanwhile, here's a nice map of Dublin:
MJ Nicholls wrote: “Pale Fire presents a 999-line poem from murdered poet John Shade...�
Actually it is a 1000-line poem, with the last line repeated (see p.229).
Actually it is a 1000-line poem, with the last line repeated (see p.229).

Last line is omitted as far as I remember, but I don't have a copy on hand to check. Either way it's a repeat of the first line so 999 original lines. This is not a debate I thought I'd have on Xmas Eve.



The digressions on Zemblan kings and princes are (intentionally, but so what?) long-winded and dreary Yes, sir, indeed.
Unvarnished, independent review, love it.


