Jessica's Reviews > Civilization and Its Discontents
Civilization and Its Discontents
by
by

This may come as a surprise considering how much I complain about psychotherapy, but I LOVE SIGMUND FREUD. This is not just transference, and no, he doesn't remind me at all of my father; I believe Freud was a great genius, and far more importantly, that he was a fantastic writer and very interesting person. I also believe that Freud is one of the most unfairly maligned and willfully misinterpreted figures of the past hundred-or-so years.
If you haven't read him (HIM, not his theories), or if you have but your mind was so full of distracting, disparaging thoughts about how he was a sexist pig or whatever that you couldn't concentrate, I encourage you to go back and read him again. He's a lot of fun, extremely interesting, and surprisingly humorous -- check out his short piece on jokes for a good time. This book here explores dark themes and ends on a somber note, as one might expect of a European book about civilization written in 1931.
Anyway, if I were to stay up all night long talking and doing lines with any figure, alive or dead, throughout human history, there is no question in any structure of my mind who it would be.
If you haven't read him (HIM, not his theories), or if you have but your mind was so full of distracting, disparaging thoughts about how he was a sexist pig or whatever that you couldn't concentrate, I encourage you to go back and read him again. He's a lot of fun, extremely interesting, and surprisingly humorous -- check out his short piece on jokes for a good time. This book here explores dark themes and ends on a somber note, as one might expect of a European book about civilization written in 1931.
Anyway, if I were to stay up all night long talking and doing lines with any figure, alive or dead, throughout human history, there is no question in any structure of my mind who it would be.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Civilization and Its Discontents.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Started Reading
January 1, 2006
–
Finished Reading
November 11, 2007
– Shelved
December 9, 2007
– Shelved as:
groups-of-people
Comments Showing 1-19 of 19 (19 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Laura
(last edited Aug 25, 2016 01:42PM)
(new)
Nov 12, 2007 10:51AM

reply
|
flag


Sometimes it seems to me that much of the story of nineteenth century Western thought is a struggle towards these two great theories, as the last fifty years is the story of our struggle away from these two great theories.
Note - If the above sounds a little tetchy it's because I think I'm coming down with a giant cold.

Freud is a lot more fun to read than Marx, and he's most fun when approached as an author of literature, not as the founder of psychoanalysis.
In his defense, Freud's reputation suffers far more from the sins of his followers than even Marx's does. Freud gave us the unconscious, which by itself is a wonderful thing to have. He did not give us Woody Allen any more than Marx gave us the Khmer Rouge. I believe that a lot of people think he said and intended things that just weren't in his actual work, which is not to say I think the actual work is necessarily "Good" in a values kind of way, but a lot of it is "good" in a "good book" kind of way.....!
You don't sound tetchy. Take some zinc!


You know what Freud may be a bit like? The Bible. Great document, but some people take parts of it way too literally, and get carried away.

Sorry, I am trying really hard not to make fun of Freud. I know you're very serious about him. But it's funny!


I know I sound totally crazy when I talk about Freud, but it's because I have a hard time articulating what I mean, so I keep trying over and over again to get it right (a bad habit I have). The penis-envy thing is a perfect example. If it weren't for the significance of that theory, reading about it would be funny! I think it would be, anyway. What a funny idea! Hah hah hah! It's funny, isn't it? The idea that a man would think women are really deeply envious of his penis is completely hilarious.
Although as you can see from Laura's picture, it is not completely inaccurate.

Maybe this'll just sound dull and won't strike a chord with anyone else, but I really like it:
"The service rendered by intoxicating media in the struggle for happiness and in keeping misery at a distance is so highly prized as a benefit that individuals and peoples alike have given them an established place in the economics of their libido. We owe to such media not merely the immediate yield of pleasure, but also a greatly desired degree of independence from the external world. For one knows that, with the help of this 'drowner of cares' one can at any time withdraw from the pressure of reality and find refuge in a world of one's own with better conditions of sensibility. As is well known, it is precisely this property of intoxicants which also determines their danger and their injuriousness. They are responsible, in certain circumstances, for the useless waste of a large quota of energy which might have been employed for the improvement of the human lot" (p. 28).

