Lightreads's Reviews > Truth & Beauty
Truth & Beauty
by
by

Okay, I'm gonna come out and say something earnest here, in a short break from the usual foul-mouthed cynicism. I think books ought to have courage; I think memoirs, out of all books, must have courage. And this one doesn't.
This is supposed to be the story of a twenty-year friendship between two women writers, but in reality this is just a book about Lucy Grealy, the girl who lost most of her face to cancer, the eventual darling of the New York literary scene, the heroin addict. The cowardice starts there, letting this book be about Lucy, who is dead, about how larger than life and brilliant and fucked up she was, because that way Patchett never really has to tell us much more than the executive summary of herself. But it doesn't stop there. This is a book about a really long, complicated friendship, where one party clearly had serious psychological problems (Borderline Personality Disorder, at least based on this narration � seriously, you can go down a freaking checklist). It's hard to explain what I'm pointing at when I say this book lacks courage. It talks about Lucy's neediness, her clinginess, her bursts of demanding infantilism, but it's in this weird, belligerent way that says, see, I'm telling you all this to show you just how much I must have loved her. Not I loved her, so I can tell these stories now that she's gone to grieve and remember and be truthful.
Like, for example, there are a half dozen pieces of evidence scattered throughout the book that Lucy was a . . . let's say fabulist. In parts of her nonfiction, and in parts of her life. And Patchett just tosses this stuff out there and doesn't touch it, not once. I don't want to piece together evidence from a friendship/memoir/fragmented biography � I want the evidence, and I want Patchett's thoughts on it, I wanted honesty about this part of Lucy, too, along with how she submitted herself again and again to abusive surgeries. I don't want diamond clarity � that's a weird thing to want from a memoir � but I do want . . . more real participation. Reflections on Lucy that reflect Patchett, too. Something that wasn't an entire book of an apology. Something braver, because you know the most summary, cursory part of this book? The few flat lines at the end, after Lucy overdoses. This is a book all about Patchett's grief, and yet, at the last, she hides her face.
Courage. Not something easily found in grief, but I have high expectations.
Still. Lucy's excerpted letters were beautiful.
This is supposed to be the story of a twenty-year friendship between two women writers, but in reality this is just a book about Lucy Grealy, the girl who lost most of her face to cancer, the eventual darling of the New York literary scene, the heroin addict. The cowardice starts there, letting this book be about Lucy, who is dead, about how larger than life and brilliant and fucked up she was, because that way Patchett never really has to tell us much more than the executive summary of herself. But it doesn't stop there. This is a book about a really long, complicated friendship, where one party clearly had serious psychological problems (Borderline Personality Disorder, at least based on this narration � seriously, you can go down a freaking checklist). It's hard to explain what I'm pointing at when I say this book lacks courage. It talks about Lucy's neediness, her clinginess, her bursts of demanding infantilism, but it's in this weird, belligerent way that says, see, I'm telling you all this to show you just how much I must have loved her. Not I loved her, so I can tell these stories now that she's gone to grieve and remember and be truthful.
Like, for example, there are a half dozen pieces of evidence scattered throughout the book that Lucy was a . . . let's say fabulist. In parts of her nonfiction, and in parts of her life. And Patchett just tosses this stuff out there and doesn't touch it, not once. I don't want to piece together evidence from a friendship/memoir/fragmented biography � I want the evidence, and I want Patchett's thoughts on it, I wanted honesty about this part of Lucy, too, along with how she submitted herself again and again to abusive surgeries. I don't want diamond clarity � that's a weird thing to want from a memoir � but I do want . . . more real participation. Reflections on Lucy that reflect Patchett, too. Something that wasn't an entire book of an apology. Something braver, because you know the most summary, cursory part of this book? The few flat lines at the end, after Lucy overdoses. This is a book all about Patchett's grief, and yet, at the last, she hides her face.
Courage. Not something easily found in grief, but I have high expectations.
Still. Lucy's excerpted letters were beautiful.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Truth & Beauty.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Started Reading
February 1, 2010
–
Finished Reading
February 23, 2010
– Shelved
February 25, 2010
– Shelved as:
disability
February 25, 2010
– Shelved as:
memoir
February 25, 2010
– Shelved as:
nonfiction
Comments Showing 1-9 of 9 (9 new)
date
newest »



Yes, precisely! Thanks for finishing that thought for me, because I hadn't actually gotten there.

so yeah, i totally had the impression that patchett didn't go there, and you confirm it.
i would like to say, too, that you don't make a friend appear in a bad light. your review and other people's comments give to me that impression that ultimately lucy grealy appears in this memoir in a negative light, and it seems to me that one doesn't do that. if that's the only way you can write about your friend, then you shouldn't write at all.

I'm having trouble with your last paragraph, and I hope you want to elaborate. Do you think we have a responsibility to our friends to lie about them? If a friendship is based on "truth and beauty", does telling only the good things diminish the rest? Isn't truth dependent on an entire truth?
(Thanks, Lightreads, for letting me muck up your review :)

I am glad that the world is big enough for many perspectives and we don't have to align ourselves with each others to know our views are still valid.

there are a half dozen pieces of evidence scattered throughout the book that Lucy was a . . . let's say fabulist. In parts of her nonfiction, and in parts of her life. And Patchett just tosses this stuff out there and doesn't touch it, not once.
Patchett seemed to feed on Grealy's ... stories. Admitting that they weren't quite true would have destroyed everything she relied on.
If this were fiction, I'd be intrigued. As a memoir ... I was sort of grossed out.