Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Lightreads's Reviews > Truth & Beauty

Truth & Beauty by Ann Patchett
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1836077
's review

liked it
bookshelves: disability, memoir, nonfiction

Okay, I'm gonna come out and say something earnest here, in a short break from the usual foul-mouthed cynicism. I think books ought to have courage; I think memoirs, out of all books, must have courage. And this one doesn't.

This is supposed to be the story of a twenty-year friendship between two women writers, but in reality this is just a book about Lucy Grealy, the girl who lost most of her face to cancer, the eventual darling of the New York literary scene, the heroin addict. The cowardice starts there, letting this book be about Lucy, who is dead, about how larger than life and brilliant and fucked up she was, because that way Patchett never really has to tell us much more than the executive summary of herself. But it doesn't stop there. This is a book about a really long, complicated friendship, where one party clearly had serious psychological problems (Borderline Personality Disorder, at least based on this narration � seriously, you can go down a freaking checklist). It's hard to explain what I'm pointing at when I say this book lacks courage. It talks about Lucy's neediness, her clinginess, her bursts of demanding infantilism, but it's in this weird, belligerent way that says, see, I'm telling you all this to show you just how much I must have loved her. Not I loved her, so I can tell these stories now that she's gone to grieve and remember and be truthful.

Like, for example, there are a half dozen pieces of evidence scattered throughout the book that Lucy was a . . . let's say fabulist. In parts of her nonfiction, and in parts of her life. And Patchett just tosses this stuff out there and doesn't touch it, not once. I don't want to piece together evidence from a friendship/memoir/fragmented biography � I want the evidence, and I want Patchett's thoughts on it, I wanted honesty about this part of Lucy, too, along with how she submitted herself again and again to abusive surgeries. I don't want diamond clarity � that's a weird thing to want from a memoir � but I do want . . . more real participation. Reflections on Lucy that reflect Patchett, too. Something that wasn't an entire book of an apology. Something braver, because you know the most summary, cursory part of this book? The few flat lines at the end, after Lucy overdoses. This is a book all about Patchett's grief, and yet, at the last, she hides her face.

Courage. Not something easily found in grief, but I have high expectations.

Still. Lucy's excerpted letters were beautiful.
82 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Truth & Beauty.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
February 1, 2010 – Finished Reading
February 23, 2010 – Shelved
February 25, 2010 – Shelved as: disability
February 25, 2010 – Shelved as: memoir
February 25, 2010 – Shelved as: nonfiction

Comments Showing 1-9 of 9 (9 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

skein "Courage." Oh, yes. (Your review is far more polite than mine.) I felt Patchett hid throughout the whole thing. She enabled Grealy, and vice-verse I'm sure. As you said
there are a half dozen pieces of evidence scattered throughout the book that Lucy was a . . . let's say fabulist. In parts of her nonfiction, and in parts of her life. And Patchett just tosses this stuff out there and doesn't touch it, not once.
Patchett seemed to feed on Grealy's ... stories. Admitting that they weren't quite true would have destroyed everything she relied on.

If this were fiction, I'd be intrigued. As a memoir ... I was sort of grossed out.


skein What I mean is that Patchett wrote this book in the same cringing way she seemed to live through the friendship. She needed to do it, but she couldn't deal with it - the doing or the need.


Lightreads Patchett seemed to feed on Grealy's ... stories. Admitting that they weren't quite true would have destroyed everything she relied on.


Yes, precisely! Thanks for finishing that thought for me, because I hadn't actually gotten there.


message 4: by jo (last edited Feb 25, 2010 07:48PM) (new)

jo nice review. i put this on my to-read list after reading the frankly amazing Autobiography of a Face, and then, after reading here and there about it, took it out of my list and my mind. i heard an interview with michael chabon in which he says that when you are writing and something makes you cringe, that's where you gotta go. i am not sure i understand exactly what he means -- i have a feeling the things that make us cringe about ourselves are vastly different and maybe we shouldn't put them all out there for others to consume -- but, at the same time, i understand something of what he means. there are memoirs and works of autobiographical fiction that make you gasp. you think, "how did she find the courage to talk about this?" yet, at the same time, you admire the person tremendously, you don't feel an ounce of judgment against her, however shame-inducing and cringe-making what she says about herself is.

so yeah, i totally had the impression that patchett didn't go there, and you confirm it.

i would like to say, too, that you don't make a friend appear in a bad light. your review and other people's comments give to me that impression that ultimately lucy grealy appears in this memoir in a negative light, and it seems to me that one doesn't do that. if that's the only way you can write about your friend, then you shouldn't write at all.


skein Jo - I felt that Patchett presented Grealy as positively as she could, and that her disassociation from the complexity of their friendship was a direct result of her (Patchett's) inability to really process, and deal with, Grealy's complexities and nastiness. (I'm not saying Grealy was any worse than anyone else - just that Patchett seemed to want her to be perfect.)
I'm having trouble with your last paragraph, and I hope you want to elaborate. Do you think we have a responsibility to our friends to lie about them? If a friendship is based on "truth and beauty", does telling only the good things diminish the rest? Isn't truth dependent on an entire truth?

(Thanks, Lightreads, for letting me muck up your review :)


Lightreads Thanks, Leaf, I was going to make a very similar comment and never quite got to it.


message 7: by Deb (new) - rated it 5 stars

Deb W Perhaps because I am listening to this read by the author (and therefore hearing it in a different light, but I think you've been un-necessarily harsh in your review. It almost seems as if you think people you yourself have judged less than your standards should not have friends that see them differently, and you are angered by it. That's unfortunate, but entirely up to you. I am touched by Patchett's work, both this and her first novel. I am recommending it already.

I am glad that the world is big enough for many perspectives and we don't have to align ourselves with each others to know our views are still valid.


Lillian If you wanted all that from a memoir, then you should have written it yourself.


message 9: by Mary (new)

Mary I know this was many years ago, but your review just gave me an "aha" moment. I used to say I judge memoirs based on if the author reveals something negative about themselves. Because it makes it that much more real and interesting. The memoirs I've read where the author shifts blame onto everyone else and paints themselves a saint (I won't name names) have often annoyed me. But then I thought of other books, like Know My Name where that didn't happen and yet it was still incredibly well done. And now it's like you've put into words exactly what I meant. Courage. A memoir needs courage and bravery to be good. So I just wanted to thank you for writing this years ago, for me to stumble upon now and finally feel understood.


back to top