Riku Sayuj's Reviews > Forty Signs of Rain
Forty Signs of Rain (Science in the Capital, #1)
by
Glimpses Of An Ordinary Future
How would it be to live in the very near future? What will happen once we cross the rubicon, the point beyond which climate change overwhelms the Anthropocene and humans are no longer in charge of their surroundings?
We should expect high human drama under such extreme duress, right?
Wrong.
Daily life will carry on. That is what will happen.
So What’s New in The Very Near Future?
Extinction Rate in Oceans Now Faster Than on Land. Coral Reef Collapses Leading to Mass Extinctions; Thirty Percent of Warm-water Species Estimated Gone. Fishing Stocks Depleted, UN Declares Scaleback Necessary or Commercial Species Will Crash.
Nears a Million Acres a Year. Deforestation now faster in temperate than tropical forests. Only 35% of tropical forests left.
The average Indian consumes 200 kilograms of grain a year; the average American, 800 kilograms; the average Italian, 400 kilograms. The Italian diet was rated best in the world for heart disease.
300 Tons of and Plutonium Unaccounted For. High Mutation Rate of Microorganisms Near Sites. Antibiotics in Animal Feed Reduce Medical Effectiveness of Antibiotics for Humans.Ìý
Environmental estrogens suspected in lowest-ever human sperm counts. The Antarctic ice has started to break up as early as May every year.Ìý
The cycle has accelerated so much that it is now called The Hyper Nino. The Gulf Stream has begun to shut down and the water no longer sinks due to the influx of fresh water from glaciers. Europe faces a complete ice age.
Two Billion Tons of Carbon Added to the Atmosphere This Year. One of the five hottest years on record. The Fed Hopes U.S. Economy Will Grow by Four Percent in the Final Quarter.
Ìý
I was constantly reminded of the movie The Day after Tomorrow when I read this. But unlike DAT, 40 Signs is not designed as a disaster story, but as a ‘domestic comedy�, to use ’s own phrase. It is not meant to shock and awe the audience; or to use the disaster potential of sudden climate change to produce high drama. Instead it is a very subtly constructed future, achieved by sketching ordinary people from specifically selected walks of life that the audience knows are bound to be affected, and thus pays attention for tiny hints on how they have been in fact affected even as they go about their daily lives.
We soon notice that the plot advancing moments have a tendency to be connected to the changed world they live in. For example, the elevator scene shows how life, or at least the perception of daily life, has changed radically from our’s when flooding of the subway system is par for the course and does not even make the list of things to be discussed over dinner.
And thus it turns out that their lives have been altered immensely by the gathering doom -- it is just that they are now used to every incremental change and walks, almost casually, into the gathering ‘whimper� that awaits them at the end.
The Theaters of the Future
There is not much here plot wise or excitement wise compared to a the dense action of , but as always KSR makes up for it by the wealth of ideas and thoughts provoked.
The plot operates mostly in what KSR clearly considers to be the Theaters of the Future - Science & Politics. In fact, a core sub-plots of the book, and one of the key ideas in it, is about the Paradigm Shift (yup, Kuhn again) that has to occur in the field of science to make the scientists aware of their political responsibility. He says that an unfortunate repercussion of the World Wars' political promotion of science was that this overt politicization of Science led to an almost knee-jerk reaction -- the scientific community withdrew almost entirely from politics and took a much more ’neutral� role. This meant that they no longer get directly involved in important political questions and so a vital and authoritative voice that can save humanity is lost to us. This has to change.
A Disaster Too Slow
Of course, most of the characters are scientists or politicians, and all of them have adequate information, theories and concerns, and fully appreciates the threat that global warming poses, but they just can't seem to awaken a Day After Tomorrow sort of urgency in their lives.
No matter how fast climate change occurs, it is not fast enough to not let us say ‘let us get used to this�, and to postpone decisive action for later.
The disasters just cannot strike fast enough for them to really act!
The most environmentally aware and empathetic politician in the book has this to say even as world falls apart around him:
Then the words burst out of Charlie: “So Phil! Are you going to do something about global warming now?�
Phil grinned his beautiful grin. “I’ll see what I can do!�
by

Riku Sayuj's review
bookshelves: ecology, genre-fiction, insti-crit, pop-science, r-r-rs, science-gen
Jun 02, 2014
bookshelves: ecology, genre-fiction, insti-crit, pop-science, r-r-rs, science-gen
Glimpses Of An Ordinary Future
How would it be to live in the very near future? What will happen once we cross the rubicon, the point beyond which climate change overwhelms the Anthropocene and humans are no longer in charge of their surroundings?
We should expect high human drama under such extreme duress, right?
Wrong.
Daily life will carry on. That is what will happen.
So What’s New in The Very Near Future?
Extinction Rate in Oceans Now Faster Than on Land. Coral Reef Collapses Leading to Mass Extinctions; Thirty Percent of Warm-water Species Estimated Gone. Fishing Stocks Depleted, UN Declares Scaleback Necessary or Commercial Species Will Crash.
Nears a Million Acres a Year. Deforestation now faster in temperate than tropical forests. Only 35% of tropical forests left.
The average Indian consumes 200 kilograms of grain a year; the average American, 800 kilograms; the average Italian, 400 kilograms. The Italian diet was rated best in the world for heart disease.
300 Tons of and Plutonium Unaccounted For. High Mutation Rate of Microorganisms Near Sites. Antibiotics in Animal Feed Reduce Medical Effectiveness of Antibiotics for Humans.Ìý
Environmental estrogens suspected in lowest-ever human sperm counts. The Antarctic ice has started to break up as early as May every year.Ìý
The cycle has accelerated so much that it is now called The Hyper Nino. The Gulf Stream has begun to shut down and the water no longer sinks due to the influx of fresh water from glaciers. Europe faces a complete ice age.
Two Billion Tons of Carbon Added to the Atmosphere This Year. One of the five hottest years on record. The Fed Hopes U.S. Economy Will Grow by Four Percent in the Final Quarter.
Ìý
I was constantly reminded of the movie The Day after Tomorrow when I read this. But unlike DAT, 40 Signs is not designed as a disaster story, but as a ‘domestic comedy�, to use ’s own phrase. It is not meant to shock and awe the audience; or to use the disaster potential of sudden climate change to produce high drama. Instead it is a very subtly constructed future, achieved by sketching ordinary people from specifically selected walks of life that the audience knows are bound to be affected, and thus pays attention for tiny hints on how they have been in fact affected even as they go about their daily lives.
We soon notice that the plot advancing moments have a tendency to be connected to the changed world they live in. For example, the elevator scene shows how life, or at least the perception of daily life, has changed radically from our’s when flooding of the subway system is par for the course and does not even make the list of things to be discussed over dinner.
And thus it turns out that their lives have been altered immensely by the gathering doom -- it is just that they are now used to every incremental change and walks, almost casually, into the gathering ‘whimper� that awaits them at the end.
The Theaters of the Future
There is not much here plot wise or excitement wise compared to a the dense action of , but as always KSR makes up for it by the wealth of ideas and thoughts provoked.
The plot operates mostly in what KSR clearly considers to be the Theaters of the Future - Science & Politics. In fact, a core sub-plots of the book, and one of the key ideas in it, is about the Paradigm Shift (yup, Kuhn again) that has to occur in the field of science to make the scientists aware of their political responsibility. He says that an unfortunate repercussion of the World Wars' political promotion of science was that this overt politicization of Science led to an almost knee-jerk reaction -- the scientific community withdrew almost entirely from politics and took a much more ’neutral� role. This meant that they no longer get directly involved in important political questions and so a vital and authoritative voice that can save humanity is lost to us. This has to change.
A Disaster Too Slow
Of course, most of the characters are scientists or politicians, and all of them have adequate information, theories and concerns, and fully appreciates the threat that global warming poses, but they just can't seem to awaken a Day After Tomorrow sort of urgency in their lives.
No matter how fast climate change occurs, it is not fast enough to not let us say ‘let us get used to this�, and to postpone decisive action for later.
The disasters just cannot strike fast enough for them to really act!
The most environmentally aware and empathetic politician in the book has this to say even as world falls apart around him:
Then the words burst out of Charlie: “So Phil! Are you going to do something about global warming now?�
Phil grinned his beautiful grin. “I’ll see what I can do!�
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Forty Signs of Rain.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
April 29, 2014
–
Started Reading
June 2, 2014
– Shelved as:
to-read
June 2, 2014
– Shelved
June 2, 2014
– Shelved as:
ecology
June 2, 2014
– Shelved as:
genre-fiction
June 2, 2014
– Shelved as:
insti-crit
June 2, 2014
– Shelved as:
r-r-rs
June 2, 2014
– Shelved as:
pop-science
June 2, 2014
– Shelved as:
science-gen
June 2, 2014
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-17 of 17 (17 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Sue
(new)
Jun 02, 2014 11:08AM

reply
|
flag

Oh no. It can never be real enough or scary enough. Real and scary is what is needed. I would never deduct stars for that. Three stars only because it is a novel and it was expected to grip me. It was in fact just an elaborate set up for the next book. Have to see how that unfolds.


I need to catch that episode. I would love to indulge in some slapping too! Though I have been developing my own methods of convincing mild skeptics, I am sure the NDT ammo will always be handy.

Mild skeptics can be swayed. It's been found that it is simply a waste of time to even talk to the "Dismissive" (see ), unless you have nothing better to do; nothing will be achieved. (Googling "six americas" will produce many other references.)
But things could be different in India for sure, no particular reason to suppose that the same six types occur in other cultures.

That was episode 12 I guess? I missed it last night but can catch it on Nat. Geo. tonight.

I think the scale could be pretty universal. I am sure I have met people along the entire spectrum.
You are right about talking to the 'dismissive' being a waste of time, but then what should we do? Especially when the 'dismissive' guy is in a position of influence? (this is also an important point in the novel - the dismissive important person being the President's scientific advisor!)

In the ultimate backed-into-the corner scenario that the novel suggests, I suppose the only recourse would be (a) giving up, (b) removal of the obstacle, (c) removal of the government.
There's always (d) keep talking, but you get into the possibility that "Rome burns while you listen to the fiddler, trying to talk him into changing instruments".
There are really no good answers, just the lesser of evils maybe.
I need to read the book, and of course the other two parts will supply some sort of resolution, for good or ill.
BTW, am I correct in assuming that the three star rating is basically a judgement of "literary" merit (plot, characters, dialogue, suspense, etc), rather than a judgement on the assumed reality behind the story? Narratives of the future are always difficult to judge highly, I think, especially when the writer has an "agenda" on his mind, as here.

Gore used the metaphor of the frog in a slowly heating pot of water not realizing the danger of being cooked in his "Inconvenient Truth". I didn't realize how frequently the parable has been used over time:
I appreciate Robinson's focus on human elements in his stories and not on extreme drama. But I am so jaded from space opera and trillers, it's hard for me to get excited by his books. The sense of wonder and power of human collaboration in there in is terraforming Mars series; still, I didn't finish it.

Gore used the metaphor of the frog in a slowly heating pot of water not realizing the danger of being cooked in his "Inconvenie..."
Perhaps his The years of rice and salt would appeal, Michael. I wouldn't call it SF, rather alternate history over the past thousand years or so, and does focus on human elements in an interesting way.

Absolutely. As far as ideas and scenario-building goes, I am fully with KSR. I think the book is quite realistic and also the fact that it is the 'very near' future means that there is nothing fundamentally different about the world of the book, say in terms of tech, ethnicity, politics, etc.
The only thing that has changed is the climate -- and the message is that climate is capable of changing faster than everything else. Now that we have set it in motion, how do we keep up?
I like the analogy to the fiddler! You are right, the options are too limited and keeping talking only limits them further by taking away time. But I am still convinced that the 'dismissive' ones are so because they feel they have no personal stake in the matter, and that is what any discussion has to address...

Gore used the metaphor of the frog in a slowly heating pot of water not realizing the danger of being cooked in his "Inconvenie..."
It is one of the most common metaphors to talk of slow change. And very effective too!
I always enjoy KSR's detailing of his worlds and the scientific rigor he brings to his novels, but somehow the actual characters hardly captures me. KSR's real heroes are the ideas, the characters are only props.
The only problem is that this makes it almost impossible to resist picking up his books and also very difficult to go on to the second book of any series. I can't explain it. But that is how it is. My extreme curiosity always vanishes after the first book of any of his series. Same thing happened with The Mars Trilogy, which is stalled after Red Mars, in spite of it being quite an amazing read.
The next one I am feeling burning curiosity for is: Shaman

Thanks, Jon! I hope that was not a variation on the closing line of the review!


Thanks, Brendon! I don't see myself reading the next book soon... I wanted to know what KSR would do with the premise and now that I know his method, I am not too interested in what actually happens in the fictional world.