Cecily's Reviews > Wild Swans: Three Daughters of China
Wild Swans: Three Daughters of China
by
by

�Father is close, Mother is close, but neither is as close as Chairman Mao.�
A fascinating description of one family's experiences of China's political upheavals across the 20th century, focusing on Jung Chang’s grandmother, mother, and then herself.
Although the family are fairly privileged much of the time, they still experience great hardships: being a Party member, or even Party official, was no guarantee of immunity from persecution and sometimes torture.
Hard to categorise - but don’t be daunted
It's part biography/autobiography and part a historical/ political/ psychological exposition of how Communist China came into being and how it maintained its hold on its citizens, even during extreme hardship, such as famine. However, it has the readability of a novel, eschewing sheer horror and dry history - quite an achievement.
This book can seem daunting because of its size, subject matter and fame, but it's actually a riveting read and although some of the content is harrowing, the writing style is very easy going. It is a complex story, but it is not confusing.
It's subtitled "Three daughters of China", but it’s a story for everyone. Strong women are in the foreground, but one of the most powerfully drawn characters is Jung Chang's father: born poor, largely self-educated, who loved literature, was a passionate and principled Communist (putting Party before family), rising to power as an official, but who couldn't cope when he saw his beliefs being violated in the name of the Party.
Contradictions inherent in the system
�They verbally attacked each other with Mao's quotations, making cynical use of his guru-like elusiveness - it was easy to select a quotation of Mao's to suit any situation, or even both sides of the same argument.�
Although I have read quite a few books about China, this one gets to the heart of the contradictions of The Party and how to brainwash a vast nation far better than many others. When Jung Chang subsequently wrote a biography of Mao, she'd already done much of the groundwork in Wild Swans.
Brutality and hypocrisy of various kinds are described, but it's some of the subtler hardships that were especially vivid. I find it extraordinary that strong family ties could coexist with couples not allowed to live together and an apparent casualness/resignation of children left to live with wet nurses, relatives or in boarding nurseries for years.

Image: Scene from The Red Detachment of Women, one of the Eight Model Operas of the Cultural Revolution (.)
During the Cultural Revolution, which began when Jung Chan was a teenager, ignorance was glorified (even in universities) and beautiful artefacts destroyed; the family were expelled from the official compound and sent to live in rooms in an old mansion:
"Beauty was so despised that my family was sent to this lovely house as a punishment."
Unexpected levity
There is humour too: sending those studying English to a southern port to practise by talking to foreign sailors; not being able to rename a street whose sign was too high, and traffic chaos when it was decided that red was a positive colour so oughtn't to mean "stop"!
The extraordinary degree of organisation in some aspects of life and none in others aligned with my expectations, but also highlighted contradictions, such as being sent to "learn" from the peasants, with no guidance as to what was to be learnt, nor account of the peasants not wanting extra mouths attached to not very useful hands.
Flaws
The main problems are minor, but nonetheless irritating.
* Although the political history is explained very well, because it is also autobiographical, important events that didn't affect the family (such as the Long March) are barely mentioned and this is where its confused identity between biography and political text book are a weakness.
* People refer to others by relationship ("my mother", "my father's mother in law" etc), which is confusing when different characters talk about their relatives, without using names.
* Some passages sound clichéd; that is partly because I have read many other books on similar subjects, but it is also because at times the writing style actually is somewhat banal.
Nevertheless, this is an insightful, accessible, and enjoyable book.
Horror and hope
There are many horrors in this book (though generally not graphically described), but I didn't find it depressing: the indomitable spirit of many of the people, coupled with the fact I know Jung Chang is now happy and successful, give an air of hope.
Freedom?
China's people are still far from free, but having read this book and travelled round China in '92 and '08, the transformation is remarkable - and ongoing. It’s a crowded country, but also one of tranquil beauty.

Image: The calm of Shennong Stream (a tributary of the Yangtze), April 2008
A fascinating description of one family's experiences of China's political upheavals across the 20th century, focusing on Jung Chang’s grandmother, mother, and then herself.
Although the family are fairly privileged much of the time, they still experience great hardships: being a Party member, or even Party official, was no guarantee of immunity from persecution and sometimes torture.
Hard to categorise - but don’t be daunted
It's part biography/autobiography and part a historical/ political/ psychological exposition of how Communist China came into being and how it maintained its hold on its citizens, even during extreme hardship, such as famine. However, it has the readability of a novel, eschewing sheer horror and dry history - quite an achievement.
This book can seem daunting because of its size, subject matter and fame, but it's actually a riveting read and although some of the content is harrowing, the writing style is very easy going. It is a complex story, but it is not confusing.
It's subtitled "Three daughters of China", but it’s a story for everyone. Strong women are in the foreground, but one of the most powerfully drawn characters is Jung Chang's father: born poor, largely self-educated, who loved literature, was a passionate and principled Communist (putting Party before family), rising to power as an official, but who couldn't cope when he saw his beliefs being violated in the name of the Party.
Contradictions inherent in the system
�They verbally attacked each other with Mao's quotations, making cynical use of his guru-like elusiveness - it was easy to select a quotation of Mao's to suit any situation, or even both sides of the same argument.�
Although I have read quite a few books about China, this one gets to the heart of the contradictions of The Party and how to brainwash a vast nation far better than many others. When Jung Chang subsequently wrote a biography of Mao, she'd already done much of the groundwork in Wild Swans.
Brutality and hypocrisy of various kinds are described, but it's some of the subtler hardships that were especially vivid. I find it extraordinary that strong family ties could coexist with couples not allowed to live together and an apparent casualness/resignation of children left to live with wet nurses, relatives or in boarding nurseries for years.

Image: Scene from The Red Detachment of Women, one of the Eight Model Operas of the Cultural Revolution (.)
During the Cultural Revolution, which began when Jung Chan was a teenager, ignorance was glorified (even in universities) and beautiful artefacts destroyed; the family were expelled from the official compound and sent to live in rooms in an old mansion:
"Beauty was so despised that my family was sent to this lovely house as a punishment."
Unexpected levity
There is humour too: sending those studying English to a southern port to practise by talking to foreign sailors; not being able to rename a street whose sign was too high, and traffic chaos when it was decided that red was a positive colour so oughtn't to mean "stop"!
The extraordinary degree of organisation in some aspects of life and none in others aligned with my expectations, but also highlighted contradictions, such as being sent to "learn" from the peasants, with no guidance as to what was to be learnt, nor account of the peasants not wanting extra mouths attached to not very useful hands.
Flaws
The main problems are minor, but nonetheless irritating.
* Although the political history is explained very well, because it is also autobiographical, important events that didn't affect the family (such as the Long March) are barely mentioned and this is where its confused identity between biography and political text book are a weakness.
* People refer to others by relationship ("my mother", "my father's mother in law" etc), which is confusing when different characters talk about their relatives, without using names.
* Some passages sound clichéd; that is partly because I have read many other books on similar subjects, but it is also because at times the writing style actually is somewhat banal.
Nevertheless, this is an insightful, accessible, and enjoyable book.
Horror and hope
There are many horrors in this book (though generally not graphically described), but I didn't find it depressing: the indomitable spirit of many of the people, coupled with the fact I know Jung Chang is now happy and successful, give an air of hope.
Freedom?
China's people are still far from free, but having read this book and travelled round China in '92 and '08, the transformation is remarkable - and ongoing. It’s a crowded country, but also one of tranquil beauty.

Image: The calm of Shennong Stream (a tributary of the Yangtze), April 2008
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Wild Swans.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
March 25, 2010
–
Started Reading
March 25, 2010
– Shelved
March 25, 2010
– Shelved as:
biog-and-autobiog
Finished Reading
January 12, 2014
– Shelved as:
china-japan-asia
March 25, 2020
– Shelved as:
politics
Comments Showing 1-19 of 19 (19 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Caroline
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Jan 19, 2013 08:57AM

reply
|
flag



A bit more than a decade ago, Cecily. I read it shortly after it was first published in 1991!

I find it extraordinary that strong family ties could coexist with couples not allowed to live together and an apparent casualness/resignation of children left to live with wet nurses, relatives or in boarding nurseries for years.
I actually know of a few modern families who have their children, as young as toddler age, partially raised by grandparents in their homelands for the sake of cultural immersion. I wonder if this practice alienates the child from bonding with their parents later in life.

I read this properly a few years ago, but dipped in again because I was reading Litte White Duck (which I reviewed here: /review/show...), and then ended up rewriting this review as well.
Alfred wrote: "I actually know of a few modern families who have their children, as young as toddler age, partially raised by grandparents in their homelands for the sake of cultural immersion. I wonder if this practice alienates the child from bonding with their parents later in life."
Toddlers, and by choice?! That seems sad to me, even when it's still within the family. But without knowing the circumstances, I wouldn't judge individuals.
Even if it's common within their family and their community in both countries, it has to make it harder to bond with parents. I went to boarding school from 11 to 18, in my home country. I always knew I would, and I was broadly happy, but a significant minority of my fellow pupils still bear the emotional scars.

Yeah, I think that's true with some families if the family dynamics thrive on being physically together and often, for bonding to occur. I think culture (maybe class too? Particularly higher classes?) may be a huge influence on the relationships within a nuclear family. For some of my Chinese (as in China-born) friends, they are not that close to their parents, or they may be close to one parent (or grandparent) but very distant with the other, even if they had all lived together as a family their entire childhood. Particularly if demonstration of affection and any show of "softness" is frowned upon and discouraged. The relationship becomes very formal, but the foundation is still strong even through it's not built on bonding and affection, but upon expectations of filial piety, respect for elders, tradition, that sort of thing, that's more duty-bound than emotionally cultivated.
So, I think when families send their very young child away to be raised by grandparents, they can bring themselves to believe that bond isn't necessary because all the other things important to their family culture-wise and duty-wise would be intact no matter the distance and time apart.
Anyway, I don't know from personal childhood experience but only from limited observations.

I think the important thing is to have a close, long-term bond with at least one care-giver. Many grandparents are at least as able to do that as parents, so the child may be OK, but the parents lose out. But I guess they have their turn a generation later. And at least it's family, unlike boarding school.


Fine to ask, and I'm happy to share. My personal experiences were late 70s to early 80s, though I know a bit about how things have changed since.
Alfred wrote: "Do regulations allow visitations (both to/from home) anytime? I've never resided in a full-fledged boarding facility but only in dorms with minimal supervision and few house rules."
Presumably that was at college/uni, so you were nearly adults? Very different from being aged 11.
Anyway, back then, there was no visiting, you were allowed home two weekends per term (three terms per year) and out somewhere else for one more. New girls weren't allowed out at all for the first few weeks, to let them settle. No mobiles phones, but a single payphone in the hall, with limited opportunity to use it. We had to write home every weekend (though at least a couple of times I put an empty envelope in the out box!). These days, most boarding schools allow flexi-boarding (odd nights, whenever) and weekly boarding (Monday to Thursday), though those are no use to those who live far away, and we had quite a lot from overseas.
I was never told I would go to boarding school because it was just assumed, as it's what most people we knew did, even though my parents couldn't afford it, so my grandmother paid half for my brother and me.
My school was half daygirls and half boarders, and the two groups didn't mix much. It had four boarding houses for girls aged 11-16 (between 35 and 70 in each house) and another for 16-18, each with a housemistress and matron, who were solely responsible for pastoral and domestic care; they weren't teachers. We slept in rooms (what we call dorms) of between two and six girls (all were doubles in the 16-18 one), so it was fairly small and friendly. But it was VERY basic: unsprung beds with thin horsehair mattresses, no central heating, and one 15-minute bath slot three times a week (no showers anywhere, not even after sports). We moaned a bit, but were used to it. What was more bothersome was the lack of things to do at weekends, as we weren't even allowed out to town until 16+, and TV was limited. These days, they have lots of activities and trips.
Alfred wrote: ".... But more importantly, I made some friends for life."
I was pretty happy there, but my family was fairly fractured and dysfunctional, and it was only 30 miles from home. My closest friends are from that time - more than those from uni.
But there's a cost for some. I don't think there was any abuse there, but nevertheless, it was a damaging environment for a few - quite a few. There was some bullying (as there is in all schools), that was ignored. There was a lot of anorexia, but there was never any support or intervention until it was far gone. And too many others suffer mental ill health even now that they attribute, at least in part, to being sent away to board. I guess some of those would have had problems even at day school, but boarding probably made it worse.
As a parent, the idea of choosing to have a child and choosing to send them away most of the time, seemed very odd, barring a few specific circumstances. We wouldn't have considered it, even if we could have afforded it.
Even so, I was fortunate to be happy.
And if there's anything else you want to know, do ask.

I was just curious, that's all. Boarding schools seem a very British thing. They exist in the US too, for sure, but maybe more for specialty programs? I don't know enough. And might I add, your descriptions are so Mallory Towers and St Clare's (sans bullying)! (Enid Blyton fan here.)
And yes, at uni.

It was fine to ask. It would have been fine for me to decline to say much. But I was happy there, and am happy to talk about it.
Alfred wrote: "Boarding schools seem a very British thing. They exist in the US too, for sure, but maybe more for specialty programs?..."
I think that's broadly true. British boarding schools are a very small proportion of our education system: they're private/fee-charging schools (a sector that covers ~8% of pupils, but including many at day schools), and most are only "speciality programs" in the sense of needing to pass an entrance exam. Traditionally, they're single-sex, though many are now co-ed.
You mention Malory Towers: I did read those a couple of years before going, and was disappointed at the time that real life wasn't as exciting as that, but in general they weren't far off. We were certainly never as racy as the St Trinian's crowd! I doubt many children read Malory Towers now, but those who've grown up on Harry Potter are likely to be more disappointed than I was.

Thanks, Jessaka. Although aspects of the story are harrowing, in some ways, it's one of the easiest 800 pages I've read.


Thanks, HoodStyled. It also makes me wonder what aspects of my time and place would be of interest to subsequent generations, or rather, it would have done 18 months ago...