Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Lani's Reviews > Gloriana, or The Unfulfill'd Queen

Gloriana, or The Unfulfill'd Queen by Michael Moorcock
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
247896
's review

it was ok
bookshelves: historicalfiction, fantasy, kindle, chicklit

I slogged through the first half of this book with little interest. There was so much exposition with so little action, and characters were piled on. An interesting setting - within the walls of the palace - was introduced, but it didn't really go anywhere.

Finally, almost two-thirds of the way through, plots started to thicken, irrelevant characters started to show up, THINGS HAPPENED.

So the book went from a total loss to a 'meh'. Looking back on the book, I'm mostly disappointed by what could have been. The idea of a subterranean between the walls second city is awesome, but is merely used as a plot device, barely explored. A cave of a seraglio, treated the same. A mad woman with ties to the story that come up in the last 20 pages? Wasted. A denizen of the hidden city who observes everything and has a cute cat for a sidekick? I want a whole book about him! Two minor chracters betrayed, corrupted, and then some betrayal of their own. But again, mere plot devices that enter and exit as needed with little exposition.

Ultimately I found myself interested in the world that wasn't addressed by this book. The court intrigue and the queen were boring. The climax (haha) of the book that tied everything together was practically independent of the rest of the story. It felt tacked on and rushed.

My edition (the Kindle) had an afterword by Moorcock describing his influences and nods to classic literature. Maybe if I had read those books I would've seen the subtle satire he is apparently working with. His afterword also addresses the last chapter and its rape scene that was later rewritten. I found it interesting that this edition included both endings but kept the original (offensive) while adding the rewrite as an appendix. Odd. I did find the original rather obnoxious, but found the rewrite just as condescending in its own way.

I know this is something of a modern classic, but the descriptions of it set the stage for a much more exciting book than it really is. It's a clever idea with potential for sexy, opulent writing about grimy underworld characters mixing with the strait-laced and proper court with a dark streak. But it falls pathetically flat with long-winded writing and little action for 200 pages.
3 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Gloriana, or The Unfulfill'd Queen.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

November 29, 2007 – Shelved
November 29, 2007 – Shelved as: historicalfiction
November 29, 2007 – Shelved as: fantasy
February 8, 2011 – Started Reading
February 8, 2011 – Shelved as: kindle
February 13, 2011 –
page 200
40.32% "This book is stupid. The writing is stilted and distant. Not a single character I care about - and too many have been introduced already - and the descriptions of the lush regal settings or their lower class derelict counterparts are lifeless. But I bought it and am going to force myself to keep reading. Ugh. Maybe something will happen eventually."
February 18, 2011 –
page 350
70.56% "Two-thirds of the way through the book and THINGS ARE HAPPENING."
February 18, 2011 – Finished Reading
February 20, 2011 – Shelved as: chicklit

Comments Showing 1-6 of 6 (6 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Carol Storm You're right, this book is way too long, slow, decadent and stale at the same time.


Lani Ooh, stale! Very good word for it! It's sad, the ideas and (some of) the characters are so intriguing!


Carol Storm It's so strange how minor characters, like Countess Una and Lady Mary, are much more likeable than Gloriana. And Captain Quire . . . ick. Just ick!


Lani Lily wrote: "It's so strange how minor characters, like Countess Una and Lady Mary, are much more likeable than Gloriana. And Captain Quire . . . ick. Just ick!"

Yes, I was totally interested in Una! She was probably the only court person I found really intriguing. And as I mentioned in the review, just about every non-court character sounded fascinating.

The main characters were not only unpleasant people, but just BORING characters!


Carol Storm Una was lovely, but I liked Lady Mary Perrott too. Where she got killed was where I really started to hate the book!


Jorge Villarruel I would prefer a book that is offensive than one that is condescending.

And for me, Quire was the best character, I really liked him (I'd hate him in real life, but this is fiction and I liked him because he was a good character, not because he was evil.)


back to top