Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Samadrita's Reviews > The Rainbow

The Rainbow by D.H. Lawrence
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
13266158
Nowhere else within the broad realm of literature have I come across such beauteous turns of phrase devoted to exploring the many dimensions of sexual desire. In fact, I cannot cease to wonder how Lawrence manages to convey the intensity and intimacy of a kiss and a caress so effectually without deploying any explicit terms. His men and women are often capricious creatures of instinct and restless, stubborn adherents of their inexorable self will which causes them to be in conflict - even if tenuously - with the world circumscribing them. And carnal love emerges as the only authentic religious force capable of exalting the unsatisfied, solitary halves to a state of spiritual communion and fulfillment.
His pride was bolstered up, his blood ran once more in pride. But there was no core to him: as a distinct male he had no core. His triumphant, flaming, overweening heart of the intrinsic male would never beat again. He would be subject now, reciprocal, never the indomitable thing with a core of overweening, unabateable fire. She had abated that fire, she had broken him.

Multigenerational family sagas usually employ some common thread that binds together the disparate story arcs and subplots - presumably some long suppressed odious family secret, the effect of the altering milieu on evolving family dynamics, the denuding influence of time on family fortunes. And yet Lawrence's account of the Brangwen family is refreshingly free of any such cliched thematic glue.
Instead, the narrative sprawls across a wide swath of years, leisurely routing its way through the rituals of marriages, motherhood, and ambivalent father-daughter bonds to eventually usher us into Ursula Brangwen's vibrant inner world which serves as the site of a perennial dispute between indefatigable individualism and the urge to live up to societal expectations. Even though the sexual politics of Tom and Lydia and Will and Anna Brangwen's marriages are flayed open and dissected with a psychoanalytic precision, it is not until heroine Ursula steps into the embrace of nubile adolescence that I was able to determine a common running theme of an existential tussle between the sexes for supremacy and control.
The men placed in her hands their own conscience, they said to her "Be my conscience-keeper, be the angel at the doorway guarding my outgoing and my incoming." And the woman fulfilled her trust, the men rested implicitly in her, receiving her praise or her blame with pleasure or with anger, rebeling and storming, but never for a moment really escaping in their own souls from her prerogative.

That Lawrence chose to re-create the persisting friction between one's individuality and the need to fit into some generic pre-ordained role set aside for one by society from a predominantly female perspective is evident from the discernible narrative focus on wonderfully humanized female characters. It is the Brangwen women who shield their private inner lives from external interference with a zealous certitude, sometimes even at the expense of emotionally alienating their fathers and husbands. They are unafraid to seek personal sexual gratification both in and out of wedlock. Lydia's faltering attempts at making peace between an irreconcilable past and present, Anna Brangwen's pertinacious rejection of her husband's religiosity coupled with her unabashed celebration of her own fecundity and the bildungsroman-ish account of Ursula's first acquaintance with sexual love and adult responsibilities complement Tom and Will Brangwen's and Skrebensky's viewpoints to create a picture portraying the truth of men and women locked in a contest of self assertion. A battle in which either adversary is eventually conquered by a desire for spiritual consummation transcending the individual's need for validation.
So it went on continually, the recurrence of love and conflict between them. One day it seemed as if everything was shattered, all life spoiled, ruined, desolate and laid waste. The next day it was all marvellous again, just marvellous.

That I have refrained from giving this the full 5 stars can in part be attributed to the raw lushness of Lawrence's prose and excessive reliance on florid metaphors which often suffocated me, dulling my desire to continue reading. Besides Ursula and Gudrun's stories remain to be told in entirety. Only after Women in Love can I decide on a final comment on the Brangwen saga.
101 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read The Rainbow.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

June 24, 2014 – Shelved
June 24, 2014 – Shelved as: on-the-radar
June 24, 2014 – Shelved as: britain
June 24, 2014 – Shelved as: european-literature
June 24, 2014 – Shelved as: timeless-classics
June 24, 2014 – Shelved as: romance
June 24, 2014 – Shelved as: human-drama
February 1, 2016 – Started Reading
February 2, 2016 –
page 1
0.3% "There was a look in the eyes of the Brangwens as if they were expecting something unknown, about which they were eager. They had that air of readiness for what would come to them, a kind of surety, an expectancy, the look of an inheritor."
February 16, 2016 –
page 33
9.79% "She knew she would die like an early, colourless, scent-less flower that the end of the winter puts forth mercilessly. And she wanted to harbour her modicum of twinkling life."
February 20, 2016 –
page 85
25.22% "In her world, there was this one tense, vivid body of a man, and then many other shadowy men, all unreal. In him, she touched the centre of reality. And they were together, he and she, at the heart of the secret."
February 24, 2016 –
page 117
34.72% ""It is impudence to say that Woman was made out of Man's body," she continued, "when every man is born of woman. What impudence men have, what arrogance!""
March 2, 2016 –
page 146
43.32% "...they would often sit together, talking desultorily. What was really between them they could not utter. Their words were only accidents in the mutual silence."
March 6, 2016 – Shelved as: slice-of-life
March 6, 2016 –
page 183
54.3% "Wherever she was, at school, among friends, in the street, in the train, she instinctively abated herself, made herself smaller, feigned to be less than she was, for fear that her undiscovered self should be seen, pounced upon, attacked by brutish resentment of the commonplace, the average Self."
March 21, 2016 –
page 221
65.58% "The idea of war altogether made her feel uneasy, uneasy. When men began organized fighting with each other it seemed to her as if the poles of the universe were cracking, and the whole might go tumbling into the bottomless pit. A horrible bottomless feeling she had. Yet of course there was the minted superscription of romance and honour and even religion about war. She was very confused."
March 31, 2016 –
page 276
81.9% "...she was not going to be made nought, no, neither by them, nor by Mr. Harby, nor by all the system around her. She was not going to be put down, prevented from standing free. It was not to be said of her, she could not take her place and carry out her task. She would fight and hold her place in this state also, in the world of work and man's convention."
March 31, 2016 – Shelved as: feminism-feminist-undertones
April 1, 2016 – Shelved as: cherished
April 1, 2016 – Shelved as: erotica
April 1, 2016 – Shelved as: semi-favorites
April 1, 2016 – Shelved as: behemoth
April 1, 2016 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-29 of 29 (29 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Violet wells Fabulous review, Samadrita. Just hope you enjoy Women in Love more than i did when I recently reread it!


message 2: by Bloodorange (new)

Bloodorange Thank you for this review, Samadrita. I'm not sure at the moment whether I want to attempt reading The Rainbow, but you make it sound like a good book to begin reading Lawrence with.


message 3: by Dolors (last edited Apr 05, 2016 09:11AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Dolors "A battle in which either adversary is eventually conquered by a desire for spiritual consummation transcending the individual's need for validation."

This review is replete with eloquent remarks like the quoted above, Sama.... I could actually copy-paste the whole text and spend the whole night praising your choice of words that so adroitly give life to the perfectly exposed train of thoughts.
Lawrence's exuberant prose can become tiresome; the biblical imagery somehow confusing, his baffling oxymorons repetitive, but I have always considered his quest to elevate desire, carnal or platonic, to the divine to be quintessentially human.
You make his work more than justice; and once more I stand in awe of your gift to make any complex idea come across effortlessly with elegant articulation. Thank you, Sama - I wish I could re-like this review!-
(view spoiler)


message 4: by Ilse (new) - added it

Ilse Exquisite write-up, Samadrita, I'd love to meet the female characters you so eloquently present here. I didn't get to Lawrence yet, but the gorgeous vitality that springs from your words is so tempting that I feel to need to alter that soon.


Samadrita Violet wrote: "Fabulous review, Samadrita. Just hope you enjoy Women in Love more than i did when I recently reread it!"

I hope so too, Violet. I started to enjoy this one after Ursula's perspective came to occupy centre stage.


Samadrita Bloodorange wrote: "Thank you for this review, Samadrita. I'm not sure at the moment whether I want to attempt reading The Rainbow, but you make it sound like a good book to begin reading Lawrence with."

I think the Brangwen books constitute some of Lawrence's best writing if critical opinion is to be considered. You might like this one, BO.


message 7: by Samadrita (last edited Apr 05, 2016 08:45AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Samadrita Dolors wrote: ""A battle in which either adversary is eventually conquered by a desire for spiritual consummation transcending the individual's need for validation."

This review is replete with eloquent remarks ..."


I'm relieved you think I did justice to your favorite Lawrence work, D. I was very much looking forward to knowing what you might think of my analysis. Also, I might have ignorantly chosen some other Lawrence to make my first had I not come across Steve's and your exquisite reviews of this one. And I am mighty thankful I made this my introduction to Lawrence's style. Most Biblical allusions in literary works sneak past me unnoticed because of my lack of knowledge of the Bible (which I must remedy some time soon) but I was still able to understand Lawrence's preoccupation with man-woman relationships which comes through beautifully in this work. Thank you once again for your kind words of assurance, Dolors. On to 'Women in Love'.


Samadrita Ilse wrote: "Exquisite write-up, Samadrita, I'd love to meet the female characters you so eloquently present here. I didn't get to Lawrence yet, but the gorgeous vitality that springs from your words is so temp..."

I think you'll love this one, Ilse. Lawrence is a keen observer of human foibles and his characterization is spot-on. Looking forward to knowing your thoughts on his style and imagery. And thank you for your lovely comment.


message 9: by Dipankar (new) - added it

Dipankar Took me just the first 3-4 lines of your review to hit the Want to Read button for this book. Wonderful review, Sam!


message 10: by Fionnuala (new)

Fionnuala I like the even-handedness of this review, Sama - you could have dismissed Lawrence because of the overly lush and overly florid prose but you didn't, holding such reservations off till the last paragraph . You're a better woman than me ;-)
I should perhaps revisit him one of these...decades.


Samadrita Dipankar wrote: "Took me just the first 3-4 lines of your review to hit the Want to Read button for this book. Wonderful review, Sam!"

Happy reading, Dipankar.


Samadrita Fionnuala wrote: "I like the even-handedness of this review, Sama - you could have dismissed Lawrence because of the overly lush and overly florid prose but you didn't, holding such reservations off till the last pa..."

If I've learned one thing on GR it is that you're one of the most even-handed reviewers on this site, Fio. I am only just learning to tame my knee-jerk response to stuff I read. Glad you felt I was fair in my assessment of Lawrence.


message 13: by Agnieszka (new)

Agnieszka Great review , Sam ! Your reviews are always sheer pleasure to read , balanced and so well put , and even if you have some objection it’s always elegantly written and well argued . I have not too much experience with Lawrence , read only Lady Chatterley’s lover but it was eons ago and I do not even remember if I liked it : (


Cecily I'll be back to read this more carefully and comment more effusively, but for now... wow. Evidently this book had a similar effect on you as it did me. An experience like no other. I need to get back to Lawrence.

As for Women in Love, I enjoyed it, but the narrative is more literal and the passion rather less.


Ivonne Rovira Samadrita, I was not as taken with The Rainbow (which I read at college) as you were; frankly, I think your review is more beautiful than the book ever was.


message 16: by Samadrita (last edited Apr 06, 2016 08:28AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Samadrita Agnieszka wrote: "Great review , Sam ! Your reviews are always sheer pleasure to read , balanced and so well put , and even if you have some objection it’s always elegantly written and well argued . I have not too m..."

Agna, your assessment is such a lovely review of my reviewing style. I am glad it has your approval. Since this is my first Lawrence I am yet to decide on my feelings for him but I did like The Rainbow overall despite not liking the prose sometimes.


Samadrita Lada wrote: "It is exceedingly forward and so nicely put in words, and I agree with you, so refreshing. He is ahead of his time. Open'spirited sisters. The sentences are so fluid , so readable. Excellent noveli..."

Thank you, Lada. I do agree with you that his sentences are often beautifully phrased and he is astonishingly sympathetic to a woman's existential dilemmas. So yes he was certainly ahead of his time. I'll check out that title you mention.


Samadrita Cecily wrote: "I'll be back to read this more carefully and comment more effusively, but for now... wow. Evidently this book had a similar effect on you as it did me. An experience like no other. I need to get ba..."

Well I have a feeling I won't enjoy Women in Love as much. Thank you for reading, Cecily. Glad the review resonated with you.


Samadrita Ivonne wrote: "Samadrita, I was not as taken with The Rainbow (which I read at college) as you were; frankly, I think your review is more beautiful than the book ever was."

Thank you, Ivonne. You say the same about most of the books I read and review. Guess our individual tastes in literature are mutually exclusive sets. ;)


Lynne King A lovely review Samadrita. I read this book in my early twenties and I was really not too taken with it. I don't know why but if I recall I found it rather "stiff".


message 21: by Seemita (new) - added it

Seemita What a day to return to GR and find your luminous review, Sam! There are so many things I loved in your write-up that choosing the thematic appraisal, the lexical sonority and the unobstructed coherence to register my appreciation would still add upto a partial pat. Khoob daroon :) D H Lawrence; yes, indeed.


Cecily I've loved recapturing the allegorical passion of Lawrence through your eyes, Samadrita. It's been back in my mind since I first read your review earlier today. Bliss.

I was so carried away by the whole thing, I didn't notice some of the things you did, like the lack of thematic glue, the psychoanalytic precision, and much else besides.

Brilliant review.


Cheryl "It is the Brangwen women who shield their private inner lives from external interference with a zealous certitude, sometimes even at the expense of emotionally alienating their fathers and husbands."

I think this was one of my favorite takeaways from his characterization of the Brangwen women. Beautiful review, Sam.


Samadrita Lynne wrote: "A lovely review Samadrita. I read this book in my early twenties and I was really not too taken with it. I don't know why but if I recall I found it rather "stiff"."

We all have our separate reactions to books we read, Lynne. I understand why you may not have appreciated Lawrence's family drama.


Samadrita Seemita wrote: "What a day to return to GR and find your luminous review, Sam! There are so many things I loved in your write-up that choosing the thematic appraisal, the lexical sonority and the unobstructed cohe..."

So good to see you back on GR, Seemita. That you registered unobstructed coherence, thematic appraisal, and lexical sonority in this review is a full-fledged rather than a partial pat in my opinion. Thank you for your generous praise. :) Hope you have a whale of a time with Lawrence when you get to him.


Samadrita Cecily wrote: "I've loved recapturing the allegorical passion of Lawrence through your eyes, Samadrita. It's been back in my mind since I first read your review earlier today. Bliss.

I was so carried away by the..."


Thank you once again, Cecily. I was worried what friends who have read and appreciated this classic might think of the review so it's a relief to read your comment.


Samadrita Cheryl wrote: ""It is the Brangwen women who shield their private inner lives from external interference with a zealous certitude, sometimes even at the expense of emotionally alienating their fathers and husband..."

Thank you, Cheryl. Your own review was a great incentive for me to pick this one up and I am glad I made this my first Lawrence.


message 28: by Anya (last edited Jun 03, 2016 11:09AM) (new) - added it

Anya Pardon my French, but holy crap, Samadrita! Your review makes me wants to pick up my copy of Lawrence's Rainbow which has been shooting accusatory glances at me for months. Brava and a bouquet of flowers to you!


Joanne Kelleher What a great review. Where I have struggled with the seemingly capricious fluidity of the characters' feelings, you have found purpose and meaning. Well done!


back to top