欧宝娱乐

The Materialist Conception of History Quotes

Rate this book
Clear rating
The Materialist Conception of History The Materialist Conception of History by Georgi Plekhanov
77 ratings, 3.56 average rating, 14 reviews
The Materialist Conception of History Quotes Showing 1-3 of 3
“We know today that there is no such thing as absolute truth, that everything is relative, that everything is dependent on the conditions of time and place; but precisely for that reason, we should be very cautious in judging the 鈥渋gnorance鈥� of various historical periods. Their ignorance, to the extent that it is manifested in their characteristic social movements, aspirations and ideals, is also relative.”
Georgi Plekhanov, The Materialist Conception of History
“Man's cognition his situation more or less lags behind the development of the new actual relations which cause that situation to change. But it does keep in wake of the actual relations. Where man's conscious striving for the abolition of old institutions and the establishment of a new legal system is weak, there the way for the new system has not yet been properly paved by the economics of the society. In other words, in history, lack of clear cognition - 'the blunders of immature thought,' 'ignorance' - not infrequently signifies only one thing, namely, that the object to be cognised, that is, the new, nascent things, are still but poorly developed.”
Georgi Plekhanov, The Materialist Conception of History
“Passing to historical nations, we must first point out that in relation to them the word race cannot and should not be used at all. We do not know of any historical nation that can be regarded as racially pure; each of them is the product of an extremely lengthy and intense process of interbreeding and intermingling of different ethnic elements.

Now try, after this, to determine the influence of 鈥渞ace鈥� on the history of the ideologies of any nation! At a first glance it seems that nothing could be simpler and more correct than the idea that natural environment influences national temperament and, through temperament, the history of the nation鈥檚 intellectual and aesthetic development. But if Labriola had only recalled the history of his own country, he would have been convinced of the erroneousness of this idea. The modern Italians are surrounded by the same natural environment as that in which the ancient Romans lived, yet how unlike is the 鈥渢emperament鈥� of our modern tributaries of Menelik to the temperament of the stern conquerors of Carthage! If we were to undertake to explain the history of Italian art, for example, by the Italian temperament, we should very soon be confronted by the baffling question why this temperament, for its part, varied so profoundly at different times and in different parts of the Apennine Peninsula.”
Georgi Plekhanov, The Materialist Conception of History