欧宝娱乐

Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

鬲丕乇賷禺 丕賱兀爻胤賵乇丞

Rate this book
賳卮兀鬲 丕賱兀爻胤賵乇丞 賱賲爻丕毓丿鬲賳丕 毓賱賶 丕賱鬲毓丕賲賱 賲毓 丕賱賲丌夭賯 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 丕賱賲爻鬲毓氐賷丞貙 賵廿毓丕賳丞 丕賱賳丕爻 毓賱賶 鬲丨丿賷丿 賲賵賯毓賴賲 賮賷 丕賱毓丕賱賲 賵鬲丨丿賷丿 賵噩賴鬲賴賲 賮賷賴. 賰賱賳丕 賷乇賷丿 兀賳 賷毓乇賮 賲賳 兀賷賳 兀鬲賷賳丕責 賵賲毓 賮賯丿丕賳 亘丿丕賷丕鬲賳丕 丕賱兀賵賱賶 賮賷 囟亘丕亘 賲丕 賯亘賱 丕賱鬲丕乇賷禺貙 丕亘鬲賰乇賳丕 賱兀賳賮爻賳丕 兀爻丕胤賷乇 毓賳 丌亘丕卅賳丕 丕賱兀賵賱賷賳貙 鬲爻丕毓丿賳丕貙 毓賱賶 丕賱乇睾賲 賲賳 賱丕 鬲丕乇賷禺賷鬲賴丕貙 毓賱賶 鬲賮爻賷乇 賲賵賯賮賳丕 鬲噩丕賴 亘賷卅鬲賳丕 賵噩賷乇丕賳賳丕 賵毓丕丿丕鬲賳丕.

賰丕賳鬲 丕賱兀爻胤賵乇丞 鬲毓亘賷乇丕賸 毓賳 丨爻賽賾賳丕 丕賱賮胤乇賷 亘兀賳 賮賷 丕賱毓丕賱賲 丕賱賲丕丿賷 丨賯丕卅賯 賵賵賯丕卅毓貙 兀賰孬乇 亘賰孬賷乇 賲賲丕 賷馗賴乇 賱賱毓賷賳. 賮丕賱兀爻胤賵乇丞 亘賲毓賳賶 賲丕貙 鬲乇賵賷 賯氐丞 丨丿孬 丨氐賱 賮賷 夭賲丕賳 賲丕貙 賵鬲噩毓賱賴 賲賲賰賳 丕賱丨氐賵賱 賮賷 賰賱 丕賱兀夭賲賳丞. 賱匕賱賰 賵亘爻亘亘 氐乇丕賲丞 乇丐賷鬲賳丕 丕賱鬲毓丕賯亘賷丞 賱兀丨丿丕孬 丕賱鬲丕乇賷禺貙 賮廿賳賳丕 賱丕 賳賲賱賰 賰賱賲丕鬲 賳毓亘賾乇 亘賴丕 毓賳 兀賳賲丕胤 丕賱丨丿賵孬 丕賱丿丕卅賲貙 賮賷 丨賷賳 兀賳 丕賱賲賷孬賵賱賵噩賷丕貙 亘氐賮鬲賴丕 氐賷丕睾丞 賮賳賷丞貙 賯丕丿乇丞 毓賱賶 丕賱廿卮丕乇丞 廿賱賶 賲丕 賵乇丕亍 丕賱鬲丕乇賷禺 賵廿賱賶 賲丕 賴賵 睾賷乇 夭賲賳賷 賮賷 丕賱賵噩賵丿 丕賱亘卮乇賷貙 賵鬲爻丕毓丿賳丕 賮賷 丕賱鬲毓乇賾賮 毓賱賶 賲丕 賵乇丕亍 丕賱鬲丿丕賮毓 丕賱賮賵囟賵賷 賱賱兀丨丿丕孬 丕賱毓卮賵丕卅賷丞貙 賵賮賷 鬲亘氐賾乇 噩賵賴乇 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞.


賲乇噩毓 睾賳賷 賵賲賰孬賮 丨賵賱 丕賱毓賱丕賯丞 丕賱賲鬲睾賷乇丞 丿丕卅賲丕賸 亘賷賳 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賵丕賱兀爻胤賵乇丞 毓亘乇 乇丨賱丞 鬲爻鬲毓乇囟 賯乇賵賳丕賸 賲賳 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷丞 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賲噩丕賱

143 pages, Paperback

First published October 5, 2005

350 people are currently reading
10.3k people want to read

About the author

Karen Armstrong

98books3,337followers
Karen Armstrong is a British author and commentator of Irish Catholic descent known for her books on comparative religion. A former Roman Catholic religious sister, she went from a conservative to a more liberal and mystical Christian faith. She attended St Anne's College, Oxford, while in the convent and graduated in English. She left the convent in 1969. Her work focuses on commonalities of the major religions, such as the importance of compassion and the Golden Rule.
Armstrong received the US$100,000 TED Prize in February 2008. She used that occasion to call for the creation of a Charter for Compassion, which was unveiled the following year.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1,493 (23%)
4 stars
2,226 (35%)
3 stars
1,880 (29%)
2 stars
539 (8%)
1 star
162 (2%)
Displaying 1 - 30 of 764 reviews
Profile Image for Riku Sayuj.
658 reviews7,538 followers
March 30, 2014

attempts to take us through the story of how myth has evolved in human history, affected its progress, how the contemporary society deals with it and the future direction it might or should take. For such a vast scope, a book that is less than 200 pages was bound to end up with a sketch that is barely an outline, let alone a complete history.

For a student of myth, this cannot even serve as an introduction to the scope and breadth of the study of mythologies, but for the casual reader, it can provide some interesting tea-time conversation at best.

To cut a short story shorter, here is听A Shorter History of Myth:

The Paleolithic Period: The Mythology of the Hunters (c. 20000 to 8000听)

We are meaning-seeking creatures. From our earliest awakenings of consciousness, we started to ascribe meanings and stories to things we found among and around us. The traditions of myth started in tis earliest phase of human history. As hunter-gatherers, Armstrong contends that human's being the only creatures conscious of their acts had a deep apprehension, a guilt, about killing other creatures for their own sustenance. So they built up stories to explain this and developed a cult of sacrifice to give the act of killing a symbolic significance of supplication and respect.

In this society, the males probably dominated and the mythology reflects this male domination. Most of these primitive gods were male. Everything that was听wondrous听and unexplainable were made the stuff of myth, The gods were the architects of the world and everything was orchestrated by them. The sky and the rains and thunder and fire were the great mysteries and these formed the earliest myths, the earliest gods.

The听: The Mythology of the Farmers (c. 8000 to 4000 BCE)

Then we invented farming. As our way of life changed, our myths too began to change. The cyclic nature of seasons and rain became more important than abstract entities life the sky and planets. The old gods were either forgotten or changed into agricultural deities. The greatest mystery now was this wonder - that earth can renew itself and bring out food for their sustenance. The seed they sow was converted as if in a womb. The Myth of the听听started to grow. Of a sustaining goddess that demands great sacrifice. The act of sex began to have symbolic meaning, human copulation aiding and abetting in earth's fertility. With fertility cults and the听听who bring rain and floods and with a mother goddess that responded to care, the world was a very personal interaction with these mythical beings.

The Early Civilisations (c. 4000 to 800 BCE)

Soon agriculture gave way to city building and more organized ways of life. Men started to have more control over their lives. Irrigation and organized agriculture brought more听and听more of the mysteries of nature under man's control. THe myths about the fertility gods too now started to sound remote. Myths that do not touch our everyday lives tend to die out, ignored.

But as the myths and the gods started becoming more and more distant, humans felt a deep spiritual anguish that was soon to culminate in the greatest spiritual revolution that man has ever seen.

The听听(c. 800 to 200 BCE)

The axial age is called so because it was a pivotal time in which the greatest philosophies of the ancient age, Buddhism, Taoism, Judaism, Confucianism, Jainism etc all arose in the same time.

It was a response to the great spiritual chasm that man was feeling as we separated from nature. We still needed an听understanding听of our significance in the world. A reason for living. As city life progressed. we developed myths about gods who lived in cities like ours with divine order - a utopia in the havens. We dreamed of recreating such order here in the world.

The axial leaders turned the focus away from gods and heavens and asked men and women to focus on their own lives, thoughts and action. They told that we are responsible for our own actions and no gods guide out fates. They wanted to recreate a heavenly order on the human sphere and focused on strict codes of living, rituals and mores and codes of conduct. These were the first stirring of听听and myths started the conversion to religion.

The Post-Axial Period (c. 200 BCE to c. 1500 CE)

Men started codifying the laws of religions and laws of life and converted myths into beliefs. they turned from symbols giving us guidance on how to live to concrete facts and gods that tell us how to live in exact terms. We converted historical figures like Jesus into archetypal myths and imbued them with divine characteristics and tried to come to terms with the lack of guidance.

This was also the time when the early Greeks started their exploration of听听or logic. They encouraged us to reject the unverifiable and the intuitive and to choose Logos over Mythos, leading humankind inevitably on to the next major change in human history

The听听(c. 1500 to 2000)

Logos finally won over Mythos and we used our logic and our understanding to gain unprecedented control over our environment and our own lives. But while we progressed materially, we seem to have regressed spiritually. the respect and reverence for nature, to our fellow creatures and to each other turned into an attitude of exploitation and self-serving that led to great catastrophes like the world wars and mass massacres. We now are gradually realizing that perhaps we need to get back to the myths and the old stories to help us make sense of our lives and to get back an appreciation of nature and of life, to learn to live together without destroying each other and our planet.

For that we need to let Mythos come back from the corner it was beaten into by our all-pervading Logos.

The real message of the book comes out in this section. It deals with the modern societies obsession with Logos over Mythos and its rejection of these fundamentally psychological听听that are myths, the primal stories that give us a sense of place in this otherwise meaningless existence. Apparently that is one of the fundamental requirements of the human condition.

This last section of the book is about how myth survives in today's world. Armstrong says that it is now the duty of the artists and the writers to carry on the tradition of mythology, which is he only tool we mankind has ever developed that helps us cope with ourselves. She also goes into great detail to give examples of modern works that are built on myths such as and .

"We have seen that a myth could never be approached in a purely profane setting. It was only comprehensible in a liturgical context that set it apart from everyday life; it must be experienced as part of a process of personal transformation. None of this, surely, applies to the novel, which can be read anywhere at all without ritual trappings, and must, if it is any good, eschew the overtly didactic. Yet the experience of reading a novel has certain qualities that remind us of the traditional apprehension of mythology. It can be seen as a form of meditation. Readers have to live with a novel for days or even weeks. It projects them into another world, parallel to but apart from their ordinary lives. They know perfectly well that this fictional realm is not real and yet while they are reading it becomes compelling. A powerful novel becomes part of the backdrop of our lives, long after we have laid the book aside. It is an exercise of make-believe that, like yoga or a religious festival, breaks down barriers of space and time and extends our sympathies, so that we are able to听empathize听with other lives and sorrows. It teaches compassion, the ability to feel with others. And, like mythology, an important novel is transformative. If we allow it to do so, it can change us forever."

The agenda at this point becomes very clear and the book's denouement is clearly an invocation towards asking novelists to take up old myths and use them and reexamine them; this of course leads smoothly on to the fact that the book is an introduction to the听 , which has commissioned a series of works from authors such as听,听听and , each of which is designed to be a modern version of an ancient myth. I have to admit that this was my original motivation to pick up the book as I really wanted to read .

Karen Armstrong does give a clear and well听reasoned听argument for the need for Myth in our daily life and in our art but does not really do justice to the title of the book.
Profile Image for Ahmad Sharabiani.
9,562 reviews763 followers
August 26, 2021
A Short History of Myth (Canongate's The Myths #1), Karen Armstrong

A Short History of Myth. 2005. A Short History of Myth, Karen Armstrong describes what these stories are and what they're not.

A myth is not a lie or just a story, for example, nor is it simply an explanation of scientific phenomena, as we're often told.

Myths are also not about comfort or condolence, but force people to face the realities of life and death.

And as we moderns become more captivated by ideals of truth and science, Armstrong warns that we've also become more rigid, unable to accept stories that don't conform to our expectations of a literal truth; we maroon ourselves in a less joyful existence.

毓賳賵丕賳賴丕蹖 趩丕倬 卮丿賴 丿乇 丕蹖乇丕賳: 芦鬲丕乇蹖禺 賲禺鬲氐乇 丕爻胤賵乇賴禄貨 芦鬲丕乇蹖禺趩賴 賲禺鬲氐乇 丕爻胤賵乇賴禄貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 讴丕乇賳 丌乇賲爻鬲乇丕賳诏貨 鬲丕乇蹖禺 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 禺賵丕賳卮 乇賵夭 亘蹖爻鬲 賵 倬賳噩賲 賲丕賴 丌诏賵爻鬲 爻丕賱 2014賲蹖賱丕丿蹖

毓賳賵丕賳: 鬲丕乇蹖禺 賲禺鬲氐乇 丕爻胤賵乇賴貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 讴丕乇賳 丌乇賲爻鬲乇丕賳诏貨 賲鬲乇噩賲 毓亘丕爻 賲禺亘乇貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賳卮乇 賲乇讴夭貙 1390貨 丿乇 113氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9789642131457貨趩丕倬 爻賵賲 1396貨 賲賵囟賵毓 鬲丕乇蹖禺 丕爻胤賵乇賴 丕夭 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 亘乇蹖鬲丕賳蹖丕 - 爻丿賴 21賲

賮賴乇爻鬲: 芦丕爻胤賵乇賴 趩蹖爻鬲責禄貨 芦丿賵乇丕賳 讴賴賳 爻賳诏蹖 丕爻胤賵乇賴 卮賳丕爻蹖 卮讴丕乇诏乇丕賳禄貨 芦丿賵乇丕賳 賳賵爻賳诏蹖: 丕爻胤賵乇賴 卮賳丕爻蹖 讴卮丕賵乇夭丕賳禄貨 芦鬲賲丿賳賴丕蹖 丕賵賱蹖賴 丕夭 趩賴丕乇賴夭丕乇 鬲丕 賴卮鬲氐丿 爻丕賱 倬蹖卮 丕夭 賲蹖賱丕丿禄貨 芦毓氐乇 賲丨賵乇蹖 丕夭 賴卮鬲氐丿 鬲丕 丿賵蹖爻鬲 爻丕賱 倬蹖卮 丕夭 賲蹖賱丕丿禄貨 芦丿賵乇丕賳 倬爻丕賲丨賵乇蹖 丨丿賵丿 丿賵蹖爻鬲 爻丕賱 倬蹖卮 丕夭 賲蹖賱丕丿 鬲丕 丨丿賵丿 賴夭丕乇 賵 倬丕賳氐丿 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖禄貨 芦鬲丨賵賱 亘夭乇诏 睾乇亘 丕夭 丨丿賵丿 賴夭丕乇 賵 倬丕賳氐丿 鬲丕 丿賵賴夭丕乇 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖禄貨 賲賳丕亘毓貙 賵 賳賲丕蹖賴貨

毓賳賵丕賳: 鈥忊€ж臂屫嗁� 賲禺鬲氐乇 丕爻胤賵乇賴貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 讴丕乇賳 丌乇賲爻鬲乇丕賳诏貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 賲氐胤賮蹖 賱賳诏鈥屫ㄘз佖з嗀� 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賴賳乇 倬丕乇爻蹖賳賴貙 1397貨 丿乇 121氐貨 卮丕亘讴9786009620104貨

丕爻胤賵乇賴 蹖讴 丿乇賵睾 蹖丕 丿丕爻鬲丕賳貙 賵 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 賳賲賵賳賴貙 鬲賵囟蹖丨 倬丿蹖丿賴 賴丕蹖 毓賱賲蹖貙 賴賲丕賳诏賵賳賴 讴賴 賳賵卮鬲賴 蹖丕 诏賮鬲賴 賲蹖卮賵丿 賴賲貙 賳蹖爻鬲貨 賴蹖趩诏丕賴 乇賵丕蹖鬲 蹖诏丕賳賴貙 賵 讴賴賳爻丕賱蹖貙 丕夭 蹖讴 丕爻胤賵乇賴 賵噩賵丿 賳丿丕卮鬲賴貙 亘丕 丿蹖诏乇 卮丿賳 卮乇丕蹖胤貙 賳蹖丕夭 亘賵丿賴貙 讴賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳賴丕賲丕賳 乇丕 亘賴 诏賵賳賴 丕蹖 丿蹖诏乇 亘丕夭诏賵 賳賲丕卅蹖賲貙 鬲丕 乇丕爻鬲蹖賴丕蹖 亘蹖 夭賲丕賳蹖 乇丕貙 讴賴 丿乇 丿賱 丌賳賴丕爻鬲貙 亘鬲賵丕賳蹖賲 亘蹖乇賵賳 亘讴卮蹖賲貨 丿乇 丕蹖賳 芦鬲丕乇蹖禺 賲禺鬲氐乇 丕爻胤賵乇賴禄 禺賵丕賴蹖賲 丿蹖丿貙 讴賴 賴乇 诏丕賴 賲乇丿丕賳 賵 夭賳丕賳貙 诏丕賲蹖 亘賴 倬蹖卮 亘乇丿丕卮鬲賴 丕賳丿貙 丕爻胤賵乇賴 賴丕蹖 禺賵蹖卮 乇丕 賳蹖夭 亘丕夭亘蹖賳蹖 讴乇丿賴貙 賵 丌賳賴丕 乇丕 亘丕 爻禺賳 夭賲丕賳 賳賵蹖賳 禺賵蹖卮貙 丿乇 丌賳 诏丕賴 賵 丿乇 丌賳 夭賲丕賳 亘賴 爻禺賳 丌賳乇賵夭 爻乇賵丿賴 丕賳丿貨 丕賲丕 丕蹖賳 乇丕 賳蹖夭 賲蹖禺賵丕賳蹖賲 讴賴 賲丕賴蹖鬲 亘卮乇 丿蹖诏乇 賳賲蹖卮賵丿貙 賴乇 趩賳丿 亘爻蹖丕乇蹖 丕夭 丕蹖賳 丕爻胤賵乇賴 賴丕貙 丿乇 讴卮賵乇賴丕蹖蹖 丌賮乇蹖丿賴 卮丿賴 丕賳丿貙 讴賴 亘蹖卮鬲乇蹖賳 丿蹖诏乇诏賵賳诏蹖 乇丕 亘丕 噩丕賲毓賴 蹖 讴賳賵賳蹖 禺賵蹖卮 丿丕卮鬲賴 丕賳丿

鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘賴賳诏丕賲 乇爻丕賳蹖 03/06/1400賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
Profile Image for 賮丐丕丿.
1,095 reviews2,226 followers
April 25, 2019
趩賵賳 鬲氐賲蹖賲 丿丕乇賲 賴乇 趩蹖 丕夭 讴丕乇賳 丌乇賲爻鬲乇丕賳诏 丿蹖丿賲 亘禺賵賳賲貙 丕蹖賳賵 丿乇 丕賵賱蹖賳 賮乇氐鬲 诏乇賮鬲賲 賵 賵爻胤 讴鬲丕亘 丿诏乇诏賵賳蹖 亘夭乇诏貙 禺賵賳丿賲卮.

讴鬲丕亘 丿乇 趩賳丿 賮氐賱貙 賳賯丕胤 毓胤賮 鬲丕乇蹖禺 丕爻胤賵乇賴 賵 丿蹖賳 乇賵 卮乇丨 賲蹖丿賴. 賳賯丕胤蹖 讴賴 丕爻胤賵乇賴 賵 丿蹖賳貙 鬲丨鬲 鬲兀孬蹖乇 毓賵丕賲賱 丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖 賵 丕賯鬲氐丕丿蹖 賵... 亘賴 卮讴賱蹖 毓賲蹖賯 賲鬲丨賵賱 卮丿賴.

噩賵丕賲毓 卮讴丕乇诏乇
丿乇 丿賵乇丕賳 倬丕乇蹖賳賴鈥屫迟嗂屫� 噩賵丕賲毓 丕夭 乇丕賴 卮讴丕乇 賵 噩賲毓 丌賵乇蹖 睾匕丕 鬲賴蹖賴 賲蹖 讴乇丿賳. 丕賵賱蹖賳 賵噩賴 賲卮禺氐賴贁 丕爻胤賵乇賴 賴丕蹖 丕蹖賳 噩賵丕賲毓貙 禺丿丕蹖 丌爻賲丕賳 亘賵丿貙 禺丿丕蹖蹖 賲毓賲賵賱丕賸 亘蹖 卮讴賱 賵 睾蹖乇丕賳爻丕賳鈥屫з嗂ж必з嗁囏� 讴賴 丿乇 賲乇鬲亘賴贁 丕賵賱 賯乇丕乇 賳亘賵丿 讴丕乇蹖 亘乇丕蹖 賲乇丿賲 丕賳噩丕賲 亘丿賴 賵 賳賮毓蹖 亘乇爻賵賳賴貙 亘賱讴賴 丨丕氐賱 丕丨爻丕爻 賯丿爻蹖 賴蹖亘鬲 丿乇 亘乇丕亘乇 丌爻賲丕賳 丿賵乇 丕夭 丿爻鬲乇爻 亘賵丿. 丕蹖賳 禺丿丕 丿乇 丿賵乇丕賳 讴卮丕賵乇夭蹖 讴賲 讴賲 丿乇 丨丕卮蹖賴 賯乇丕乇 诏乇賮鬲 賵 禺丿丕蹖丕賳 賲鬲毓丿丿 夭賲蹖賳蹖 賵 丿乇 丿爻鬲乇爻 賵 丕賳爻丕賳鈥屫з嗂ж必з嗁� 賵 賳賮毓鈥屫必池з� 噩丕卮 乇賵 诏乇賮鬲賳.

丿賵賲蹖賳 賲卮禺氐賴贁 亘丕賵乇賴丕蹖 噩賵丕賲毓 卮讴丕乇趩蹖貙 丕爻胤賵乇賴贁 爻賮乇 賯賴乇賲丕賳 亘賵丿. 卮讴丕乇趩蹖 賴丕 亘乇丕蹖 鬲賴蹖賴贁 睾匕丕 亘丕蹖丿 乇賵夭賴丕 丕夭 禺賵賳賴 賵 賲丨蹖胤 丕賲賳 賯亘蹖賱賴 丿賵乇 賲蹖 卮丿賳 賵 禺胤乇丕鬲 倬蹖卮鈥屫ㄛ屬嗃屸€屬嗀з矩佰屫臂� 乇賵 亘賴 噩賵賳 賲蹖 倬匕蹖乇賮鬲賳 賵 丿乇 賳賴丕蹖鬲 亘丕 讴卮鬲賳/賯乇亘丕賳蹖 讴乇丿賳 賲賵噩賵丿蹖 夭賳丿賴 讴賴 亘賴 賳賵毓蹖 亘乇丕丿乇 蹖丕 倬爻乇毓賲賵蹖 禺賵丿卮賵賳 賲蹖 丿賵賳爻鬲賳貙 亘乇丕蹖 賲乇丿賲卮賵賳 睾匕丕 賲蹖 丌賵乇丿賳. 亘丕夭鬲丕亘 丕蹖賳 爻賮乇 丕爻乇丕乇丌賲蹖夭 讴賴 卮讴丕乇趩蹖 乇賵 亘乇丕蹖 賴賲蹖卮賴 賲鬲丨賵賱 賲蹖 讴乇丿貙 丿乇 丕爻胤賵乇賴贁 爻賮乇 賯賴乇賲丕賳 鬲亘賱賵乇 倬蹖丿丕 讴乇丿賴: 賯賴乇賲丕賳蹖 讴賴 丕夭 禺賵賳賴 丿賵乇 賲蹖卮賴貙 亘賴 噩賴丕賳 丕爻乇丕乇丌賲蹖夭 賳丕卮賳丕禺鬲賴 賴丕 賲蹖乇賴貙 賵 丿乇 賳賴丕蹖鬲 亘毓丿 丕夭 讴卮鬲賳 睾賵賱 賴丕 賵 禺丿丕蹖丕賳 賵 丨鬲蹖 禺賵丿卮貙 丿賵亘丕乇賴 賲鬲賵賱丿 賲蹖卮賴 賵 亘丕 亘乇讴鬲 賯丿爻蹖 亘賴 禺賵賳賴 賵 賳夭丿 賲乇丿賲卮 亘乇 賲蹖诏乇丿賴.


噩賵丕賲毓 讴卮丕賵乇夭蹖
丿乇 丿賵乇丕賳 賳賵爻賳诏蹖 讴賲 讴賲 亘卮乇 讴卮丕賵乇夭蹖 乇賵 蹖丕丿 诏乇賮鬲貙 賵 丕蹖賳 鬲睾蹖蹖乇 亘夭乇诏 丿乇 卮讴賱 夭賳丿诏蹖貙 鬲睾蹖蹖乇蹖 亘夭乇诏 丿乇 亘丕賵乇賴丕蹖 丿蹖賳蹖 乇賵 亘賴 賴賲乇丕賴 丿丕卮鬲. 禺丿丕蹖 丌爻賲丕賳 噩丕卮 乇賵 亘賴 禺丿丕蹖丕賳 夭賲蹖賳蹖 丿丕丿 讴賴 亘丕 讴卮鬲 賵 讴卮丕賵乇夭蹖 丕乇鬲亘丕胤 丿丕卮鬲. 賲孬賱丕賸 蹖賴賵賴 亘丕 亘毓賱 賵 毓卮鬲丕乇 噩丕蹖诏夭蹖賳 卮丿 賵 賴賲蹖賳 胤賵乇 丕蹖賳丿乇丕 亘丕 禺丿丕蹖丕賳 丿蹖诏賴.
賲卮丨氐賴贁 丕氐賱蹖 丿蹖賳 丿賵乇丕賳 讴卮丕賵乇夭蹖貙 禺丿丕蹖 賲蹖乇賳丿賴 賵 乇爻鬲丕禺蹖夭 讴賳賳丿賴 亘賵丿: 禺丿丕蹖蹖 讴賴 卮賴蹖丿 賲蹖 卮丿貙 亘賴 丿賳蹖丕蹖 賲乇丿诏丕賳 賲蹖 乇賮鬲貙 賵 賴賲夭賲丕賳 鬲賲丕賲 诏蹖丕賴丕賳 禺卮讴 賲蹖 卮丿賳貙 賵 亘丕 丕賳噩丕賲 丌蹖蹖賳 賴丕蹖蹖 丿乇 亘賴丕乇 丿賵亘丕乇賴 夭賳丿賴 賲蹖 卮丿 賵 賴賲夭賲丕賳 诏蹖丕賴丕賳 乇卮丿 賲蹖 讴乇丿賳.

丿乇 丕蹖賳 丿賵 賮氐賱 賲丐賱賮 鬲丕 丨丿 夭蹖丕丿蹖 丕夭 賳馗乇蹖丕鬲 賲蹖乇趩丕 丕賱蹖丕丿賴 賵 噩賵夭賮 讴賲亘賱 丕爻鬲賮丕丿賴 讴乇丿賴 亘賵丿.


噩賵丕賲毓 卮賴乇蹖
亘毓丿 丕夭 爻丕禺鬲賴 卮丿賳 卮賴乇賴丕貙 賴賲乇丕賴 亘丕 夭蹖乇 賵 乇賵 卮丿賳 卮讴賱 賯丿蹖賲蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖貙 丕丿蹖丕賳 賯丿蹖賲蹖 賴賲 亘賴 卮丿鬲 賲鬲夭賱夭賱 卮丿賳. 丿賳蹖丕蹖蹖 讴賴 禺丿丕蹖丕賳 噩賵丕賲毓 丿丕蹖乇賴鈥屫й� 讴卮丕賵乇夭蹖 鬲氐賵蹖乇 賲蹖 讴乇丿賳 丿乇 噩丕賲毓賴贁 禺胤蹖 卮賴乇蹖 亘賴 讴丕乇 賳賲蹖 丕賵賲丿: 噩賵丕賲毓 卮賴乇蹖 倬蹖趩蹖丿賴 鬲乇 丕夭 丕賵賳 亘賵丿賳 讴賴 亘丕 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屬囏й� 鬲讴乇丕乇 卮賵賳丿賴贁 賲乇亘賵胤 亘賴 趩乇禺賴贁 孬丕亘鬲 亘賴丕乇 賵 夭賲爻鬲丕賳貙 亘卮賴 賳蹖丕夭賴丕蹖 賲毓賳賵蹖 賲乇丿賲 乇賵 爻蹖乇丕亘 讴乇丿. 倬爻貙 賴乇 趩賳丿 丿蹖賳 賴丕蹖 卮賴乇蹖 倬乇丕讴賳丿賴 丕蹖 倬丿蹖丿 丕賵賲丿賳 亘丕 禺丿丕蹖丕賳蹖 讴賴 賯亘賱 丕夭 賴乇 趩蹖夭 賲賴賳丿爻 賵 賲毓賲丕乇 卮賴乇賴丕蹖 丌爻賲丕賳蹖 亘賵丿賳貙 丕賲丕 丕囟胤乇丕亘 賵 爻乇诏卮鬲诏蹖 亘蹖卮鬲乇 賵 亘蹖卮鬲乇 賲蹖 卮丿貙 賵 丕蹖賳 賲賳噩乇 卮丿 亘賴 丕賳賯賱丕亘 賲毓賳賵蹖 讴賴 讴丕乇賳 丌乇賲爻鬲乇丕賳诏 鬲賵蹖 趩賳丿 讴鬲丕亘 鬲賵噩賴卮 乇賵 賲氐乇賵賮 亘賴 丕賵賳 讴乇丿賴.


毓氐乇 賲丨賵乇蹖
丿乇 亘乇賴賴 丕蹖 倬賵賳氐丿 卮卮氐丿 爻丕賱賴 丕夭 鬲丕乇蹖禺貙 丕夭 賯乇賳 賴卮鬲賲 鬲丕 賯乇賳 丿賵賲 倬蹖卮 丕夭 賲蹖賱丕丿貙 丿乇 賳賯丕胤 賲禺鬲賱賮 噩賴丕賳貙 丕夭 趩蹖賳 賵 賴賳丿 鬲丕 丕爻乇丕卅蹖賱 賵 蹖賵賳丕賳貙 賮乇夭丕賳賴 賴丕蹖蹖 馗賴賵乇 讴乇丿賳 讴賴 賴賲賴 賳賵毓 賲卮丕亘賴蹖 丕夭 賲毓賳賵蹖鬲 乇賵 鬲亘賱蹖睾 賲蹖 讴乇丿賳 賵 丿乇 丨賯蹖賯鬲貙 丿乇 丕蹖賳 丿賵乇丕賳 亘賵丿 讴賴 丕爻胤賵乇賴 噩丕蹖 禺賵丿卮 乇賵 丿丕丿 亘賴 丿蹖賳 亘賴 丕賵賳 賲毓賳丕 讴賴 賲丕 丕賲乇賵夭 賲蹖 卮賳丕爻蹖賲.
丕蹖賳 賮乇夭丕賳賴 賴丕貙 賱丕卅賵鬲爻賴貙 讴賳賮賵爻蹖賵爻貙 亘賵丿丕貙 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 诏賲賳丕賲 丕賵倬丕賳蹖卮丕丿貙 丕乇賲蹖丕 賵 丨夭賯蹖丕賱貙 賵 爻賯乇丕胤貙 賴賲賴 賳賵毓蹖 賲毓乇賮鬲 卮禺氐蹖 乇賵 噩丕蹖诏夭蹖賳 賲毓乇賮鬲 噩賲毓蹖 丕爻胤賵乇賴 賲蹖 讴乇丿賳. 賴賲賴 賲蹖 诏賮鬲賳 賴乇 讴爻 亘丕蹖丿 爻賱賵讴蹖 卮禺氐蹖 亘乇丕蹖 乇爻蹖丿賳 亘賴 丨賯蹖賯鬲蹖 丿乇賵賳蹖 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮賴貙 賵 丨賯蹖賯鬲 趩蹖夭蹖 賳蹖爻鬲 讴賴 丨丕囟乇 賵 丌賲丕丿賴 丕夭 爻賳鬲 丿乇蹖丕賮鬲 亘卮賴. 鬲賲丕賲 丕蹖賳 賮乇夭丕賳賴 賴丕 亘賴 賲毓賳賵蹖鬲 賵 丕禺賱丕賯貙 賲禺氐賵氐丕賸 亘賴 賴賲丿乇丿蹖 賵 丕夭禺賵丿诏匕卮鬲诏蹖 丕賴賲蹖鬲 夭蹖丕丿蹖 賲蹖 丿丕丿賳. 鬲賲丕賲 丕蹖賳 賮乇夭丕賳賴 賴丕 賳诏丕賴蹖 丕賳鬲賯丕丿蹖 亘賴 丕爻胤賵乇賴 賴丕 丿丕卮鬲賳 賵 诏丕賴蹖 丕賵賳 賴丕 乇賵 亘賴 讴賱蹖 乇丿 賲蹖 讴乇丿賳貙 賵 诏丕賴蹖 亘賴 氐賵乇鬲 鬲賲孬蹖賱蹖 亘丕夭鬲賮爻蹖乇卮賵賳 賲蹖 讴乇丿賳.

讴丕乇賳 丌乇賲爻鬲乇丕賳诏 亘賴 禺氐賵氐 賲毓鬲賯丿賴 讴賴 賲丕 亘毓丿 丕夭 丕蹖賳 丕賳賯賱丕亘 賲毓賳賵蹖貙 丿蹖诏賴 倬蹖卮乇賮鬲蹖 丕夭 賱丨丕馗 賲毓賳賵蹖 賳丿丕卮鬲蹖賲貙 賵 丕賲乇賵夭 賴賲 亘賴 丌乇賲丕賳 賴丕蹖 毓氐乇 賲丨賵乇蹖 賲丨鬲丕噩蹖賲貙 賵 賲蹖 鬲賵賳蹖賲 亘乇禺蹖 蹖丕 鬲賲丕賲 乇丕賴 丨賱 賴丕蹖 賮乇夭丕賳诏丕賳 丕賵賳 丿賵乇賴 乇賵 賲鬲賳丕爻亘 亘丕 夭賲丕賳 禺賵丿賲賵賳 亘賴 讴丕乇 亘亘乇蹖賲.


丿賵乇丕賳 噩丿蹖丿
賮氐賱 賴丕蹖 亘毓丿蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 亘賴 丿賵乇丕賳 乇賵卮賳诏乇蹖 賵 毓氐乇 噩丿蹖丿 倬乇丿丕禺鬲貙 讴賴 丿乇 丨賯蹖賯鬲 丿賵乇丕賳 倬丕蹖丕賳 丕爻胤賵乇賴 亘賵丿賳貙 賵 诏賮鬲 讴賴 賳亘賵丿 賲毓賳丕 趩賴 囟乇乇賴丕蹖蹖 亘乇丕蹖 鬲賲丿賳 睾乇亘蹖 丿丕卮鬲賴 賵 丕蹖賳 禺賱兀 亘丕蹖丿 亘丕 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖蹖 賲孬賱 賴賳乇 賵 賲禺氐賵氐丕賸 乇賲丕賳 倬乇 亘卮賴貙 賲亘丕丨孬蹖 讴賴 讴賲丕亘蹖卮 亘丕賴丕卮 丌卮賳丕蹖蹖賲.
Profile Image for Seyed Hashemi.
133 reviews61 followers
September 1, 2024
賲蹖鬲賵爻 毓賱蹖賴 賱賵诏賵爻!

丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 倬丕乇爻丕賱 禺賵賳丿賴 亘賵丿賲 賵 丕賱丕賳 丿蹖丿賲 賲乇賵乇卮 乇賵 丕蹖賳噩丕 賳匕丕卮鬲賲. 禺賱丕氐賴 丿丕乇蹖賲 讴賴:

丕賵賱 丕賳丿讴蹖 丿乇 讴賱蹖丕鬲 賲鬲賳 賲蹖鈥屭堐屬� 賵 亘毓丿卮 賲乇賵乇賴丕蹖 賮氐賱 亘賴 賮氐賱 丕夭 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 讴賴 丨蹖賳賽 賲胤丕賱毓賴 賳賵卮鬲賲 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫①堌辟�.

賵賯鬲蹖 丿乇 蹖讴 讴鬲丕亘鈥屬佖辟堌篡屫� 趩卮賲 亘賴 賯賮爻踿 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屬囏� 賲蹖鈥屫з嗀ж槽屫� 蹖讴 賳丕賲 丕爻鬲 讴賴 鬲賵 趩卮賲 賲蹖鈥屫操嗀� 毓亘丕爻 賲禺亘乇. 賲丕賳賳丿 賳丕賲賽 賲乇丨賵賲 讴賵乇賵卮 氐賮賵蹖(鄱 鬲蹖乇 郾鄢鄢鄣 鈥� 鄄郯 賲乇丿丕丿 郾鄞郯鄄) 賵 夭亘丕賳鈥屫促嗀ж驰屫� 蹖丕丿 賵 賳丕賲卮 诏乇丕賲蹖. 丿乇 鬲賵卅蹖鬲乇 蹖讴 讴丕乇亘乇(丌乇賲丕賳) 賲亘丕賳蹖 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屫促嗀ж驰屫� 鬲丕賱蹖賮 毓亘丕爻 賲禺亘乇 賵 賴賲蹖賳 鬲丕乇蹖禺 賲禺鬲氐乇 丕爻胤賵乇賴 乇丕 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 讴鬲亘 禺賵亘 亘乇丕蹖 丌睾丕夭 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屫堌з嗃� 賲毓乇賮蹖 讴乇丿. 賲亘丕賳蹖 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屫促嗀ж驰� 乇賵 丕夭 丿賵鬲丕 讴鬲丕亘鈥屬佖辟堌篡� 丿賳亘丕賱鈥屭辟佖呚� 賳亘賵丿 亘乇丕蹖 賴賲蹖賳 丕夭 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 卮乇賵毓 讴乇丿賲.
禺亘貙 讴鬲丕亘 亘丕 鬲賯爻蹖賲鈥屫ㄙ嗀� 鬲丕乇蹖禺 丿乇6 丿賵乇賴貙 亘賴 賴賲乇丕賴 蹖讴 賲賯丿賲賴貙 爻毓蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 鬲氐賵蹖乇蹖 丕夭 鬲丕乇蹖禺賽 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屬囏� 亘賴 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 丕乇丕卅賴 丿賴丿 讴賴 毓賱丕賵賴 亘乇 丌卮賳丕 讴乇丿賳 丕亘鬲丿丕蹖蹖 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 亘丕 亘乇禺蹖 丕爻丕胤蹖乇 倬丕蹖賴鈥屫й� 賵 賲賴賲貙 鬲賳馗蹖賲丕鬲賽 匕賴賳蹖 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 乇丕 亘乇丕蹖 禺賵丕賳丿賳 亘蹖卮鬲乇 丕夭 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屬囏� 丌賲丕丿賴 讴賳丿貨 丿乇 囟賲賳 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 丌賲丕丿賴 卮賵丿 禺賵丿 丿乇 丨丿賽 禺賵丿 丕爻丕胤蹖乇 乇丕 賮賴賲 讴賳丿 賵 丕诏乇 丕乇噩丕毓蹖 亘賴 丕爻丕胤蹖乇 賵... 丿乇 丿蹖诏乇 賲鬲賵賳 丿蹖丿貙 亘鬲賵丕賳丿 讴賱蹖丕鬲蹖 丕夭 亘丨孬 乇丕 丿乇讴 讴賳丿.
丕夭 丕賵賱 鬲賯丕亘賱賽 賲蹖鬲賵爻 賵 賱賵诏賵爻 (賳讴 禺賱丕氐賴 賮氐賱2) 丿乇 讴鬲丕亘 卮賮丕賮 丕爻鬲. 丿乇 賮氐賱 丌禺乇 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 卮乇丨 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 讴賴 丿乇 毓氐乇 賲丿乇賳 丕蹖賳 賱賵诏賵爻 丕爻鬲 讴賴 倬蹖乇賵夭 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲. 丿乇 丕蹖賳噩丕 讴鬲丕亘 趩賳丿 倬丕乇丕诏乇丕賮蹖 倬賳丿 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 丕賳丿讴蹖 賮丕氐賱賴 丿丕乇丿 噩賴丕賳 丕蹖賳 丨乇賮鈥屬囏� 亘丕 讴鬲丕亘蹖 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 芦鬲丕乇蹖禺禄 丕爻丕胤蹖乇. 丕賱亘鬲賴 丿乇 丕丿丕賲賴 亘丕 鬲賮爻蹖乇賽 賳賯丕卮蹖鈥屬囏й� 倬蹖讴丕爻賵 賵 鬲毓丿丕丿賽 夭蹖丕丿蹖 乇賲丕賳 賵 丕孬乇 丕丿亘蹖賽 賲乇亘賵胤 亘賴 丿賵乇丕賳賽 賲丿乇賳貙 讴鬲丕亘 亘賴 芦丕氐賱賽 禺賵丿 亘丕夭 賲蹖鈥屭必� :)) 丕賱亘鬲賴 丕蹖賳 倬蹖卮鈥屫操呟屬嗁団€屫й� 讴賴 讴鬲丕亘 趩蹖丿貙 亘爻蹖丕乇蹖 賲亘丕丨孬賽 賮氐賱 丌禺乇 乇丕 卮賮丕賮 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�. 亘乇丕蹖 賲孬丕賱 丕蹖賳 賲賯丿賲踿 90氐賮丨賴鈥屫й� :)) 亘乇丕蹖 賮氐賱 丌禺乇貙 亘丕毓孬 卮丿 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 鬲賮爻蹖乇 丿賯蹖賯 賵 丿乇爻鬲蹖 丕夭 芦賲乇诏賽 禺丿丕禄蹖 賳蹖趩賴 亘丿爻鬲 亘丿賴丿.
賲孬賱丕 丿賯鬲 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 丿乇 丕蹖賳讴賴 讴賵倬乇賳蹖讴 賵 賳蹖賵鬲賵賳 賱夭賵賲丕 囟丿丿蹖賳 賳亘賵丿賴 丕賳丿 賵 丕夭 賯囟蹖 賱丕丕賯賱 丕蹖賳 丿賵貙 亘乇乇爻蹖鈥屬囏й� 毓賱賲蹖 禺賵丿 乇丕 賳賵毓蹖 賮毓丕賱蹖鬲賽 丿蹖賳蹖 賲蹖鈥屫з嗀池� 丕賳丿貙 亘爻蹖丕乇 毓丕賱蹖 丕爻鬲 賵 丕蹖賳 賳讴鬲賴鈥屬囏� 乇丕 倬蹖卮鬲乇 丿乇 倬丕丿讴爻鬲 "鬲丕乇蹖禺 毓賱賲 賵 丕賳丿蹖卮賴" 丕夭 丿讴鬲乇 诏賲蹖賳蹖 卮賳蹖丿賴 亘賵丿賲.


{賮氐賱 丿賵賲}:
丕蹖賳 賮氐賱 賳卮丕賳 賲蹖鈥屫囏� "丕爻胤賵乇賴 賳賵卮丿丕乇賵蹖蹖 賴賵爻鈥屫ㄘж藏з嗁� 賳亘賵丿賴 丕爻鬲" 賵 囟乇賵乇鬲賽 夭蹖爻鬲賽 丕賳爻丕賳 讴賴賳鈥屫迟嗂� 讴丕乇蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┴必� 丕爻鬲 讴賴 噩賴丕賳賽 賲丕丿賴 乇丕 賳賲丕蹖賳丿賴鈥屫й� 丕夭 丕賲乇 賯丿爻蹖 亘丿丕賳丿. 亘賴 賯賵賱蹖 噩賴丕賳鈥屫ㄛ屬嗃� 丿賵乇丕賳賽 讴賴賳鈥屫迟嗂� 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屫й� 亘賵丿賴 丕爻鬲 賵 賲毓賳丕蹖 噩賴丕賳 乇丕 亘丕 丕爻胤賵乇賴 賮賴賲 賲蹖鈥屭┴必� 丕賳丿.
賲乇诏貙 丌爻賲丕賳 賵 賳爻亘鬲蹖 讴賴 丕蹖賳 讴賱丕賳賿 賲賮丕賴蹖賲 亘丕 丕賲乇 賯丿爻蹖 賵 噩賴丕賳鈥屫ㄛ屬嗃屬� 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屫й� 丿丕乇賳丿 丕夭 賲賮丕丿蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丿乇 丕蹖賳 賮氐賱 亘賴 丕禺鬲氐丕乇 亘賴 丌賳賴丕 倬乇丿丕禺鬲賴 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲.
蹖讴蹖 丕夭 丕蹖丿賴鈥屬囏й� 賲賴賲賽 丿蹖诏乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 鬲毓乇蹖賮賽 賲賯丕亘賱賴 賵 亘乇賴賲讴賳卮 賱賵诏賵爻 賵 賲蹖鬲賵爻 丕爻鬲. 賲毓賳丕蹖 鬲讴鈥屫粉屬� 賱賵诏賵爻 賴賲丕賳丕 毓賯賱賽 賲賳胤賯蹖貙 毓賲賱蹖 賵 毓賱賲蹖 丕爻鬲 賵 賲蹖鬲賵爻 賴賲丕賳 丕賳丿蹖卮賴贁 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屫й�. (丕賱亘鬲賴 丕蹖賳 鬲毓丕乇蹖賮賽 讴鬲丕亘 丕爻鬲 賵 賱丕丕賯賱 丿乇 賮賯乇賴贁 賲毓賳丕蹖 賱賵诏賵爻 賲蹖鈥屫з嗁� 卮丕蹖丿 趩賳丿 鬲賮爻蹖乇 賲賵噩賵丿 亘丕卮丿.) 亘丿賴鈥屬堌ㄘ池з� 亘蹖賳 賱賵诏賵爻 賵 賲蹖鬲賵爻 亘丿蹖賳 卮乇丨 丕爻鬲貨 賵賯鬲蹖 賲蹖鬲賵爻 亘賴 倬卮鬲 爻乇 賵 丿賳蹖丕蹖 鬲禺蹖賱蹖賽 讴賴賳鈥屫з勞堎囏� 賳诏丕賴 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賱賵诏賵爻 亘丕 賳馗乇 亘賴 噩賱賵 賲丿丕賲 爻毓蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 趩蹖夭蹖 鬲丕夭賴 讴卮賮 讴賳丿. 亘賴 亘蹖丕賳蹖 "賱賵诏賵爻貙 讴丕乇丌賲丿貙 毓賲賱蹖 賵 毓賯賱丕賳蹖" 丕爻鬲 賵 賲蹖鬲賵爻 丿乇 倬蹖 蹖丕賮鬲賳 賲毓賳丕蹖 睾丕蹖蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕賳爻丕賳.
賲賮賴賵賲 丿蹖诏乇 噩丕賱亘 丕蹖賳 賮氐賱 亘蹖丕賳 賳賲賵賳賴鈥屬囏й屰� 丕夭 讴賴賳鈥屫з勞堎囏й屰� 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丨鬲蹖 丿乇 丿賵乇丕賳 亘毓丿 丕夭 讴賴賳鈥屫迟嗂� 讴賴 賴賲丕賳 賳賵爻賳诏蹖 丕爻鬲 丕丿丕賲賴 丿丕卮鬲賴 丕爻鬲. 亘乇丕蹖 賲孬丕賱 乇丿賽 賴乇讴賵賱 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫堌з� 丿乇 丿賵乇丕賳 讴賴賳鈥屫迟嗂� 蹖丕賮鬲. 丕蹖囟丕 丌乇鬲賲蹖爻 賳蹖夭 趩賳蹖賳 倬蹖卮蹖賳賴鈥屫й� 丿丕乇丿.
蹖讴 賳賯丿賽 乇蹖夭 賴賲 亘诏賲貙 丕氐賱丕 噩丿蹖 賳诏蹖乇蹖丿 丕蹖賳 乇賵貙 诏丕賴丕 亘賴 賳馗乇賲 鬲賮丕爻蹖乇 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 匕賵賯蹖 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 丕賱亘鬲賴 賲丕賴蹖鬲賽 丕蹖賳诏賵賳賴 賲胤丕賱毓丕鬲 亘賴 賳馗乇賲 亘毓囟丕 丕蹖賳 賲賵囟賵毓 乇丕 毓賱鬲 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲. 蹖賴賵 丕蹖賳 丕賵賲丿 亘賴 匕賴賳賲貙 丕賵賱蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘蹖 賴賲 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丿丕乇賲 丿乇賲賵乇丿 丕爻胤賵乇賴 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗁呚� 倬爻 丕氐賱丕 噩丿蹖 賳诏蹖乇蹖丿.

{賮氐賱 爻賵賲}:
丿乇 丕蹖賳 賮氐賱貙 亘卮乇 蹖丕丿 诏乇賮鬲 讴卮丕賵乇夭蹖 讴賳丿. 卮乇丕蹖胤賽 夭蹖爻鬲 亘卮乇 鬲睾蹖蹖乇 讴乇丿貙 丕賲丕 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屬囏� 亘丕賯蹖 賲丕賳丿貨 丕賱亘鬲賴 賵丕囟丨 賵 賲亘乇賴賳 丕爻鬲 亘丕 丿诏乇丿蹖爻蹖鈥屬囏й屰�.
賱賵诏賵爻(賴賲丕賳 毓賯賱 毓賲賱蹖 賵 毓賱賲蹖) 亘乇丕蹖 丕賳爻丕賳 讴卮丕賵乇夭蹖 乇丕 亘賴 丕乇賲睾丕賳 丌賵乇丿 丕賲丕 亘丕毓孬 賳卮丿 噩賴丕賳鈥屫ㄛ屬嗃屬� 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屸€屬呚堌� 賳丕亘賵丿 卮賵丿. 賴賲趩賳丕賳 賲乇诏 亘丕 賴賲賴 毓馗賲鬲 賲賵噩賵丿 亘賵丿 賵 "毓賱賲 噩丿蹖丿 讴卮丕賵乇夭蹖 亘丕 丨蹖乇鬲蹖 丿蹖賳蹖 乇賵亘乇賵 卮丿."
丕蹖賳 鬲丨賵賱貙 賲賳丕爻讴蹖 賳丕馗乇 亘賴 讴卮丕賵乇夭蹖 乇丕 倬丕蹖賴 诏匕丕卮鬲 讴賴 丿賵 乇讴賳 賯丕亘賱 鬲卮禺蹖氐 丿丕卮鬲賴 丕爻鬲:
丕賵賱 丕蹖賳讴賴 賳賲蹖鈥屫堌з� 丕賳鬲馗丕乇 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮蹖丿 丕夭 賴蹖趩貙 趩蹖夭蹖 亘賴 丿爻鬲 丌賵乇蹖丿. 禺賱丕氐賴 亘丕蹖丿 丿丕賳賴 亘讴丕乇蹖 賵 鬲蹖賲丕乇卮 亘讴賳蹖 鬲丕 賲丨氐賵賱 丿乇賵 讴賳蹖.
丿賵賲 賴賲 丕蹖賳讴賴 趩乇禺賴 胤亘蹖毓鬲 賵 鬲賵噩賴 丕賳爻丕賳 亘賴卮" 丿蹖丿诏丕賴蹖 讴賱鈥屭必й屫з嗁� 丕夭 賵丕賯毓蹖鬲" 乇丕 亘乇丕蹖卮 亘賴 丌乇賲睾丕賳 丌賵乇丿.
丿乇 丕丿丕賲賴 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 噩夭卅蹖丕鬲 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 鬲賱賯蹖鈥屬囏й� 賲禺鬲賱賮 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屫й� 丕夭 噩賳爻蹖鬲 夭賲蹖賳 賵 賲丕賴蹖鬲賽 噩賳爻蹖賽 讴卮丕賵乇夭蹖 亘賴 賲蹖丕賳 賲蹖鈥屫①堌必� 讴賴 丨丕賱 賳丿丕乇賲 卮乇丨 亘丿賲 :)
丕賲丕 蹖賴 趩蹖夭 禺賱丕氐賴 亘诏賲 丕蹖賳讴賴貙 亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 讴卮丕賵乇夭蹖 讴卮賮 卮丿貙 丕賲丕 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘卮乇 賴賲趩賳丕賳 丿乇 趩賳亘乇賴 賯賴乇 胤亘蹖毓鬲 亘賵丿貙 賵 丕賱賴賴鈥屬囏й� 夭賳賽 丌賳 丿賵乇丕賳貙 賲禺氐賵氐丕 丕賱賴賴鈥屬囏й� 讴卮丕賵乇夭蹖貙 禺卮賲诏蹖賳 賵 睾囟亘鈥屫①勝堌� 亘賵丿賴 丕賳丿.
噩丕賱亘 丕爻鬲 丿乇 丕蹖賳 賮氐賱 賲孬丕賱鈥屬囏й� 亘爻蹖丕乇蹖 亘蹖卮鬲乇蹖 丕夭 丕爻丕胤蹖乇 丿賵乇丕賳賽 賲賵乇丿賽 亘乇乇爻蹖 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫ㄛ屬嗃屬呚� 诏賵蹖蹖 亘蹖卮鬲乇 丕夭卮賵賳 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗃屬� 賵 賲賳丕亘毓 丿丕乇蹖賲 賵 賴賲 丕蹖賳讴賴 賮氐賱 賯亘賱 丕賳诏丕乇 賲賯丿賲賴 亘賵丿賴.
丿乇 丕蹖賳 賮氐賱 丕夭 亘毓賱 賵 賲賵鬲 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗃屬呚� 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 賳夭賵賱賽 丕蹖賳丕賳丕 乇丕 丿丕乇蹖賲 讴賴 亘賴 賴賲乇丕賴賽 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屰� 蹖賵賳丕賳蹖賽 丿蹖賲蹖鬲乇 賵 丿禺鬲乇卮 倬乇爻蹖賮賵賳賴 亘賳鈥屬呚й屬団€屬囏й� 蹖讴爻丕賳蹖 丿丕乇賳丿. 鬲賯乇蹖亘丕 賴賲賵賳 鬲氐賵蹖乇 亘丕賱丕 讴賴 丕賱賴賴鈥屬囏й� 丌賳 丿賵乇丕賳 丿丕丿賲. 丕賱亘鬲賴 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗃屫� 讴賴 禺蹖賱蹖 禺賱丕氐賴 亘賵丿 賵 賳丕賯氐 丕蹖賳 鬲賯乇蹖乇責
丿乇 丕蹖賳 丿賵乇賴 賴賲 丕爻胤賵乇賴 亘乇丕蹖 亘卮乇 讴丕乇讴乇丿 丿丕卮鬲賴 賵 鬲夭卅蹖賳蹖 賳亘賵丿賴 丕爻鬲 亘賴 賴蹖趩 賵噩賴!

调賮氐賱4皑鈥�:
禺亘 丕蹖賳噩丕 亘賵丿 讴賴 亘卮乇 卮賴乇 爻丕禺鬲. 夭亘丕賳 乇賵 賴賲 丕亘丿丕毓 讴乇丿 賵 丕夭 丕蹖賳 亘賴 亘毓丿 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗀池� 丿乇 賯丕賱亘 丕丿亘蹖丕鬲 賴賲 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屬矩必ж槽� 讴賳賴. 丿乇 卮賴乇 爻乇毓鬲 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘蹖卮鬲乇 卮丿賴 亘賵丿 賴賲趩賳蹖賳 睾乇賵乇 亘卮乇. 丕賱亘鬲賴 丕賵賳 賲賵賯毓 卮賴乇鈥屬囏� 爻丕禺鬲賴 賲蹖鈥屫簇嗀� 丕賲丕 亘賴 爻乇毓鬲 鬲禺乇蹖亘 賲蹖鈥屫簇嗀� 賵 亘丕蹖丿 亘丕夭爻丕夭蹖 賲蹖鈥屫簇嗀�. 亘丕賱丕禺锟斤拷賴 賮乇爻賵丿诏蹖賽 卮丿蹖丿 賵賯鬲蹖 鬲讴賳賵賱賵跇蹖 禺蹖賱蹖 丨賯蹖乇 亘賵丿賴 胤亘蹖毓蹖賴.
讴賱丕 "卮賴乇" 胤亘賯 乇賵丕蹖鬲 讴鬲丕亘貙 賳賲丕丿蹖 丕夭 胤睾蹖丕賳 丕賳爻丕賳 丕爻鬲. 丕氐賱丕 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 讴爻蹖 讴賴 卮賴乇 爻丕禺鬲 賴賲丕賳 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 賯丕鬲賱賽 鬲丕乇蹖禺 丕爻鬲貨 賯丕亘蹖賱. 亘毓丿 丕氐賱丕 賵賯鬲蹖 亘卮乇 賲鬲賲丿賳 賵 卮賴乇賳卮蹖賳 卮丿 乇賮鬲 爻乇丕睾 讴丕乇賴丕蹖蹖 賲孬賱 毓賱賲 讴乇丿賳 亘乇噩 亘丕亘賱. 賳賲丕丿賽 卮丕匕 胤睾蹖丕賳. 賴賲賵賳 亘乇噩蹖 讴賴 毓賱鬲賽 鬲讴孬乇 夭亘丕賳鈥屬囏� 卮丿.
丕胤賱丕賯賽 丕賲乇 賯丿爻蹖 賴賲 丿趩丕乇 丿诏乇丿蹖爻蹖 卮丿. 丕噩丿丕丿 卮讴丕乇趩蹖 賵 讴卮丕賵乇夭賽 丕賳爻丕賳 卮賴乇賳卮蹖賳貙 夭賲蹖賳 賵 丌爻賲丕賳 賵... 乇丕 賲賯丿爻 賲蹖鈥屫з嗀池� 丕賲丕 亘卮乇 卮賴乇賳卮蹖賳 丿爻鬲丕賵乇丿賴丕蹖 賮乇賴賳诏蹖 禺賵丿卮 乇丕 賳蹖夭 鬲賯丿蹖爻 讴乇丿. 趩蹖責 丿爻鬲丕賵乇丿賴丕蹖 "禺賵丿卮" 乇丕. 亘賴 賳馗乇 讴賴 鬲睾蹖蹖乇蹖 賲賴賲 丕爻鬲. 亘卮乇 賵 讴丕乇賴丕蹖卮 丿乇 賲乇讴夭 丌賲丿賴 亘賵丿 賵 禺丿丕蹖丕賳 丿賵乇 卮丿賳丿貙 丌賳賴丕 賵丕賯毓蹖鬲蹖 丌卮讴丕乇 賳亘賵賳丿.
丕賱亘鬲賴 睾乇賵乇 亘丕毓孬 賳卮丿 亘卮乇 賳賮賴賲丿 鬲賲丿賳蹖 讴賴 爻丕禺鬲賴 賲孬賱 禺賵丿卮 卮讴賳賳丿賴 丕爻鬲. 鬲乇爻 丕夭 卮讴爻鬲賽 鬲賲丿賳 毓賱蹖賴 毓賵丕賲賱 賵蹖乇丕賳诏乇 胤亘蹖毓鬲貙 鬲賱丕卮蹖 賯賴乇賲丕賳丕賳賴 賵 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屫й� 賳蹖丕夭 丿丕乇丿. 丕夭 丕蹖賳噩丕爻鬲 讴賴 賴乇 卮賴乇 禺丿丕 賵 丨丕賮馗 锟斤拷 倬賳丕賴蹖 丿丕乇丿.
賳诏丕賴 鬲讴丕賲賱蹖 亘賴 丌賮乇蹖賳卮 賴賲 丿乇 丕蹖賳 丿賵乇丕賳 夭丕蹖蹖丿賴 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�.
诏蹖賱诏賲卮賽 賲毓乇賵賮 賴賲 亘乇丕蹖 丕蹖賳 丿賵乇賴 丕爻鬲 賵 毓噩亘 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 毓噩蹖亘 賵 噩丕賱亘蹖 丿丕乇丿. 亘賴 亘蹖丕賳蹖 "诏蹖賱诏賲卮貙 丕賳爻丕賳 賲鬲賲丿賳貙 丕爻鬲賯賱丕賱 禺賵丿 丕夭 丌爻賲丕賳 乇丕 丕毓賱丕賲 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�.". 卮丕蹖丿 诏蹖賱诏賲卮 賲蹖乇丕 亘丕卮丿 賵 亘賲蹖乇丿貙 丕賲丕 亘丕 丕亘丿丕毓 禺胤貙 禺賵丿 乇丕 賲丕賳丕 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 丌乇賴 丿蹖诏賴 丕賱丕賳 丕賮爻丕賳賴鈥屫й� 卮丿賴 讴賴 鬲丕 丕賲乇賵夭 夭賳丿诏蹖 讴乇丿賴 丕爻鬲!
賵丕賯毓丕 爻賮乇賴 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屫堌з嗃�!

{賮氐賱 倬賳噩賲}:

毓氐乇 賲丨賵乇蹖 (丨丿賵丿 800鬲丕200 賯 賲)

趩乇丕 丕蹖賳 丿賵乇賴 乇丕 亘乇禺蹖 賲丕賳賳丿 讴丕乇賱 蹖丕爻倬乇爻 毓氐乇 賲丨賵乇蹖 賳丕賲蹖丿賴 丕賳丿責 亘賴 丿賱蹖賱 賳賯卮 丕爻丕爻蹖 丕蹖賳 丿賵乇賴 丿乇 鬲丨賵賱賽 賲毓賳賵蹖賽 亘卮乇貨 "丕蹖賳 丿賵乇賴 爻乇丌睾丕夭 丿蹖賳 亘賴 賲賮賴賵賲蹖 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屫促嗀ж驰屬� 亘賵丿" 丕夭 讴賳賮賵爻蹖賵爻鈥屭必й屰� 賵 鬲丕卅賵蹖爻賲 丿乇 趩蹖賳貙 賴賳丿賵卅蹖爻賲 賵 亘賵丿蹖爻賲 丿乇 賴賳丿 鬲丕 蹖讴鬲丕倬乇爻鬲蹖 丿乇 禺丕賵乇賲蹖丕賳賴 賵 丨鬲蹖 禺乇丿诏乇丕蹖蹖賽 蹖賵賳丕賳蹖.
丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屬囏� 亘蹖卮鬲乇 亘丕 丕禺賱丕賯蹖丕鬲 賵 丿乇賵賳蹖丕鬲 丕賳爻丕賳鈥屬囏� 乇丕亘胤賴 亘乇 賯乇丕乇 讴乇丿賳丿 賵 丿蹖诏乇 賳賲賵丿賽 丕爻丕胤蹖乇 丿乇 丌蹖蹖賳 賵 賲賳丕爻讴 賳亘賵丿貙 亘賱讴賴 丕爻胤賵乇賴 亘丕蹖丿 乇丕賴蹖 亘乇丕蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕禺賱丕賯蹖 賵 鬲毓丕賲賱 亘蹖賳 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 賳蹖夭 賲毓乇賮蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┴必�. 丿乇 囟賲賳 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屬囏� 丿乇 丕蹖賳 丿賵乇賴 賳賯丿 卮丿賳丿.
丿乇 丕丿丕賲賴 卮乇丨蹖 丕夭 丕爻丕胤蹖乇 趩蹖賳 賵 丿丕爻鬲丕賳賽 倬蹖丿丕蹖卮 賵 诏爻鬲乇卮 讴賳賮賵爻蹖賵爻鈥屭必й屰� 亘賴 賲蹖丕賳 賲蹖鈥屫③屫�. 鬲讴 噩賲賱賴鈥屫й� 噩匕丕亘 亘乇丕蹖 賲賳 丕夭 亘禺卮 "丿賵賱鬲賽 夭賲蹖賳蹖[丿乇 趩蹖賳]貙 賴賲匕丕鬲 鬲乇鬲蹖亘丕鬲 丌爻賲丕賳蹖 亘賵丿." 鬲丕 丨丿蹖 丕蹖賳 毓亘丕乇鬲 趩讴蹖丿賴 賮氐賱蹖 丕夭 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕賴 亘丕乇蹖讴 丌夭丕丿蹖 丕夭 毓噩賲鈥屫з堌嘿勝� 賵 乇丕亘蹖賳爻賵賳 賴賲 賴爻鬲.
卮乇丨蹖 丕夭 亘賵丿蹖爻賲 賴賲 丿丕乇蹖賲. 賲卮禺氐賴 讴賴 賴賲卮 禺蹖賱蹖 讴倬爻賵賱蹖 賵 禺賱丕氐賴 丕乇丕卅賴 卮丿賴.
亘賴 亘蹖丕賳蹖 亘丕 丕囟丕賮賴 卮丿賳 丕禺賱丕賯 亘賴 丕爻胤賵乇賴貙 丕爻胤賵乇賴 亘蹖卮 丕夭 倬蹖卮 鬲毓賲蹖賯 賵 丿賵乇賳蹖 卮丿 丿乇 讴賳賴 丕賳爻丕賳!
禺丿丕蹖 賯賵賲賽 蹖賴賵丿貙 蹖賴賵賵賴貙 賳蹖夭 丿乇 丕蹖賳 賮氐賱 丿乇 爻鬲蹖夭 亘丕 禺丿丕蹖诏丕賳 賵 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屬囏й� 倬蹖卮 亘賵丿. 禺賱丕氐賴 蹖賴賵賵賴 卮丿 "鬲賳賴丕 禺丿丕蹖 賲賵噩賵丿".

丕賲丕 亘禺卮 噩匕丕亘 丕蹖賳 賮氐賱 亘乇丕蹖 賲賳 蹖賵賳丕賳 亘賵丿. 丿毓賵丕蹖 賴賲蹖卮诏蹖 賲蹖鬲賵爻 賵 賱賵诏賵爻 亘賴 毓賱鬲 賮賱爻賮賴 丿乇 蹖賵賳丕賳 亘爻蹖丕乇 賵禺蹖賲 賵 噩丿蹖 卮丿. 鬲乇丕跇丿蹖 賵 賮賱爻賮賴 賵 丕爻胤賵乇賴貙 爻鬲蹖夭蹖 禺賵賳蹖 賵 "鬲乇丕跇蹖讴" :)) 丿丕卮鬲賳丿.
丿乇 鬲賲丕賲 丕蹖賳 亘禺卮 丕夭 讴鬲丕亘 爻蹖亘蹖賱賽 賳蹖趩賴貙 噩賱賵 趩卮賲丕賳賲 亘賵丿. 讴賱丕 亘禺卮 賲賴賲蹖 丕夭 賳蹖趩賴 丿毓賵丕蹖蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丕賵 亘丕 毓賯賱賽 賮賱爻賮蹖賽 賲賳亘毓孬 丕夭 蹖賵賳丕賳 丿丕乇丿. 亘毓丿 蹖賴 毓丿賴 賴賲蹖賳 噩賵乇蹖 亘丕 丕噩鬲賴丕丿賽 卮禺氐蹖 賳蹖趩賴 賲蹖鈥屫促嗀ж迟嗀� 賵 亘丕 丕蹖賳 卮賳丕禺鬲 賮賱爻賮賴鈥屫з� 卮丿賴 丕賳丿. 賴夭丕乇 丕賱賱賴 丕讴亘乇. 賲賳 蹖讴蹖 噩乇卅鬲 賳讴乇丿賲 噩丿蹖 亘乇賲 爻乇丕睾 丕賵賳 丿蹖賵賵賳賴. 丨丕賱賲 賳丿丕乇賲 亘乇賲 賵 夭蹖丕丿 賴賲 丿賵爻鬲 賳丿丕乇賲貙 賵賱蹖 匕賴賳賽 賲乇蹖囟蹖 丿丕卮鬲賴 賵 賲賳賲 賲乇蹖囟賽 匕賴賳賽 賲乇蹖囟!
賵賱蹖 丕蹖賳 賮氐賱 賲賳 乇賵 噩賻乇蹖 讴乇丿 亘乇賲 蹖讴 丿賵乇 亘丕夭禺賵丕賳蹖 噩丿蹖 亘讴賳賲 讴鬲丕亘蹖 毓丕賱蹖 乇丕貨 讴鬲丕亘賽 "賮賱爻賮賴 毓賱賵賲 丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖 賯丕乇賴鈥屫й�" 丕夭 丕蹖賵賳 卮乇鬲貙 賯亘賱丕 亘賴 賮乇丕禺賵乇 賵 倬乇丕讴賳丿賴貙 85丿乇氐丿 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 噩賵蹖丿賴 丕賲貙 丨丕賱丕 亘丕蹖丿 蹖賴 丿賵乇 賲丿賵賳 賵 丨賵丕爻 噩賲毓 亘丕夭禺賵丕賳蹖鈥屫ж� 讴賳賲. 噩丕賱亘賴 禺蹖賱蹖 卮毓賮 賵 匕賵賯 丿丕乇賲. 卮讴乇

{賮氐賱 卮卮賲}:
丿乇 丿賵乇丕賳 倬爻丕賲丨賵乇蹖 讴賴 禺蹖賱蹖 賴賲 胤賵賱丕賳蹖 丕爻鬲 (丨丿賵丿 200 賯 賲 鬲丕 丨丿賵丿 1500賲蹖賱丕丿蹖) 亘賴 夭毓賲 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 亘賴 賲丿鬲 丨丿賵丿 1700爻丕賱 鬲睾蹖蹖乇 賯丕亘賱 鬲賵噩賴蹖 丿乇 丕爻丕胤蹖乇 亘賴 賵噩賵丿 賳蹖丕賲丿賴 丕爻鬲. 亘禺卮蹖 賲賴賲 丕夭 丿賵乇丕賳 (丨丿賵丿 10賯乇賳)貙 賲蹖鈥屫促� 賯乇賵賳 賵爻胤蹖 賵 爻蹖胤乇賴贁 賲爻蹖丨蹖鬲 亘乇 丕乇賵倬丕.
蹖毓賳蹖 賴賲 睾乇亘蹖丕賳 丕爻胤賵乇賴 乇丕 亘賴 賳賯丿 讴卮蹖丿賳丿 賵 賴賲趩賳蹖賳 丕丿蹖丕賳 蹖讴鬲丕倬乇爻鬲蹖 亘蹖卮 丕夭 丕蹖賳讴賴 禺賵丿 乇丕 賲亘鬲賳蹖 亘乇 丕爻胤賵乇賴 亘丿丕賳賳丿 禺賵丿 乇丕 賲亘鬲賳蹖 亘乇 "鬲丕乇蹖禺" 賲毓乇賮蹖 讴乇丿賴 丕賳丿.
丕賱亘鬲賴 丿乇 丕蹖賳 賮氐賱 亘賴 亘乇禺蹖 丕夭 乇蹖卮賴鈥屬囏й� 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屫й� 亘乇禺蹖 丕丿蹖丕賳 丕卮丕乇賴 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲.
丿乇 丕蹖賳 賮氐賱 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 亘丕 丕蹖賳 卮乇丨 讴賴 丕爻胤賵乇賴 丕賲乇蹖 丿乇賵賳蹖 賵 毓賲蹖賯 丿乇 丕賳爻丕賳 丕爻鬲貙 丕爻鬲丿賱丕賱 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賵 卮賵丕賴丿蹖 亘賴 丿爻鬲 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 讴賴 鬲賮丕爻蹖乇 毓乇賮丕賳蹖 丕夭 丕丿蹖丕賳 乇蹖卮賴 丿乇 丕爻丕胤蹖乇 丿丕乇賳丿.
蹖讴 賳讴鬲賴 賲賴賲 讴賴 丿乇 丕蹖賳 賮氐賱 亘丿丕賳 丕卮丕乇賴 卮丿賴 亘賵丿 丕蹖賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴: 丿乇 "丿賵乇丕賳 倬蹖卮 丕夭 賲丿乇賳 亘丿蹖賴蹖 賮乇囟 賲蹖鈥屫簇� 讴賴 乇賵丕蹖鬲蹖鈥�" 乇爻賲蹖" 丕夭 蹖讴 丕爻胤賵乇賴 賵噩賵丿 賳丿丕乇賳丿". 蹖毓賳蹖 丕賳爻丕賳鈥屬囏� 賴賲蹖卮賴 丨爻 賲蹖鈥屭┴必嗀� 賲噩丕夭 丕賳丿 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屬囏й� 噩丿蹖丿 禺賱賯 讴賳賳丿 蹖丕 鬲賮爻蹖乇蹖 賳賵 丕夭 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屬囏� 亘賴 丿爻鬲 丿賴賳丿.
蹖讴 丕丿毓丕蹖 噩丕賱亘 賵 噩匕丕亘 丿乇 讴鬲丕亘 丕蹖賳 亘賵丿 讴賴 "丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屰� 诏賳丕賴 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳" 讴賴 丿乇 賲爻蹖丨蹖鬲 鬲賵爻胤 賯丿蹖爻 丌诏賵爻鬲蹖賳 丕乇丕卅賴 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲貙 賲亘賳丕蹖蹖 丿乇 讴鬲丕亘 賲賯丿爻 賳丿丕乇丿. 亘爻蹖丕乇 鬲丕賲賱鈥屫ㄘ必з嗂屫� 賵 爻賵丕賱鈥屫屫� 丕爻鬲 丕蹖賳 賲丿毓丕.
乇噩毓鬲 倬蹖丕賲亘乇 賵 睾蹖亘鬲 丕賲丕賲 丿賵丕夭丿賴賲 賳蹖夭 噩夭賵 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屬囏� 賲賯賵賱賴鈥屫ㄙ嗀� 卮丿賴 丿乇 乇賵丕蹖鬲 讴鬲丕亘.
讴鬲丕亘 丿乇賲賵乇丿 1700爻丕賱 丕夭 鬲丕乇蹖禺 噩賴丕賳 丿乇 10氐賮丨賴 丨乇賮 夭丿賴 丕爻鬲 賵 賵賯鬲蹖 丕夭 丕爻賱丕賲 丨乇賮 賲蹖鈥屫藏� 賲卮禺氐 亘賵丿 趩賯丿乇 噩夭卅蹖丕鬲 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 賱丕丕賯賱 亘賴 丌賳賴丕 丕卮丕乇賴 賳讴乇丿賴 丕爻鬲貨 噩夭卅賷丕鬲賽 賲賴賲蹖 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗁嗀� 鬲賲丕賲 丕爻鬲丿賱丕賱鈥屬囏й� 賳賵蹖賳爻丿賴 乇丕 賳賯卮 亘乇 丌亘 讴賳. 亘賴 賯賵賱蹖 "卮蹖胤丕賳 丿乇 噩夭卅蹖丕鬲 丕爻鬲鈥�".


賴賲賵賳鈥屫焚堌� 讴賴 诏賮鬲賲 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 倬丕乇爻丕賱 禺賵賳丿賴 亘賵丿賲. 鬲賵 丕蹖賳 賲丿鬲 丿賵亘丕乇賴 賳乇賮鬲賲 禺蹖賱蹖 爻乇丕睾 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屫促嗀ж驰�. 賵賱蹖 丕禺蹖乇丕 賲亘丕賳蹖 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屫促嗀ж驰� 賲禺亘乇 乇丕 禺乇蹖丿賲 賵 賲蹖鈥屫堌з囐� 亘禺賵丕賳賲貙 丕爻胤賵乇賴贁 丿賵賱鬲賽 讴丕爻蹖乇乇 賴賲 亘爻蹖 丕爻丕爻蹖 丕爻鬲 (噩乇卅鬲 賳丿丕乇賲 亘禺賵丕賳賲卮) 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屫促嗀ж驰� 乇賵賱丕賳 亘丕乇鬲 賵 賮賴賲 賲毓丕氐乇 亘丕 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥� 賴賲 噩匕丕亘賴...
Profile Image for Jan-Maat.
1,653 reviews2,376 followers
Read
May 1, 2021
This is a likeable book, but it is overwhelmingly Karin Armstrong鈥檚 book and my lasting impression was that I am not in tune enough with Karin Armstrong to best appreciate this book, which made it far more complex for me to read than I suspect that she intended.

To my mind, a couple of days after reading, this book is like an upside down pudding and to explain it I need to flip it round and start discussing it where this book ends, perhaps I need to give the book a new title to better in my opinion explain what it is all about, and that would be 鈥榃hy the 鈥淲est鈥� is in such a snake filled pit and how we can get out of it鈥�.

For Armstrong there is our familiar earthly realm, but along side it there is a divine, or spiritual reality. Myths, for her, explain the relationship of the physical with the metaphysical. One of her examples of this is the escape of the Hebrews through the Red Sea: in the physical realm this is a singular event, but spiritually she says, it demonstrates God鈥檚 relationship with the chosen people and so the myth teaches the faithful the nature of that relationship. You may notice that for Armstrong religion is not distinct from myth, it is a part of myth, therefore for her a short history of myth turns out to be a short history of religion , it is plain though that it is religion that interests her, not myth.

This she explores chronologically: Old Stone Age, New Stone age, Early civilisations, Axial Age, post Axial period , then 鈥渢he Great Western transformation鈥� - the final chapter title gives he game away really, the 鈥榃est鈥� (The WEIRD countries) are not like everywhere else, no they are worse, because in Armstrong鈥檚 view they have lost the interface provided by myth between the physical and the metaphysical. The depth of the snake pit for Armstrong is illustrated by a number of books; , , , and , some what she says about these books I felt was very interesting 鈥� heart of darkness and Magic mountain as flawed hero鈥檚 quests, in the traditional narrative there needs to be death and rebirth, while in the modern narrative there is just death and no new life (pp 147-153).

For Armstrong, and this is her important point, the West has gone wrong, starting with Plato and Aristotle, getting worse with worshipping one God, down to our current position in the snake pit, getting bitten in sensitive places by vipers, a consequence of divorcing ourselves from the spiritual realm . Personally I think she is wrong in lots of ways 鈥� starting by conflating religion and myth, I could write about that all day (in theory) because I sighed deep within reading as if I had been given Casaubon's Key to all mythologies as though it were a worthwhile exploration of myth, but I think more importantly, that her sense of loss and particularly that 鈥渨estern鈥� civilisation has lost something essential is a widespread one, to my mind she is articulating much the same pain as T.S. Elliot, or Max Weber with his Iron Cage of life in a modern capitalist society. Part of me feels they might all require the spiritual equivalent of a hip transplant but I also recall Rebecca Solnit in saying "Disenchantment is the blessing of becoming yourself".
Profile Image for Brittany.
1,286 reviews136 followers
July 29, 2015
This book began by making a sweeping, unfounded generalization, and then irritated the heck out of me.

That's not a great way for a book to start.

In fact, if I'd just been reading it for fun I would have been tempted to stop. But I'm determined to read all the Canongate Myths, and for whatever reason this one is listed first. And it's only 150 pages long so, I figured, how bad can it be?

It starts by stating categorically that humans are the only animals to have language, the think on a meta level, and to play. These are all untrue. They're not even up for debate. The degree to which they're true is debated, hotly, but the bald fact that other animals have language, metacognition, and play is not at question in serious scientific circles. To suggest otherwise is just pure, blatant lazy thinking and bad research.

I figured these antiquated notions must reflect the old age of the book, but it turns out it was published in 2005. The source she cites for these ideas, however, was published in 1949. That's just lazy researching. That's fishing for a citation for a fact that you assume is true and don't want to put the effort into researching. And that just makes me crabby. How am I supposed to believe anything else Armstrong has to say if she's not even going to take researching seriously?

At that point, I really just started to squabble with the book, and Armstrong did nothing to redeem herself. For 100 or 120 pages, it all reads like a term paper written the night before its due date. There are interesting ideas, but they are scantily supported and the internal logic is not strong.

She makes sweeping generalizations (about why sky gods died out, for example, or assuming that sky god religions died out). She gets her logic confused, and repeatedly contradicts herself. She states that early humans did not distinguish between mundane, profane, and divine, but then uses exactly those terms to define how they thought about something. She makes unsupported statements about the state of mind of humans millennia ago, something she can't know, and gives no information regarding how she reached her conclusions. She uses modern perspective to analyze ancient times.

She keeps telling us that myths don't make sense without their liturgy or their rituals, but never explains this and, furthermore, doesn't explain how that fits in with her writing about myths in the first place.

The only reason I kept reading was stubbornness, and the fact that someone who'd read this (library!) copy before me had clearly had the same reaction. Wry, witty, comments in green ink at the most irksome sections kept me entertained. At least I wasn't alone.

I was all prepared to give this book two stars at the most when I hit page 130, and all of a sudden things got good.

The very last section of the book is where Armstrong hid her thesis: Humans need myths, and mythical thinking, to survive successfully. The degeneration of mythical thinking is at fault for most of our societal ills. Not that we need to believe someone can save us, but strict materialism doesn't seem to be working. This is extremely interesting, and she has some fascinating things to say on the topic of religious fundamentalism and creationism.

The last 20 pages or so are worth four stars, maybe even five. They are meaty, intelligent, and ripe for exploration. It's a pity I had to read so far to get there, and got so annoyed along the way.
Profile Image for BookHunter M  購H  賻M  賻D.
1,660 reviews4,393 followers
May 9, 2025

鉂� 丕賱兀爻胤賵乇丞 賵丕賱毓賱賲 賷賵爻毓丕賳 賲毓丕賸 賲丿賶 丕賱賵噩賵丿 丕賱亘卮乇賷. 賵賰賲丕 賴賲丕 丕賱毓賱賲 賵丕賱鬲賯賳賷丞. 賮廿賳 丕賱賲賷孬賵賱賵噩賷丕 賱賷爻鬲 禺乇賵噩丕 賲賳 賴匕丕 丕賱毓丕賱賲. 亘賱 鬲鬲毓賱賯 亘賯丿乇鬲賳丕 毓賱賶 丕賱毓賷卮 賮賷賴 亘賰孬丕賮丞. 鉂�
猸愶笍猸愶笍猸愶笍猸愶笍
鉂� 賷亘丿賵 賲賳 賴匕丕. 兀賳 丕賱亘卮乇 鬲賲賷夭賵丕 賲賳匕 夭賲賳 賲亘賰乇 噩丿丕. 亘賯丿乇鬲賴賲 毓賱賶 丨賷丕夭丞 兀賮賰丕乇 鬲鬲噩丕賵夭 鬲噩丕乇亘賴賲 丕賱賷賵賲賷丞. 鉂�
猸愶笍猸愶笍猸愶笍猸愶笍
鉂� 賮毓賳丿賲丕 丨丿賯 丕賱賳丕爻 賮賷 丕賱爻賲丕亍 丕賱賱丕賳賴丕卅賷丞 賵丕賱亘毓賷丿丞 賵丕賱賲賵噩賵丿丞 亘卮賰賱 賲賳賮氐賱 毓賳 丨賷丕鬲賴賲 丕賱賴夭賷賱丞. 鬲賵賱賻賾丿鬲 賱丿賷賴賲 鬲噩乇亘丞 丿賷賳賷丞. 賮丕賱爻賲丕亍 丕賱賲亘賳賷丞 賮賵賯賴賲 亘囟禺丕賲丞 賴丕卅賱丞. 賱丕 賷賲賰賳 丕爻鬲賷毓丕亘賴丕 賵賱丕 賷賲賰賳 丕賱賵氐賵賱 廿賱賷賴丕 賵賴賷 兀夭賱賷丞. 賰丕賳鬲 丕賱爻賲丕亍 丨賷賳賴丕. 鬲賲孬賱 噩賵賴乇 丕賱鬲毓丕賱賷 賵丕賱賲賮丕乇賯丞 賵丕賱丌禺賻乇賷丞. 賵賱丕 賷賲賱賰 丕賱亘卮乇 丕賱鬲兀孬賷乇 毓賱賷賴丕. 賰賲丕 兀賳 丕賱丿乇丕賲丕 丕賱鬲賷 賱丕 鬲賳鬲賴賷. 賵丕賱賳丕鬲噩丞 賲賳 乇毓丿 丕賱爻賲丕亍 賵亘乇賯賴丕. 賵禺爻賵賮賴丕 賵乇賷丕丨賴丕. 賵賲睾賷亘 卮賲爻賴丕. 賵賯賵爻 賯夭丨賴丕. 賵卮賴亘賴丕 賵賳賷丕夭賰賴丕. 鬲鬲丨丿孬 毓賳 亘毓丿 丌禺乇 賮丕毓賱 賵賱丕賲鬲賳丕賴賷. 賵賴賵 兀賳 賱賱爻賲丕亍 丨賷丕鬲賴丕 丕賱丿賷賳丕賲賷丞 丕賱禺丕氐丞 亘賴丕. 賱賯丿 賲賱兀 鬲兀賲購賾賱購 丕賱爻賲丕亍 丕賱賳丕爻賻 亘丕賱乇毓亘 賵丕賱丕亘鬲賴丕噩. 亘丕賱丿賴卮丞 賵丕賱禺賵賮. 賮丕賱爻賲丕亍 丕噩鬲匕亘鬲賴賲 賵賳賮賻賾乇鬲賴賲. 廿賳賴丕 亘胤亘賷毓鬲賴丕 丕賱匕丕鬲賷丞 廿賱賴賷丞. 鉂�
猸愶笍猸愶笍猸愶笍猸愶笍
鉂� 賮賷 丕賱賷賵賳丕賳. 鬲賲 廿胤賱丕賯 丕賱毓氐乇 丕賱賲丨賵乇賷 賲賳 禺賱丕賱 丕賱賱賵睾賵爻 (丕賱毓賯賱) 賭 丕賱匕賷 賷毓賲賱 丕賱丌賳 亘賲爻鬲賵賶 匕賴賳賷 賲禺鬲賱賮 毓賳 丕賱兀爻胤賵乇丞. 丨賷孬 鬲鬲胤賱亘 丕賱兀爻胤賵乇丞 賲卮丕乇賰丞 毓丕胤賮賷丞 兀賵 賳賵毓丕賸 賲賳 賲丨丕賰丕丞 胤賯賵爻賷丞 賱賷賰賵賳 賱賴丕 賲毓賳賶 賲丕. 賮賷 丨賷賳 賷丨丕賵賱 丕賱賱賵睾賵爻 鬲兀爻賷爻 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞 亘兀爻賱賵亘 丕爻鬲丿賱丕賱 賲鬲兀賳 賷爻鬲賳丿 賮賯胤 廿賱賶 丕爻賱賵亘 丕賱賳賯丿 丕賱賮賰乇賷. 鉂�
猸愶笍猸愶笍猸愶笍猸愶笍
鉂� 丨氐賱 鬲賮丕丐賱 噩丿賷丿 賮賷 丕賱睾乇亘. 賵卮毓乇 丕賱賳丕爻 兀賳 賱丿賷賴賲 爻賷胤乇丞 兀賰孬乇 毓賱賶 亘賷卅鬲賴賲 賵賲丨賷胤賴賲. 賵賱賲 賷毓丿 賴賳丕賱賰 賯賵丕賳賷賳 賲賯丿爻丞 賱丕 鬲賯亘賱 丕賱鬲毓丿賷賱. 兀氐亘丨 亘廿賲賰丕賳賴賲. 賵亘賮囟賱 丕賰鬲卮丕賮丕鬲賴賲 丕賱毓賱賲賷丞. 賲毓丕賱噩丞 丕賱胤亘賷毓丞 賱鬲丨爻賷賳 賲乇丿賵丿賴賲 賲賳賴丕. 賰賲丕 兀丨丿孬鬲 廿賰鬲卮丕賮丕鬲 丕賱胤亘 丕賱丨丿賷孬. 賵毓賱賵賲 丕賱氐丨丞. 賵鬲賯賳賷丕鬲 鬲賳馗賷賲 丕賱毓賲賱. 賵鬲胤賵乇 賵爻丕卅賱 丕賱賳賯賱. 孬賵乇丞賸 賮賷 丨賷丕丞 丕賱卮毓亘 丕賱睾乇亘賷 賳丨賵 丕賱兀賮囟賱. 賵乇睾賲 匕賱賰. 賮廿賳 丕賱賱賵睾賵爻 賱賲 賷賰賳 兀亘丿丕賸 賯丕丿乇丕賸 毓賱賶 鬲賵賮賷乇賽 廿丨爻丕爻 亘丕賱賲毓賳賶 賱丿賶 丕賱亘卮乇. 賵丕賱匕賷 賷亘丿賵 兀賳賴賲 賲丕 夭丕賱賵丕 賷胤賱亘賵賳賴 賵賷亘丨孬賵賳 毓賳賴 亘丕爻鬲賲乇丕乇. 賮丕賱兀爻胤賵乇丞 賴賷 丕賱鬲賷 鬲毓胤賷 賱賱丨賷丕丞 賲毓賳賶 賵卮賰賱丕 鉂�
猸愶笍猸愶笍猸愶笍猸愶笍
鉂� 賳丨鬲丕噩 廿賱賶 丕賱丕爻胤賵乇丞 賰賷 鬲爻丕毓丿賳丕 毓賱賶 丕賱鬲毓乇賮 毓賱賶 兀禺賵鬲賳丕 賮賷 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷丞 賵丕賱鬲丌賱賮 賲毓賴賲. 賱賷爻 賮賯胤 兀賵賱卅賰 丕賱匕賷賳 賷賳鬲賲賵賳 廿賱賶 賯亘賷賱鬲賳丕 丕賱賯賵賲賷丞 賵丕賱廿賷丿賷賵賱噩賷丞 賵丕賱廿孬賳賷丞. 賳丨鬲丕噩 廿賱賶 丕賱兀爻胤賵乇丞 賰賷 鬲爻丕毓丿賳丕 毓賱賶 廿丿乇丕賰 賯賷賲 丕賱鬲毓丕胤賮 賵丕賱鬲丌賱賮 丕賱鬲賷 賯丿 賱丕 鬲賰賵賳 匕丕鬲 賲乇丿賵丿 賵賲賳賮毓丞 賲丕丿賷丞 賰丕賮賷賷賳 賮賷 毓丕賱賲賳丕 丕賱匕乇丕卅毓賷 賵丕賱毓賯賱丕賳賷. 賳丨鬲丕噩 廿賱賶 丕賱兀爻胤賵乇丞 賱鬲爻丕毓丿賳丕 毓賱賶 鬲賰賵賷賳 爻賱賵賰 乇賵丨丕賳賷 賷賲賰賳賳丕 賲賳 丕賱鬲毓乇賮 毓賱賶 賲丕 賵乇丕亍 丕賱賲鬲胤賱亘丕鬲 丕賱丌賳賷丞. 賵賲賳 丕禺鬲亘丕乇 賯賷賲 爻丕賲賷丞 鬲鬲丨丿賶 賲丨賵乇賷丞 丨亘 丕賱匕丕鬲 賮賷賳丕. 賳丨鬲丕噩 廿賱賶 丕賱兀爻胤賵乇丞 賱賰賷 鬲爻丕毓丿賳丕 毓賱賶 鬲孬賲賷賳 丕賱兀乇囟 賲賳 噩丿賷丿 賰卮賷亍 賲賯丿爻 亘丿賱丕 賲賳 丕爻鬲毓賲丕賱賴丕 賰賲賵乇丿. 賴匕丕 兀爻丕爻賷 賵囟乇賵乇賷 賮賷 毓氐乇賳丕. 賵賲丕 賱賲 賷賰賳 賴賳丕賱賰 孬賵乇丞 乇賵丨賷丞 賲賵丕賰亘丞 賱毓亘賯乇賷鬲賳丕 丕賱鬲賰賳賵賱賵噩賷丞. 賮賱賳 賳爻鬲胤賷毓 廿賳賯丕匕 賰賵賰亘賳丕. 鉂�
猸愶笍猸愶笍猸愶笍猸愶笍
鉂� 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞. 賲孬賱 丕賱兀爻胤賵乇丞. 鬲毓賱賲賳丕 兀賳 賳乇賶 丕賱毓丕賱賲 亘胤乇賷賯丞 賲禺鬲賱賮丞. 鬲乇賷賳丕 賰賷賮 賳賳馗乇 賮賷 賯賱賵亘賳丕 賵賰賷賮 賳乇賶 毓丕賱賲賳丕 亘賲賳馗賵乇 賷匕賴亘 廿賱賶 賲丕 賵乇丕亍 丕賴鬲賲丕賲丕鬲賳丕 丕賱禺丕氐丞. 賲毓 毓噩夭 賯丕丿丞 丕賱兀丿賷丕賳 丕賱賲丨鬲乇賮賷賳 賲賳 鬲賵噩賷賴賳丕 賵賮賯 丕賱鬲賯丕賱賷丿 丕賱兀爻胤賵乇賷丞. 兀氐亘丨 亘廿賲賰丕賳 賮賳丕賳賷賳丕 賵賰鬲丕亘賳丕 丕賱賲亘丿毓賷賳 鬲賯賲氐 賴匕丕 丕賱丿賵乇 丕賱賰賴賳賵鬲賷. 賱賷丨賲賱賵丕 廿賱賶 毓丕賱賲賳丕 丕賱囟丕卅毓 賵丕賱鬲丕賱賮. 乇丐賶 噩丿賷丿丞 賵丨賷丞. 鉂�
Profile Image for Arman.
353 reviews321 followers
July 1, 2019
蹖讴蹖 丕夭 丕賳鬲賯丕丿賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 賴賲賵丕乇賴 亘賴 丕賱蹖丕丿賴 賵 亘禺卮蹖 丕夭 丌孬丕乇 噩賵夭賮 讴賲亘賱 賲蹖 卮賵丿貙 丕蹖賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 亘乇乇爻蹖 鬲胤亘蹖賯蹖 丕爻胤賵乇賴 賴丕 鬲賵爻胤 丕蹖賳 丿賵貙 亘丿賵賳 鬲賵噩賴 亘賴 亘丕賮鬲丕乇賽 鬲丕乇蹖禺蹖貙 丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖 賵 爻蹖丕爻蹖 賵 賮乇賴賳诏蹖 賲賳丨氐乇 亘賮乇丿 賴乇 賲賳胤賯賴 丕賳噩丕賲 賲蹖 诏蹖乇丿.
丿乇 丕蹖賳 噩丕 讴丕乇賳 丌乇賲爻鬲乇丕賳诏 亘賴 毓賳丕蹖鬲 亘賴 丕蹖賳 丕賳鬲賯丕丿貙 鬲賱丕卮 賳賲賵丿賴 丕爻鬲 鬲丕 丿乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘貙 賳馗乇蹖丕鬲 丕賱蹖丕丿賴 賵 讴賲亘賱 乇丕 丿乇 趩丕乇趩賵亘蹖 鬲丕乇蹖禺蹖 賵 丕賳爻丕賳 卮賳丕禺鬲蹖 賯乇丕乇 丿丕丿賴貙 賵 亘賴 鬲丨賱蹖賱 賵 胤亘賯賴 亘賳丿蹖 鬲丨賵賱丕鬲賽 賳馗丕賲 賴丕蹖 丕爻胤賵乇賴 卮賳丕禺鬲蹖 丿乇 诏匕乇 夭賲丕賳 亘倬乇丿丕夭丿.
丌乇賲爻鬲乇丕賳诏 倬爻 丕夭 鬲賯爻蹖賲 亘賳丿蹖 鬲丨賵賱丕鬲 鬲丕乇蹖禺蹖 噩賵丕賲毓 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 亘賴 丿賵乇賴 賴丕蹖 賲禺鬲賱賮貙 亘賴 亘乇乇爻蹖 賵蹖跇诏蹖 賳馗丕賲 賴丕蹖 丕爻胤賵乇賴 卮賳丕禺鬲蹖 丌賳 賴丕 賲蹖 倬乇丿丕夭丿. 賵蹖 丕蹖賳 亘乇乇爻蹖 乇丕 丿乇 6 亘禺卮賽 丿賵乇丕賳 讴賴賳 爻賳诏蹖(噩賵丕賲毓 卮讴丕乇)貙 丿賵乇丕賳 賳賵爻賳诏蹖(噩賵丕賲毓 讴卮丕賵乇夭)貙 鬲賲丿賳 賴丕蹖 丕賵賱蹖賴(噩賵丕賲毓 卮賴乇賳卮蹖賳)貙 毓氐乇 賲丨賵蹖(馗賴賵乇 倬蹖丕賲亘乇丕賳 賵 丨讴蹖賲丕賳 亘夭乇诏)貙 丿賵乇丕賳 倬爻丕賲丨賵乇蹖(馗賴賵乇 爻賴 丿蹖賳 丕亘乇丕賴蹖賲蹖 亘夭乇诏)貙 鬲丨賵賱 亘夭乇诏 睾乇亘(丿賵乇丕賳 丕爻胤賵乇賴 夭丿丕蹖蹖) 丕賳噩丕賲 賲蹖 丿賴丿 賵 賳爻亘鬲賽 毓賵丕賲賱 丕賯鬲氐丕丿蹖 賵 丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖 噩賵丕賲毓 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 丿乇 賴乇 丿賵乇賴 蹖 夭賲丕賳蹖 乇丕 亘丕 賳馗丕賲 丕爻胤賵乇賴 卮賳丕禺鬲蹖 丌賳 賴丕 賳卮丕賳 賲蹖 丿賴丿.

丕賲丕 丕賳鬲賯丕丿蹖 讴賴 亘賴 賳馗乇賲 賲蹖 鬲賵丕賳 亘賴 讴鬲丕亘 賵丕乇丿 丿丕賳爻鬲貙 賵賮丕丿丕乇蹖 爻賮鬲 賵 爻禺鬲賽 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 亘賴 爻賱爻賱賴 賲乇丕鬲亘 鬲丕乇蹖禺蹖 爻鬲貨 丿乇 賵丕賯毓 賲蹖 丿丕賳蹖賲 讴賴 丿賵乇賴 賴丕蹖 鬲丕乇蹖禺蹖 丕蹖 讴賴 賵蹖 鬲乇爻蹖賲 賲蹖 讴賳丿貙 丕蹖賳 趩賳蹖賳 丿丕乇丕蹖 賲乇夭賴丕蹖 夭賲丕賳蹖 賲卮禺氐蹖 賳亘賵丿賴 丕賳丿 讴賴 亘鬲賵丕賳 丌賳 賴丕 乇丕 亘賴 爻丕丿诏蹖 丕夭 賴賲 賲鬲賲丕蹖夭 讴乇丿 (賲蹖 丿丕賳蹖賲 讴賴 丿乇 蹖讴 夭賲丕賳賽 禺丕氐 賲賲讴賳 亘賵丿 丿乇 亘禺卮賴丕蹖 賲禺鬲賱賮蹖 丕夭 噩賴丕賳貙 丕蹖賳 噩賵丕賲毓 乇丕 亘胤賵乇 賴賲夭賲丕賳 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮蹖賲. 賲孬賱丕 賴賲蹖賳 丕賱丕賳 讴賴 丿乇 毓氐乇 丕爻胤賵乇賴 夭丿丕蹖蹖 亘賴 爻乇 賲蹖 亘乇蹖賲貙 賴賳賵夭 噩賵丕賲毓 诏乇丿丌賵乇賳丿賴-卮讴丕乇趩蹖 乇丕 丿乇 亘禺卮 賴丕蹖蹖 丕夭 噩賴丕賳 賲蹖 亘蹖賳蹖賲).
賴賲趩賳蹖賳 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 賴乇诏夭 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賳賲蹖 倬乇丿丕夭丿 讴賴 趩乇丕 亘丕 賵噩賵丿 诏匕乇 丕夭 噩賵丕賲毓 讴賴賳 爻賳诏蹖 賵 賳賵爻賳诏蹖貙 賴賳賵夭 卮丕賴丿賽 丿賵丕賲賽 丕爻胤賵乇賴 賴丕 賵 丌蹖蹖賳 賴丕蹖 賳馗丕賲 賴丕蹖 丕爻胤賵乇賴 卮賳丕禺鬲蹖 丌賳 賴丕 (噩卮賳 賴丕蹖蹖 讴卮丕賵乇夭蹖 賲孬賱 毓蹖丿 賳賵乇賵夭) 丿乇 丿賳蹖丕蹖 丕賲乇賵夭 賴爻鬲蹖賲貙 賵 亘賯丕 賵 丕爻鬲丨丕賱賴 蹖 丕蹖賳 丌蹖蹖賳 賴丕 賵 賳賲丕丿賴丕 乇丕 夭蹖乇 爻亘蹖賱蹖 乇丿 讴乇丿賴 丕爻鬲 賵 亘乇丕蹖 賴賲蹖賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賮氐賱 丌禺乇貙 噩賵丕賲毓 丿賳蹖丕蹖 丕賲乇賵夭 乇丕 禺丕賱蹖 丕夭 賴乇诏賵賳賴 丕爻胤賵乇賴 賵亘乇賴賵鬲 (賳爻亘鬲丕) 讴丕賲賱蹖 賲蹖 丿丕賳丿. 丿乇 丨丕賱蹖 讴賴 丕賱蹖丕丿賴 亘賴 氐乇丕丨鬲 丕夭 丕爻胤賵乇賴 賴丕蹖 丿賳蹖丕蹖 丕賲乇賵夭 賵 亘賯丕蹖 丕爻胤賵乇賴 賴丕 丿乇 丿賳蹖丕蹖 賲毓丕氐乇 爻禺賳 亘賴 賲蹖丕賳 賲蹖 丌賵乇丿.
賴賲趩賳蹖賳 賳馗丕賲 爻賱爻賱賴 賲乇丕鬲亘蹖賽 鬲乇爻蹖賲 卮丿賴 丿乇 讴鬲丕亘貙 亘賴 賲賳賽 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 趩賳蹖賳 丕賱賯丕 賲蹖 讴賳丿 讴賴 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 爻賴 丿蹖賳 丕亘乇丕賴蹖賲蹖 (蹖賴賵丿蹖鬲貙 賲爻蹖丨蹖鬲 賵 丕爻賱丕賲) 乇丕 賳賯胤賴 蹖 倬丕蹖丕賳蹖 賵 睾丕蹖鬲賽 爻蹖乇賽 鬲賮讴乇 丕爻胤賵乇賴 丕蹖 賵 丕丿蹖丕賳 賲蹖 丿丕賳丿 (趩蹖夭蹖 讴賴 丕賱蹖丕丿賴 亘卮丿鬲 賵 亘賴 氐乇丕丨鬲 丕夭 丌賳 倬乇賴蹖夭 讴乇丿賴 丕爻鬲).

倬 賳賵卮鬲: 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘貙 亘乇丕蹖 卮乇賵毓 噩丿蹖賽 賲胤丕賱毓賴 蹖 賳馗丕賲 賴丕蹖 丕爻胤賵乇賴 卮賳丕禺鬲蹖 賵 鬲丨賵賱丕鬲 丌賳貙 讴鬲丕亘 賲賵噩夭 賵 賲賳丕爻亘蹖 爻鬲 賵 丕夭 丌賳 賲蹖 鬲賵丕賳 亘毓賳賵丕賳 賲丿禺賱蹖 亘乇丕蹖 賵乇賵丿 亘賴 丕蹖賳 丿賳蹖丕蹖 诏爻鬲乇丿賴 丕爻鬲賮丕丿賴 讴乇丿.
Profile Image for Nandakishore Mridula.
1,306 reviews2,596 followers
May 5, 2020
I loved Karen Armstrong's A Short History on Myth precisely because it was extremely concise without being simplistic. The author has conveyed her knowledge in an extremely lucid way, spanning myth from its beginnings during the Paleolithic Period as an essential part of human existence to its existence as a dead and fossilised mummy in the religions of today, taking life only in the imagination of artists and writers. One can, of course, differ with her conclusions - in a subject like this, it would be surprising if there were any consensus.

Having read 's massive four volume Masks of God, I sort of knew what to expect - and Ms. Armstrong didn't disappoint. Of course, whereas Campbell focusses heavily on the Jungian aspects of myth, Karen covers a number of other aspects too. But her approach is also more tuned towards the psychological interpretation of myth than the historical.
An experience of transcendence has always been part of the human experience. We seek out moments of ecstasy, when we feel deeply touched within and lifted momentarily beyond ourselves. At such times, it seems that we are living more intensely than usual, firing on all cylinders, and inhabiting the whole of our humanity. Religion has been one of the most traditional ways of attaining ecstasy, but if people no longer find it in temples, synagogues, churches or mosques, they look for it elsewhere: in art, music, poetry, rock, dance, drugs, sex or sport. Like poetry and music, mythology should awaken us to rapture, even in the face of death and the despair we may feel at the prospect of annihilation. If a myth ceases to do that, it has died and outlived its usefulness.
Karen Armstrong has divided the development mythology into six distinct periods - the paleolithic, the neolithic, the period of the early civilisations of Egypt and Mesopotamia, the "Axial Age" (800 - 200 BCE), the "Post-Axial Period"(200 BCE - 1500 CE), and our modern era. In each of these periods, myth formed and unformed and changed shape according to the development of the communal psyche.

Myth began with the ethos of the hunt in the Paleolithic Period. As Joseph Campbell once said, "life eats life". The carnivores and omnivores of the animal kingdom other than homo sapiens, lacking the ability to think about it, are not bothered - but killing disturbs us because we feel it inherently against nature to take a life. So, the concept of sacrifice evolved - of the sacrificial animal laying down its life willingly, and being deified in the process. At the same time, nature was also mythified and the "Sky God" was born.

The author is at pains to assert here that for primitive man, myth and reason occupied two different planes, never interacting - that of the mythos and the logos.
Myth and logos both have their limitations, however. In the pre-modern world, most people realised that myth and reason were complementary; each had its separate sphere, each its particular area of competence, and human beings needed both these modes of thought. A myth could not tell a hunter how to kill his prey or how to organise an expedition efficiently, but it helped him to deal with his complicated emotions about the killing of animals. Logos was efficient, practical and rational, but it could not answer questions about the ultimate value of human life nor could it mitigate human pain and sorrow.
A key figure during this period is the shaman: the person who can move into the transcendent plane at will to touch base with the Godhead. It is he who provides the bridge between the sacred and the profane.

The dichotomy between these two worlds remained during the neolithic period, only the myth changed - instead of the story of the hunt, we now have the story of the seed going beneath the ground and regenerating: that of the murdered god going beneath the ground and coming back as fresh life. (The myth of Persephone is a leftover from this era - and once we come to India, that of Sita, Rama's consort, being discovered in the farmer king's furrow is another example. The harvest festival of Onam in Kerala is ostensibly to celebrate the return of the mythical king Mahabali who ruled the country once, and who was banished underground by Lord Vishnu, to return on this one day. This is also an example of a neolithic myth being grafted on to Indian mythology.) However, people could still differentiate myth from reality, and give both their space.

Once humans began building cities, myth once again changed hue to accommodate them as the centre of existence. However, with the beginning of civilisation, history started - and the dreamtime of myth started moving away from the human sphere.
Hitherto mythology had centred almost entirely on the primordial feats and struggles of the gods or the archetypal ancestors of primordial time. But the urban myths began to impinge upon the historical world. Because there was now greater reliance upon human ingenuity, people began to see themselves as independent agents. Their own activities came to the foreground, and, increasingly, the gods seemed more distant. Poets began to reinterpret the old stories.
This distancing of the sacred from daily life lead to a "spiritual vacuum", and the concept of religion was born, in what is termed the "Axial Age". Instead of rituals and sacrifices carried out mindlessly, living lives with moral responsibility and compassion was advocated by various spiritual teachers who sprung up across the world during this period; who also advocated introspection, looking within oneself for one's own spiritual salvation.

In the Post-Axial Age, for a long period, there was no development in mythology. The religions of the Levant moved more and more towards historicity, but even then, space was left the practice of myth, like the Jewish Kabbalah and Sufism. (What the author does not state explicitly, but what could be inferred, was that myth somehow stagnated and religion based on static stories instead of the dynamically changing ones of the mythic ritual started to gain ascendance. So for example, instead of the god who was killed and resurrected in perpetuity, Christ became a historical figure who was killed and came back to life at a specific point of time in history.)

But the big change, according to Ms. Armstrong, came with the Industrial Revolution.
During the sixteenth century, almost by trial and error, the people of Europe and, later, in what would become the United States of America, had begun to create a civilisation that was without precedent in world history, and during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries it would spread to other parts of the globe. This was the last of the great revolutions in human experience. Like the discovery of agriculture or the invention of the city, it would have a profound impact, whose effect we are only now beginning to appreciate. Life would never be the same again, and perhaps the most significant 鈥� and potentially disastrous 鈥� result of this new experiment was the death of mythology.
Now logos took over totally - and mythos was dumped into the dustbin as a useless legacy.
The Western achievement relied on the triumph of the pragmatic, scientific spirit. Efficiency was the new watchword. Everything had to work. A new idea or an invention had to be capable of rational proof and be shown to conform to the external world. Unlike myth, logos must correspond to facts; it is essentially practical; it is the mode of thought we use when we want to get something done; it constantly looks ahead to achieve a greater control over our environment or to discover something fresh. The new hero of Western society was henceforth the scientist or the inventor, who was venturing into uncharted realms for the sake of his society. He would often have to overthrow old sanctities 鈥� just as the Axial sages had done. But the heroes of Western modernity would be technological or scientific geniuses of logos, not the spiritual geniuses inspired by mythos. This meant that intuitive, mythical modes of thought would be neglected in favour of the more pragmatic, logical spirit of scientific rationality. Because most Western people did not use myth, many would lose all sense of what it was.
Thus discredited, even the religious forswore myth and its essential unreality; and religion began to get ossified, as it had to prove all its claims rationally. And, as the author says, when you start proving the creation myths of the Genesis scientifically, you have "very bad science and very bad religion".

On the other side, it became the habit of "rational" men to denigrate myth, and to extol the "death of God". A myth-free future began to be envisaged, where religion will totally vanish and we would all live perfectly rational lives. Organised religion may very well disappear; but as Ms. Armstrong says, the need for myth will never vanish.
We need myths that will help us to identify with all our fellow-beings, not simply with those who belong to our ethnic, national or ideological tribe. We need myths that help us to realise the importance of compassion, which is not always regarded as sufficiently productive or efficient in our pragmatic, rational world. We need myths that help us to create a spiritual attitude, to see beyond our immediate requirements, and enable us to experience a transcendent value that challenges our solipsistic selfishness. We need myths that help us to venerate the earth as sacred once again, instead of merely using it as a 鈥榬esource鈥�.
So are we lost? destined to live out our lives in myth-less (and mirthless) world? Not really, as even today we have our mythographers, our shamans, our sages - the artists and the writers.

Karen Armstrong says (and in this, she echoes Joseph Campbell) that art, and literature, by blurring the boundaries between "truth" and "falsehood" - between "reality" and "fiction" - takes us to the mythical realm, the realm of transcendence, of the dreamtime where spatial and temporal boundaries have no meaning. When Picasso shows us the horrors of war through a seemingly absurd cubist painting; when Joseph Conrad writes a dark fable of renegade soldier as a parable about the heart of darkness; when T. S. Eliot makes us wander through the waste land of a dead civilisation... myth comes alive. Then we move out of the mundane world ruled tyrannically by logos into the zone where we touch the Godhead; the still centre of existence, where Nirvana can be encountered.
Profile Image for Parnian.K.
58 reviews105 followers
December 26, 2024
蹖讴 賲賯丿賲賴鈥屰� 禺賱丕氐賴 賵 讴丕乇亘乇丿蹖 亘乇丕蹖 賵乇賵丿 亘賴 丿賳蹖丕蹖 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屫促嗀ж驰�
亘丕 鬲乇噩賲賴鈥屸€屰� 诏蹖乇丕 賵 乇賵丕賳 毓亘丕爻 賲禺亘乇.
賮氐賱 丕賵賱 丕夭 丕蹖賳 氐丨亘鬲 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 讴賴 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屬囏� 趩蹖鈥屫з� 賵 趩乇丕 賵噩賵丿 丿丕乇賳貙 賵 丿乇 卮卮 賮氐賱 亘毓丿蹖貙 丕賵賳鈥屬囏� 乇賵 丿乇 卮卮 毓氐乇 賵 丿賵乇丕賳 賲禺鬲賱賮 鬲丕乇蹖禺蹖 亘乇乇爻蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�: 丿賵乇丕賳 讴賴賳鈥屫迟嗂屫� 丿賵乇丕賳 賳賵爻賳诏蹖貙 鬲賲丿賳鈥屬囏й� 丕賵賱蹖賴貙 毓氐乇 賲丨賵乇蹖貙 丿賵乇丕賳 倬爻丕賲丨賵乇蹖 賵 鬲丨賵賱 亘夭乇诏 睾乇亘.
賵丕賯毓丕賸 賱匕鬲 亘乇丿賲貙 禺氐賵氐丕賸 丕夭 亘禺卮鈥屬囏й屰� 讴賴 丿乇亘丕乇賴鈥屰� 丨囟賵乇 賵 鬲睾蹖蹖乇 卮讴賱鈥屰屫з佖嗁� 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屬囏ж� 賵 賳賯卮 賵 丕賴賲蹖鬲卮賵賳 丿乇 丿賳蹖丕蹖 賲丕 氐丨亘鬲 賲蹖鈥屭┴必�. 禺蹖賱蹖 賲賳 乇賵 賲鬲賵噩賴賽 丕蹖賳 讴乇丿 讴賴 趩賯丿乇 丿丕乇賲 亘禺卮 賲蹖鬲賵爻賽 (丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屸€屫й�) 賵噩賵丿賲 賵 賴乇 卮讴賱蹖 丕夭 丕丿乇丕讴賽 卮賴賵丿蹖 乇賵 丿乇 禺賵丿賲 爻乇讴賵亘 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�. 賴賲蹖賳 趩賳丿 賵賯鬲 倬蹖卮貙 丕夭 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 丕爻鬲丕丿賴丕賲 丕蹖賳 賮蹖丿亘讴 乇賵 诏乇賮鬲賲 讴賴 氐賵乇鬲鈥屬囏й� 丿蹖诏乇蹖 丕夭 丕丿乇丕讴 亘賴 睾蹖乇 丕夭 丕丿乇丕讴賽 毓賯賱丕賳蹖 乇賵 賴賲 丿乇 禺賵丿賲 噩爻鬲鈥屬堌� 讴賳賲 賵 丨丕賱丕 賲賵丕噩賴 卮丿賳 亘丕 丕蹖賳 賵丕賯毓蹖鬲 讴賴 丿丕乇賲 亘賴 亘賴丕賳賴鈥屰� 丕丿乇丕讴 毓賯賱丕賳蹖貙 趩蹖 亘賴 爻乇賽 亘禺卮鈥屬囏й� 丨爻蹖 賵 卮賴賵丿蹖賽 賵噩賵丿賲 賲蹖丕乇賲 賵 鬲丕 趩賴 丕賳丿丕夭賴 賳丕賲毓鬲亘乇卮賵賳 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁呚� 亘乇丕賲 鬲讴賵賳鈥屫囐嗀� 亘賵丿 賵 丕蹖賳 爻賵丕賱 乇賵 亘乇丕賲 丕蹖噩丕丿 讴乇丿 讴賴 趩胤賵乇 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 亘蹖賳 氐賵乇鬲鈥屬囏й� 賲禺鬲賱賮賽 丕丿乇丕讴 丿乇 賵噩賵丿賲 鬲毓丕丿賱賽 亘賴鬲乇蹖 亘乇賯乇丕乇 讴賳賲.
丕蹖賳鬲乇賵丿丕讴卮賳 禺蹖賱蹖 禺賵亘蹖 亘賵丿 賵 禺蹖賱蹖 賲卮鬲丕賯賲 讴乇丿 讴賴 亘蹖卮鬲乇 丕夭 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屬囏� 亘禺賵賳賲. 丕丨鬲賲丕賱丕賸 亘禺卮蹖 丕夭 鄄郯鄄鄣 乇賵 亘賴 丕蹖賳 讴丕乇 丕禺鬲氐丕氐 亘丿賲.

丕夭 賲鬲賳 讴鬲丕亘:
芦鬲噩乇亘賴鈥屰� 賯乇丕卅鬲 蹖讴 乇賲丕賳貙 讴蹖賮蹖鬲鈥屬囏й� 賲毓蹖賳蹖 丿丕乇丿 讴賴 丿乇讴 爻賳鬲蹖 丕爻胤賵乇賴 乇丕 亘賴 蹖丕丿賲丕賳 賲蹖鈥屫①堌必�. 丕蹖賳 讴丕乇 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫堌з� 賳賵毓蹖 賲乇丕賯亘賴 亘賴鈥屫促呚ж� 丌賵乇丿. 禺賵丕賳賳丿诏丕賳 賳丕诏夭蹖乇賳丿 乇賵夭賴丕 蹖丕 丨鬲蹖 賴賮鬲賴鈥屬囏� 亘丕 蹖讴 乇賲丕賳 夭賳丿诏蹖 讴賳賳丿. 乇賲丕賳 丌賳鈥屬囏� 乇丕 亘賴 丿賳蹖丕蹖 丿蹖诏乇蹖 賲蹖鈥屫ㄘ必� 讴賴 賲賵丕夭蹖 丕賲丕 噩丿丕 丕夭 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲毓賲賵賱 丌賳鈥屬囏ж池�. 丌賳鈥屬囏� 亘賴鈥屫堌ㄛ� 賲蹖鈥屫з嗁嗀� 讴賴 丕蹖賳 賯賱賲乇賵 禺蹖丕賱蹖貙 賵丕賯毓蹖 賳蹖爻鬲貙 賵 亘丕 丕蹖賳 丨丕賱 賵賯鬲蹖 亘賴 禺賵丕賳丿賳 丌賳 賲卮睾賵賱鈥屫з嗀� 賲鬲賯丕毓丿讴賳賳丿賴 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 蹖讴 乇賲丕賳 禺賵亘 鬲丕 賲丿鬲鈥屬囏� 倬爻 丕夭 丌賳鈥屭┵� 讴賳丕乇卮 賲蹖鈥屭柏ж臂屬呚� 亘賴 亘禺卮蹖 丕夭 夭賲蹖賳賴鈥屰� 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲丕 鬲亘丿蹖賱 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 鬲噩乇亘賴鈥屫й� 丕夭 亘丕賵乇倬匕蹖乇蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賲丕賳賳丿 蹖賵诏丕 蹖丕 蹖讴 噩卮賳賵丕乇賴鈥屰� 丿蹖賳蹖貙 賲賵丕賳毓 夭賲丕賳 賵 賲讴丕賳 乇丕 丿乇賴賲 賲蹖鈥屫蹿┵嗀� 賵 丿丕賲賳賴鈥屰� 賴賲丿賱蹖鈥屬囏й� 賲丕 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屭池必з嗀� 鬲丕 亘鬲賵丕賳蹖賲 亘丕 夭賳丿诏蹖鈥屬囏� 賵 丨乇賲丕賳鈥屬囏й� 丿蹖诏乇 賴賲丿乇丿蹖 讴賳蹖賲. 亘賴 賲丕 卮賮賯鬲 賲蹖鈥屫①呝堌藏� 賵 鬲賵丕賳丕蹖蹖 丨爻 讴乇丿賳 亘丕 丿蹖诏乇丕賳. 蹖讴 乇賲丕賳 賲賴賲 賲丕賳賳丿 丕爻胤賵乇賴 鬲丨賵賱鈥屫ㄘ� 丕爻鬲. 丕诏乇 丕噩丕夭賴 丿賴蹖賲 丕蹖賳 讴丕乇 乇丕 亘讴賳丿貙 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗀� 亘乇丕蹖 賴賲蹖卮賴 賲丕 乇丕 鬲睾蹖蹖乇 丿賴丿.禄

氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 郾郯鄞-郾郯鄢
Profile Image for Ellen.
1,567 reviews442 followers
February 15, 2020
A brief but highly instructive overview of the development of mythology throughout the Western World and the Middle East (with a quick look at China). Armstrong breaks down the history into epochs. We're in the time of no myths, leading to a sense of despair and a loss of felt meaning to life (according to Armstrong: makes sense to me).

Interesting to me was her connections between myth story, ritual, and life enactment. It makes it clearer to me why I'm a Catholic (embracing the mythology in its best sense, the rituals, and the prescriptions for daily living) and not a Protestant. (Of course, the Church has many problems, but in this area it's interesting for the ways in which it preserves myth). However, as a culture, we don't have meaningful shared myths and, says Armstrong, that leaves people paralyzed emotionally. She refers to Eliot's as a description of what happens when people lose their myths.

Armstrong feels that art and literature have tried to take the place of a shared mythology. According to her (if I'm understanding correctly), it's only been partially successful in that only a small group of people are engaging in these activities (either as creator or audience) and because there are no rituals that bring people into the activity and transform them.

I'm still thinking over her arguments. For a short book, there's a lot of information and as a writer I found some of it especially interesting. I do believe that we have a need for something that both undergirds and transcends our daily life; I'm just not sure what that should be. Certainly, literature and art fill a large part of that need but Armstrong's ideas about the necessity of ritual acts as well as connections to daily life are intriguing.

I do think that the book connects a lot of today's problems with fundamentalist religions with the loss of mythmaking capacities and the forcing of often symbolic texts into literal interpretations.

Quick read but with lots to think about and enjoy. I definitely would like to read more deeply and I wish Armstrong had provided a recommended reading list to guide me. It's such a huge topic--I don't know where to begin.

If anyone has any suggestions for me, I'd love to hear them!
Profile Image for Araz Goran.
846 reviews4,565 followers
January 17, 2018
丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賮賷 賲噩賲賱賴 賷乇賵噩 賵賷爻鬲噩丿賷 丕賱賲賳賴噩賷丞 丕賱廿賱丨丕丿賷丞 丕賱賲毓鬲丕丿丞 賮賷 廿亘乇丕夭 丕賱兀丿賷丕賳 毓賱賶 兀賳賴丕 兀禺鬲乇丕毓 亘卮乇賷 賲丨囟 賵毓丿賲 丕賱鬲賮乇賷賯 丕賱賲鬲毓賲丿 亘賷賳 丕賱丿賷賳 賵丕賱兀爻胤賵乇丞 賵噩毓賱 賰賱賷賴賲丕 賳丕亘毓丕賸 賲賳 孬賯丕賮丞 亘卮乇賷丞 賯丿賷賲丞 鬲胤賵乇鬲 賲毓丕賸 賮賷 賯丕賱亘 廿噩鬲賲丕毓賷-丨囟丕乇賷 兀丿鬲 賮賷 丕賱賳賴丕賷丞 賵丨爻亘 丕賱鬲乇鬲賷亘 丕賱夭賲賳賷 賱鬲胤賵乇 丕賱夭賲賳賷 賱賱兀賳爻丕賳 賵丕賱丨囟丕乇丞 , 廿亘鬲丿丕亍丕賸 賲賳 夭賲賳 賲賷孬賵賱賵噩賷丕 丕賱氐賷丕丿賷賳 孬賲 丕賱毓氐乇 丕賱丨噩乇賷 賵賳賴丕賷丞 亘丕賱兀丿賷丕賳 丕賱兀亘乇丕賴賷賲賷丞 丕賱孬賱丕孬 ,賴匕賴 丕賱賮乇囟賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 賵囟毓鬲賴丕 丕賱賰丕鬲亘丞 噩毓賱鬲 丕賱兀丿賷丕賳 丕賱鬲賵丨賷丿賷丞 賰賳賴丕賷丞 賱毓氐乇 丕賱賲賷孬賵賱賵噩賷丕 丕賱賯丿賷賲丞 賵亘丿亍 丕賱賲乇丨賱丞 賲丕 賯亘賱 丕賱兀禺賷乇丞 , 孬賲 丕賱爻賯賵胤 丕賱鬲丿乇賷噩賷 賱賱丨爻 丕賱兀爻胤賵乇賷 賲毓 亘丿亍 毓氐乇 丕賱賳賴囟丞 丕賱兀賵乇賵亘賷丞 賵鬲丨賵賱 丕賱丿賷賳 賳賮爻賴 丕賱賶 兀爻胤賵乇丞 賲賳 兀爻丕胤賷乇 丕賱兀賵賱賷賳 賮賷 賳馗乇 丕賱賰孬賷乇 賲賳 丕賱賮賱丕爻賮丞 丕賱丨丕賱賷賷賳..



賵兀賷囟丕賸 賵氐賲 賰賱 賲毓噩夭丕鬲 丕賱兀賳亘賷丕亍 亘丕賱兀爻丕胤賷乇 賵丕賱禺乇丕賮丕鬲 賴賵 賲氐丕丿乇丞 毓賱賶 丕賱賲胤賱賵亘 賲賳 丿賵賳 鬲兀氐賷賱 賵賱丕 亘丨孬 賮賷 賲囟賲賵賳 鬲賱賰 丕賱賲毓噩夭丕鬲 賵噩賵賴乇賴丕 賵丕賱賮乇賯 丕賱卮丕爻毓 亘賷賳賴丕 賵亘賷賳 兀爻丕胤賷乇 丕賱丿賷丕賳丕鬲 丕賱賯丿賷賲丞 ..



丕賱賰鬲丕亘 孬賯賷賱 賵賲賲賱 乇睾賲 鬲丨賲爻賷 賮賷 丕賱亘丿丕賷丞 丨賷賳 兀胤賱毓鬲 毓賱賶 賳亘匕丞 賲賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賵賱賰賳 賲丕 廿賳 鬲亘丿兀 亘賯乇丕卅鬲賴 丨鬲賶 鬲卮毓乇 亘丕賱囟賷丕毓 賵丕賱鬲卮鬲鬲 亘賷賳 氐賮丨丕鬲賴..




Profile Image for Welwyn Wilton Katz.
Author听14 books56 followers
September 13, 2010
I should have been warned by the title. It is impossible for someone capable of writing 15 books on topics as diverse as the development of sexism, St. Paul, life in the convent, Islam, the English mystics of the 14th century, and so on, to have had time to study the subject of mythology sufficiently well to understand it, let alone put it together in such a way that others can understand it on any but the most superficial (and European biased) level. And to call it a history in the roughly 27,000 words of this book is a serious misnomer. People do like short, cut-to-the-chase analyses of tough subjects. Can't blame them for that. But there are subjects such as the history of myth (which is basically the history of the human psyche) that do not lend themselves to such summaries. Myths do connect, from country to country, as from Paleolithic to Mesolithic to Neolithic to Bronze to Iron Age, and so on, but it would take a mightily trained intellect and a lifetime of reading to find the threads, if such do exist, that would make a "short" history accurate or even marginally close to correct. For the $25 this book cost, buy the interviews with Joseph Campbell that Bill Moyers had on Public television, and that were later written up as "The Power of Myth".
Profile Image for Farnaz.
359 reviews115 followers
June 19, 2020
亘蹖卮鬲乇 卮亘蹖賴 蹖讴 蹖丕丿丿丕卮鬲 亘賱賳丿 鬲丕 蹖讴 亘乇乇爻蹖. 鬲賯乇蹖亘丕 丕夭 賴乇趩蹖夭 賮賯胤 爻乇賮氐賱 丕乇丕卅賴 賲蹖鈥屭┴必� 賵 鬲賵蹖 賴蹖趩 趩蹖夭蹖 乇蹖夭 賳賲蹖鈥屫簇�.
賲賳 趩賳丿丕賳 丿賵爻 賳丿丕卮鬲賲
Profile Image for Claudia.
1,008 reviews740 followers
May 18, 2018
I guess, after reading 鈥檚 related works, nothing can surprise you. This book doesn鈥檛 bring anything new and I can鈥檛 even say that it鈥檚 well written. Or maybe it鈥檚 the translation, although it doesn鈥檛 seem so.

It reads like a summary and that鈥檚 exactly what it is. Half the book has references from Eliade鈥檚 works, the other half from various other authors, which I鈥檓 not familiar with but I don鈥檛 think I want to be: Adonis, a political myth (according to )? Hm. I鈥檓 all for different interpretations, 鈥榚verybody reads a different story in the same book鈥�, but to me this interpretation seems rather out of context.

Anyway, for one who is not familiar with myths history, could be an acceptable start. However, if you know the drill, skip it altogether.
Profile Image for Trevor.
1,467 reviews24k followers
August 23, 2009
The best of this is where she explains that myths have two lives. There is the myth as it is supposed to have happened once in historical time 鈥� Jesus at the last supper sharing his body and blood with his followers 鈥� and the myth that is forever present and forever made new 鈥� the presence of Jesus in the Eucharist (and to many Christians, particularly those who believe in the literal transubstantiation of the bread and wine, this is the literal presence of Jesus today and always) is the forever renewed reliving of that mythic experience. That is, there is the actual experience that only 13 people shared in, and then the ritual deed in which billions have taken part and in a sense these are both the same experience.

I鈥檝e been thinking a lot of about this sort of thing lately, mostly after reading . If I was to set out my credo I guess one of the things that would have to go onto my list of beliefs would be that I believe in metaphor. I believe that how we structure the world into networks of metaphors structures how we are able to view the world at all. In this sense we are the metaphors which we use to view our world. The man who views women as conquests, the politician who views the war in Iraq as a crusade or the employer who views her workers as human resources 鈥� with these metaphors we structure our experiences.

This book implies that myths are a bit like my metaphors, ways to structure the world so that it makes sense, but that myths change with history and in ways that reflect the social concerns of people living in the world and experienced by people at particular developmental stages. AS Hegel says of tradition, myths are not fixed statues, but rather flowing rivers that start as streams and become mighty as they rush to the sea. So that the myths that might have been appropriate to Neanderthals (and I won鈥檛 bore you with her speculations here or my reply concerning separate species) would clearly not be appropriate to those living as farmers following the agricultural revolution. Likewise for those living later in city-states and one step removed from the rhythms of nature there needed to be new myths. The interesting thing is that these myths build on each other often growing in significance, rather than being replaced outright. Perhaps harvest myths do not have the life and death meaning to us today in the first world 21st century that they did to an Ancient Greek farmer, but we are still moved by the myth of Persephone and Demeter. The myth still holds significance for us.

With the Enlightenment it became increasingly difficult for people to believe and to be guided by the myths as had been practiced up until then. History is seen in this book as a struggle between mythos and logos (the world as revelation of truth through parable and story and the world as understood through natural laws). With the Enlightenment there was a move away from mythos towards science as the great hope that would explain the human condition without need of 鈥榮tories鈥�. There was, of course, counter moves 鈥� Pascal is given as an example here with his horror of an empty universe and of a humanity stuck in a tiny, insignificant corner devoid of meaning and without value or hope. This vision could only be bleak for Pascal and it is not hard to see why.

And so we get Nietzsche, who created the myth of God鈥檚 death, the myth of the eternal return, the myth of the will to power of the artist, as his way to again allow humanity to live with the terror of the fundamental meaninglessness of our existence.

At the end of this short history we are more or less in the 1920s. The new myths are seen as manifest in art and the art is that of TS Eliot鈥檚 The Waste Land, Joyce鈥檚 Ulysses, Conrad鈥檚 Heart of Darkness 鈥� and all of these deeply symbolic works drawing on the wealth of images from the whole of Western (and at least in Eliot鈥檚 case, some Eastern too) myths and traditions. As she quotes herself: These fragments have I shorn against my ruin.

She also refers to Picasso鈥檚 Guernica 鈥� with its nightmarish references to Christian martyrdom and hideous revisioning of Madonna and Child as a way to 鈥榤ake sense鈥� of the fascist bombing of Guernica in the Spanish Civil War.

The message of this book is that it is very hard for us in the first world, a world dominated by science and reason and 鈥榣ogos鈥� to have a world of myth in quite the same way that the pre-Enlightenment world lived in a world of myth. Nevertheless, science does not provide us with answers to all questions of importance to us. Science is 鈥榲alueless鈥� in the sense that the same knowledge that can convert the energy of a uranium atom to enable us to power a city can also be use to reduce that city to ashes. To have compassion, understanding and to overcome the solipsistic selfishness of modernity requires some type of mythos, some sort of connection to what I have hesitated to call the spiritual realm. Interestingly, she views this realm as being provided today not by organised religion as much as by art and artists in our all-too-modern world.

Although I would find it hard to accept this thesis without reservations 鈥� not the least because I don鈥檛 really share Pascal鈥檚 terror and so have never felt the need of Nietzsche鈥檚 sacrament 鈥� I do think there is a need for metaphors by which we can understand the world and that this is an important thing Art can do for us. As someone who has never quite understood the religious experience, the aesthetic experience is the only one I can claim access to and its importance to me is heightened accordingly.

A couple of years ago I sat at the National Gallery and watched a series of films being played on the walls of the contemporary art space on the top floor. I later took various people there to sit with me and watch these films. They were quite simple in execution. A Latin American artist who used water to paint the faces of men and women who had gone missing, never to be seen again with the assistance of their government (and the US government too, of course). The water was applied to what I take to have been warm stone so that the image appeared as dark patches on the stone and started to evaporate as soon as it was applied. This meant that the faces would appear and then slowly melt back to nothing. Then another face was drawn. I was transfixed. Every time I went to see this, perhaps four times, I could hardly contain my emotions. So much pain, but perhaps being confronted by the terrible and universal transience of human existence, so beautifully displayed in this work of art, perhaps this would be enough to show us, as it showed me, our common humanity, our common responsibility, our need to act in common to stop such inhumanity.

If this is the power of myth, then we need myths of this kind, we need ways that allow us to see the world anew 鈥� even if anew in all its horror. There were parts of this book where I felt things were tending towards New Age nonsense and perhaps some of the explanations (particularly of the 鈥榤eanings鈥� of Neolithic art which I took to be a bit of a stretch) didn鈥檛 really explain anything 鈥� but there was enough here in this very short book to chew over. And I ask for little more.
Profile Image for Julian Worker.
Author听41 books424 followers
April 30, 2022
Karen Armstrong suggests the history of myth is the history of humanity; our stories and beliefs link us to our ancestors and each other. This wonderful book takes the reader from the Palaeolithic period and the myths of the hunters right up to modern times when myths have almost all been discredited by science.

Armstrong makes the point that today we still seek heroes but that this adulation is unbalanced. The myth of the hero was never intended to provide us with icons to admire, but was intended to tap into the vein of heroism within all of us.

We need myths that will help us to identify with all our fellow-beings, myths that help us create a spiritual attitude, and myths that help us venerate the earth as sacred once again, otherwise we will not save our planet, if we just regard it as a resource.

Armstrong also makes a great point about the early hunters who felt a kinship with the animals that they killed. They expressed their distress in the rituals of sacrifice which honoured the beasts which had died for the sake of humanity.

Superb book. Recommended.
Profile Image for Miss Ravi.
Author听1 book1,148 followers
May 13, 2019


賲丕 亘丕蹖丿 丕夭 丕蹖賳 禺胤丕蹖 賯乇賳 賳賵夭丿賴賲蹖 讴賴 丕爻胤賵乇賴 乇丕 丿乇賵睾 蹖丕 賳賲丕蹖卮诏乇 卮蹖賵賴鈥屰� 倬爻鬲鈥屫臂� 丕夭 丕賳丿蹖卮賴 賲蹖鈥屫з嗀池� 亘倬乇賴蹖夭蹖賲. 賲丕 丕賲乇賵夭 亘賴 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屬囏й屰� 賳蹖丕夭 丿丕乇蹖賲 讴賴 亘賴 賲丕 讴賲讴 讴賳賳丿 禺賵丿 乇丕 賳賴 亘丕 賯亘蹖賱賴 賯賵賲蹖貙 賲賱蹖 蹖丕 丕蹖丿卅賵賱賵跇蹖讴鈥屬呚з嗀� 亘賱讴賴 亘丕 賴賲賴 賴賲賳賵毓丕賳鈥屬呚з� 賴賲匕丕鬲 讴賳蹖賲. 亘賴 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屬囏й屰� 賳蹖丕夭 丿丕乇蹖賲 讴賴 亘賴 賲丕 讴賲讴 讴賳賳丿 丕賴賲蹖鬲 賴賲丿乇丿蹖 乇丕 丿乇蹖丕亘蹖賲貨 毓賳氐乇蹖 讴賴 丿乇 丿賳蹖丕蹖 毓賯賱丕賳蹖 賵 毓賲賱鈥屭必й� 賲丕 亘賴 賯丿乇 讴丕賮蹖 亘丕乇賵乇 蹖丕 讴丕乇丌賲丿 賳蹖爻鬲. 亘賴 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屬囏й� 賳蹖丕夭 丿丕乇蹖賲 讴賴 亘賴 賲丕 讴賲讴 讴賳賳丿 賳诏乇卮蹖 賲毓賳賵蹖 亘蹖丕賮乇蹖賳蹖賲貙 賮乇丕鬲乇 丕夭 賳蹖丕夭賴丕蹖 賮賵乇蹖 賵 賮賵鬲蹖 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘亘蹖賳蹖賲貙 賵 亘鬲賵丕賳蹖賲 丕乇夭卮蹖 賲鬲毓丕賱蹖 乇丕 鬲噩乇亘賴 讴賳蹖賲 讴賴 賲賳蹖鬲 禺賵丿禺賵丕賴丕賳賴 賲丕 乇丕 亘賴 趩丕賱卮 亘讴卮丿. 亘賴 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屬囏й屰� 賳蹖丕夭 丿丕乇蹖賲 讴賴 亘賴 賲丕 讴賲讴 讴賳賳丿 亘丕乇 丿蹖诏乇 亘賴 夭賲蹖賳 賴賲趩賵賳 賲賵噩賵丿蹖鬲蹖 賲賯丿爻 丕丨鬲乇丕賲 亘诏匕丕乇蹖賲 賵 丕夭 亘賴乇賴鈥屭屫臂� 氐乇賮 丕夭 丌賳 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 蹖讴 賲賳亘毓 亘倬乇賴蹖夭蹖賲. 丕蹖賳 賲賵囟賵毓 亘爻蹖丕乇 賲賴賲 丕爻鬲 趩賵賳 丕诏乇 丿爻鬲 亘賴 賳賵毓蹖 丕賳賯賱丕亘 賲毓賳賵蹖 賳夭賳蹖賲 讴賴 亘鬲賵丕賳丿 賴賲倬丕蹖 賳亘賵睾 賮賳丕賵乇蹖 丨乇讴鬲 讴賳丿貙 爻蹖丕乇賴鈥屬呚з� 乇丕 丨賮馗 賳禺賵丕賴蹖賲 讴乇丿.

Profile Image for Sinem A..
478 reviews284 followers
July 26, 2017
konuya ilgi duyanlar daha 枚nce ba艧ka kaynaklar okumu艧sa 莽ok da yeni birseyler soylemeyecektir kitap. ayrica 枚ne s眉rd眉臒眉 tezler benim i莽in 莽ok ikna edici olmad谋.
Profile Image for Terence.
1,243 reviews457 followers
August 7, 2015
A Short History of Myth lives up to its title but despite its brevity is well worth reading. It鈥檚 an extended introductory essay to the Canongate Myth series, several volumes of which I鈥檝e read: Margaret Atwood鈥檚 The Penelopiad, Jeanette Winterson鈥檚 Weight, and A.S. Byatt鈥檚 Ragnarok, respectively, reinterpretations of The Odyssey, the Atlas myth, and the Viking Apocalypse.(1)

Armstrong asserts that myths are timeless stories that define what life is about. They answer questions such as why are we here? what is our relationship to the divine? where do we come from?, etc. They may arise from an actual event but aren鈥檛 bound by historical narrative. One of the examples Armstrong uses is Jesus Christ. As a man, it鈥檚 well established that Jesus lived in 1st century AD Palestine, claimed to be a messiah, and that the Romans executed him. As the Christ, his message became fodder for Paul鈥檚 mythologizing, transcending the historical fact of his existence. From this point of view, it鈥檚 not essential that Jesus existed. [But that鈥檚 a topic for another book and not central to what Armstrong is talking about here.]

Back to myths in general...

Myths are often characterized by a concern with death and our fear of (personal) extinction. They鈥檙e intimately connected with rituals, without which they become meaningless or (at best) entertaining stories (a la TV鈥檚 Xena). The most influential myths force their protagonists (and, thus, us) to go beyond their experiences. Myths also show us how to behave.(2) And, finally, myths reflect the higher reality of which we can only catch glimpses (in ecstatic trances or via drugs, for example). The 鈥渢ruth鈥� of a myth lies in its effectiveness. As Armstrong writes, 鈥淸i]f it works, that is, if it forces us to change our minds and hearts, gives us new hope, and compels us to live more fully, it is a valid myth鈥� (p. 10).

In the Introduction, Armstrong mentions modern society鈥檚 near total alienation from myth, which she鈥檒l return to at the conclusion. In between, she divides mythological development into six periods:

1. Paleolithic (pre-agriculture)
2. Neolithic (agriculture)
3. Beginning of urban civilization (Sumer, etc.)
4. Axial Age
5. Post-Axial (up to the Reformation in Europe)
6. Post-Reformation Europe

Paleolithic myth(3) arose out of a desire to reconcile humanity with the violence by which they survived in the world 鈥� i.e., by hunting. Armstrong argues that in these earliest myths the 鈥渉ero鈥� was born. A person who faces the prospect of death and undergoes an arduous journey to return to his people with gifts and wisdom. She mentions Herakles and Artemis as most likely arising from this tradition. The chief divinity at this point, appears to have been a goddess figure (though this doesn鈥檛 imply that humans lived in a matriarchy, as some have argued).

Why should a goddess have become so dominant in an aggressively male society? This may be due to an unconscious resentment of the female. The goddess of Catal Huyuk gives birth eternally, but her partner, the bull, must die. Hunters risked their lives to support their women and children. The guilt and anxiety induced by hunting, combined with frustration resulting from ritual celibacy, could have been projected onto the image of a powerful woman, who demands endless bloodshed. The hunters could see that women were the source of new life; it was they 鈥� not the expendable males 鈥� who ensured the continuity of the tribe. The female thus became an awe-inspiring icon of life itself 鈥� a life that required the ceaseless sacrifice of men and animals. (p. 39)


The Agricultural Revolution didn鈥檛 displace the goddess but humans adapted their hunting myths to reflect a new understanding of their relationship with the Earth. The goddess assumed more maternal and nurturing aspects. She still represented 鈥� at times 鈥� the implacable and fatal aspects of life but she was now also a force of creation. Armstrong concludes her Neolithic chapter with the suggestion that humans were able to find a sense of optimism absent in Paleolithic myths: 鈥淭he initiation at Eleusis showed that the confrontation with death led to spiritual regeneration, and was a form of human pruning鈥�. [I]t could enable you to live more fearlessly and therefore more fully her on earth, looking death calmly in the face. Indeed, every day we are forced to die to the self we have already achieved. In the Neolithic period too, the myths and rituals of passage helped people to accept their mortality, to pass on to the next stage, and to have the courage to change and grow鈥� (p. 57).

The advent of cities caused yet another fundamental change in myth. Humans were gaining ever greater (though still precarious) control over their destinies and growing ever more alienated from Nature. And the gods reflected that new distance. Myths arose or were adapted to celebrate and justify cities, writing, bureaucracy, and the other appurtenances of civilization. Another interesting development was the increasing prominence of human agents, as in The Epic of Gilgamesh, which challenged the traditional mythology of the Mother Goddess and asserted that it was best for gods and humans to remain apart.

The loss of the old certainties embodied in Neolithic mythology led to the spiritual crisis that ushered in the Axial Age (beginning around 800 BC). 鈥淸The Axial Age] marks the beginning of religion as we know it鈥� (p. 79). In terms of myths, they became more introspective and often had an ethical cast. And the gods (or God in the case of the Jews) continued to become more remote. It became impossible to experience the sacred in everyday life; only through breaking down the normal consciousness could people contact the divine. In this section of the book, Armstrong reviews the varying responses China, India, Israel and the Greeks developed in response.

And their responses (including the later developments of Christianity and Islam) held true until the 16th century AD, when Europe entered the Modern Era, a chief aspect of which 鈥渨as the death of mythology鈥� (p. 119):

The Western achievement relied on the triumph of the pragmatic, scientific spirit. Efficiency was the new watchword. Everything had to work. A new idea or an invention had to be capable of rational proof and be shown to confirm to the external worlds. Unlike myth, logos must correspond to facts; it is essentially practical; it is the mode of thought we use when we want to get something done; it constantly looks ahead to achieve a greater control over our environment or to discover something fresh鈥�.

But logos had never been able to provide human begins with the sense of significance that they seemed to require. It had been myth that had given structure and meaning to life, but as modernization progressed and logos achieved such spectacular results, mythology was increasingly discredited. As early at the sixteenth century, we see more evidence of a numbing despair, a creeping mental paralysis, and a sense of impotence and rage as the old mythical way of thought crumbled and nothing new appeared to take its place. We are seeing a similar anomie today in developing countries that are still in the earlier stages of modernization (pp. 121-2).(4)


The loss of mythology has made it difficult for people to face the unspeakable, though not for want of trying. Art, music, drugs, films and more: all attempts to recapture the certitude and significance that mythology had formerly supplied. 鈥淏ut there is something unbalanced about this adulation. The myth of the hero was not intended to provide us with icons to admire, but was designed to tap into the vein of heroism within ourselves. Myth must lead to imitation or participation, not passive contemplation. We no longer know how to manage our mythical lives in a way that is spiritually challenging and transformative鈥� (p. 135).

In the last few pages of the book, Armstrong calls for new myths (or 鈥� as we shall see 鈥� myth-like stories) that will help us identify with our fellow humans, realize the importance of compassion, create a spiritual attitude that challenges individual selfishness, and venerates the Earth as something more than a resource to be exploited. As she writes, 鈥渦nless there is some kind of spiritual revolution that is able to keep abreast of our technological genius, we will not save our planet鈥� (p. 137).

She also connects this extended essay to the purpose of the Canongate myth series: Using the novel as a means of achieving what myth had done for our ancestors. She likens the reading of a book to meditation since readers have to live for a while in a world outside of their lives and 鈥� in a good novel 鈥� find themselves a different person when the experience is over.

A novel, like a myth, teaches us to see the world differently; it shows us how to look into our own hearts and to see our world from a perspective that goes beyond our own self-interest. If professional religious leaders cannot instruct us in mythical lore, our artists and creative writers can perhaps step into this priestly role and bring fresh insight to our lost and damaged world (p. 149)


I would recommend taking a look at this book. It packs a lot into a small package, and there鈥檚 much that Armstrong can only assert without being able to back it up with extensive argument, but I think many of her points are defensible and much in her analysis of what鈥檚 wrong with our world, true.

1. My favorite is Weight but can recommend the other two as well.
2. This is not necessarily ethical behavior. The earliest myths are more concerned with ritual purity and preparing the listener for the afterlife, among other things. Morality 鈥� as we understand the term 鈥� would only become an integral part of mythology with the Axial Age.
3. I should mention that Armstrong鈥檚 focus in this short book is on West Asian mythology, though she鈥檒l mention in passing other cultures.
4. I would say the 鈥渄eveloped countries鈥� are still attempting to cope with the modern world.
Profile Image for Hesper.
406 reviews55 followers
March 8, 2016
I'll keep this short. This book is a fantastic mythology primer for:

A) Someone who's never read a single mythology book. Ever.
B) Anyone who finds Joseph Campbell too challenging
C) Those inclined to believe mythology can be explained by exactly one theory
D) All of the above

Profile Image for Pablo.
146 reviews8 followers
September 17, 2013
Armstrong declares, unconvincingly, that historically believers haven鈥檛 taken their holy texts literally. Her argument is unconvincing because it鈥檚 demonstrably false. Islam, for example, has hundreds of millions of adherents who would declare her claim ridiculous and demonstrate their disagreement vehemently. Their mythology is so literal to them that many of them live a life that's more similar to their religion's 7th century origins than it is to the modern world.

Entire nations live under systems, legal, moral, educational, that are ancient. A tiny percentage, of course, (royalty and oil barons) enjoy the fruits of a modern economic and political system, but the truth, the day-to-day realty, is that the vast majority live in a world that moved on without them centuries ago.

Armstrong claims that myth without liturgy is impotent. I would argue that myth without liturgy is exactly where the world needs to be - where an educated 40% (or so) of American are, where large swathes of Europeans have been for decades, even centuries.

I agree with other parts of her thesis: her realization that most religious figures were myths. She recognizes the historicity of the Buddha and Mohamed, though she inaccurately declares Jesus as an absolutely real historical figure. While many historians may agree that the anecdotal evidence points toward such a person having lived, not one shred of empirical evidence has been unearthed to prove this.

She also fails miserably in her argument when she states (twice) that humans are at the end of their biological evolution. This is not knowable. She鈥檚 basically declaring that she can see 10,000 or 20,000 years (or further) into the future. We simply cannot know what she claims to know, but the evidence of life on earth over the last 500 million years or so would demonstrate her claim as unlikely, if not outright ridiculous.

She seems to decry the awfulness of science, as exemplified by her obvious example of the atomic bomb, while completely, utterly and totally ignoring the crimes of religion. Her anti-science argument ignores that for the vast majority of people throughout history science has been lifesaving: vaccines, sanitation, transportation, education and discovery. Religion, while perhaps personally uplifting for some, has been the cause of misery, war and death.

Her affection for faith (which she calls myth, but who does she think she鈥檚 kidding?) would be charming, if it wasn鈥檛 so appalling in its one-sidedness.
Profile Image for Megan.
63 reviews2 followers
August 30, 2007
There are some who are best at showing, and some that are best at telling. Karen Armstrong is best at telling. I really appreciate her lucid, straightforward narrative here, in such a huge, swimming subject. She rarely ever oversimplifies. It's like a little guidebook to western culture, and it often got me thinking about similarities between the role of myth and the role of art; I was a little surprised to see them converge so smartly at the end. The ending is more determined than I'd like it to be, and there are so many examples that could more complexly illustrate her points... but there will always be more to say, and ways to describe it. I've read a few of the re-shown myths in this series, and thus far this re-telling has been the most meaningful to me.
Profile Image for Claudiu.
460 reviews
January 1, 2024
nu planuisem sa incep anul cu aceasta carte, dar m-am gandit ca ar fi interesant ca prima carte din 2024 sa fie una de non-fictiune si ma bucur ca am facut alegerea asta (in special pentru ultimul capitol)

cartea lui Karen Armstrong nu este nici foarte academica, nici exhaustiva, e un eseu despre istoria mitului, perfect pentru o introducere in subiect. mi-a placut mult pentru conciziune, simplitate (dar fara sa fie simplista), desi recunosc ca pe alocuri am simtit nevoia de mai mult.

eseul are 7 capitole, primul despre definitia mitului si 6 coincizand unei epoci anume - tind sa cred ca delimitarea ii apartine autoarei, nu stiu exact, e chiar prima carte pe subiect pe care o citesc.
primele doua capitole mi-au placut foarte mult pentru ca vorbesc despre miturile oamenilor din paleolitic si din neolitic. am simtit, totusi, nevoia de mai multa explicatie aici, probabil unde ma si interesa tema foarte tare. sper ca are o carte unde reia cu mult mai multe detalii aceste doua capitole.
tot incomplet mi s-a parut si capitolul despre religiile monoteiste si aparitia lor. exista o explicatie generica, dar as fi vrut mai mult.

ultimul capitol mi s-a parut foarte interesant si mi-a placut foarte mult pentru ca vorbeste despre nevoia de mit a omului modern.
la fel de interesante mi s-au parut si povestile si mentiunile despre zeitatile sumeriene, despre care nu stiam, din nou, mai nimic. pacat, totusi, ca nu exista si la noi traduceri (macar din engleza) ale acestor mituri scrise pe tablite de lut acum 3000 de ani.
Profile Image for Nicky.
4,138 reviews1,100 followers
October 21, 2012
This is interesting, although not exactly revelatory if you're interested in mythology and the like. I couldn't take it seriously after this section, though:

Why should a goddess have become so dominant in an aggressively male society? This may be due to an unconscious resentment of the female. The goddess of Catal Huyuk gives birth eternally, but her partner, the bull, must die. Hunters risked their lives to support their women and children. The guilt and anxiety induced by hunting, combined with frustration resulting from ritual celibacy, could have been projected onto the image of a powerful woman, who demands endless bloodshed. The hunters could see that women were the source of new life; it was they -- not the expendable males -- who ensured the continuity of the tribe. The female thus became an awe-inspiring icon of life itself -- a life that required the ceaseless sacrifice of men and animals.


...Which is not exactly the whole story, is it? Has this author heard of women dying in childbirth? I'm sure they did so plenty often in the Palaeolithic period. And the part about frustration from ritual celibacy, just, ugh. In this model she has the men voluntarily abstaining from sex and then blaming women for it. What?

Mind you, I know some men are perfectly capable of believing that, the whole idea just doesn't quite ring true for me as a model for society and religious belief.

Oh, and the idealisation of primitive belief over science is just. What?
Profile Image for Hasan Al Tomy.
219 reviews159 followers
May 3, 2022
賷胤乇丨 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 鬲毓乇賷賮 賲賵噩夭 賱賱兀爻胤賵乇丞 賵賷亘丿兀 亘爻丐丕賱 丨賵賱 丕賱賴丿賮 賲賳 丕賱兀爻胤賵乇丞 賵賵噩賵丿賴丕貙 賮丕賱兀爻胤賵乇丞 賯丿賷賲丞 賯丿賲 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳貙 亘賱 廿賳賴丕 鬲爻亘賯 馗賴賵乇 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 丕賱毓丕賯賱 賮丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 睾丕賱亘丕賸 賲丕 賷賯毓 賮賷 兀爻乇 丕賱睾丕賲囟貙 毓氐賷 丕賱鬲賮爻賷乇貙 毓賳丿 賲賵丕噩賴丞 丕賱賲氐丕毓亘貙 賵賱毓賱 賴匕丕 賲丕 丿賮毓賴 賲賳匕 兀賳 賵噩丿 丕賱賶 廿禺鬲賱丕賯 丕賱賯氐氐 亘睾賷丞 鬲賮爻賷乇 賴匕丕 丕賱睾賲賵囟 賵丕賱丕噩丕亘丞 毓賳 鬲爻丕丐賱丕鬲 賲氐賷乇賷丞 賲孬賱 賲賳 賳丨賳 賵賰賷賮 禺賱賯賳丕 賵賲丕 賴賵 賲氐賷乇賳丕 亘毓丿 丕賱賲賵鬲

賵賰賲丕 鬲賯賵賱 丕賱賰丕鬲亘丞 賮丕賱兀爻胤賵乇丞 亘亘爻丕胤丞 賳爻禺丞 睾賷乇 賲賰鬲賲賱丞貙 鬲毓賰爻 賵毓賷 賵鬲賮賰賷乇 丕賱賰丕卅賳丕鬲 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 丕賱賮丕賳賷丞貙 睾賷乇 兀賳 兀賴賲 賲丕 賷賲賷夭賴丕 廿賲賰丕賳賷丞 丕賱賲卮丕乇賰丞貙 賰賲丕 兀賳賴丕 鬲丿賮毓 丕賱亘卮乇 廿賱賶 鬲睾賷賷乇 兀賳馗賲丞 爻賱賵賰賴賲 賵賯賷賲賴賲 賲賳 兀噩賱 鬲匕賱賷賱 賮賴賲 賲丕 賷亘丿賵 毓氐賷丕賸 毓賱賶 丕賱賳賮爻貙碳 賰賲丕 兀賳賴丕 鬲毓胤賷賳丕 兀賲賱丕賸 噩丿賷丿丕賸 賰賷 賳爻鬲賲乇 賮賷 丕賱丨賷丕丞貙 賮丕賱睾乇囟 丕賱兀爻丕爻賷 賲賳 丕賱兀爻胤賵乇丞 賲毓 賲丕 賷乇丕賮賯賴丕 賲賳 胤賯賵爻貙 賴賵 丕賱鬲匕賰賷乇 亘兀賳 丕賱兀卮賷丕亍 爻鬲氐賷乇 丕賱賶 丕賱兀爻賵兀 賯亘賱 兀賳 鬲鬲丨爻賳
Profile Image for Clif Hostetler.
1,235 reviews950 followers
September 14, 2009
The first third of this book by Karen Armstrong overlaps much of the same material covered by Barbara J. King in her book Evolving God where she discusses the origins of religion from an anthropological point of view.
King uses the word "religion" where Armstrong is using the word "myth." King used the word "belongingness" where Armstrong uses words such as "meaningfulness" to explain the human drive to create religion/myth. The following quotation of Karen Armstrong shows how her definition of mythology pretty much is the same as that which most of us think of as religion:

"... but mythology is an art form that points beyond history to what is timeless in human existence...An experience of transcendence..."

She points out that the Neanderthals left signs of ritual, as did also Paleolithic era modern humans. Evidence of ritual acts is taken to be an indication of myth making. Myth is so intertwined with human prehistory and current history that it appears to be an integral part of being human. She defends myth making as a necessary human activity that provide a means to connect our finite lives with the infinite beyond us. In other words, myth gives our lives meaning and significance in an otherwise unfriendly world.

From speculation of paleolithic myths she progresses on to the better documented neolithic era myths. Here the book truly starts sounding like a "short history of myth" where the activites of the various gods and heros are reviewed.

Karen Armstrong applies the term myth to stories from monotheistic faiths along with the tales of Zeus or Odin which I suppose could bother those deeply enmeshed in western religion. But they are all obvious instances to mythologies trying to make sense of the unknown forces and destinies beyond human understanding.

In the final third of the book Armstong explores the role of myth in the age of enlightnment and modern era. Now that science and rational thought has removed much of the mystery from our lives, can we live without myth? Perhaps, but according to Armstrong we can't achieve human fulfillment and completeness if we try. For example, if you confine yourself to only rational thinking, how do you describe the human experience of art and music? She notes that artists and novelists are the current day myth makers. She suggests mythology is a valuable tool toward achieving good mental health.

"... purely linear, logical and historical modes of thought have debarred many of us from therapies and devices that have enabled men and women to draw on the full resources of their humanity in order to live with the unacceptable. ... " She goes on to say that the role of "an ethically and spiritually informed mythology" can heal "deep-rooted, unexorcised fears, desires and neuroses."

She admits that we can't simply ignore our rational education, but we can learn to appreciate the value of myth.

"We cannot completely recreate ourselves, cancel out the rational bias of our education, and return to a pre-modern sensibility. But we can acquire a more educated attitude to mythology. We are myth-making creatures ..."

The following is my commentary (not necessarily ideas from the book):
Near the end of the book she gives a good summary of outstanding examples of 20th Century literary fiction, and she describes how the literature speaks to modern myth. It's a list of literature that most English teachers would probably support, but it's not necessarily the literature that has been widely read. Which is an observation that can probably be applied to this book as well. I'm not so sure that the view of myth presented in the book is the sort of view that can be appreciated by the population at large.

She is obviously accentuating the positive side of myth in this book. However, I can't help but think that the rise of radical fundamentalism in various faith traditions is a negative use of myth. So if our goal is to save the world's human community from militant religious fundamentalism which approach do you suppose is the more effective; A declaration that all myth is false, or a suggestion of an alternative interpretation of myth? I guess I'm suggesting that the later is the preferred approach. And this is a good reason to be informed about how myth can help us understand both ourselves and others.
Profile Image for Ahoo.
41 reviews6 followers
October 12, 2023
丕蹖賳胤賵乇 讴賴 賲卮禺氐 丕爻鬲貙 夭賳丿诏蹖 丌丿賲蹖夭丕丿 讴賴 丕蹖賳 乇賵夭賴丕 丿乇 賲丕丿蹖鈥屭必й屰� 睾賵胤賴鈥屬堌� 丕爻鬲貙 亘丕蹖丿 丕夭 丕亘鬲丿丕 亘丕 丕爻胤賵乇賴 賵 賲毓賳賵蹖鬲 賵 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖蹖 丕夭 丕蹖賳 丿爻鬲 诏乇賴 禺賵乇丿賴 亘丕卮丿.
禺賱丕氐賴 丕蹖賳讴賴 讴鬲丕亘蹖 賲禺鬲氐乇 賵 賲賮蹖丿 讴賴 丿蹖丿蹖 讴賱蹖 丿乇亘丕乇賴贁 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屬囏� 亘賴 卮賲丕 賲蹖鈥屫囏�.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 764 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.