欧宝娱乐

“Lula had Eminem cranked up. He was rapping about trailer park girls and how they go round the outside, and I was wondering what the heck that meant. I'm a white girl from Trenton. I don't know these things. I need a rap
cheat sheet.”
― Janet Evanovich, To the Nines

“they have enough testosterone between them, if testosterone were electricity they could light up New York City for the month of August”
― Janet Evanovich, Twelve Sharp

“It wasn't exactly that Lula was fat. It was more that she was too short for her weight." - Stephanie Plum”
― Janet Evanovich, Explosive Eighteen

“As Stephanie and Lula were going after the bad guys, Lula was making preparations from the trunk of her Firebird. Stephanie looked inside and stopped breathing for a beat. "That's a rocket launcher!" "Yep," Lula said. "It's a big boy. I got it at a yard sale in the projects.”
― Janet Evanovich, Explosive Eighteen

“Maybe your pregnant. Oops, hold on, you're not pregnant, on account of you're not gettin any.”
― Janet Evanovich, Sizzling Sixteen

“I don't feel so good." Lula said. And she farted.
She squeezed her eyes shut tight and did a full minute-long fart. "Excuse me." she said.
I was horrified and impressed all at the same time. It was a record breaking fart. On my best day, I couldn't come near to farting like that.”
― Janet Evanovich, Finger Lickin' Fifteen

“Bitch, this is a gun...”
― Janet Evanovich

“Remember, so swashing anyone into the trunk of your car!鈥�
鈥淪ure,鈥� Lula said, 鈥淚 know that”
― Janet Evanovich, Three to Get Deadly

“Lunch with Fabius. How naive to seek enlightenment on the art of govern ment from a motley collection of intellectuals and actresses! What do the population want? Why have they no enthusiasm for anything? Why do the efforts made on their behalf produce negative opinion-poll results? It is quite bewildering how this man, who certainly didn't get to be Prime Minister without employing some cunning and who must surely know how much sharp practice, ill will, deceit and pride goes into any successful political career, can be so ingenuous about the perverse mechanisms of popular indifference, deploring the apathy and per fidiousness of the masses, their lack of imagination and participation, the absence of a collective myth, etc. (when it is by virtue of this indifference that he and others like him are in power today), deploring the emptiness of the social world apparently without noticing the void which power itself occupies (which is why he fills that void so wonderfully well). You wonder how he can survive two days in this role and this setting. The people are bored? Then give them something to marvel at. Otherwise they will make their own entertainment at your expense. They will seek out something to astonish them in spectacle (the spectacle of the media or of terrorism) if they cannot find it on the political stage. Individuals and peoples want something to marvel at - that remains their great passion. And nothing you have done has amazed them. Shock them by telling them the truth? Rubbish! Truth is extremely dangerous, since the person who tells it is the first to believe it. Now it only takes a politician believing in what he says for the others to stop believing him: that is the specific perversity of the political field. It's no use just telling the truth; you need the ring of truth too. It's no use lying. You need to have the ring of lying. This is what the socialists will have lacked to the end. They will have lied a lot and told the truth a lot, but they will never have known how to do something that had this ring about it. Now, admittedly, you can pull off quite a political stroke by using the truth - and indeed that was Fabius's intention. But you must never believe in the truth of truth. If you do, you lose all its effect. You have to use truth as a challenge, go beyond what needs to be said for it to be strictly true. The truth must astonish; otherwise, it becomes akin to stupidity. That's what produced all the political tribulations of the Greenpeace Affair. If a prime minister doesn't know that, then he has his head in the clouds. And this is the impression Fabius gives: sure of his ambitions and totally ignorant of the immoral ways of the world. I had before me the Divine Left in person.”
― Jean Baudrillard, Cool Memories

“Como se prova a inoc锚ncia de uma pessoa? Como se prova a exist锚ncia de Deus?
Est茫o na mesma esfera: eles revertem a l贸gica. Eles querem que as pessoas provem a n茫o exist锚ncia de Deus. Se digo que vi um fantasma, a pessoa que viu o fantasma deveria provar que fantasmas existem, n茫o o c茅tico deveria provar a n茫o exist锚ncia. Tanto no caso da inoc锚ncia do Lula quanto no caso de Deus existir, eles revertem a l贸gica, tornando mais complicado a argumenta莽茫o saud谩vel e l贸gica. Fantasmas desafiam qualquer l贸gica do nosso mundo. Ou seja, a pessoa que viu o fantasma deveria provar a sua exist锚ncia, n茫o a pessoa c茅tica.”
― Jorge Guerra Pires, Ci锚ncia para n茫o cientistas: como ser mais racional em um mundo cada vez mais irracional (Vol. II: Religi茫o) (Intelig锚ncia Artificial, Democracia, e Pensamento Cr铆tico)

“Por que o Lula n茫o consegue se mover nas redes como Bolsonaro?

Recentemente o Lula tem se empenhado em usar as redes, inclusive, fazendo lives. Contudo, n茫o tem funcionado como funciona para Bolsonaro. Por qu锚? Isso ocorre porque Bolsonaro misturou redes sociais com 贸dio, discurso de 贸dio. Por mais que qualquer discurso funciona nas redes, o discurso de 贸dio ganha maior engajamento. Ou seja, foi um alinhamento de um discurso que Bolsonaro sempre fez, desde jovem como parlamentar, com uma rede nova, que valorizar esse tipo de discurso.”
― Jorge Guerra Pires, Ci锚ncia para n茫o cientistas: como ser mais racional em um mundo cada vez mais irracional, vol. 1 (Bolsonarismo) (Intelig锚ncia Artificial, Democracia, e Pensamento Cr铆tico)

“No Brasil, o Lula teve sua imagem aranhada somente ao criticar abertamente o massacre em Gaza, cr铆tica totalmente v谩lida e importante, isso porque os 别惫补苍驳茅濒颈肠辞蝉 apoiam Israel como povo de Deus. Lula fez a mesma cr铆tica 脿 Ucr芒nia, nesse caso uma besteira sem contexto, contudo, ningu茅m falou nada, passou desapercebido.”
― Jorge Guerra Pires, Seria a B铆blia um livro cient铆fico?: Por que a B铆blia Sagrada n茫o deve ser levada a s茅rio e como argumentar contra ela (Intelig锚ncia Artificial, Democracia, e Pensamento Cr铆tico)