I was quite looking forward to reading about failure, as I hadn't really encountered any other books tackling the topic.
Moran speaks harshly about priI was quite looking forward to reading about failure, as I hadn't really encountered any other books tackling the topic.
Moran speaks harshly about prizes, successes and what might be called toxic positivity. All of these things are mirages, which simply skew our thinking for a minute, from the desert of failure that constitutes the reality of our lives.
"That hunted-after truffle, hidden under the ground and so delectable in prospect, tastes only of mud and truffle hog's breath. Prizes make no one happy, even those who win them." Virginia Woolf was of the same mind. She declined the Companion of Honour, the presidency of the writers' association 'PEN', and honorary degrees from two universities.
To drive the point home Moran points out that thirty-one of the thirty-two football teams in the World Cup finals fail. 126 of the 128 men and women in the Wimbledon singles fail. Playwrights fail too - most plays and musicals even if they make the stage, never get to the West End, in spite of people's dreams. He also quotes famous authors who see themselves as failures - Henry James was a failed playwright, William Faulkner a failed poet. Ezra Pound near the end of his life called his work "a mess...stupidity and ignorance all the way through...I found out after seventy years I was not a lunatic but a moron." He also speaks of the process of writing a book - starting off with enthusiasm but ending up with barely any momentum. "It is all the writer can do to keep going. But worse is to come when the river empties itself into an endless ocean made up of other people's indifference."
As someone who has experienced a lot of failure in her life, I disagree with Moran's perspective. Even decades later I still get pleasure from the very rare occasions when I won prizes, either literally or figuratively. On the other hand I very much dislike being "bottom of the class", and when that seems to be the case I usually drop out. But that isn't what Moran is addressing. He talks rather about the pain of coming forth, the pain of just missing the cups or rosettes. Like Woolf, he is not keen on prizes.
But all is not lost for those of us familiar with failure, Moran says it has positive aspects.
"Success divides us. In search of it, we drive through our lives in little armoured tanks of ego. Inside these tanks, we try to do two irreconcilable things: compete with others and win their approval and love. Failure strips us of all that competitive bullet plate. It makes us tender and undefended, more open to the world and each other. It throws us off the hamster wheel of other people's expectations. It inspires modesty, compassion and an awareness that life is a crapshoot and there are numberless ways of living it well."
"Failure speaks to us of our vulnerability, our precarity, or mortality. It is where we meet and break bread with other weak and wavering mortals. It reminds us, as Le Guin writes, that our roots are not in the light that blinds, but in the dark that nourishes, where human beings grow human souls'. Failure is not a holding station we pass through on the way to somewhere else. It is its own country, where we must all learn to live."
At the end of the book I looked back on my life and saw a huge vista of failure following failure - but that isn't normally the way I regard it. In fact I tend rather to rather celebrate the small triumphs I experience. I think this book can be rather overwhelming with its perspective. Unless you are feeling fairly resilient, I suggest you read it with caution.......more
This was one of those books I couldn't put down. A memoir about a community of dog walkers in a park, and I thoroughly enjoyed the way we got to know This was one of those books I couldn't put down. A memoir about a community of dog walkers in a park, and I thoroughly enjoyed the way we got to know the individual characters and their canine counterparts. Plus they have an adventure, one which I found both plausible and exciting. Duerden creates a strong picture of the sort of relationships that these dog walkers have. Intimate sometimes, boring sometimes, and often full of concern for one another. They frequently see one another every day - yet their relationships are limited to the parameters of the park.
I also thoroughly enjoyed Duerden's description of the various dogs, especially his own, Missy - a feisty Border Terrier - whom he is obviously besotted. Yet he often describes her quirky antics with a cool eye, which is unusual when considering the impassioned glue that usually holds people and their dogs together. Perhaps because until Missy came along he says he has always been a cat person. For whatever reason, it gives him a bit of distance which makes his writing that much more interesting.
Over and above these people and their dogs, the book also has an ace adventure as part of the story. For me it really added spice to the book. The book is full of emotions and small, everyday, but extraordinary scenarios. Life in the park has successes, failures, occasional dog fights and loss. I thought it was a fabulous read. My only complaint is that in spite of Missy clearly being a Border Terrier, the dog on the front of the book looks like a large-eyed labradoodle. Good eye-candy but bad marketing. ...more
Scenario: an aquarium, where a rather crotchety old lady befriends a rather crotchety old octopus. What is there not to love? The reply is nothing! ScScenario: an aquarium, where a rather crotchety old lady befriends a rather crotchety old octopus. What is there not to love? The reply is nothing! Scrape together your pennies from down the side of your sofa, dig out your library card or polish your Kindle. But whatever your do, please read this fabulous book....more
Tom Templeton has written a moving memoir about his life when working in an NHS hospital. He starts out by telling us that he volunteered for the NHS Tom Templeton has written a moving memoir about his life when working in an NHS hospital. He starts out by telling us that he volunteered for the NHS as a holiday job when he was eighteen.
"Until that summer I had always thought of the NHS as a bland, antiseptic institution. Up till then it had meant the drab waiting room at the local GP surgery I scarcely visited. This holiday job opened my eyes to what I now know is pulsating, variegated hive of pain, lunacy, death, sorrow, redemption and recovery, and when a stone crashes into the waters of a life many of the ripples wash on to its shores."
This nevertheless didn't entice him into medicine, and after university he went on to pursue a career he loved, in journalism. He worked for The Observer, one of our most respected national papers - but his story didn't end there. One day he "glanced down an alleyway and saw a paramedic trying to resuscitate a dead man." It was a time where there had been a lot of suffering, in his family and amongst friends - and this was a pivotal moment for him. He wanted to do something to help alleviate the suffering. And so, at the age of thirty, he went to medical school.
The patients described in this book are from when he was a hospital doctor. They are brief pictures of his connection with various people. Sometimes just during one day, at other times a bit longer.
The descriptions only mention medical details very briefly - but at the end of the book, also in chronological order, you will find in depth descriptions of what his patients are experiencing medically. I found this to be a great way of handling that information, rather than having large tracts of medical details clogging up the stories.
The people have problems which are sometimes physical, sometimes psychological and sometimes a mixture of both. Throughout the book Templeton's skills as a physician are clear, but also his caring, compassion and vulnerability. Not all the stories have happy outcomes.
The story that moved me most was that about a young boy with Prader-Willi Syndrome. His mother had died of cancer, leaving his father to bring him up.
Somewhere in the intricate dance of Johnny's genes a misstep has take place. Now an almond-sized glad in his brain, a few centimetres behind his eyes, is pumping out chemicals that are giving him the stomach-gnawing, ignorable sensation of hunger until he has eaten five times as many calories as he needs. Five bananas instead of one. Ten biscuits instead of two. Fifteen fish fingers instead of three. From the moment he wakes up to the moment he falls asleep, he will feel the magnificently evolved, sledgehammer cravings of hunger. He is destined to be ravenous for the rest of his life."
Maybe because I spent much of my youth unsuccessfully yo-yo-ing from diet to diet, this particularly resonated with me. That poor child, and the poor father, having to act as gatekeeper to the larder.
He mentions an occasion when he thought a patient might be faking his symptoms, so he almost failed to refer him for a CT scan. Fortunately he double checked with the consultant on duty who said to get the scan done anyway. It showed bad bleeding in the brain, which thankfully could then be treated.
One patient asks him that if working in A & E hasn't got him down.
" I guess you must see a lot of misery here" says Tariq.
He replies "The opposite actually, within the misery we see people's drive to live, to get whole, to enjoy life again."
I thought this book was outstanding. Not surprisingly it left me with a feeling of overwhelming gratitude for my imperfect but reasonable health....more
**spoiler alert** In 2014, Mikael Lindnor, the author of this book, lead a Swedish Adventure Racing Team in competing in the Adventure Racing World Ch**spoiler alert** In 2014, Mikael Lindnor, the author of this book, lead a Swedish Adventure Racing Team in competing in the Adventure Racing World Championship. The course that year was particularly difficult: 435 miles, reaching about 15,000 feet in elevation and spanning 13 different climate zones across Ecuador.
Whilst in coastal Ecuador, Lindnor fed one of the stray dogs there some meatballs, and this scrawny dog, an incredibly determined and stoical animal, proceeded to follow him for the rest of the race. Over this time they bonded, and at the end of the race Lindnor made great endeavours to bring the dog, now called Arthur, back to Sweden with him. It took some work, but finally he was successful - and Arthur's happy ever after home is now with the Lindnor family.
The book is a novel, told from Arthur's perspective - it's sort of anthropomorphic on steroids. It's heart-wrenching in many places, but has a wonderfully happy ending.
I enjoyed it but I felt cheated. I meant to buy the sister book to this - just called "Arthur", which is a non-fiction account of what happened, and I bought this book by mistake. Grrrrr! Anyway, it's a good read if like me you're soppy about dogs....more
This book is a short, yet highly entertaining collection of essays. Ephron was a scriptwriter - most famous for 'When Harry Met Sally." The essays refThis book is a short, yet highly entertaining collection of essays. Ephron was a scriptwriter - most famous for 'When Harry Met Sally." The essays reflect Ephron's thoughts about various aspect of her life. She isn't a glass half full type of person - the glass is either overflowing or empty, as she writes about her feelings with passion, but also with a wonderfully dry sense of humour.
The essays cover various topics. My favourite ones include:
'The Six Stages of Email' - a case of moving from enthralment to disgust.
'Flops' - a very funny yet poignant account of what it's like to write a film that's a flop. "One of the saddest thing about a flop is that even if it turns out to have a healthy afterlife, even if it's partly redeemed, you remain bruised and hurt by the original experience...."
'My Life as an Heiress" - a fantastic true story, about Ephron's hopes of inheriting a lot of money, which eventually didn't happen. I think fully deserving of being turned into one of Ephron's films, but that never happened.
'The Legend' The tragic story of Ephron's mother, who started out as a successful scriptwriter in Beverley Hills (especially unusual for a woman), but who ended up dying when young of alcoholism.
'Journalism - A Love Story' A fascinating piece about women and journalism, and Ephron's rather crazy experiences at Newsweek magazine and the Post. (When she joined Newsweek, like all the women there, she had to join as a mail room girl.)
Most of all I was touched by the short pieces she wrote on the topic of ageing. 'I Remember Nothing', 'Who are You?' 'The O Word' and the two lists - 'What I Won't Miss' and 'What I Will Miss.' Her observations about ageing are deeply perceptive - much too perceptive to be comfortable if you're over seventy, as I am. But I think they are brilliant.
I keep returning to her final entries - the two lists. What will I miss when I die, what won't I miss? These questions just keep popping into my head at unexpected moments. Some of things Ephron said she wouldn't miss included technology in general, bras and funerals. Some of the things she said she would miss included Shakespeare in the Park, reading in bed, and coming over the bridge to Manhattan......
Ephron died in 2012, and I'm very glad she left this short book as part of her legacy.
I felt this book centered around four areas - Knapp's personal history and relationships, her growing relationship with alcohol, the nature of alcoholI felt this book centered around four areas - Knapp's personal history and relationships, her growing relationship with alcohol, the nature of alcohol, and her experiences as a member of AA.
With regard to the first, she gives an excellent description of what it's like to have problems in a middle class family that ostensibly look squeaky clean. Her father was a psychoanalyst, and life at home seemed very civilized. Then we learn that her father's first marriage was to an alcoholic, and that she had a half brother, called Wicky, whose chaotic life was the result of fetal alcohol syndrome. Wiky lived with them for a while, his behaviour causing extreme disruption. Later on in the book, her father admits to a friend that he has serious problems with drinking too, albeit that "he drank in a Ivy League, genteel way". The squeaky clean family exterior was masking some major cracks.
With regard to her commenting on the nature of alcohol, I found the following of interest. It goes a long way to explaining why people sometimes feel depressed for some time after they stop drinking....
Drinking artificially "activates" the brain's reward system....increasing the release of the neurotransmitter dopamine which is central to feelings of pleasure and reward. Over time...the brain develops what are known as "compensatory adaptations"to all the artificial revving up: in an effort to bring its own chemistry back into its natural equilibrium, it works overtime to decrease dopamine, ultimately leaving those same pleasure/reward circuits depleted. A vicious cycle ensues: by drinking too much, you basically diminish your brain's ability to manufacture feelings of well-being and calm on its own, and you come to depend increasingly on the artificial stimulus - alcohol - to produce those feelings.
I was also interested in her descriptions of AA, and the people she met there. She obviously wrote the book when still a relative newbie, going to 4 or 5 meetings a week, and her enthusiasm is palpable. And why not? This organisation has managed to inspire her to stop what was an extremely destructive habit. The thing that impressed me most was her description of the comaraderie and community that is found in AA. As Johann Hari is famous for saying "the opposite of addiction is connection".....and AA seems to provide that in spadefuls.
She is vehemently against the idea of moderating or harm reduction, which is also very much an AA stance. (view spoiler)[
"One of the most commonly cited statistics on recidivism comes from the Course of Alcoholism: Four Years after Treatment, a January 1980 report by the Rand Corporation and the most extensive and comprehensive study of its kind today. This study tracked a group of 900 alcoholic men over a period of 4 years. Of those, only 28% remained free of alcohol problems both at 18 months and at 4 years after entering treatment; only 15% were in continuous remission for the entire 4 years. Once you've crossed the line into alcoholism, the percentages are not in your favour; there appears to be no safe way to drink again, no way to return to normal, socially controlled drinking."
She also talks about the frequency of cross addictions. In her experience with men this often involves alcohol with drugs or gambling, and for women it is frequently alcohol and food issues. (At one point in her life Knapps developed anorexia, and her weight went down from 120 lbs to 83 lbs. Thankfully she recovered.)
All in all I found this an interesting read - and I was sorry to hear that Knapps had died since writing the book (she died of cancer.) I'm sure it has been an inspiring read for many people....more
This is going to be an odd 欧宝娱乐 review! I was reading this book - slowly as usual - but long before I had finished the book, I found that I had tThis is going to be an odd 欧宝娱乐 review! I was reading this book - slowly as usual - but long before I had finished the book, I found that I had to return it to the library, and couldn't renew it again. It was also an inter-library loan, so it would have been a kerfuffle to get it out again.
So, and this is the odd bit, I have only read up to page 119.... What I did read was interesting, a bit predictable in places, but interesting, and a good wake-up call for listening more carefully, which is always helpful.
What I do have from reading the books so far though is a pile of notes I wish to keep - which is why I basically did the review.... (view spoiler)[
Cited as the most frequent bad listening behaviours
*Interrupting *Responding vaguely or illogically to what was just said. *Looking at a phone, watch, looking around the room, or otherwise away from the speaker. *Fidgeting (tapping on the table, frequently shifting position, clicking a pen, etc)
Foetuses can recognise human voices
We begin to listen even before we are born. Foetuses respond to sound at just sixteen weeks' gestation and, during the last trimester of pregnancy, can clearly distinguish between language and other sounds. An unborn child can be soothed by a friendly voice and startled by an angry outburst.
Attachment Theory
If we don't attach well with our carers when we are babies, we can form dysfunctional attachments not only as children, but also when we are older.
Our ability to listen and connect with people as adults is shaped by how well our parents listened and connected with us as children.
Attentive and responsive care givers set you up to have a secure attachment style, which is characterised by an ability to listen empathetically and this for functional, meaningful and mutually supportive relationship.
On the other hand, children whose parents were not dependably attentive typically grow up to be adults with an insecure anxious attachment style, which means they tend to worry and obsess about relationships. They do not listen well because they are so concerned about losing people's attention and affection. This preoccupation can lead them to be overly dramatic, boastful, or clingy. They might also pester people, rather than allowing them to have their space.
An insecure avoidant attachment style comes from growing up with care givers who were mostly inattentive - or perhaps overly attentive, to the point of smothering. People raised this way are often bad listeners because they tend to shut down or leave relationships whenever things get too close. They resist listening because they don't want to be disappointed or overwhelmed.
Finally people who have an insecure disorganised attachment style display both anxious and avoidant behaviours in an illogical and erratic manner. This is often the result of growing up with a care giver who was threatening or abusive. Intimacy can feel scary or frightening.
Of course not everyone fits neatly into one of these categories . Most people land somewhere along a continuum from secure to insecure.
Several programmes have emerged in the last decade to teach parents of young children how to listen and respond to their babies and toddlers, before dysfunctional neural patterns get grooved into their developing brains.
To listen well
To listen well is to figure out what's on someone's mind and demonstrate that you care enough to want to know.
Listening is not about teaching, shaping, critiquing, appraising or showing how it should be done.
Listening requires, more than anything, curiosity.
In How to Win Friends and Influence People, Dale Carnegie wrote, "You can make more friends in two months by becoming interested in other people that you can in two years by trying to get other people interested in you"
While you might think you'd be more likely to listen to a loved one than a stranger, in fact, the opposite is often true.
Things that help us talk to people.
The person shows interest. They ask the right questions. They were less judging They didn't interrupt.
We are more open with people we don't know well
In an in-depth study of a cohort of 38 graduate students and confirmed in a large online survey of 2,000 people representative of all Americans, Harvard sociologist Mario Luis Small found that slightly more than half the time, people confided their most pressing worrisome concerns to people with whom they had weaker ties, even people they encountered by chance, rather than to those they had previously said were closest to them - like a spouse, family member or dear friend. In some cases, the subjects actively avoided telling the people in their innermost circle because they feared unkindness, judgement, blowback or drama.
The Closeness Communication bias
Also people in long term relationships tend to lose their curiosity about one another. They become convinced that they know the other person better than they do. They don't listen, because they think they know what the other person will say. This is called The Closeness Communication bias.
Nurturing Relationships
One of the most widely cited researchers on the topic of human relations is British anthropologist and evolutionary psychologist Robin Dunbar. He says that a primary way we maintain friendships is through "everyday talk" That means asking "How are you?" and actually listening to the answer. Dunbar stresses that there are hierarchical layers of friendship determined by how much time you spend with the person. Without consistent contact, friendships can easily fall into the realm of acquaintance. At this point, you are friendly, but not really friends, because you've lost touch with who they are, which is always evolving. An exception might be friends with whom you feel like you can pick up right where you left off, even though you haven't talked to them for ages. According to Dunbar, these are usually friendship forged through extensive and deep listening at some point in your life, usually during an emotionally wrought time, like a personal crisis.
Prying
Prying is the the quickest way to lose someone's confidence. In Notes from Underground, Fyodor Dostoyevsky wrote, "Every man has some reminiscences which he would not tell to everyone but only to his friends. He has other which he would not reveal even to his friends, but only to himself, and that in secret. But finally there are still others which a man is even afraid to tell himself, and every decent man has a considerable number of such things stored away"
We never understand one another fully
Daniel Flores, a Roman Catholic bishop in Texas, believes that expecting complete understanding is the root of many troubled relationships. "We all long to express ourselves to another, but if we thing there will be the perfect person who will be able to receive it all, we will be disappointed. Not that we shouldn't always try to communicate and give one another the gift of listening, for that is love, even if we aren't always able to understand.
Reflecting/paraphrasing is not enough, we need to display understanding
Research by Graham Bodie, a professor of integrated marketing communication at the University of Mississippi, shows that people are more likely to feel understood if a listener responds not by nodding, parroting, or paraphrasing, but by giving descriptive and evaluative information. Contrary to the idea that effective listening is some sort of passive exercise, Bodie's work reveals it requires interpretation and interplay. We want someone to respond in a thoughtful, feeling way. People want to the sense you get why they are telling you the story and what it means to them.
Active listening goes beyond just listening to the facts. You want to pick up the mood of the person who is speaking, how they feel about what they are saying.
You already know about you. You miss out on opportunities when you don't take a breath and listen. Talking about yourself doesn't add anything to your knowledge base. You already know about you.
3 Questions to ask yourself after a conversation
When you leave a conversation ask yourself: * What did I just learn about that person? * What was most concerning to that person today? * How did that person feel about what we were talking about? If you can't answer those questions, you probably need to work on your listening.
Keep an open mind. You may be wrong
Disagreements and sharp differences of opinion are inevitable in life whether they are over political ideology, ethical issues, business dealings, or personal matters. When engaged in any kind of dispute, the father of listening studies, Ralph Nichols, advised listening for evidence that you might be wrong rather than listening to poke hole in the other person's argument, much less plugging your ears or cutting someone out of your life entirely. If you remain open to the possibility that you might be wrong, or at least not entirely right, you'll get far more out of the conversation.
This approach is backed up by science. The amygdala in our brain is what activates when we sense a threat, and the more the amygdala is activated the less we are able to listen. It also clouds judgement, rendering us unthinking and irrational.
To listen doesn't mean you agree with someone. It simply means you accept the legitimacy of the other person's point of view, and that you might have something to learn from it. It also means that you embrace the possibility that there might be multiple truths and understanding them might lead to a larger truth.
As this book started off I felt quite lost. It was like a patchwork quilt, with different people and different perspectives being highlighted, often oAs this book started off I felt quite lost. It was like a patchwork quilt, with different people and different perspectives being highlighted, often only with very tenuous connections, or seemingly with no connections at all. As the book progressed though the bits of the patchwork started aligning, and it all began to make more sense.
It's a heartwarming story about a group of strangers thrown together in a hostage situation, and slowly we get to know them, and watch how their relationships with one another progress.
It's written with gentle humour and tremendous affection for the characters - all building up to a hugely satisfying ending, (or at least it was for me.)
I read this using my Kindle, and given the patchwork nature of the book I would rather have read it in paper form. It would have been good to be able to go back and forth in places. But that is a small niggle, overall the book was a great read. I also read it as my bedtime book, and it was perfect for that....more
A large children's picture book with some taster info about different types of robot. Illustrated in an appropriately robotic/graphic style. It was a A large children's picture book with some taster info about different types of robot. Illustrated in an appropriately robotic/graphic style. It was a quick and enjoyable read.
Some fun facts (or scary facts, depending on your perspective) that I found interesting....(view spoiler)[
* At one car factory in India 580 robots produce one complete motor care every 30 seconds!
* The 'ASUS Zenbo' is a 62cm tall personal bot which trundles around your home, switching lights off, streaming video calls and performing other simple tasks. Its *face* is a touchscreen depicting a face with a range of 24 different emotions. :O)*
* A robot coffee-maker called Ella, can work 5 times faster than a human barista, making up to 15 different coffees and recognising regular customer's faces - AND recalling their favourite hot drink.
* The PRECEYES Surgical System helps surgeons work inside the human eye, to reattach retinas and perform other operations with incredible precision. The robot moves the surgical tools to within 0.02mm - just 1/4 the width of a human hair.
* A Robot-Rx can dispense 6,000 - 7,000 prescriptions a day, saving human pharmacists 90% of their time.
*Some wards of the Covid-19 field hospital in Wuhan were largely staffed by robots, which took temperatures, instructed patients, delivered medicine and food and sprayed disinfectant.
*Japan has three troops of 32 cheerleading robots called 'Murata', capable of performing choreographed routines. They use gyroscopic sensors to stay balanced and upright.
*Sony's AIBO robot dog comes with a bone it will hunt for, a ball to play with, and the ability to learn lots of new tricks. It can also patrol a home as a security guard, seeking out faces it recognises and those it doesn't. It recognises more than 50 voice commands.
* Robotic exoskeletons are just one of the robots used to help people during rehabilitation from injury or illness. They can support a patient's weight and assist their movement until they can build up the strength to do exercises fully for themselves. This can help patients strengthen their muscles, or improve their heart and lung fitness.
* In 2018 the Smithsonian started using robots as tour guides. They lead visitors around the exhibits, answering questions and providing commentaries. During Covid, some robots travelled around closed galleries and museums, providing filmed tours which people could stream and enjoy from home.
* PARO is a robot modelled on a baby harp seal, and is used to provide company for elderly people who suffer with loneliness or anxiety. It moves its head and flippers, blinks and makes facial expressions and sounds to provide company and comfort. Sensors embedded in its fur react to touch. In 2018 there were 5,000 in use, 3,000 of them in Japan.
* The most popular robots in the world are Roomba vacuum cleaners and Braava robot floor moppers.
With all the talk we hear about robots and AI, it was enlightening to have some very simple examples of the sort of work that is being done with them. On one hand the book was ominous - yikes - robots really can do a lot of things that our current workforce does, and on the other hand it was entertaining. A fun read....more
Ramachandran is a neuroscientist and academic. He writes a lot about people who have had strokes, and other forms of brain damage, for example people Ramachandran is a neuroscientist and academic. He writes a lot about people who have had strokes, and other forms of brain damage, for example people who have experienced things like epilepsy and problems with phantom limbs after amputation. He looks at how the way these patients' issues, casts light on how we all think, and anomolies found in healthy brains.
For me the real pleasure of the book lies not only in Ramachandran's fascinating theories, but also in the fact that he explains his ideas so clearly. This is a very accessible book for anyone.
Now for the opt out.... The book covers a lot of ground. Rather than trying to summarize and make notes about my favourite extracts as I usually do, I'm simply going to refer to a brilliant review which is way better than anything I could produce. It's by Riku Sayuj, and can be found here...
Whilst I was attracted to the thought of someone experiencing Nepal at a time when there were few travellers there, I found the book to be too unstrucWhilst I was attracted to the thought of someone experiencing Nepal at a time when there were few travellers there, I found the book to be too unstructured. Almost like a stream of consciousness, which didn't sit comfortably with it being a book about travel, places and people. Or at least it didn't work for me....more
I loved the first book I read by Henry Marsh - Do No Harm- and there was much of this book that I relished too, but regrettably my ignorant brain coulI loved the first book I read by Henry Marsh - Do No Harm- and there was much of this book that I relished too, but regrettably my ignorant brain couldn't keep up with some of his lengthy scientific descriptions written for educated laypersons. Here's the sort of description I mean..... (view spoiler)[
(Linear accelerators) are triumphs of physical science and high-tech engineering, which have taken decades and thousands of scientists and engineers to create. A magnetron - just as in your microwave oven-generates radio frequency waves (streams of photons). An electrongun (usually a heated tungsten filament) fires electrons down 'the wave-guide' - a long tube which lies within the radiofrequency waves. The electrons, steered by surrounding magnets, surf the waves, and are accelerated close to the speed of light to slam into a tungsten target. The target spits out photons as the high-speed electrons react with the tungsten atoms. The photons are then filtered and focused and shaped into a narrow beam, like the light from a torch, and fired into the cancer (and whatever else surrounds it.) By firing the photon beam in a rotating arc, and modulating its intensity, as well as its shape, a high dose of X-rays is delivered to the tumour and a relatively low dose to the surrounding body.
However the book was also full of ideas that I could enjoy. Marsh has a wonderful magpie mind and he's led an interesting life. He read philosophy at Oxford before deciding to change paths and become a neurosurgeon instead - and he isn't guilty of having led 'an unexamined life', rather this book is full of his ponderings about himself and the world.
We learn what it's like to be a respected neurosurgeon, who's now placed in the position of patient. Like many doctors, he hadn't monitored his health in the way that he should...
"Doctors with cancer are often said to present with advanced disease, having dismissed and rationalised away the early symptoms for far too long. I was well aware of this phenomenon, but this knowledge did not prevent me from falling victim to it myself..... For too many years I had indeed chosen to bury my head in the sand. I was a doctor -admittedly a retired one - and illness still only happened to patients, not to me."
As a result was told that he had advanced prostate cancer. Like the rest of us, he then got intensely worried and took to googling, in the hope of finding a promise of greater longevity.
He talks about a brain research initiative he took part in. He and the others were given scans. Although he was seventy at the time, he thought the results would be pretty good, and he was shocked to find the degree to which his brain "was shrunken and withered. A worn and sad version of what it must once have been...... Not to put too fine a point on it, my brain is starting to rot..." He defends his own practice of having been optimistic when talking to patients about their brains.
I always downplayed the extent of these age-related changes seen on brain scans when talking to my patients, just as I have never spelled it out that with some operations you must remove part of the brain. We are all so suggestible that doctors must choose their words very carefully.... You can unwittingly precipitate all manner of psychosomatic symptoms and anxieties. I usually told cheerful white lies 'Your brain looks very good for your age', I would say, to the patients' delight."
He talks about the joy he gets from his grandchildren - to the extent he built them a magnificent sounding dolls house, and then he talks about the pleasure he got from practising other types of woodworking, and in sourcing good quality and interesting woods to work with. He said that his attic was full of things like old computers - he was always rushing on to get to the next thing, without stopping to sort out the old. It tallies with the general enthusiasm about life that comes across in his writing.
He feels deeply concerned about climate change and the future of the planet, and this is heightened by his awareness of the beauty around him. Here he speaks about some surprising aspects of the Covid lockdown, as experienced in his house in Wimbledon, a rather lovely old suburb of London.
And lockdown brought complete peace and quiet. The air felt as fresh as if you were in the countryside and the sky was a clear and deep blue. The only sounds were of birds singing, children playing and the wind in the trees. And at night, at first, there was a full moon, looking down kindly on the suddenly silent city, and you could see the stars. It was a vision of heaven, here in London SW19. Time had stopped. Eternity is not the infinite prolongation of time but instead its abolition.... In the evening I would sit in my garden and look up at the tall trees in the little park beyond my workshop, illuminated by the setting sun against the infinite, deep blue sky and for a while feel quite swept away.
The above are just a brief taster of all the myriad things he discusses, all of which (bar the scientific descriptions), I enjoyed a lot. Most of all, I was intrigued by the degree to which he seemed to fear death.
When I now think of how the uncertainty about my own future, and the proximity of death, threw me into torment, careering wildly between hope and despair, I look back in wonder at how little I thought about the effect I had on my own patients after I had spoken to them. I did worry that if my tone of voice was too pessimistic the poor patient might spend what little time he or she had left feeling deeply depressed, simply waiting to die. So I tried to find a balance between telling them the truth and not depriving them of hope...... As I was discovering myself, false hope - denial by another name - is better than no hope at all, but it is always very difficult for the doctor to know how to balance hope against truth when talking to patients with diseases such as mine. I listened to classical music on the radio. I derived very real consolation from the thought of how all these composers had died -indeed , there is a countless army of people who have died before me. Death comes to us all, sooner or later, one way or another, I told myself, and is part of life. I will be keeping good company.
But all this was fighting talk, rationalist bravado - I so long not to die. Evolution may have no interest in our living into old age, but it has burdened us with an overwhelming fear of death. It is essential, after all, if our genes are to be successful, that as young parents we fear death and avoid putting our lives at risk, so that our children will thrive. But we carry this fear into old age,when it no longer serves any real purpose, other than to make us miserable..... Yes, death comes to us all, sooner or later, in one way or another, and is part of life, but my wish to go on living is as overwhelming and incontrovertible as love at first sight.
Thankfully when later scans were done, Marsh was told they showed no metastatic spread.
I come from a family where we were brought up to regard death as a completely peaceful state of non-being, certainly nothing to fear,and I am surprised that someone as logical and rational as March should find the prospect so frightening, especially at his age (he was seventy-two when he wrote the book.) I completely respect that we all have different perspectives about these things - but nevertheless it was interesting for me to read about someone with such different ideas to my own.
All in all, a good read. I shall end with a few notes for my own reference.
The brain is sculpted by experience, cutting away connections that are not being used. Until the age of two, for instance, children in all cultures can discriminate between all the basic sounds of all languages, but from then on, they can only recognise the phonemes of their mother tongue.
Compassion
After I had been diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer and became a patient myself, I was surprised to keep on remembering more and more patients whom I had completely forgotten - some were cases going back more than thirty years. Now that I was so anxious and unhappy, feeling abandoned, I realised how anxious and unhappy so many of my patients must have been, and yet how I had chosen to turn a blind eye to this. My former patients became reproachful ghosts who came to punish me....I thought of how I would be a much better doctor if I could start all over again. How I would be full of the compassion and understanding that I lacked when I was younger. But would this then leave me unable to enter the operating theatre, pull on my gloves, and cut into my patients' heads? I simply don't know, although I do know that the arthritis I am starting to suffer from in my hands makes it all a nonsense anyway.....
As a doctor, you could not do the work if you were truly empathetic..... Empathy, like exercise, is hard work, and it is normal and natural to avoid it. You have to practise instead a limited form of compassion, without losing your humanity in the process. While I was still working, I thought that I had achieved it, but now, looking back, and as a patient myself, I was full of doubt."
Mistakes
He mentions the time he operated on the problem of a trapped nerve, but he operated on the wrong side of the man's neck. The man was incredibly understanding and said he understood, he installed kitchens for people and said he knew how easy it was to make a mistake. Marsh ends by saying that nowadays the pressure on him to lie would have been far greater, as if the mistake had happened today he would probably have been dismissed. (He also says that this happened in the time before the introduction of checklists, although in this instance that probably wouldn't have helped.)
Surgeons and experience
Marsh stresses that the question we need to find out about surgeons doing our operations is how experienced they are in doing these types of procedures.
The Private Finance Initiative
"The building was built under the private finance initiative (PFI), and it was owned by a private, highly profitable company that rented the building to the NHS. PFI was supposed to be a cheaper and more efficient way of building hospitals and schools than direct government funding, but as many warned at the time, the opposite was true. PFI was a con, little short of an economic crime, for which nobody has been held to account."
The pleasures of working in a small hospital
He writes about the pleasure he had working in a small hospital - Atkinson Morley's Hospital in Wimbledon. "It had tall ceilings and high windows, the emphasis being on fresh air and light. It was built before hospitals became machines for healing, and when Wimbledon was still surrounded by fields and gardens. The hospital had its own stables, and laundry and staff residences. When I worked there it was only three stories high, and it had a staff of fewer than 200. It was built on a human scale. I knew all the staff - not just the other doctors, but the nurses, the physios, the porters and the cleaners. I think all of us, at all levels, had a real sense of belonging and personal responsibility for what happened to our patients. The hospital was famously efficient - I would get through three or four major surgical cases a day, something unimaginable now.
We are tribal animals - we are happiest in relatively small groups."
FreeWill
Given that nerve cells act over space and time, perhaps we should not be surprised that scientific experiments show some strange effects. Some of the earliest, and most famous, were Benjamin Libet's experiments in America in the 1980s. These showed (and have been confirmed subsequently many times) that the conscious decision to move your hand comes a few milliseconds after electrical activation of the brain's hand area, as revealed by electrodes placed over the scalp. Libet's experiments have inevitably added to the already excessive literature about 'freewill'..... Studies have shown that a remarkably high proportion of violent offenders in prison have a history of previous head injury, or an abusive childhood, or both. In my work I often saw patients with physical brain damage, typically to the frontal lobes from accidental trauma. This often causes personality change, almost invariably for the worse. They were almost always unaware of this themselves, but it could be quite terrible for their families. Such experiences make it very hard indeed to believe that thought and feeling, and consciousness itself, are not generated by physical processes in our brains. Free will might be a legal necessity for an ordered society, but it is an illusion. Our decisions are determined by our past..... But that doesn't mean that pain isn't painful, or that difficult decisions are not difficult. It just means we don't understand how our brains work.
AI I am not worried about super-intelligent AI in some way replacing us in the foreseeable future, although it may well render large numbers of people unemployed. (Most economists argue that this does not usually happen with the introduction of new labour-saving technology, and instead new jobs are created.) But I am deeply worried about the way AI will be used in a malign way by my fellow human beings, and especially by despotic governments. The loss of anonymity, for instance, that comes with omnipresent CCTV and facial-recognition software puts enormous power in the hands of a few people.
Establishing trust with your patients
You should always be seated. You should never appear to be in a hurry.
The curse of good medicine
Although scientific medicine has brought great and wonderful blessings, it has also brought a curse - dying, for many of us, has become a prolonged experience, even if severe pain is now only rarely a problem.
This is a charming children's book - a paperback of only 63 pages. The main characters - a goose, a bear and a mouse, are an absolute delight, and youThis is a charming children's book - a paperback of only 63 pages. The main characters - a goose, a bear and a mouse, are an absolute delight, and you can't help but get very fond of all of them. Plus there are lessons to be learnt about friendship, trust, misunderstandings, guilt and forgiveness..... and of course it has a wonderful ending.
The illustrations were just black and white drawings - but like the story they had a lot of character.
I read this as a bedtime book. Perfect for children of all ages, including me at 72....more
I very seldom read novels, but having heard such good reports of this book I thought I'd give it a go. Well, it reduced me to emotional jelly - severaI very seldom read novels, but having heard such good reports of this book I thought I'd give it a go. Well, it reduced me to emotional jelly - several times I had to stop and blow my nose after a drippy weep. It was also an un-put-downable read.
If you find the idea of sentimental emotional stories about dogs unattractive - just keep walking. But if you feel even remotely gooey about them, this is your book. I enjoyed it enormously....more
This is a memoir written by a brave young doctor who in the early years of a successful career went blind with something called keratoconus. Usually iThis is a memoir written by a brave young doctor who in the early years of a successful career went blind with something called keratoconus. Usually it can be treated with a corneal transplant, but regrettably he was one of the few whose transplant was rejected. Not only did he go blind, but this condition caused him a lot of pain - and continues to do so.
As readers we get an excellent insight into what the experience of going blind feels like. The moments of hope and the moments of distress, when he realised that nothing is going to be able to help. His fumbling efforts to try and get used to ordinary life as a blind person, and the wonderful support he gets from his wife and family. He works hard on coming to terms with his blindness - going as far as learning to read braille, which can't have been easy as an adult. Later on in the book we also have a chapter written by his wife, about the challenges she had to handle in the beginning, trying to support him in the face of his despair, coming to terms with the fact her career now involved her being the sole breadwinner for the family, and trying to keep positive with the various changes they had to make to their lives in order to make life liveable.
However the bulk of the book concerns Patel's experience of getting his wonderful guide dog Kita, and explaining the amazing work she does for him. By the end of the book you appreciate the extraordinary amount of care and training that goes into creating a guide dog - and what a superb job the people from The Guide dogs for the Blind Association do. From a carefully monitored puppyhood, to hours of patient, expert training, and up to the care that is given to matching each dog to the right person.
The book also discusses Patel's work with RNIB (The Royal National Institute for the Blind), and The Guide Dogs for the Blind Association - his campaigning for better access for people who are blind, to many of the facilities that the sighted take for granted.
I found the book an interesting read, but it didn't move me nearly as much as it could have done - therefore the three stars. I'm very glad I read it though, as I learnt a lot....more
This book has had excellent reviews. Its average rating here on 欧宝娱乐 is 4.68, and a brief glance at the reviews suggests that people were very moThis book has had excellent reviews. Its average rating here on 欧宝娱乐 is 4.68, and a brief glance at the reviews suggests that people were very moved by reading it.
But, I couldn't get into it, and it has ended up on my DNF shelf after about 30 pages. Every time I picked it up I just started feeling sleepy. I was also annoyed because there is a certain aspect of Pratchett's life that I particularly want to know more about, but the book has no index, plus the chapters have titles like "Spy-thighed reptiles, chickens in barrels and everything but the solar stove" or "Rubber gloves, TV snobs and an Olivetti on the line at Waterloo." Nothing to help the reader navigate the book or Pratchett's life.
Anyway, I am very much in the minority with my views - others are obviously finding it a pretty outstanding read....more