Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Sasha's Reviews > The Man in the High Castle

The Man in the High Castle by Philip K. Dick
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
3144945
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: 2014, rth-lifetime

For a novel about Nazis taking over the world, this book is awfully concerned with the I Ching and jewelry.

I mean, it's concerned with truth, as usual. Dick, as close as we get to an American Borges, is always about truth and counterfeit and authenticity. (You may have heard about Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?) In this book, a character holds up two Zippos. "One was in Franklin D. Roosevelt's pocket when he was assassinated," he says; "And one wasn't. One has historicity...one has nothing. Can you feel it?" You cannot feel it.

So for the worlds: in ours, the Allies won World War II; in this book's, the Axis won; in a book within this book, the Allies won again, though not in the same way. Which one is correct? asks the book, and in an expanding universe this question isn't academic; all three are real to someone. This world, like that historical Zippo, has as much value as you choose to give it. None of it is intrinsically real. What is real is good - and evil. "There is evil! It's actual like cement," says Dick in one of his finer moments.

But in order to explore all this we need a guide, and the I Ching makes a poor Dumbledore; there's too much involved. (Or too much wu, if you'd rather. It was, btw, consulted during the writing; Dick actually let the I Ching make plot decisions. It worked out about as well as can be expected.) This book has intrigue and assassination plots and some sort of wizard of Oz, but it also spends a fair amount of its time off the rails, rambling about the I Ching and antique watches and jewelry; it's not terribly focused. Ubik is a better novel, but Dick is at his best writing short stories.

41 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read The Man in the High Castle.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

September 22, 2014 – Shelved as: to-read
September 22, 2014 – Shelved
December 7, 2014 – Started Reading
December 9, 2014 – Finished Reading
December 21, 2014 – Shelved as: 2014
January 2, 2015 – Shelved as: rth-lifetime

Comments Showing 1-10 of 10 (10 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

nostalgebraist I remember hating this one when I read it in middle school because of the lack of coherence, although later on I filed that opinion under "maybe I was just too young to 'get' it." But having read a few Dick novels as an adult, the one I really enjoyed was VALIS. Dick gets very interesting when he writes about his own delusions, in part because he's able to maintain skeptical distance from them while still having them.


message 2: by Sasha (last edited Dec 09, 2014 03:18PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Sasha No, I think your middle-school self had the right idea; it's not super crazy coherent.

Maybe I'll make Valis my next one - thanks!


message 3: by Emma (new) - added it

Emma I give your review five stars. I'm pro-pithy.


message 4: by Emma (new) - added it

Emma Plus also for the woo link.


Sasha Thanks Emma!


message 6: by Alan (new) - rated it 1 star

Alan Spot on with the I Ching fetish. It's as overemphasized as Legolas in Peter Jackson's Hobbit movies.


Sasha Alan wrote: "Spot on with the I Ching fetish. It's as overemphasized as Legolas in Peter Jackson's Hobbit movies."

Haha, awesome comparison.


message 8: by Alan (new) - rated it 1 star

Alan (curtsies)


message 9: by Jennifer (new) - added it

Jennifer Have you watched the series?


Sasha I haven't, no - no one's made a compelling argument that I should. Do you watch it?


back to top