Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Julie Ehlers's Reviews > 10:04

10 by Ben Lerner
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
2120450
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: literary-fiction

10:04 is a novel about how Ben Lerner signs a contract to write a particular novel, and then does a bunch of other things rather than write it. He goes to an artists' colony in Texas, where he works on poetry instead of on the novel. He decides whether to serve as a sperm donor for his best friend Alex, who cautions him not to put her in his novel. He weathers two (literal) hurricanes. He serves as a "big brother" of sorts for an elementary school student (they self-publish a brief book on dinosaurs, included here). He frets about writing the novel but doesn't really get serious about writing it. This novel is the result. It's a novel about not writing a novel.

At this point, this idea is nothing new; the film Adaptation and Geoff Dyer's Out of Sheer Rage spring to mind, and of course there are many other meta-novels out there. By the same token, Ben Lerner inserting himself into works that are ostensibly fiction is also nothing new. Of course, reading 10:04 we're aware that some of the stuff that seems to be autobiographical is really just made up—but do we really care enough to want to sort it all out?

More so even than Lerner's previous novel, Leaving the Atocha Station, 10:04 has a forced quality. There are various themes he keeps circling back to, but it never feels organic, and for me there was never a moment when it all clicked into place. I noticed what he was doing every time: "Oh," I would think, "he's bringing that idea in again." It was benign but extremely self-conscious.

Yet, I enjoyed the experience of reading this much more than Atocha. This time around, I was OK wandering around in Lerner's head as Lerner wandered around town—maybe because he experienced no language barrier in this book and, because he was therefore freer with this speech and actions, he was also freer with his thoughts? 10:04 just had an easier prose style to me, and was more emotionally accessible. With Atocha I could never tell when Lerner was trying to be funny or not; I felt constantly off-balance. With 10:04 I could tell when I was supposed to laugh and when I was supposed to feel moved. This doesn't sound like high praise, but it enabled me to relax into the story (or "story") in a way I couldn't with Atocha.

And as it turns out, Lerner is perfectly (or newly) capable of crafting scenes with genuine emotional impact. When I laughed, it was because I genuinely found things funny. When I was moved, it was because I had read something that genuinely moved me. Lerner has also gotten much better at setting: There was a vividness and tactile quality to his descriptions of places here that I just don't remember from Atocha, despite the latter's more foreign (to me), and thus potentially more fascinating, locale.

Ben Lerner would probably not want to hear this, but I would really like to see him put these newly revealed skills to use in a more conventional novel, one that still has intellectual and literary themes but that manages to work them into an actual plot. Granted, this type of novel is not particularly fashionable at the moment. Still, as it always does, a new moment is bound to come around again. Everything will be as it is now, just a little different.
43 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read 10.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

February 18, 2015 – Shelved as: wish-list
February 18, 2015 – Shelved
October 20, 2015 – Shelved as: to-read
August 9, 2016 – Started Reading
August 10, 2016 –
page 6
2.34% "Ben Lerner, you are a trickster."
August 11, 2016 –
page 27
10.55% "I spent most of Leaving the Atocha Station wondering if the whole book was some kind of joke or trick. I definitely don't feel that way about 10:04."
August 12, 2016 –
page 55
21.48% "This is interesting, but I'm not 100 percent sure I can be in Ben Lerner's head as my main reading experience. I may need to take breaks."
August 12, 2016 –
page 61
23.83% "What is happening"
August 13, 2016 –
page 104
40.63% "I don't want to jinx it, but I'm liking this much more than his last novel."
August 14, 2016 – Shelved as: literary-fiction
August 14, 2016 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-18 of 18 (18 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Kelli (new)

Kelli Straight to the point, Julie!


Julie Ehlers Kelli wrote: "Straight to the point, Julie!"

Ha, this is just a temporary reaction. :) My feelings about this book are rather complex. I'm planning to write a longer review soon.


message 3: by Deanna (new)

Deanna great review, Julie :)


message 4: by Rae (new) - rated it 3 stars

Rae Meadows Yes, Julie, I so agree with what you wrote. Excellent review!


Julie Ehlers Deanna wrote: "great review, Julie :)"

Thanks, Deanna!


Julie Ehlers Rae wrote: "Yes, Julie, I so agree with what you wrote. Excellent review!"

Thanks, Rae! I see you gave four stars to Leaving the Atocha Station. I know you're a little busy at the moment, :) but when you get a chance I'd be curious to know what about that one worked for you.


message 7: by Esil (new) - added it

Esil Great review Julie. This sounds like intelligent fun. And now, I'm going to totally embarrass myself. I've had Lerner's book on my tbr for a long time. But I am clearly a numbers dyslexic because the book I brought with me on vacation is Jean-Paul Didierlaurent's The Reader of 6:27 -- may not be the exact title because I have a French version. Yikes! The titles both have numbers :)


Julie Ehlers Esil wrote: "But I am clearly a numbers dyslexic because the book I brought with me on vacation is Jean-Paul Didierlaurent's The Reader of 6:27 -- may not be the exact title because I have a French version. Yikes! The titles both have numbers :)"

Ha--this is totally understandable to me. Even though I've had this book since the paperback came out almost a year ago, I kept thinking of it as 10:14, 10:08, 10:19--anything but 10:04! Hopefully now that I've actually read the book I'll be able to remember what it's called. :) Thanks for your kind words about my review.


message 9: by Rae (new) - rated it 3 stars

Rae Meadows Julie wrote: "Rae wrote: "Yes, Julie, I so agree with what you wrote. Excellent review!"

Thanks, Rae! I see you gave four stars to Leaving the Atocha Station. I know you're a little busy at the moment, :) but w..."


Hi Julie--I wish that my sieve brain had more coherent reasons, but I think it came down to that his shtick felt fresher the first time around, the meta worked more for me, particularly given the dislocation of the setting. I guess I found it more moving. It could also just be when I read 10:04 I was less patient? I'm with you, though. I'd love to see him write a more traditional narrative. He's obviously super talented.


message 10: by Debbie "DJ" (new)

Debbie "DJ" Terrific review Julie! Does 10:04 have any meaning in the story?


Julie Ehlers Debbie "DJ" wrote: "Terrific review Julie! Does 10:04 have any meaning in the story?"

Thanks, DJ! Believe it or not, 10:04 refers to the time when the lightning has to strike the clock tower in Back to the Future in order for Marty McFly to make it back to 1985. Back to the Future is mentioned several times in the book, although I thought its inclusion was one of the things about the book that felt a little forced.


Julie Ehlers Rae wrote: "Hi Julie--I wish that my sieve brain had more coherent reasons, but I think it came down to that his shtick felt fresher the first time around, the meta worked more for me, particularly given the dislocation of the setting. I guess I found it more moving."

Thanks, Rae. I agree that the meta worked better in Leaving the Atocha Station. It's funny, because that book left me more off-balance than 10:04 did, which I recognize might actually be seen as a positive--more thought-provoking and all. But for me what it finally boiled down to was that I had more fun reading 10:04 and felt more of a fondness for both book and author.


message 13: by Rae (new) - rated it 3 stars

Rae Meadows Julie wrote: "Rae wrote: "Hi Julie--I wish that my sieve brain had more coherent reasons, but I think it came down to that his shtick felt fresher the first time around, the meta worked more for me, particularly..."

I can see that, Julie. You know part of it for me was probably what was going on in my life at the time of reading each. I was frazzled during 10:04 so that probably didn't help my reading experience!


message 14: by Debbie "DJ" (new)

Debbie "DJ" Julie wrote: "Debbie "DJ" wrote: "Terrific review Julie! Does 10:04 have any meaning in the story?"

Thanks, DJ! Believe it or not, 10:04 refers to the time when the lightning has to strike the clock tower in Ba..."


Wow, this sure sounds like one interesting book!


Jonathan Pool I like your assessment of Lerners writing style and intent. The release of a more ‘conventional narrative� remains a wish though, as The Topeka School (2019) is very much in the same mould. He describes them (with Atocha) as a trilogy.


Julie Ehlers Jonathan wrote: "I like your assessment of Lerners writing style and intent. The release of a more ‘conventional narrative� remains a wish though, as The Topeka School (2019) is very much in the same mould. He des..."

Is it? For some reason I was under the impression Topeka School was more conventional. Either way, I'm looking forward to getting to it soon. Thanks for your kind words about my review!


message 17: by Emily (new)

Emily I recently watched Adaptation for the first time, and now I am mixing up Ben Lerner and Nic Cage in my head :) Lots of mixed reviews on The Topeka School .... that's the Ben Lerner I'm most likely to read.


Julie Ehlers Emily wrote: "I recently watched Adaptation for the first time, and now I am mixing up Ben Lerner and Nic Cage in my head :) Lots of mixed reviews on The Topeka School .... that's the Ben Lerner I'm most likely ..."

I loved Adaptation a lot! It was very endearing how Charlie Kaufman portrayed himself as such a loser. :) Topeka School seems like the more conventional novel I wished for in this review, so it's kind of ironic I haven't read it yet, especially since I got an ARC of it. Soon, soon....


back to top