ŷ

Jeffrey Keeten's Reviews > Mrs Dalloway

Mrs Dalloway by Virginia Woolf
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
3427339
's review

it was amazing

“So on a summer’s day waves collect, overbalance, and fall; and the whole world seems to be saying ‘that is all� more and more ponderously, until even the heart in the body which lies in the sun on the beach says too, That is all. Fear no more, says the heart. Fear no more, says the heart, committing its burden to some sea, which sighs collectively for all sorrows, and renews, begins, collects, lets fall. And the body alone listens to the passing bee; the wave breaking; the dog barking, far away barking and barking.�



We first meet Clarissa Dalloway and her husband Richard in The Voyage Out. Too many pages have been turned since my reading of Virginia Woolf’s first novel for me to remember that I’ve met them before. It is similar to meeting someone at a party and then meeting them again several years later. I might have a sliver of memory of meeting them before. I always find it awkward to decide to confess that I do have a vague memory of them, potentially subtly unintentionally insulting them, or brazen it out with of course I remember you (potential minefield if my slender memory is in fact wrong). There is always the option of hitting the restart button by saying what a pleasure it is to meet them.

Some of this, of course, is entirely up to how they play it and if they remember meeting me before.

Clarissa Dalloway would know exactly how to handle that situation. If she did bungle it, she would recover the situation with a little laugh and say something along the lines of how silly she is about names and faces. I feel that Virginia was a bit harsh in her description of Clarissa in The Voyage Out. Clarissa is "a tall slight woman, her body wrapped in furs, her face in veils, with artistic tastes and inclinations, but no brain whatsoever.� I think that Clarissa has become who she was supposed to be not, as we find out, who she wanted to be. She has become Mrs. Richard Dalloway, and her identity beyond that has become a series of sepia toned memories of her brief life before marriage.

If you were to look in any phone book for Phillips County, Kansas, from 1954 to 1995, you would find listed a Mrs. Dean Keeten. From the moment Leota Irene Chester (22) married Dean Leo Keeten she became known as Mrs. Dean Keeten. My grandfather died in 1954, but when she checked herself into the hospital in 1995, for what became the last time, she still registered as Mrs. Dean Keeten. To her, the only power she had existed in my grandfather’s name. I can only think that she was well aware of the powerlessness of women and wanted people to believe that if they irritated her they would have to deal with her husband, ghostly though he was. I’d like to think, too, that there was a lingering pride in being married to the man.

Clarissa has trepidations over the changes in herself. She is feeling older. �. . . June morning; soft with the glow of rose petals for some, she knew, and felt it, as she paused by the open staircase window which let in blinds flapping, dog barking, let in, she thought, feeling herself suddenly shrivelled, aged, breastless, the grinding, blowing, flowering of the day, out of doors, out of the window, out of her body and brain which now failed�.�

Clarissa is planning a party while her doppelganger Septimus Smith is considering his death. ”He is linked to Clarissa through his anxieties about sexuality and marriage; his anguish about mortality and immortality; and his acute sensitivities to his surroundings, which have gone over the line into madness.�

Birds sing in Greek.

He is haunted by the war, in particular his memories of his friend Evans who died in the closing months of the war.

He hallucinates.

He is certainly suffering from acute shell shock. He is: ”Septimus Warren Smith, aged about thirty, pale-faced, beak-nosed, wearing brown shoes and a shabby overcoat, with hazel eyes which had that look of apprehension in them which makes complete strangers apprehensive too. The world has raised its whip; where will it descend? I do wonder if there weren’t some homosexual overtones to his relationship with Evans. I like the idea because if he is a true doppelganger of Clarissa, then her thoughts and memories of Sally Seton tie in so nicely.

I would say Clarissa was smitten at first sight. ”But all that evening she could not take her eyes off Sally. It was an extraordinary beauty of the kind she most admired, dark, large-eyes, with that quality which, since she hadn’t got it herself, she always envied---a sort of abandonment, as if she could say anything, do anything;....� Sally must have been a handful because the strained relations with her family necessitated a span of time apart. There is the hope that an unruly child will act better with others than they do with their own family. A kiss shared between the two girls is remembered by Clarissa as one of the most passionate moments in her life.

Sally does come to the party, now married, now Lady Rosseter with five sons. She is completely reformed and conformed to the very aspects I’m sure she found so infuriating about her family.

Clarissa also has an old flame, Peter Walsh, who is back from India just in time to attend her party. She has not seen Sally or Peter for many years so her party is infused with a certain level of warped nostalgia. Though really one gets the impression that Clarissa might have preferred leaving them both suspended in time when they were who she remembered them to be.

She...you see... jilted Peter for Richard.

Peter is still in love with her. As she analyzes her thoughts of Peter, it is certainly on a more practical level than a romantic one. She considers, without any gossamer wrapped sentimentality, what her life would have been like if she had married him.

In his pockets Peter carries a menagerie of totems. �...his knife, his watch; his seals, his note-case, and Clarissa’s letter which he would not read again but liked to think of, and Daisy’s photograph?� The knife he pulls out whenever he is nervous and opens and closes it. This trait so annoys Clarissa. It is potentially comparable to fondling oneself into arousal. I had the impression that if he were to lose everything he owned except for those few things he carried on his person, he would be fine. If he were to lose those precious items, he would be out of sorts for quite some time and would be slow to recover from their loss.

Peter has trouble with women, leaving scandals in his wake wherever he goes. He falls in love too easily, which could be attributed to a naturally romantic manner. He once followed a girl for a half hour and, from the scant information he gained about her, nearly fell in love with her. Easy to do when you have only flipped through the pages very quickly without taking the time to actual read the narrative. I’d like to think that the reason he is this way is because of the torch he still carries for Clarissa. Nothing else will ever be as real for him anyway. Of course, the woman he loved no longer exists either.

Clarissa shares some of her thoughts on death after she hears the chatter at her party about the suicide of Septimus Smith. ”Death was defiance. Death was an attempt to communicate, people feeling the impossibility of reaching the centre which mystically, evaded them; closeness drew apart; rapture faded; one was alone. There was an embrace in death.� The reverence with which this statement about death is made put a shiver down my back. Woolf admitted that she had difficulty writing about the madness of Septimus. She used some of her own depression inspired hallucinations to describe his distressing anxiety. She had planned for Clarissa to die at the end of the novel, but shifted that role to Septimus. Not that I think Clarissa is Virginia, but there are certainly aspects to her thought processes that are shared with Woolf. It may have been too bold, too frightening for those who knew Virginia to have Clarissa kill herself.

The treatment, if you call it that, of Septimus is a condemnation of psychology in post WW1 British society. Woolf was treated by several incompetent doctors for her own struggles with depression. Sir William Bradshaw, the famous psychiatrist, who was treating Septimus often bragged about his ability to determine a person’s problems, and to also be able to prescribe a treatment in five minutes or less. Obviously, his respect for his own profession is rather cavalier, and certainly his dismissive attitude to the true nature of mental illness is reprehensible.

Virginia Woolf put stones in her pockets, walked into the river Ouse, and drowned herself sixteen years after the publication of this novel. I often think how long she had been considering suicide before she actually made that final decision.

I had planned to start this book and then set it aside while I finished another book. That turned out to be impossible. Mrs. Dalloway would not tolerate any rivals. I was hers for the duration. It is a modest book in regards to size, but so packed with so many wonderful observations that I could continue, with ease, to write several more thousand words regarding other aspects of this novel. I loved the style. There is a bounce to the writing as if springs have been attached to the words to keep them from miring down in meditative thought. The characters, though possessing few characteristics that I admire, were likeable, and today I actually find myself missing them as if I had toddled off to India or the West Indies.

The ending was superb.

”What is this terror? what is this ecstasy? Peter thought to himself. What is it that fills me with extraordinary excitement?

It is Clarissa, he said.

For there she was.�


If you wish to see more of my most recent book and movie reviews, visit
I also have a Facebook blogger page at:
347 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Mrs Dalloway.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

August 2, 2015 – Started Reading
August 2, 2015 – Shelved
August 3, 2015 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-50 of 76 (76 new)


Jason I am in love with this review. it is pure excellence. I tried this one out, but it is so far above me that i found myself lost.


Jeffrey Keeten Jason wrote: "I am in love with this review. it is pure excellence. I tried this one out, but it is so far above me that i found myself lost."

Thank you Jason! Your kind words have put a smile on my face. The stream of consciousness flow of the narrative will certainly throw some readers. This novel also has a non-linear plot which can add more confusion for readers. I do hope you get a chance to revisit this book. it is a book that you have to relax a bit and let the words flow over you.


message 3: by Pramod (new)

Pramod Nair Excellent review, Jeffrey...


Jeffrey Keeten Pramod wrote: "Excellent review, Jeffrey..."

Thanks Pramod! The rule of thumb seems to be excellent books lead to excellent reviews. I am but a messenger.


Jason Jeffrey wrote: "Jason wrote: "I am in love with this review. it is pure excellence. I tried this one out, but it is so far above me that i found myself lost."

Thank you Jason! Your kind words have put a smile on ..."


I think it's a real wintery read, at least for me. A time that i can slow down. Summer is such a frenetic time for me.


message 6: by Seemita (new)

Seemita Ah! Virginia Woolf hardly ever disappoints, does she? Wonderul review, Jeffrey! Like a whiff of air, early in the morning :)


Cherie Wow! I can't think of anything else.


s.penkevich YES! Fantastic review, so glad you loved this. Great, golden write-up! One of the best.


message 9: by Fionnuala (new) - added it

Fionnuala Love your story about forgetting meeting the Dalloways, Jeffrey - you tell it so well I could almost imagine you were on that voyage out! Actually, were you the guy who...?
Only joking! Loved the review.


Jeffrey Keeten Jason wrote: "Jeffrey wrote: "Jason wrote: "I am in love with this review. it is pure excellence. I tried this one out, but it is so far above me that i found myself lost."

Thank you Jason! Your kind words have..."


That sounds like a great plan Jason!


Jeffrey Keeten Seemita wrote: "Ah! Virginia Woolf hardly ever disappoints, does she? Wonderul review, Jeffrey! Like a whiff of air, early in the morning :)"

Thanks Seemita! It is been too long since I've read Woolf, but it won't be long before I read the next one. I've went through many maturing phases as a reader. I think I'm in the right one now to truly appreciate Woolf and do her proper justice in a review.


Jeffrey Keeten Cherie wrote: "Wow! I can't think of anything else."

I like "Wow!" just fine Cherie.:-) I'm so glad you liked the review. I tried to write the review in such a way as to reflect the style of the book.


Jeffrey Keeten s.penkevich wrote: "YES! Fantastic review, so glad you loved this. Great, golden write-up! One of the best."

I loved the way that the greatness of this book was not readily apparent. I wish I'd marked the spot where I realized I was reading a masterpiece. There was this CLICK...I'm sure S.PENK you've heard that click before as well. The copy I had was heavily notated by someone up to page 53 where I found their bookmark of abandonment. They gave up WAY too soon. Thanks S.PENK! I thought this would be a book that would be difficult to review, but once started I had a hard time calling it finished.


Jeffrey Keeten Fionnuala wrote: "Love your story about forgetting meeting the Dalloways, Jeffrey - you tell it so well I could almost imagine you were on that voyage out! Actually, were you the guy who...?
Only joking! Loved the r..."


Alas, I've never been that guy one meets on an ocean voyage. I might occasionally be that guy one meets on a train. The one looking at the other travelers with a bemused expression on his face and a book to hide in. Thanks Fionnuala! I'm so pleased that Woolf speaks so well to me at this point in my life.


Jeffrey Keeten Rebeccarampling wrote: "o"

You are so concise in your comments Rebecca! :-)


message 17: by [deleted user] (new)

Fantastic, truly fantastic


Jeffrey Keeten Sidharth wrote: "Fantastic, truly fantastic"

Thanks Sidharth!


Steve I was afraid of this: your wise words forcing me to reassess. Maybe my original rating of "blah" was from not trying hard enough to see the great things you and many others have. Either that or you all are wrong. :-)


message 20: by Jeffrey (last edited Aug 07, 2015 06:28AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jeffrey Keeten Steve wrote: "I was afraid of this: your wise words forcing me to reassess. Maybe my original rating of "blah" was from not trying hard enough to see the great things you and many others have. Either that or y..."

Well you know how these things work. You could be right, but it might take another twenty or fifty years for everyone else to evolve/devolve in their thinking to agree with you. :-) I don't know if it was just dumb luck, but I really felt, even as I was reading it, that I was reading this book at the right time. Maybe the Cubs were on a long losing streak at the time which might have tinted your perspective? I'd say give it another whirl sometime...maybe when the Cubs make the World Series. :-)


Steve Everyone knows the quote by Heraclitus: "No man ever steps in the same river twice." Less cited, but still true, is one by his cousin Herareadus: "No man ever reads the same book twice."

Good point about mood and context. I suspect if the Cubs ever win the World Series in my lifetime, Fun With Dick and Jane will seem like seem like a masterpiece.


Rakhi Dalal Thanks for this comprehensive review,Jeffrey :) Very well analysed and articulated.


Jeffrey Keeten Steve wrote: "Everyone knows the quote by Heraclitus: "No man ever steps in the same river twice." Less cited, but still true, is one by his cousin Herareadus: "No man ever reads the same book twice."

Good poi..."


After the Royals win the World Series this year, I'm rooting for the Cubs to be next. It is time!!


Jeffrey Keeten Rakhi wrote: "Thanks for this comprehensive review,Jeffrey :) Very well analysed and articulated."

You are most welcome Rakhi! I wasn't sure I was ready to review this book when I started to write the review, but it flowed like butter. :-)


Steve Jeffrey wrote: "After the Royals win the World Series this year, I'm rooting for the Cubs to be next. It is time!!"

I'll take that deal!


message 26: by Kylie Baldwin (new)

Kylie  Baldwin ho


message 27: by Ted (new) - added it

Ted I'll just add my applause to everything above, Jeffrey.


Renata Your review perfectly mirrors the many moods of Mrs. Dalloway. It also recalls another view - maybe through the looking glass - Michael Cunninghams The Hours. I have yet to read The Voyage Out.


Jeffrey Keeten Ted wrote: "I'll just add my applause to everything above, Jeffrey."

Thanks Ted! It was a great book to review!


Jeffrey Keeten Marita wrote: "And applause from me too, Jeffrey."

Thanks Marita! I'm glad you liked this review. I thought it was pretty good when I wrote it, but of course GR has to let me know for sure. :-)


Jeffrey Keeten Renata wrote: "Your review perfectly mirrors the many moods of Mrs. Dalloway. It also recalls another view - maybe through the looking glass - Michael Cunninghams The Hours. I have yet to read The Voyage Out."

At some point I will need to read The Hours. I've heard nothing but good things about it. I also need to reread The Voyage Out. I read that over two decades ago. It has certainly faded from my memory. Thanks Renata!


Catherine Anderson I read this so long ago ... I may just dig it out and re-read.


Jeffrey Keeten Cathy wrote: "I read this so long ago ... I may just dig it out and re-read."

Worthy of a reread for sure. It is the sort of novel that readers find more points of reference with the older they get.


Parthiban Sekar Jeff, your review is ten-across-the-board... I feel really lost in time and place, after reading this masterpiece and I must reread... Keep reviewing *thumbs up*


Jeffrey Keeten Parthiban wrote: "Jeff, your review is ten-across-the-board... I feel really lost in time and place, after reading this masterpiece and I must reread... Keep reviewing *thumbs up*"

Thanks Parthiban! This book will discombobulate you. Not a book to read while beset with distractions. I hope you do get a chance to reread this great book. I'll keep writing them as long as people keep reading them. :-)


Traveller Oh Jeffrey... wow. I was just starting to feel a little depressed that so many people see so little in this novel, and then you come and throw this bomb. You have, with this review, made my day a lot brighter! :)
Thank you.


Jeffrey Keeten Traveller wrote: "Oh Jeffrey... wow. I was just starting to feel a little depressed that so many people see so little in this novel, and then you come and throw this bomb. You have, with this review, made my day a ..."

You've made my day as well! Thank you. This book blew me away. I'm glad you enjoyed the review. As to why people don't like this book? It is a mystery. It is brilliant.


Traveller Indeed! When I started reading it, I thought it was boring, but when I looked at it again, I saw how packed it was with patterns, allusions, social commentary, existential commentary, anguish... just.. but you have to look carefully, it's almost like when you focus and unfocus your eyes. But that is just, IMO, a testament to her subtlety. She's not in your face with stuff.


Jeffrey Keeten Traveller wrote: "Indeed! When I started reading it, I thought it was boring, but when I looked at it again, I saw how packed it was with patterns, allusions, social commentary, existential commentary, anguish... j..."

I wonder if people make a decision about the book before they have a chance to understand it. Your mentioning that you found it boring in the beginning kind of spooked me. The book can seem very simplistic on the surface. I sat down and read it not quite in one sitting, but pretty close. I...fell...in. All those aspects you mentioned are there, but they are woven so nicely in the writing that we are never bludgeoned with any of it.


Traveller VW uses a lot of symbolism in her work. The moment that you realize that things like the flowers and the birds and the colors that she mentions carries symbolic meaning, then you immediately see a whole new dimension to it. Also, her work tends to be very spatial, it's like she moves physically with her characters in her headspace.

Then also, she has a very dry, sarcastic way of commenting on stuff that you get to see for what it is the moment you read a bit more of her work.


Steve Traveller wrote: "Then also, she has a very dry, sarcastic way of commenting on stuff that you get to see for what it is the moment you read a bit more of her work."

Is this to say that her books should not be attempted a first time? :-)


Traveller Silly billy. Does anything tell you I like VW's work? ;P
Anyway, I mean, that one can miss her sarcasm because it is sophisticated.


message 43: by Sketchbook (new)

Sketchbook Very effective, Mr K.


Jeffrey Keeten Sketchbook wrote: "Very effective, Mr K."

Thank you Sir Sketch!


cameron Actually loved this review of my favorite ever Wolf novel. There is something definitely diaphanous about her point of view. It's hard to see clearly and requires your participation as well as you opinion. So personal.


cameron Actually loved this review of my favorite ever Wolf novel. There is something definitely diaphanous about her point of view. It's hard to see clearly and requires your participation as well as you opinion. So personal.


Jeffrey Keeten cameron wrote: "Actually loved this review of my favorite ever Wolf novel. There is something definitely diaphanous about her point of view. It's hard to see clearly and requires your participation as well as you..."

Thanks Cameron! Absolutely! You must pay attention. You must allow it all to just wash over you and suddenly it will all become clear. When I figured out exactly what she was doing I had to admit it is one of the best novels I've ever read. Brilliant!


message 48: by Vessey (new) - added it

Vessey “I could continue, with ease, to write several more thousand words regarding other aspects of this novel.�

Jeffrey, please do. I will never get tired of your writing. You’re wonderful. :)

“I often think how long she had been considering suicide before she actually made that final decision.�

Indeed, while reading about the similarities between her and her characters, I was also wondering whether she knew that one day she would do this. I don’t mean whether she has been considering it, but whether she has already (maybe subconsciously, maybe not) known that she would do it one day. Probably not. This would mean that she has lost all hope, in which case why would she go on living and creating? On the other hand, even when one makes this final, fatal decision, one doesn't put it into practice right way, but does all that he/she feels it needs to be done before taking the final step. Maybe everything she creates during those sixteen years is her goodbye note to the world. If she has indeed decided this long ago, I wonder how has she been able to go on writing and being brilliant, haunted by such an awful knowledge? Or maybe she has been so great exactly because of that? We all create some restrictions or accept ones others have forced on us, but what happens when we know that this is it, that we are on the threshold of death and if we don’t give into what is inside of us now, we would never have another chance for it? It is sad how it turns out that we are most alive when’re dying. I admit that I don’t know anything about her life. Is it known what has driven her to kill herself? I wonder what would she feel like, was she alive now, knowing how many people worship her. What has been her status when she was alive? Have her books been accepted in the same way as today?

And one more thing: I am surprised that at those years homosexuality has been explored in a straightforward manner in literary fiction. I imagined that people have been much more conservative about these things then.

Thank you so much for another mighty review, my friend. :)


Jeffrey Keeten Vessy wrote: "“I could continue, with ease, to write several more thousand words regarding other aspects of this novel.�

Jeffrey, please do. I will never get tired of your writing. You’re wonderful. :)

“I oft..."


Thank you Vessy! For your wonderful response. Sorry I have been busy with work related issues the past four days. Finally I am able to come up for air and respond to comments from my friends.

I think when we start thinking about mental illness as a chemical imbalance it starts to make more sense. So regardless of how well someone is regarded or even how good they are at something it doesn't seem to make them happy. Their head is telling them something different. I think it was inevitable that Woolf would kill herself. I'm not sure knowing how famous she would be or how well regarded she would be would have made any different. Look at John Foster Wallace.

I would think once she made the decision to kill herself that there must have been some relief. Finally, I can quit fighting life. It is sad because obviously she would have probably written several more wonderful books if she had lived her natural lifespan.

I'm glad you enjoyed the review! This book is certainly worth an afternoon of your time. It is one of the best books I've ever read.


message 50: by [deleted user] (new)

Every single day I like to be in touch with a good text. Not only books, I mean,,, such as your review
I have a question , why have not you read To the lighthouse yet?


« previous 1
back to top