Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Belarius's Reviews > From Hell

From Hell by Alan             Moore
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
837414
's review

it was ok
bookshelves: fiction-finished, graphic-novels, reviewed

From Hell is a brick of a book by legendary author Alan Moore. It presents one theory (since discredited) about the Jack The Ripper killings, and in so doing presents us with the story from every conceivable angle. The result is an exhaustive (albeit fictional) account of a sweeping slice of Victorian landscape.

From Hell is dense, multi-layered, and overflowing with an obsessive connect-the-dots tone that fancifully associates the events to everything from Aleister Crowley's childhood to Hitler's conception. The murders are, of course, the central events of the book, and are depicted as an elaborate Masonic ritual by the killer (with pages and pages of Masonic theory to boot), but devotes considerable time to even the minor characters, a sort of pantheistic character study of an entire society.

There is little doubt that From Hell is a "great work" from a strictly literary perspective. Its devilish intricacy and boldly experimental approach make it a pioneering achievement. At the same time, it is not an enjoyable read. Setting aside for a moment its most uncomfortable moments (most notably a gruesomely detailed depiction of every step involved in the Ripper's most famous killing), large patches of the text are dull and technical. Other tangents, presumably included for "completeness," seem superfluous and distract from the central focus of the story.

Making matters worse is the artwork of Eddie Campbell, which can kindly be called "pen-and-ink impressionism" and less kindly be called "chickenscratch." Apart from robbing much of the story of the shading a black-and-white style needs to really breath, it also often makes it extremely difficult to recognize characters. Readers must depend on gross physical characteristics (weight, facial hair, outfit) to keep track of which character is which in many cases.

Ironically, the best part of the book is an appendix comic-essay called "The Dance of the Gull Catchers," which explores the difficulty of studying the history of the killings. Moore and Campbell also provide an exhaustive overview of which parts of the story are fictionalized and which have some basis in reality, an exceptionally rare move in historical graphic fiction.

On the back cover, Moore states, "For my part I am concerned with cutting into and examining the still-warm corpse of history itself." This, we can all agree, he has done. The sad truth, however, is that this examination, while epic and masterful, still isn't especially rewarding to watch.
60 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read From Hell.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
December 1, 2001 – Finished Reading
January 27, 2008 – Shelved

Comments Showing 1-9 of 9 (9 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by [deleted user] (new)

Well put.


D.M. With that assessment of this book, I can only imagine you loved the miscarriage that was the movie version! It cut out all the superfluous details, had lots of purty pictures to look at, and was certainly easy to watch. Of course, it was also a piece of crap, but who cares as long as it wasn't such a difficult work, right?


Belarius D.M. wrote: "With that assessment of this book, I can only imagine you loved the miscarriage that was the movie version!"

Simply because a work is complex and challenging does not automatically make it worthwhile.

And simply because I make a distinction between difficulty and value does not mean I celebrate adaptation-to-film-through-castration.


D.M. Belarius wrote: "D.M. wrote: "With that assessment of this book, I can only imagine you loved the miscarriage that was the movie version!"

Simply because a work is complex and challenging does not automatically ma..."


Your points are valid and, after all, merely based upon opinion. And I have to agree: a complex, challenging work is not immediately worth the while it takes to read. I'm confused, though, as you seem to concede this is a worthwhile literary work, and only criticise it from your lack of enjoyment initially, but now say that you made it 'a distinction between difficulty and value.' Are you only saying value to you specifically or the world as a whole.
I think part of the problem with Moore and this book (or any) is he's more a mythology-maker than a storyteller, so he does lose control of his writing now and again (rumour has it his next proper novel is already well over 1000 pages). So, maybe that's where your criticism comes in: you seem fine with the story (though it does, as you say, base itself -- knowingly, I'm sure -- on a long-since discredited and always laughable theory), but the detail and intricacy of plot weigh it down.
I enjoy this book thoroughly, and thought Campbell was a good fit for illustration recalling as he does the Sickert paintings as well as some period crime-mag illustrations. You're perfectly right to describe his style as chicken-scratchy, but I don't think it was misplaced.


Graham Hopkins What an awful review. Have you read any other graphic novels, I wonder? Also, 'dense', are you sure? A couple of hours to read equates to a pamphlet really. Oh well, you can't please everyone ....


Belarius Graham wrote: "Have you read any other graphic novels, I wonder?"

Indeed. How could someone possibly fail to share your opinion, except through a mix of ignorance and idiocy? You are truly your generation's Wilde.

For my part, I find that treating a graphic novel as a screenplay, to be "read" at a speed determined by its word count, is rather like watching a film with the sound off. If you only spent a couple of hours trying to decode a work like From Hell (which corresponds to around five pages a minute), then you're unlikely to have plumbed its depths. Then again, I suppose you must have read a great many graphic novels at those speeds.


Matthew Travers Sounds like you recognize the work as great in all things but the quantity of stars doled out.


Belarius Matt wrote: "Sounds like you recognize the work as great in all things but the quantity of stars doled out."

...and the genuinely terrible artwork, the wildly uneven pacing, the tendency to use characters as sockpuppets to explain Masonic mysticism to the reader, and the especially spurious tangents.

From Hell is a bold experiment. I respect experimentation, because we learn from its failures as well as from its successes. From Hell is not a successful experiment, but it is an important one. Moore & Campbell deserve credit for trying, but I am not required to treat effort as success.


message 9: by Lou (new) - rated it 5 stars

Lou Reads "There, there, Belarius. There, there. I shall tell you where we are. We're at the apogee of ignorance and the willfully ignorant part of the human mind. A dull, paraconscious underworld. A fecal abyss where men ignore themselves. The Internet, Belarius. We're in the Internet."


back to top