Lyn's Reviews > Lolita
Lolita
by
by

I once represented a man who had been accused of statutory rape and sexual exploitation of a minor. I did it because it is my job and I fundamentally believe that everyone, no matter how heinous the crime alleged, deserves a fair trial.
That said, it was the single most unpleasant experience of my legal career and high in the running for most unpleasant all time.
In popular culture we are inundated with scenes of crime and violence, we live in a morally relative landscape where “to each his own� is taken to Bohemian extremes.
But sexual attention towards children, in any context, is universally reviled and vilified.
Lo. Lee. Ta.
Vladimir Nabokov’s 1955 novel is masterful prose. Like Joseph Conrad before him, it is understatement to say that his virtuosity in English (not his first language) literature is impressive.
Yes, it is about a pervert, a sex offender, a child rapist. A brute. A monster.
Humbert Humbert names himself such. Whether sympathetic chronicler or unreliable narrator I will leave for each reader’s interpretation, but either way Nabokov has demonstrated his consummate skill with a character as enigmatic and iconoclastically established in modern literature as to be a shadowy lurker in the black alleys of our most maligned society.
Nabokov’s narration, told from the prison diary of HH, is erudite, witty and humorous. The author’s stylish ability is incomparable. In spite of the subject matter I had to laugh many times at the way he crafted his narrative, especially his droll word play and numerous double entendres.
This is presented as a first person letter, recommended by his lawyer, of his unfortunate attraction to “nymphets� (a girl child between the ages of 9 and 14) and to his particular seduction of his erstwhile step-daughter Dolores, whom he affectionately calls Lolita. Several times throughout the chronicle the tragi-comic protagonist entreats the attention of the “gentlemen of the jury�. He describes his yearlong affair with the child in words that are at times repentant and remorseful, and at other times attempting a justification and explanation of his acts.
Humburt, a European émigré to our shores, also fills his account, “joyriding� as they do across America, with an ongoing ironic observation of our culture. Nabakov could use this all as an extended allegory for old world attraction with our new world mores and customs. Lolita, then, would be the central focus of this fascination and a living metaphor for America, at once childlike and alluring.
Brilliantly written with a shamefully outrageous subject, once the reader recovers from the shock quotient (if the reader recovers) this is a wealth of literary genius and style.
That said, it was the single most unpleasant experience of my legal career and high in the running for most unpleasant all time.
In popular culture we are inundated with scenes of crime and violence, we live in a morally relative landscape where “to each his own� is taken to Bohemian extremes.
But sexual attention towards children, in any context, is universally reviled and vilified.
Lo. Lee. Ta.
Vladimir Nabokov’s 1955 novel is masterful prose. Like Joseph Conrad before him, it is understatement to say that his virtuosity in English (not his first language) literature is impressive.
Yes, it is about a pervert, a sex offender, a child rapist. A brute. A monster.
Humbert Humbert names himself such. Whether sympathetic chronicler or unreliable narrator I will leave for each reader’s interpretation, but either way Nabokov has demonstrated his consummate skill with a character as enigmatic and iconoclastically established in modern literature as to be a shadowy lurker in the black alleys of our most maligned society.
Nabokov’s narration, told from the prison diary of HH, is erudite, witty and humorous. The author’s stylish ability is incomparable. In spite of the subject matter I had to laugh many times at the way he crafted his narrative, especially his droll word play and numerous double entendres.
This is presented as a first person letter, recommended by his lawyer, of his unfortunate attraction to “nymphets� (a girl child between the ages of 9 and 14) and to his particular seduction of his erstwhile step-daughter Dolores, whom he affectionately calls Lolita. Several times throughout the chronicle the tragi-comic protagonist entreats the attention of the “gentlemen of the jury�. He describes his yearlong affair with the child in words that are at times repentant and remorseful, and at other times attempting a justification and explanation of his acts.
Humburt, a European émigré to our shores, also fills his account, “joyriding� as they do across America, with an ongoing ironic observation of our culture. Nabakov could use this all as an extended allegory for old world attraction with our new world mores and customs. Lolita, then, would be the central focus of this fascination and a living metaphor for America, at once childlike and alluring.
Brilliantly written with a shamefully outrageous subject, once the reader recovers from the shock quotient (if the reader recovers) this is a wealth of literary genius and style.

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Lolita.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
December 8, 2015
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-50 of 73 (73 new)
message 1:
by
SUSAN *Nevertheless,she persisted*
(new)
Dec 08, 2015 03:30PM

reply
|
flag

I do too. But it's so brilliant! Maybe making us like it is his most remarkable coup. Really great review :)

God but the language. And when I think of Lolita as being fresh, but not quite innocent America and Humburt as being Old, pervy Europe, it washes the sleaze right out of my hair.


Books are well written, or badly written. That is all.�

I do too. But it's so brilliant! Maybe making us like it is his most remarkable coup. Really great review :)"
Great point, sarah, thanks

God but the language. And when I think of Lolita as being fresh, but not quite innocent America and Humburt as being Ol..."
Ha!

Thanks Justine. I am mainly a civil / ALJ attorney, but I have taken a few criminal cases. I can play the part when I need to, but cross examining a rape victim is a dirty job no matter how you approach it.

Books are well written, or badly written. That is all.�"
Thanks Wayne, and well said

Agreed, sexual assault and cases involving children are the most difficult for everyone involved. When I was practicing I was the only woman lawyer in a criminal law firm (whole other issue) and I focused mainly on appeal cases (a mix of defence and prosecution) but it was still challenging even without having to do the initial trial. Sometimes it was almost worse because one side or the other was pretty unhappy to be there after going through the trial process once already.






I totally get that. I jumped at the chance to do a group read of Pale Fire, because I figured I should read Nabokov but have never been able to bring myself to read Lolita.
But you're messing with my general opinion of lawyers! [Just kidding; I count a surprising number of lawyers as good friends.]



I checked this (and The Godfather!) out of the library the summer I was 13 and devoured both before my folks noticed they were a bit...hummm..."adult"! For a time I wondered if ALL grown men were interested in young girls, because a cousin my age was molested by a neighbor only a short time before. I have a friend who as a public defender defended child rapists and the third one (particularly horrific) gave her so many nightmares she quit and now is at a Human Rights Commission. (You remind me to ask her if she read this!) Maybe all public defenders should, tho, to desensitize themselves.