Kinga's Reviews > Freedom
Freedom
by
by

UPDATED.
To keep in style of the book this review will be just a lot of rambling.
I mean, it was mostly a soap opera. And I just don’t do soap operas. I can just about manage about 10 minutes every 5th episode, but that’s about it. And Franzen submitted me to 570 bloody pages of a soap opera which I had to digest in a few sittings.
Like in all soap operas, everything ends well and love conquers all, of course some characters might have to be killed off along the way, but it seems like a small price to pay for a happy ending, non?
If it was well written, then maybe. But how can I take this sort of thing seriously:
"Patty said no, Walter insisted, she insisted no, he insisted yes. Then she realized he didn’t have a car and was offering to ride the bus with her, and she insisted no all over again, and he insisted yes"
Sorry, what is this? Is this the Great American Novel? Are you kidding me?
"She almost suggested to Walter that he had better kiss her first, if he was going to be asking her to live with him, but she was so offended that she didn’t feel like being kissed at that moment."
And if you are tired of this sugary girly revelations, you can get the more raw stuff when the perspective changes to Katz:
"His dick was saying yes to something now, and this something was certainly not the wideish ass of the retreating jogger. Had death, in fact, been his dick’s message in sending him to Washington? Had he simply misunderstood its prophecy?"
You get the idea.
And don’t even get me started on the fucked up chronology. It wasn’t done in eloquent, mysterious way, it was done in a blabbermouth with ADHD way. It is like my friend Maciek, who tells me a story and in the middle of it he remembers some other story that might or might not be related to the story he is telling me so he tells me that other story, and then some other story that somehow came from the second story, and then maybe he will return to the main story and you end up wondering if the second story actually happened in the middle of the first story or it was just his way of telling a story.
The final moral from this book is that we are all fucked up in our own special way but it will all be alright unless, of course, we become Republicans, in which case there will be no redemption.
It almost killed me. This book almost killed me. But as they say what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger, therefore this book made stronger, so for that alone I had to give it two stars.
I will admit that Patty and Walter were both interesting characters with all the supporting cast being all sorts of caricatures and serving as props to the main duo.
Now, I am off to read a book about people who do things and have real problems.
*UPDATE - oh yeah. And I also forgot to say that if this book was written by a woman, it would be deemed chick lit and stuck in a pastel colour cover with birds and flowers. No one would even look at it twice because there is so much better chick lit out there. But as Jonathan Franzen is lucky enough to be a man, this, all of a sudden, is the Great American Novel. DON'T MAKE ME LAUGH.
If anyone else claims there is no sexism in literary/publishing world, this here is my best demonstrative evidence that there is. Honest to God, who would take this book seriously if it was written by a woman and had something pink on the cover?
To keep in style of the book this review will be just a lot of rambling.
I mean, it was mostly a soap opera. And I just don’t do soap operas. I can just about manage about 10 minutes every 5th episode, but that’s about it. And Franzen submitted me to 570 bloody pages of a soap opera which I had to digest in a few sittings.
Like in all soap operas, everything ends well and love conquers all, of course some characters might have to be killed off along the way, but it seems like a small price to pay for a happy ending, non?
If it was well written, then maybe. But how can I take this sort of thing seriously:
"Patty said no, Walter insisted, she insisted no, he insisted yes. Then she realized he didn’t have a car and was offering to ride the bus with her, and she insisted no all over again, and he insisted yes"
Sorry, what is this? Is this the Great American Novel? Are you kidding me?
"She almost suggested to Walter that he had better kiss her first, if he was going to be asking her to live with him, but she was so offended that she didn’t feel like being kissed at that moment."
And if you are tired of this sugary girly revelations, you can get the more raw stuff when the perspective changes to Katz:
"His dick was saying yes to something now, and this something was certainly not the wideish ass of the retreating jogger. Had death, in fact, been his dick’s message in sending him to Washington? Had he simply misunderstood its prophecy?"
You get the idea.
And don’t even get me started on the fucked up chronology. It wasn’t done in eloquent, mysterious way, it was done in a blabbermouth with ADHD way. It is like my friend Maciek, who tells me a story and in the middle of it he remembers some other story that might or might not be related to the story he is telling me so he tells me that other story, and then some other story that somehow came from the second story, and then maybe he will return to the main story and you end up wondering if the second story actually happened in the middle of the first story or it was just his way of telling a story.
The final moral from this book is that we are all fucked up in our own special way but it will all be alright unless, of course, we become Republicans, in which case there will be no redemption.
It almost killed me. This book almost killed me. But as they say what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger, therefore this book made stronger, so for that alone I had to give it two stars.
I will admit that Patty and Walter were both interesting characters with all the supporting cast being all sorts of caricatures and serving as props to the main duo.
Now, I am off to read a book about people who do things and have real problems.
*UPDATE - oh yeah. And I also forgot to say that if this book was written by a woman, it would be deemed chick lit and stuck in a pastel colour cover with birds and flowers. No one would even look at it twice because there is so much better chick lit out there. But as Jonathan Franzen is lucky enough to be a man, this, all of a sudden, is the Great American Novel. DON'T MAKE ME LAUGH.
If anyone else claims there is no sexism in literary/publishing world, this here is my best demonstrative evidence that there is. Honest to God, who would take this book seriously if it was written by a woman and had something pink on the cover?
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Freedom.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-27 of 27 (27 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
David
(new)
-
rated it 2 stars
Nov 09, 2011 07:50AM

reply
|
flag



By the way, thanks for sending me the link [some months ago] to the website where you can hear pronunciation of Polish words. It's great!!



Basically the difference between a good book and Freedom is like the difference between a good drama film and a soap-opera. The latter being tacky, cheesy, overdramatic and never-ending.
I am aware of the bitter-sweet, supposedly ironic, taste of the 'happy ending' but I still don't rate it.



Freedom is not supposed to be a mysterious way its just out there for a reason. Franzen idea of Freedom is by how these characters are living. No regards to what they do or say because they have no sense of like cell. Its sets up all in the end by showing each characters perspective of Freedom. The drama that goes into it is how it sets up how they try and deal with it. Its set up by a description of the feelings or setting to then dialogue to characters. We also get a background of each character and why they are they act when it comes to certain things. I don’t know how you don’t get how each event leads to something its not all over the place its well placed with high school, college, adult life, kids, then back to adult life so I don’t know how you don’t know what’s going on.

my pleasure :D

Freedom is not supposed to be a mysterious way ..."
Where did I say I didn't know what was going on??
I just said it was tedious. Not that it was difficult

I agree, I don't understand the sequencing either. This would be considered sub par chick lit but he obviously has a great marketing team.