Tom LA's Reviews > Freedom
Freedom
by
by

This is a magnificent book and I enjoyed it a lot.
I'd like to focus a bit on the author: let's talk for a second about Ego with a capital E. Mr Franzen's Ego can only be compared to something like Mt Everest, or maybe Jupiter. Don't get me wrong, I don't see Ego as a bad thing per se. It just comes with the package in the very first years of your life, giving you a strong personality, opinions, leadership, and often some basic arrogance, entitlement, and a disproportionate sense of your own importance.
I've seen and read some interviews with Franzen, and yes, he does come across as an author who believes his books are incredibly important. Important to America (Freedom!). Important to the world. It's not difficult to perceive this self-importance in the book itself, either, so I perfectly understand the readers who (perhaps pushed over the edge by that astonishingly irritating Times cover, or by the deluge of foam-at-the-mouth praising reviews for this book) decided to hate Franzen from the start. Â
I was one of them, for sure. I was ready to shout: "soap opera!", whatever story Franzen was going to tell me. So, in short, I started by really not wanting to like this book. And my mission received a strong help by the first 200 pages, where Franzen presents Patty, one of the most difficult and unpleasant characters of the book, in a sort of autobiographical memoir written by herself. Her cold, selfish attitude is made even uglier by the cynicism and negativity and hopelessness that permeate this first portion of the book. Just so negative. Blah!
But then, when I was just moments from condemning Franzen to never-ending hatred, some magic happened. The portion about another character, Katz, started, and I realized that the tone of the first 200 pages was just a partial act. A trick, maybe. Franzen, like a chameleon, propels us forward into the world of Katz, the rock musician, and the register changes completely. I was very impressed by that, actually. And then again, the narrating voice develops, evolves, and keeps changing depending on the perspective and point of view. A wonderful ear.Â
He actually did something similar in "The Corrections", where he used the initial part of the novel almost as an obstacle for the reader, to overcome and then slide into the rest of it. But the difficult part was much shorter there.Â
The interview with Katz about the state of music is a little masterwork. Just like his first interaction with Walter and Lalitha.Â
Franzen's writing style is extremely clever, elegant and unsentimental, a little too cold, mental and cerebral for my personal taste, almost chilling in his acute, poignant, accurate, objective, hyper-rational observations and descriptions. More than once, while reading this book, I thought of that quote by (someone): "If we spent our life constantly looking at reality the way it actually is, we would go absolutely mad in a very short time". P.S. I think it's actually a line from ÂFyodor Dostoyevsky’s Notes From Underground: “I swear to you, gentlemen, that to be overly conscious is a sickness, a real, thorough sickness.â€�
There is a risk inherent in describing everything through words, and rationalizing reality too much: that you end up missing the point. Missing the heart, the emotions, the human perspective, what really matters.
Similarly, there is a limit to "thinking", beyond which it becomes just a painful exercise in analysis and dissolution of reality in smaller and smaller pieces, until you find either sublime madness (as above) or nothing at all (the terrifying emptiness at the very center of the onion).Â
Franzen's ambition is huge, child-like. He set out to write with a mission, and the mission was to go straight to the heart of America (Freedom). Sounds like he wants to be a Great Writer, like Tolstoy or Hugo. Someone who actually changes the world, someone who has an IMPACT on society.
And he does undoubtedly have an impact, because his books sell millions of copies, and they are full of intelligence and deeply human characters, however, I'm afraid to say, it is probably a much less "serious" impact than what he might think. Let me try to explain: people read Franzen because they love to read, or because they just want to be entertained, maybe by something smart with a little bit of thinking too, but not because they want to change anything, the world, or (especially!) themselves. Yes, there is always a little seed that might stay with you, but then even a pop song can leave a seed in you, or a movie, and here’s the truth: today we are hit by just too many seeds to be properly receptive to any one of them. We just move on to the next one. As important as it might be, it is all, at the end of the day, entertainment. It's not real life.
In other words, I would say: Relax! It's just a book! But of course, that is the whole point of being an extraordinary writer like he is. You Do Not Relax.Â
Finally, I disagree with the comment made by some reviewers that the novel falls quickly into the soap opera realm. This novel deserves more attention. I am a very slow reader, almost "Flowers-for-Algernon-slow", and I think it was a good thing with this book. No soap opera is as complex, intelligent, and ambitious as this novel. On the other hand, many novels would feel like soap operas if read at the speed of light.
Overall - this is an impressive, brilliant, complex, cold, sometimes disturbing, sometimes funny, extremely well-written and structured novel about the life of an American couple.
I'd like to focus a bit on the author: let's talk for a second about Ego with a capital E. Mr Franzen's Ego can only be compared to something like Mt Everest, or maybe Jupiter. Don't get me wrong, I don't see Ego as a bad thing per se. It just comes with the package in the very first years of your life, giving you a strong personality, opinions, leadership, and often some basic arrogance, entitlement, and a disproportionate sense of your own importance.
I've seen and read some interviews with Franzen, and yes, he does come across as an author who believes his books are incredibly important. Important to America (Freedom!). Important to the world. It's not difficult to perceive this self-importance in the book itself, either, so I perfectly understand the readers who (perhaps pushed over the edge by that astonishingly irritating Times cover, or by the deluge of foam-at-the-mouth praising reviews for this book) decided to hate Franzen from the start. Â
I was one of them, for sure. I was ready to shout: "soap opera!", whatever story Franzen was going to tell me. So, in short, I started by really not wanting to like this book. And my mission received a strong help by the first 200 pages, where Franzen presents Patty, one of the most difficult and unpleasant characters of the book, in a sort of autobiographical memoir written by herself. Her cold, selfish attitude is made even uglier by the cynicism and negativity and hopelessness that permeate this first portion of the book. Just so negative. Blah!
But then, when I was just moments from condemning Franzen to never-ending hatred, some magic happened. The portion about another character, Katz, started, and I realized that the tone of the first 200 pages was just a partial act. A trick, maybe. Franzen, like a chameleon, propels us forward into the world of Katz, the rock musician, and the register changes completely. I was very impressed by that, actually. And then again, the narrating voice develops, evolves, and keeps changing depending on the perspective and point of view. A wonderful ear.Â
He actually did something similar in "The Corrections", where he used the initial part of the novel almost as an obstacle for the reader, to overcome and then slide into the rest of it. But the difficult part was much shorter there.Â
The interview with Katz about the state of music is a little masterwork. Just like his first interaction with Walter and Lalitha.Â
Franzen's writing style is extremely clever, elegant and unsentimental, a little too cold, mental and cerebral for my personal taste, almost chilling in his acute, poignant, accurate, objective, hyper-rational observations and descriptions. More than once, while reading this book, I thought of that quote by (someone): "If we spent our life constantly looking at reality the way it actually is, we would go absolutely mad in a very short time". P.S. I think it's actually a line from ÂFyodor Dostoyevsky’s Notes From Underground: “I swear to you, gentlemen, that to be overly conscious is a sickness, a real, thorough sickness.â€�
There is a risk inherent in describing everything through words, and rationalizing reality too much: that you end up missing the point. Missing the heart, the emotions, the human perspective, what really matters.
Similarly, there is a limit to "thinking", beyond which it becomes just a painful exercise in analysis and dissolution of reality in smaller and smaller pieces, until you find either sublime madness (as above) or nothing at all (the terrifying emptiness at the very center of the onion).Â
Franzen's ambition is huge, child-like. He set out to write with a mission, and the mission was to go straight to the heart of America (Freedom). Sounds like he wants to be a Great Writer, like Tolstoy or Hugo. Someone who actually changes the world, someone who has an IMPACT on society.
And he does undoubtedly have an impact, because his books sell millions of copies, and they are full of intelligence and deeply human characters, however, I'm afraid to say, it is probably a much less "serious" impact than what he might think. Let me try to explain: people read Franzen because they love to read, or because they just want to be entertained, maybe by something smart with a little bit of thinking too, but not because they want to change anything, the world, or (especially!) themselves. Yes, there is always a little seed that might stay with you, but then even a pop song can leave a seed in you, or a movie, and here’s the truth: today we are hit by just too many seeds to be properly receptive to any one of them. We just move on to the next one. As important as it might be, it is all, at the end of the day, entertainment. It's not real life.
In other words, I would say: Relax! It's just a book! But of course, that is the whole point of being an extraordinary writer like he is. You Do Not Relax.Â
Finally, I disagree with the comment made by some reviewers that the novel falls quickly into the soap opera realm. This novel deserves more attention. I am a very slow reader, almost "Flowers-for-Algernon-slow", and I think it was a good thing with this book. No soap opera is as complex, intelligent, and ambitious as this novel. On the other hand, many novels would feel like soap operas if read at the speed of light.
Overall - this is an impressive, brilliant, complex, cold, sometimes disturbing, sometimes funny, extremely well-written and structured novel about the life of an American couple.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Freedom.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
May 27, 2013
–
Started Reading
May 27, 2013
– Shelved
June 5, 2013
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-11 of 11 (11 new)
date
newest »


Oh, and I did promise I would read more female authors, so I'll have to pick up A visit from the Goon Squad!



I should be done with Citizen Vince either tonight or tomorrow, with a review to follow shortly thereafter. Thank you, I appreciate your support.:)


:)

But unlike you I actually approached this book expecting to like it. I had no idea who Franzen was or that he was on the cover of TIME. I just thought it would be some big, proper, American novel, sometimes funny, sometimes disturbing, well-written, etc. It was none of that to me. It was Jennifer Egan's A visit from The Goon Squad that did all the things that I thought Freedom would do. So I recommend that.