Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Campbell Andrews's Reviews > The Nix

The Nix by Nathan  Hill
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
84599
's review

it was ok

** spoiler alert ** Hey everybody, can you feel it? Can you tell by the advance copies, the promised marketing campaign(s), the effusive praise from the publisher? It's THE NEXT BIG THING!!! (I know it is, it says so on the cover.)

But let's dispense with the pleasantries first.

Mr. Hill's prose is straightforward, direct; thankfully, he isn't writing for other writers. His characters are distinct individuals whose motivations are (mostly) understandable. He skewers college & academia most delightfully (one sequence early on dazzles). There is heart in the book, and it seems to be in the right place� or, places.

Before I detail for you just exactly why this book is yet another in a line of emperors sans clothes, let me apologize for my preponderance of long, negative reviews. It's like this: good books need only a thumbs-up, an oblique description that preserves a new reader's experience.

But bad books, and especially bad books that have only their own promotion to recommend them? They need to be nipped in the bud. You may disagree, of course, but at least you'll have to explain yourself beyond I Was Excited to Read It Before Everybody Else.

OK then.

Some books want to tell us How Things Are Now, to make their canvas the whole of the world we live in and capture the moment we're all presently sharing. I've come to call these zeitgeist novels.

The zeitgeist novel aims at a story either so universal or so sprawling that it can't help but trap the reader in its net. But this presents a tricky problem for the writer. If he's too specific or peculiar, he may lose the reader's identification; if he generalizes and his observations are readily apparent, he loses the reader's interest.

The Nix falls under the latter rubric. The voice is pretty much all Captain Obvious, the book's conclusions amounting to revelations such as

- playing video games for most of your waking hours is bad for you
- leaving your family is wrong and will affect them negatively
- college students can be manipulative and dishonest.

There is very little in this book that could not have been written by any writer. Certainly it took time and dedication to produce, but neither while reading it nor afterward did I have any better sense of who Mr. Hill is as a person or how he, specifically, sees the world. Not enough distinguishes The Nix to recommend it.

In the latter pages, especially, Mr. Hill is given to stabs at aphorisms and the kind of the suppositions that pass for wisdom only in tone, not substance. Like, "Time heals many things because it sets us on trajectories that make the past impossible." It does? I've read that sentence a dozen times and I still can't make sense of it.

Or, after a description of airport terminal commerce, a one-sentence paragraph: "This is who we are." Is it? It does tell me somewhat who YOU are- reductive, and mired in sophomoric analysis. This kind of 'insight' merely flatters the reader; no one who reads a book like The Nix finds their soul nourished by the shopping opportunities between Gates 30 and 40. Again, obvious.

Worst: "who if he could have heard what was going through Bishop's head at that moment... would never have exploded that bomb." Wouldn't it be nice to think so, the untapped empathy even of the guerrilla terrorist, who needs only see into the soul of the other to stop him from killing? Here Mr. Hill reveals a fundamentally shallow view of the world, which in this instance (and others) borders on outright naïveté.

And then by the end we're again tying up all the loose ends, converging the characters, and arranging for the climax to take place at an historically significant event; we're in the head of Hubert Humphrey and Allen Ginsberg and Walter Cronkite and whatever on earth for? Because intertwining one's narrative with an Important Historic Event lends heft and significance� and is a hallmark of a bad book.

But narratives like these seem to be catnip to publishers, who love to take the credit for discovering The Next Big Thing. Congratulations, Mr. Hill, on being all the richer for it.
72 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read The Nix.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

April 5, 2016 – Started Reading
April 5, 2016 – Shelved
April 5, 2016 – Shelved as: to-read
April 5, 2016 –
page 4
0.64%
April 5, 2016 –
page 4
0.64%
April 6, 2016 –
page 17
2.72% "well, the prose isn't fussy. but it's also rather plebeian, the perspective rather Captain Obvious. so far I feel like anybody could have written it- well, anybody who wanted to bother and wasn't concerned with communicating anything unexpected. I'll soldier on."
April 29, 2016 –
page 162
25.92% "I see no reason to continue."
May 24, 2016 –
page 275
44.0% "the student Laura is the best. the rest? eh.... "Time heals many things because it sets us on trajectories that make the past impossible." It does? much here is similarly muddled."
May 24, 2016 –
page 335
53.6% "this is a zeitgeist novel."
May 24, 2016 –
page 343
54.88% ""who if he could have heard what was going through Bishop's head at that moment... would have never exploded that bomb." yeah, no. here Mr. Hill reveals his fundamentally shallow view of the world, which in this instance (and others) borders on outright naivete."
May 24, 2016 –
page 360
57.6% "comes alive in the Laura Pottsdam sections"
May 25, 2016 –
page 496
79.36% "kills a minor character over the course of a chapter to reinforce the point that video games can be dangerous. that's the level of profundity we're dealing with here."
May 25, 2016 –
page 504
80.64% "a description of airport commerce, followed by this one-sentence paragraph: "This is who we are." No, it's not. This is a reductive and sophomoric novel."
May 25, 2016 –
page 519
83.04% "and we're inhabiting Hubert Humphrey and Ginsberg and why?"
May 25, 2016 –
page 552
88.32% "culminates in another of those historically-coincidental climaxes featuring famous figures to whose thoughts we are suddenly privy... this is a hallmark of a bad book."
May 25, 2016 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-22 of 22 (22 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Loring Wirbel Thanks for pointing out the absurd buildup, even if I'm more inclined to give this book a 4 or so, based on the first 200 pages. It"s humorous, rollicking, can compare with the newest from Canin, Hallberg, Larsen, but book of the decade? "Hints of John Irving with a bit of Pynchon or Dickens"? Naaah. No way can the opening 20 pages compare with those of Gravity's Rainbow or Infinite Jest. The Nix is just not at that level. Fun, but not earth-shattering.


Dave I've enjoyed this book, more so than most novels-its a bit ridiculous, but has some great scenes, humor and biting wit.


message 3: by Jc (new)

Jc Wow you really overthought this. This book was good, and didn't take itself too seriously.


Campbell Andrews Thanks for the insight! I wonder what other things I'm overthinking, what stuff is "good" that I'm missing out on because I can articulate and form an argument based on its qualities??


Linda A. Wow. I guess I'm just the village idiot. I really enjoyed this book for its current relevance, but I love historical novels and even though this book was not steeped in history, it runs parallel to what I have experienced in my life.

Sure video games are bad if one sits there all day, but I don't think I've read much about it the way it's written here and woven into the story line.

It was a quick read, even at 600+ pages and I thoroughly enjoyed it.


Gloria I love your review so much. Reading all the 4 and 5 star reviews, I couldn't believe these people read the same book I did. I'm just not funny or talented enough to produce a review like yours, but I agree with it 200%.


message 7: by Pandora (new)

Pandora Thank you so much. I'm always glad when someone pinpoints things I dislike in novels instead of just vaguely saying 'I didn't like it'. Now I don't have to bother with 600 pages of meh! :)


Misteeyed Loved your review. My sentiments about The Nix exactly, except better expressed.


Christine Garner What you said :)


Cookie Thank you for your succinct review. My review is rather lacking because my brain is SLUDGE after sloshing through this book.


Zoriana Z YES I agree with your comment...I'm in the middle of the big scene and what do I care about what's going on in Cronkite's head?? I completely skipped those parts.


message 12: by Mia (new) - rated it 4 stars

Mia Emslie I agree with you, Andrew. I was also Not seduced by the nix.
(Just read a very long 'accolade' to the book, and was offended at how the writer kept comparing everything 'meaningful' to a cynical criticism of Trump. Good grief. I'd rather not encounter haters while reading a book review. )


Beatrice Gormley I agree. I appreciated a lot of the satire and the individual scenes, but I guess I concluded that Hill was too young,or too inexperienced maybe, to write a Big Book. But he may yet.


Laianna You hit the nail on the head with this review. "Reductive" is a good word for the book. I found myself rolling my eyes and skipping through pages of condescending, unoriginal "insight." I wish the author would have focused on the core characters' perspectives rather than vainly dropping into the heads of every named character.


Sharon Seal I agree!! I can't believe anyone could give this 4 much less 5 stars


Colleen G I agree. Tedious & long winded!


message 17: by Moira (new)

Moira This review illustrates very much how I feel, down to a couple of specific sentences that rubbed me wrong. You're an outstanding book reviewer.


Kessler Thank god someone else recognizes how shitty this book was


Susan Thank you! I thought I must be missing something - till I hit a 4 page sentence describing the almost death of a minor character and thought, "why am I still even reading this tripe?" I skimmed the last 100 pages just to be done with it.


message 20: by Anne (new) - rated it 2 stars

Anne THANK YOU. Finally a review I can relate to. I did not have one interesting or new idea while reading this book and actually felt dumber after finishing. It was like reading the blog of a 10th grader who developed writing ambitions after reading David Foster Wallace. The title is good though.


message 21: by Amy (new)

Amy I agree strongly with your review. I am less than half way through. I googled "Nathan Hill" "obvious" "lacking" and got what I was looking for. I am cringing and squirming because of the obviousness all the little "wisdoms." Maybe this book would be better for a younger reader for whom these ideas are fresher? Also - I don't think the characters are that interesting.


message 22: by Tom (new) - rated it 2 stars

Tom M (London) Full review doesn't display. Very annoying.


back to top