Kevin Ansbro's Reviews > Room
Room
by
by

Kevin Ansbro's review
bookshelves: human-cruelty, human-emotions, human-psyche, immorality
Jul 06, 2016
bookshelves: human-cruelty, human-emotions, human-psyche, immorality
"Is that God up there?"
-Felix Fritzl, upon seeing the moon for the first time since leaving the cellar he had been imprisoned in.
ROOM for improvement.
2.5, bumped up to 3 stars (and that's being generous)
This life-affirming, but at times frustrating, story is told from the POV of Jack, a five-year-old boy whose universe is a room that he has never left, and which he shares with his mother.
What Jack doesn't initially realise is that both he and his mum are incarcerated (she, a victim of a kidnapping; he, the product of a rape at the hands of her captor).
Wonderfully told is the indestructible love of a mother for her son, borne from the helplessness of her situation.
Not so good are the stark inconsistencies in the boy's grammar.
Yes, he's only five, but he's stuck with a grown-up for twenty-four hours a day, so why on earth is his dialogue so infantile?
Example:
"Why am I hided away like the chocolates?"
Oh, give me a break! What five-year-old speaks like that, let alone one who exclusively converses with an adult?
You do have to suspend belief for a large part of the story. Jack's baby talk made me wish his mum would put a dummy (pacifier) into his mouth and the plot descended into inconceivable farce.
The book sets out with good intentions, but (for me) it becomes tedious after a while.
I applaud Donoghue for her courage in tackling such a difficult topic. Her writing, other than Jack's dialogue, is exemplary.
It could have been so much better.
-Felix Fritzl, upon seeing the moon for the first time since leaving the cellar he had been imprisoned in.
ROOM for improvement.
2.5, bumped up to 3 stars (and that's being generous)
This life-affirming, but at times frustrating, story is told from the POV of Jack, a five-year-old boy whose universe is a room that he has never left, and which he shares with his mother.
What Jack doesn't initially realise is that both he and his mum are incarcerated (she, a victim of a kidnapping; he, the product of a rape at the hands of her captor).
Wonderfully told is the indestructible love of a mother for her son, borne from the helplessness of her situation.
Not so good are the stark inconsistencies in the boy's grammar.
Yes, he's only five, but he's stuck with a grown-up for twenty-four hours a day, so why on earth is his dialogue so infantile?
Example:
"Why am I hided away like the chocolates?"
Oh, give me a break! What five-year-old speaks like that, let alone one who exclusively converses with an adult?
You do have to suspend belief for a large part of the story. Jack's baby talk made me wish his mum would put a dummy (pacifier) into his mouth and the plot descended into inconceivable farce.
The book sets out with good intentions, but (for me) it becomes tedious after a while.
I applaud Donoghue for her courage in tackling such a difficult topic. Her writing, other than Jack's dialogue, is exemplary.
It could have been so much better.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Room.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
July 6, 2016
–
Started Reading
July 6, 2016
– Shelved
July 10, 2016
– Shelved as:
human-cruelty
July 10, 2016
– Shelved as:
human-emotions
July 10, 2016
– Shelved as:
human-psyche
July 10, 2016
– Shelved as:
immorality
July 10, 2016
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 62 (62 new)
message 1:
by
Cndy
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Jul 10, 2016 09:23AM

reply
|
flag


Mine is a minority opinion here, Trish.
Most people find this book to be totally engrossing.
So please don't be put off by my unimportant review.



Good points, Cheri.
Mine would be that by exclusively spending twenty-four hours a day with an adult, Jack's speech should mature exponentially. Instead it's regressed to that of a three-year-old child!
I just didn't buy it and it distracted me from what should have been a harrowing, but life-affirming story.

For my own vicarious pleasure, I would like you to read it, Trish.
Me? I'm hoping to read a book soon where I go with the popular consensus.


Thanks, Jennifer.
I appreciate that!

Honestly, this is one I enjoyed as a movie.



Exactly, Kevin, and I believe the film is, presumably in part because Jack isn't narrating. Having such a naive narrator shelters the reader from the true horror (like the Nadsat in Clockwork Orange), but Jack just doesn't ring true, as you say. But even worse, occasionally, his speech is very advanced. Bizarrely inconsistent.

Thanks, Cndy.
Isn't this book a great conversation piece?
ŷ is a wonderful meeting point for such opposing views.

A salient point well made, Leslie.
Thank you for reading my review.

I'd prefer to not swim against the tide, Jill.
Thanks for your kind words.

Exactly, Kevin, and I believe the film is, presumably in part because Jack isn't narrating. Having such a naive narrator shelters the reader from the true horr..."
Thanks, Cecily.
I purposely avoided reading reviews until I'd posted this, so I was delighted when I found that yours held a similar view to mine.
We even came up with the same last line!
Such synchronicity!


Thanks, Julie. I probably am too kind in my ratings.
You can rest assured, though, that if I award a book less than three stars, it must've been an absolute stinker!

Thanks, LeAnne. There are notable issues with this book.


Thanks, Tammy.
The baby talk was ridiculous. It got on my nerves! : )
I'm pleased you felt the same way.


Yes, the story did seem opportunistic, given real-life events preceding it.
Thanks, Deb!

I knew you were exceptionally wise, Fran!


I’d still love you to read it though, Jaline, if only to see your perspective! : )


Thanks, Susanne!
I probably was overly generous. I agree with you entirely, it was a frustrating read.

Thank you, Ruci. A child reared in such a circumstance, with only an adult for company, is likely to achieve a higher degree of eloquence and intelligence. His babyish dialogue just doesn’t make sense!

I have a special shelf for this one, "Nobody talks like this.""
Ha! Brilliant, Julie.
I think a lot of writers must have led sheltered lives and don't know how 'real' people speak. They need to get out more; eavesdrop on conversations in supermarkets, restaurants and airports, as I do!
; )


Modest too, Julie! ; )

I've got 3 kids (1 who is leaning on my arm--literally--as I write this) and a novel that I've written that has sat, untouched, for 4 years in the dark of my computer. . . please, let me be cocky about dialogue!

I've got 3 kids (1 who is leaning on my arm--literally--as I write this) and a novel that I've written that has sat, untouched, for 4 years in the dark of my computer. . . please, let me be cocky about dialogue!
..."
I already knew you'd have ninja dialogue skills, Julie!

Now, as to setting. . . I wish I were more interested in the burning fields, but I can't look away from the elephant in the room. . . There is a benefit to writing a novel from the perspective of one ROOM, isn't there?

I'm assuming, Julie, that you weren't talking metaphorically and were referring to yourself tapping away within the confines of one room. Nothing wrong with that at all. Being a writer is not like being a landscape painter, where it's desirable to paint under blotting paper skies, placing oneself at the mercy of the elements and in the face of shifting daylight.
Your universe of outré characters, snappy dialogue and unnerving predicaments is already stored in the iCloud of your imagination. No need to go anywhere.



Well, whichever route you choose, I look forward to reading it, Julie!

Ha! Brilliant, Vanessa!
Yes, he was an annoying little kid, talking like an infant and causing me to have frown lines that weren't there before. : )
Hey! I've worked out that Jack must be 14 now, and probably able to use spoonies and forkies to feed himself, without any help from Ma. : )