ŷ

Kevin Ansbro's Reviews > Room

Room by Emma Donoghue
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
43579369
's review

liked it
bookshelves: human-cruelty, human-emotions, human-psyche, immorality

"Is that God up there?"
-Felix Fritzl, upon seeing the moon for the first time since leaving the cellar he had been imprisoned in.

ROOM for improvement.
2.5, bumped up to 3 stars (and that's being generous)
This life-affirming, but at times frustrating, story is told from the POV of Jack, a five-year-old boy whose universe is a room that he has never left, and which he shares with his mother.
What Jack doesn't initially realise is that both he and his mum are incarcerated (she, a victim of a kidnapping; he, the product of a rape at the hands of her captor).

Wonderfully told is the indestructible love of a mother for her son, borne from the helplessness of her situation.
Not so good are the stark inconsistencies in the boy's grammar.
Yes, he's only five, but he's stuck with a grown-up for twenty-four hours a day, so why on earth is his dialogue so infantile?
Example:
"Why am I hided away like the chocolates?"
Oh, give me a break! What five-year-old speaks like that, let alone one who exclusively converses with an adult?

You do have to suspend belief for a large part of the story. Jack's baby talk made me wish his mum would put a dummy (pacifier) into his mouth and the plot descended into inconceivable farce.

The book sets out with good intentions, but (for me) it becomes tedious after a while.
I applaud Donoghue for her courage in tackling such a difficult topic. Her writing, other than Jack's dialogue, is exemplary.
It could have been so much better.
109 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Room.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

July 6, 2016 – Started Reading
July 6, 2016 – Shelved
July 10, 2016 – Shelved as: human-cruelty
July 10, 2016 – Shelved as: human-emotions
July 10, 2016 – Shelved as: human-psyche
July 10, 2016 – Shelved as: immorality
July 10, 2016 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-50 of 62 (62 new)


Cndy Why only three stars? Please tell!


Kevin Ansbro I have.
I'm sorry, Cndy!


message 3: by Trish (new)

Trish Too bad that the boy's dialogue was sort of a joy-kill. I've heard a lot about this book and its important message so that message not being delivered the way it should? That's just a shame.


Kevin Ansbro Trish wrote: "Too bad that the boy's dialogue was sort of a joy-kill. I've heard a lot about this book and its important message so that message not being delivered the way it should? That's just a shame."
Mine is a minority opinion here, Trish.
Most people find this book to be totally engrossing.
So please don't be put off by my unimportant review.


message 5: by Trish (new)

Trish *lol* Well, it's not unimportant, but I usually don't decide based on one opinion alone (unless we're talking about the opinion of three very close friends here who seem to always know the perfect books for me). So don't worry. If I wanna read it, I will.


Cheri Kevin, my thoughts on his language are that his mother didn't really want to think of him as growing up, didn't want to face how many years had gone by - I think the fact that she was still nursing him, also, was part of that. Then there's the addition of not wanting him to become too curious, too knowledgeable, to able to put two and two together and realize how many things she lied to him about in order to protect him from the truth. Of course that is just my opinion - but I completely agree that it was distracting! At five my oldest was correcting my friends use of language...


message 7: by Kevin (last edited Jul 11, 2016 11:31AM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Kevin Ansbro Cheri wrote: "Kevin, my thoughts on his language are that his mother didn't really want to think of him as growing up, didn't want to face how many years had gone by - I think the fact that she was still nursing..."

Good points, Cheri.
Mine would be that by exclusively spending twenty-four hours a day with an adult, Jack's speech should mature exponentially. Instead it's regressed to that of a three-year-old child!
I just didn't buy it and it distracted me from what should have been a harrowing, but life-affirming story.


Kevin Ansbro Trish wrote: "*lol* Well, it's not unimportant, but I usually don't decide based on one opinion alone (unless we're talking about the opinion of three very close friends here who seem to always know the perfect ..."

For my own vicarious pleasure, I would like you to read it, Trish.
Me? I'm hoping to read a book soon where I go with the popular consensus.


message 9: by Trish (new)

Trish *lol* Popular consensus is overrated anyway.


message 10: by Jennifer (new) - added it

Jennifer Masterson Terrific and honest review, Kevin! I could see where this would get tedious. I saw the movie. It was disturbing.


Kevin Ansbro Jennifer wrote: "Terrific and honest review, Kevin! I could see where this would get tedious. I saw the movie. It was disturbing."

Thanks, Jennifer.
I appreciate that!


message 12: by Leslie D. (new) - added it

Leslie D.  Holy knight, go to audible and even try sitting through the audio preview of this one! couldn't get past the voice of Jack--and I have a HIGH tolerance (I work with children with special needs).
Honestly, this is one I enjoyed as a movie.


message 13: by Cndy (new) - rated it 5 stars

Cndy Well what a wonderful review to back up three stars. And not that I want to defend the book or author-though I gave it five stars-I must say that I raised four children who had very different speech/learning traits. I can not imagine what a child would be like who was raised in these circumstances. Nor would I be subject to tell how they would talk. I accepted the story as it was written because every child is an individual destined to his own tale. And talk. Glad not everyone thinks alike....


message 14: by Leslie D. (new) - added it

Leslie D.  Also, Jack wasn't exposed to anyone other his mother (and perhaps his biological father somewhat) until right after he turns 5. His 'Ma' was struggling with depression as I understood it, and it takes a village... Sometimes with teaching/modeling the way a child acquires language as well


Cecily "It could have been so much better."

Exactly, Kevin, and I believe the film is, presumably in part because Jack isn't narrating. Having such a naive narrator shelters the reader from the true horror (like the Nadsat in Clockwork Orange), but Jack just doesn't ring true, as you say. But even worse, occasionally, his speech is very advanced. Bizarrely inconsistent.


Kevin Ansbro Cndy wrote: "Well what a wonderful review to back up three stars. And not that I want to defend the book or author-though I gave it five stars-I must say that I raised four children who had very different speec..."

Thanks, Cndy.
Isn't this book a great conversation piece?
ŷ is a wonderful meeting point for such opposing views.


Kevin Ansbro Leslie wrote: "Also, Jack wasn't exposed to anyone other his mother (and perhaps his biological father somewhat) until right after he turns 5. His 'Ma' was struggling with depression as I understood it, and it ta..."

A salient point well made, Leslie.
Thank you for reading my review.


Kevin Ansbro Jill wrote: "Thank you, Kevin, for this honest review. I agree about the child's vocabulary. I was raised by parents that believed in speaking adult language at all times. I can see your point about Jack's infa..."

I'd prefer to not swim against the tide, Jill.
Thanks for your kind words.


Kevin Ansbro Cecily wrote: ""It could have been so much better."

Exactly, Kevin, and I believe the film is, presumably in part because Jack isn't narrating. Having such a naive narrator shelters the reader from the true horr..."


Thanks, Cecily.
I purposely avoided reading reviews until I'd posted this, so I was delighted when I found that yours held a similar view to mine.
We even came up with the same last line!
Such synchronicity!


Cecily Synchronicity... or spooky?!


Kevin Ansbro Cecily wrote: "Synchronicity... or spooky?!"

Great minds...
: )


message 22: by Julie (new)

Julie Good 'un, Kevin. My thoughts exactly. I didn't even put in on my "to read" or "did not finish" list, as I skimmed it once in the library. That was enough. You are too kind in your ratings. In terms of the language, maybe Mum, too, was gramatically-challenged, or challenged gramatically, ... : ) whichever is the best usage.


Kevin Ansbro Julie wrote: "Good 'un, Kevin. My thoughts exactly. I didn't even put in on my "to read" or "did not finish" list, as I skimmed it once in the library. That was enough. You are too kind in your ratings. In terms..."

Thanks, Julie. I probably am too kind in my ratings.
You can rest assured, though, that if I award a book less than three stars, it must've been an absolute stinker!


message 24: by LA (new) - rated it 3 stars

LA No stink on the kidnapped and raped people of the world, but I gave it three stars as well.


Kevin Ansbro LeAnne wrote: "No stink on the kidnapped and raped people of the world, but I gave it three stars as well."

Thanks, LeAnne. There are notable issues with this book.


Tammy Spot on, Kevin! The baby talk drove me to distraction. I read this when it first released and the thought of it makes me cringe


Kevin Ansbro Tammy wrote: "Spot on, Kevin! The baby talk drove me to distraction. I read this when it first released and the thought of it makes me cringe"

Thanks, Tammy.
The baby talk was ridiculous. It got on my nerves! : )
I'm pleased you felt the same way.


message 28: by DeB (new) - rated it 3 stars

DeB A controversial review, Kevin, but I agree... it wasn’t my fav either, found it hard to like. I guess that, for me, the horror of the reality is sufficient. I really didn’t want to read someone’s artificial stage setting and creation of such a horrible situation and that put me off more than anything, now that I can reflect again.


message 29: by Fran (new)

Fran Kevin...honest, straight forward review. The subject matter did not entice me and I passed on it.


Kevin Ansbro DeB wrote: "A controversial review, Kevin, but I agree... it wasn’t my fav either, found it hard to like. I guess that, for me, the horror of the reality is sufficient. I really didn’t want to read someone’s a..."
Yes, the story did seem opportunistic, given real-life events preceding it.
Thanks, Deb!


Kevin Ansbro Fran wrote: "Kevin...honest, straight forward review. The subject matter did not entice me and I passed on it."

I knew you were exceptionally wise, Fran!


message 32: by Jaline (new) - added it

Jaline Excellent review, Kevin! I have this one and have wanted to read it - because it's written by Emma Donoghue!! However, it just hasn't "called" to me . . . and thanks to your review, I think I know why. 😊


Kevin Ansbro Jaline wrote: "Excellent review, Kevin! I have this one and have wanted to read it - because it's written by Emma Donoghue!! However, it just hasn't "called" to me . . . and thanks to your review, I think I know ..."

I’d still love you to read it though, Jaline, if only to see your perspective! : )


Susanne My sentiments exactly Kevin!! Brilliant review. Seriously, you took the words out of my mouth, except that you rate this higher than I did.. (not sure I even rated it.. I know this author wrote another book but I can't fathom reading it.. this one frustrated me so!)


Kevin Ansbro Susanne wrote: "My sentiments exactly Kevin!! Brilliant review. Seriously, you took the words out of my mouth, except that you rate this higher than I did.. (not sure I even rated it.. I know this author wrote ano..."

Thanks, Susanne!
I probably was overly generous. I agree with you entirely, it was a frustrating read.


message 36: by Ruci (new) - rated it 3 stars

Ruci Tukana Exactly Kevin. I cannot understand why his dialogue is infantile!!


Kevin Ansbro Ruci wrote: "Exactly Kevin. I cannot understand why his dialogue is infantile!!"

Thank you, Ruci. A child reared in such a circumstance, with only an adult for company, is likely to achieve a higher degree of eloquence and intelligence. His babyish dialogue just doesn’t make sense!


message 38: by Julie (new)

Julie G Kevin,
I have a special shelf for this one, "Nobody talks like this."


Kevin Ansbro Julie wrote: "Kevin,
I have a special shelf for this one, "Nobody talks like this.""


Ha! Brilliant, Julie.
I think a lot of writers must have led sheltered lives and don't know how 'real' people speak. They need to get out more; eavesdrop on conversations in supermarkets, restaurants and airports, as I do!
; )


message 40: by Julie (new)

Julie G I agree. Dialogue happens to be my greatest strength as a writer, so I am particularly picky about it. I've spent most of my life talking or eavesdropping, so I'm a natural.


Kevin Ansbro Julie wrote: "I agree. Dialogue happens to be my greatest strength as a writer, so I am particularly picky about it. I've spent most of my life talking or eavesdropping, so I'm a natural."

Modest too, Julie! ; )


message 42: by Julie (last edited Aug 09, 2019 09:02AM) (new)

Julie G Dude,
I've got 3 kids (1 who is leaning on my arm--literally--as I write this) and a novel that I've written that has sat, untouched, for 4 years in the dark of my computer. . . please, let me be cocky about dialogue!


Kevin Ansbro Julie wrote: "Dude,
I've got 3 kids (1 who is leaning on my arm--literally--as I write this) and a novel that I've written that has sat, untouched, for 4 years in the dark of my computer. . . please, let me be cocky about dialogue!
..."


I already knew you'd have ninja dialogue skills, Julie!


message 44: by Julie (new)

Julie G Well, thank you. I guess all of the blabbering and listening to blabber has paid off.
Now, as to setting. . . I wish I were more interested in the burning fields, but I can't look away from the elephant in the room. . . There is a benefit to writing a novel from the perspective of one ROOM, isn't there?


Kevin Ansbro Julie wrote: "There is a benefit to writing a novel from the perspective of one ROOM, isn't there? ..."

I'm assuming, Julie, that you weren't talking metaphorically and were referring to yourself tapping away within the confines of one room. Nothing wrong with that at all. Being a writer is not like being a landscape painter, where it's desirable to paint under blotting paper skies, placing oneself at the mercy of the elements and in the face of shifting daylight.
Your universe of outré characters, snappy dialogue and unnerving predicaments is already stored in the iCloud of your imagination. No need to go anywhere.


message 46: by Julie (new)

Julie G I was trying to bring my comments back to your review and this story. I always write from the confines of one room (with a lock on it!), but I meant that it's easier for me to write stories that take place in a restricted setting, as I'm not terribly interested in describing the view (nor reading about it).


Vanessa I also wanted the mum to shove a pacifier in his face! I was completely irritated by Jack’s voice I couldn’t enjoy the book at all. Ha..now I feel abit better about my poor rating for this book. Everyone else seems to love this book 🤷‍♀�


Kevin Ansbro Julie wrote: "I was trying to bring my comments back to your review and this story. I always write from the confines of one room (with a lock on it!), but I meant that it's easier for me to write stories that ta..."

Well, whichever route you choose, I look forward to reading it, Julie!


Kevin Ansbro Vanessa wrote: "I also wanted the mum to shove a pacifier in his face! I was completely irritated by Jack’s voice I couldn’t enjoy the book at all. Ha..now I feel abit better about my poor rating for this book. Everyone else seems to love this book 🤷‍♀� ..."

Ha! Brilliant, Vanessa!
Yes, he was an annoying little kid, talking like an infant and causing me to have frown lines that weren't there before. : )

Hey! I've worked out that Jack must be 14 now, and probably able to use spoonies and forkies to feed himself, without any help from Ma. : )


Peter Excellent review, Kevin.


« previous 1
back to top