Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Ian "Marvin" Graye's Reviews > Peter Greenaway: The Draughtsman's Contract

Peter Greenaway by Peter Greenaway
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
5022264
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: fill-um, reviews, reviews-5-stars

Screen Play

This is the screenplay of one of my favourite films.
It's a beautiful film, and it's possible to appreciate it without caring about anything that follows in this review.

The Merchant Class

The film is set in a time when English life under Royalty was separated into the Aristocracy (who were members of the Royal Court) and Commoners (who were usually farmers or peasants).
However, something new had just appeared on the scene and that was the first intimation of a new class, the middle class.
This class was a class of merchants, they traded with each other and with the other classes.
They took risks and did deals, often across significant distances and boundaries.

Excuse Me, What Did I Just Contract Here?

But in order to achieve some level of certainty in their mercantile or trading activities, they needed to know that their contracts could be "enforced" and the other parties to their contracts would honour their part of the bargain.
In order to achieve this certainty, they needed Royalty (i.e., the King) to preside over disputes.
So at the same time was created both the role of the Court and the role of a representative who could make their case for them (e.g., what we now call an attorney or lawyer).

From Monks to Attorneys

At a time when most people were illiterate, the ability to read and write was effectively restricted to monks.
However, the need to be represented before the King and his Court created a new non-ecclesiastical function for literacy outside the Church.
So at the time that the merchant or middle class was born, so was the function of attorney or lawyer.
Ever since, lawyers have been associated with mercantilism, trade and commerce.
But it needs to be remembered that their rights and privileges derive from the fact that they could read and write.
Nothing else.

A Very Classy Film

In the film, it's important that the draughtsman's contract needs to be negotiated and enforced.
Its enforcement foreshadows the new middle class, which in this case includes the draughtsman or architect.
And at the end of the film, we see a dirty, muddy, grubby worker, who is presumably an intimation of the next class to be born, the working class.
So for me, one of the great attractions of this film and its script is the way it captures society at a major point of transition.
But it also highlights the importance of trade, commerce, contract and enforcement by the State to the society that grew out of this period in time.
And, for better or for worse, attorneys and lawyers.
8 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Peter Greenaway.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
May 28, 2011 – Shelved
May 28, 2011 – Shelved as: fill-um
June 28, 2011 – Shelved as: reviews
February 15, 2012 – Shelved as: reviews-5-stars

Comments Showing 1-6 of 6 (6 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Paul (last edited May 29, 2011 12:33PM) (new)

Paul Bryant "The film is set in a time when English life was separated into Royalty and Commoners"

I know what you mean but I have to slightly demur here - thre were 3 classes - royalty is one class, a very tiny one; the aristocracy is another; and commoners a third. The middle class, a fourth, can never transmogrify into the aristocracy unless they are ennobled; and likewise the aristocrats never get to be royal unless they marry one.

Great movie, and very nice review. Sorry for the nit picking.


message 2: by Ian (last edited May 29, 2011 02:10PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Ian "Marvin" Graye Thanks, Paul.
Your comment is totally right.
I wrote this review from memory. I had worked this interpretation out when I first saw the film and had stored it away in the back of my brain, but when I came to write it down, I couldn't remember the exact terminology I had used (even if it was overtly borrowed from Marx).
I wasn't comfortable with "Royalty", because it wasn't what I had originally used and it didn't say what I meant, but I didn't give myself enough time to think it through (a very children's sporting weekend this last one).
So, if you don't mind and as a result of your comments, I'll change:
"The film is set in a time when English life was separated into Royalty and Commoners, who were usually peasants or farmers."
to:
"The film is set in a time when English life under Royalty was separated into the Aristocracy (who were members of the Royal Court) and Commoners (who were usually farmers or peasants)."


message 3: by Ian (new) - rated it 5 stars

Ian "Marvin" Graye I have always been a little uncomfortable with how Greenaway portrayed the new working class.
Unless I am mistaken, his portrait was not particularly flattering, so I have used the language of dirtiness that it evoked for me.
I have never understood why he did this, and would like to hear from anyone with a different view or interpretation.
I don't want to leap in and suggest that Greenaway himself is an upper or middle class snob.


message 4: by Lisa (new)

Lisa Great review, but I can't believe you didn't comment on the nice hair styles:



message 5: by Ian (new) - rated it 5 stars

Ian "Marvin" Graye No, but I don one of them when I write my reviews.


message 6: by Ian (new) - rated it 5 stars

Ian "Marvin" Graye Jennifer, please insert laudatory comments in box below.


back to top