Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Snotchocheez's Reviews > The Nix

The Nix by Nathan  Hill
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1899836
's review

it was amazing

4.5 stars

I'll be the first to admit that I agree with some of the plaints of this novel's detractors and dissectors: Nathan Hill's often-precocious writing style (trying really hard to emulate Franzen and DF Wallace); blatant audience pandering (trying to please the gamut of readers from YA-friendlies and gaming nerds to (recent) history-philes and magical realists); and a tendency to meander down myriad and inconsequential plot threads and stray from the important ones. Yet, despite its flaws, I really ate up Hill's debut novel, The Nix. I'm not sure if it's the book's fortuitous timing (released months before the insane circus that is the 2016 US Presidential election) or having utterly appealing, utterly flawed characters I thoroughly relate to, but I could not stop reading, and laughing, and shedding a tear (or twenty).

The story pogos everywhere, spanning roughly six decades and two continents, but all plot threads ultimately lead to 2010 and Samuel Andresen-Anderson (an English prof at a low tier college outside Chicago, an aspiring author with only a Choose Your Own Adventure-esque short story to his writing credit, and a Level umpty-thousand elf on Elfscape, a MMORPG he devotes most of his non-working waking hours to); and his mom, Faye Andresen-Anderson (a mousy, Iowa raised former U of Chicago student and Vietnam War protestor, who abandoned her son and husband in the late '80s, presumably under the influence of The Nix, a Norwegian ghosty-wraith). When Samuel inadvertenly catches a newscast of his mom chucking rocks at an ultra-conservative presidential candidate (turning herself overnight into an internet sensation), it prompts Samuel's literary agent to get the rock-throwing terrorist's abandoned son to write a lurid tell-all.

Then the story back-and-forths between son Samuel and mother Faye, filling in the blanks (Samuel's childhood, Faye's high school and college days) to let the reader know why Samuel's the milquetoast-y gaming slug he is, and why Faye's the irresponsible parent/rock chucker she is. Plenty of memorable supporting characters round out the mix of The Nix, like plagiarist student (of Samuel's) Laura, fellow online gamer Pwnage, the twin "B"s; Faye's fellow protestors Alice and Sebastian, her Norwegian father (and napalm producer) Frank. And, of course, that nix (and maybe even, that Nix, too (good old Tricky Dick himself)).

This book is so stuffed to the gills, it's hard to be enamored of the 640-page length (and more than a few times I thought "did he really have to include that?" or "Did he really need to write a thirteen page-long sentence on the ills of role-playing computer games?" (for instance) but I can overlook sins of commission when the overall output is so engaging, funny, sad, and (mostly) relevant. This reminded me a bit of the last super highly-anticipated novel I read, Garth Risk Hallberg's City on Fire (another problematic doorstopper that I really liked). Despite Nathan Hill's frequent flights of fancy, I liked The Nix quite a bit more than City on Fire (which I gave 4 stars). Nowhere to go but up from there, hence the 4.5 stars, rounded up. Wouldn't be a bit surprised if it won an award or two (ahem, stodgy Pulitzer Panel, I got my eyes on y'all). Flawed, but all kinds of fun.
59 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read The Nix.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

September 8, 2016 – Shelved
September 8, 2016 – Shelved as: to-read
October 19, 2016 – Started Reading
October 21, 2016 –
page 22
3.52% "I doubt Nathan Hill's going to garner kudos frim the fussy Strunk & White contingent, but from me? Thus far, I'm loving this. Hope this doesn't turn out to be another City on Fire with the bottom dropping out 60% through. I'm feeling optimistic."
October 21, 2016 –
25.0% "Duh, big difference between page 23 and 23% (my last update). And, with a ginormous book like The Nix, even the difference beteeen 23% and 25% (or the break between Parts Two and Three, where I'm really at now) is huge. What a pivotal scene! Can I finish this tonight? Only 500 pages and 8 parts to go...no problem."
October 22, 2016 –
44.0% "Poor Samuel:

"At college, at Juilliard, the "Love you" at the end of (Bethany's) correspondence switches quickly to "Love ya," which stings. "Love ya" seems to be what happens to real love when its formality and dignity are amputated.""
October 22, 2016 –
52.0% "Okay, so "You Can Get The Girl!", Hill's Choose Your Own Adventure intermezzo, may not be the most novel of novel choices (after all, NPH modelled his entire autobiography after the series) but wow, what a way to set the stage for the second half of the book. Go Samuel!"
October 23, 2016 –
65.0% "Baseball fans: The connections are tenuous at best, but The Nix's Samuel is a Chicago Cubs fan, though his Elfquest username is 'Dodger'. IRL, last night perennial doormats the Cubs beat my Dodgers to go to the World Series for the first time since 1945. No one cares but me, but neat coincidence. (Grudgingly,) Go Cubs!"
October 23, 2016 –
76.0% "Was that a 13 page-long sentence? Why yes, I believe it was. Okay, that maybe wasn't one of Hill's finest literary moments in what has been up until now a consistently enjoyable reading experience, but still: pretty great (if overly obvious) indictment of the MMORPG world."
October 24, 2016 –
81.0% "Part Nine, and the chapters have gotten dinky. You know some shit is going down. But what? Rioters vs. National Guard snipers? A slaughterhouse copro-mountain unleashing a methane bomb on DNC delegates? A spurned "pig" going ballistic? Or is it the dreaded nisse/nix, paying a visit to Chicago? Gonna find out soon, I'm sure."
October 25, 2016 –
90.0% "With guest appearances by Allen Ginsberg and Walter Cronkite, The Nix's penultimate part comes to a close. I'm exhausted, and still not quite sure who or what the Nix really is. Hill's got about 50 pages to tie this all up, though."
October 27, 2016 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-23 of 23 (23 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Angela M (new) - added it

Angela M I wasn't planning to read this but now you have me wondering whether I should! Terrific review!


Snotchocheez Thank you, Angela! I think there's a little something for everyone here (which may be a bad thing, dunno). If you can carve out the time, you might wanna give it a try.


message 3: by Esil (new) - added it

Esil I've been keeping my eye on this one. Great review, Robbie. You make it sound like it's worth the effort.


Snotchocheez Thank you, Esil. I'll bet you enjoy at least some of this book. Enough to brave the 640 page length? Sure, I think so.


Peter Boyle A most elegant review, Robbie. I saw Stephen King tweet enthusiastically about this book the other day (which must be a dream for any author!)


Snotchocheez Thank you so much, Peter! Ya know, I've repeatedly mentioned I've only sporadically been a fan of SK (the author), but just about every tme I've investigated a book (or movie, or TV series, or amazingly, even a contemporary music release) his gushing recommendations have been SPOT ON. So when you mention SK tweeted about The NIx, it's just one more example (in my mind, and hopefully many others') of SK's incredibly savvy perceptions on what is worthwhile out there. The Nix (despite Nathan Hill's copious freshman-writerly mistakes) is a gem, and deserves to be read.


Steve I've read enough of your reviews now to know that when you call something "all kinds of fun", it's pretty much guaranteed to be up my alley, too. I don't even care what those stodgy folks awarding Pulitzers think. If my friend Snotcho gives it enthusiastic thumbs up, that's good enough for me.


Snotchocheez Thanks, Steve. I'm not 100% certain you're gonna like this one, though. If memory serves, you are a recent transplant to (or from?) Chicago so the Windy City parts you'll probably identify with. The rest? I'll keep my fingers crossed. I don't think you'll hate it, but no guarantees you'll love it. I would love to see what you think, and wouldn't be at all offended if it didn't work for you. (I'm just hoping that it will) : )


Steve It's to Chicago, but regardless, the parts set there sound appetizing. There are no two ways about it, though: you're on the hook for my happiness if I do read this book. It'll be hours of commitment where I'm sitting in stark judgment of you as an adviser. :-)


message 10: by Deanna (new)

Deanna Great review, Robbie! This does sound fun :)


Snotchocheez Deanna! Thank you! It is much fun, albeit a little frustrating. Fun definitely wins out over frustrating though.


Snotchocheez Steve: The operative phrase is "if I do read this book..." Clearly, you are on the fence with The Nix. If you do end up reading it, it will only be with the combined exhortations of others. I will only take .14.333% responsibility for your hours of no fun. (Thats the extent of my liability.) : p


Steve Nice job wriggling out of that one, Mr. Cheez. You used one of my tricks -- drawing on the perceived authority of a precisely stated, though inherently unknowable number.


Snotchocheez Steve: I forgot to mention that a) Sorry to confuse your emigre status TO Chicago, which means b) chances are, you may not be a Cubs fan. which is sad if you're not cause you'd be ecstatic now that the Cubs broke the curse, not to mention you'd have no excuse NOT to read The Nix as Wrigley Field and Ernie Banks (Mr. Cub himself) are minor characters in this yarn. So "...if you read it" only means that you never intended to read it to begin with (even with you, a neophyte Chicagoan and avid reader), being de facto (if not de jure) required to read The Nix. I think that completely releases me from liability. (Yes I know this response makes zero sense, logically; I was trying to emulate Hill---who in turn is accused of emulating Franzen, but it doesn't matter anyway because I've completely scared you away from this book, thus releasing me from "enjoyment liability" entirely.)


Steve First of all, you're not allowed to use lawyerese to get out of any obligation to my reading enjoyment. Secondly, I am a Cubs fan and have the bona fides to prove it. (Though the cobwebs in my head after the big celebration make it difficult to argue my point as effectively as you've argued yours.) We were 25 years in a Chicago suburb before moving to the city proper. Even before that, when my wife and I were at U of Illinois, Harry Caray got us hooked on Cubs baseball. If only Ernie Banks were alive today to enjoy the moment. I could imagine him saying, "Let's play seven!"


message 16: by [deleted user] (new)

Great review, and great writing style of it!


Trudie Ok, so I caved and got this great tome. At my reading pace I will be done by mid July ;) Never read Franzen or Wallace so pretty much going into the unknown here - be it on your head - just so you know ;)


Snotchocheez Elyse: (sorry, didn't see your comment until now): Thank you! And yeah, loved all those scenes you mentioned. It was (by a narrow margin) my fave 2016-released novel reaf last year. Just a heck of a lot of fun (yeah, even more than City on Fire, which I liked plenty).

Trudie: Yay! (Although did you buy a copy or check it out from the library? I devoured it in a little over a week, but that was only because I found myself reading it at just about every non-parenting waking moment available (you won't have enough time to read it if you checked it out from the library. Though I compared Nathan Hill to Franzen and DF Wallace, he's really a much less self-indulgent writer, much more down to earth. Aside from the length I doubt it will be an intrepid reading experience. Can't wait to see what you think. (and though a few of my female GR friends detest Franzen and his writing style, you should at least give him a try. I swear by The Corrections but Freedom is pretty good too.


Trudie Well, I was on the library waiting list as #34 and it was becoming obvious I was never going to get this in time for any ToB discussion (will be pushing it as is), so I now own the beast.
I don't have any real reason to have avoided Franzen only a unsubstantiated vibe of "wankeryness" but that's likely grossly undeserved;)


message 20: by jo (new) - rated it 5 stars

jo "Did he really need to write a thirteen page-long sentence on the ills of role-playing computer games?"

my FAVORITE set piece in the whole novel.


message 21: by Matt (new) - rated it 2 stars

Matt Quann Great review! I'm glad to read that you had some similar complaints to me. Interestingly, I've been picking away at City on Fire for the past few months and am, as of yet, not taken with it.


Gerhard '...often precocious writing style': I am about 250 pages into this; amazed at how quick a read it is, due mainly to Hill's effortless, transparent writing style, which sucks you into his narrative. '...trying really hard to emulate Franzen and DW Wallace': Has literature with a 'L' really, truly ended with Franzen & Wallace? Hill just happens to be writing in their milieu; deliberate emulation is surely not his intention here. Imagine the burden on any respectable author trying to strike a match in that particular shadow.


Katie Great review. As I said to someone else I find myself agreeing with all the compliments thrown at this novel but struggle to feel much love for it.


back to top