Matthias's Reviews > The Handmaid's Tale
The Handmaid's Tale
by
by

Don't let the bastards grind you down.
There's a lot of talk about women's rights these days. There were times where I thought: enough already. You girls got it good. I looked around me and saw women with strong voices and a million choices. If they wished to go for a career, they could go for it. If they didn't, no biggie. Their liberty seemed greater than men's in a lot of respects. The power they wield over men is magnificent and often described as the greatest humanity is capable of: a woman's love. They can choose to give it or withhold it. Men's political and physical powers look puny and artificial in contrast, as their strings are constantly pulled by forces they can't resist. Somewhere deep inside me I had a hard time believing things could really be so bad for women, with their majority in numbers and all this strenght at their disposal.
But then you turn on the news or you open a history book. You look outside your own country. You look at a presidential candidate talking about women as animals, as goods to be acquired, as territories to be conquered. You see people making excuses for it, making light of it, you see in their eyes they assume that it's normal. You see laws that tell women what to do with their own bodies, in the name of religion or the greater good. You hear of households where tiny kings use their physical power to terrorise their tiny kingdoms. And then you see all the machinations that have gone into trying to rob women of their mystical, almost holy, powers in greater kingdoms, machinations that often seem on the verge of systematising in the blink of an eye.
So, having accepted that the Woman's struggle is real, I was reading The Handmaid's Tale that paints a picture of how things would look like if circumstance and evil succeeded in stripping women of all the agency they have. When they have succesfully been ground down by the bastards. Bastards aren't Men, per se. Or all men. Or only men. This isn't so much a story about women versus men. It's a story of the artificial power against the real one, a story where the former won.
It's a bleak picture. Atwood uses the very claustrophobic perspective of Offred to great effect. Offred is the eponymous handmaid who find herself in a dystopia where her only societal value is also a curse: her fertility. Her world consists of her room, a stroll down the stairs, a garden, a walk to the butcher and her one and only societal mission: to get pregnant. She has to wear a cape that allows her to only look directly in front of her. She's isolated and stripped of her identity. Even her memories are slowly disappearing and losing relevance in a surrounding that offers nothing to link them to. Through this narrative Margaret Atwood succeeds in donning that same vision-confining cape on her readers' heads, immersing them in that same claustrophobic atmosphere.
This books does very well what it set out to do and that also explains why I didn't thoroughly enjoy it. I wanted more background. I wanted more explanations. I wanted more adventure. I wanted more action by the protagonist. I wanted her spirit, still apparent in the secretly hoarding of butter and the plotting of small thefts, to break free and wreak havoc among the bastards. Make them lose without losing herself. I wanted more direction. I wanted the flashes of hope to last. In short: the author succeeded in making me want what the protagonist wanted. She showed me what it is we should all strive to avoid actively.
An important book, and a good one to boot.
There's a lot of talk about women's rights these days. There were times where I thought: enough already. You girls got it good. I looked around me and saw women with strong voices and a million choices. If they wished to go for a career, they could go for it. If they didn't, no biggie. Their liberty seemed greater than men's in a lot of respects. The power they wield over men is magnificent and often described as the greatest humanity is capable of: a woman's love. They can choose to give it or withhold it. Men's political and physical powers look puny and artificial in contrast, as their strings are constantly pulled by forces they can't resist. Somewhere deep inside me I had a hard time believing things could really be so bad for women, with their majority in numbers and all this strenght at their disposal.
But then you turn on the news or you open a history book. You look outside your own country. You look at a presidential candidate talking about women as animals, as goods to be acquired, as territories to be conquered. You see people making excuses for it, making light of it, you see in their eyes they assume that it's normal. You see laws that tell women what to do with their own bodies, in the name of religion or the greater good. You hear of households where tiny kings use their physical power to terrorise their tiny kingdoms. And then you see all the machinations that have gone into trying to rob women of their mystical, almost holy, powers in greater kingdoms, machinations that often seem on the verge of systematising in the blink of an eye.
So, having accepted that the Woman's struggle is real, I was reading The Handmaid's Tale that paints a picture of how things would look like if circumstance and evil succeeded in stripping women of all the agency they have. When they have succesfully been ground down by the bastards. Bastards aren't Men, per se. Or all men. Or only men. This isn't so much a story about women versus men. It's a story of the artificial power against the real one, a story where the former won.
It's a bleak picture. Atwood uses the very claustrophobic perspective of Offred to great effect. Offred is the eponymous handmaid who find herself in a dystopia where her only societal value is also a curse: her fertility. Her world consists of her room, a stroll down the stairs, a garden, a walk to the butcher and her one and only societal mission: to get pregnant. She has to wear a cape that allows her to only look directly in front of her. She's isolated and stripped of her identity. Even her memories are slowly disappearing and losing relevance in a surrounding that offers nothing to link them to. Through this narrative Margaret Atwood succeeds in donning that same vision-confining cape on her readers' heads, immersing them in that same claustrophobic atmosphere.
This books does very well what it set out to do and that also explains why I didn't thoroughly enjoy it. I wanted more background. I wanted more explanations. I wanted more adventure. I wanted more action by the protagonist. I wanted her spirit, still apparent in the secretly hoarding of butter and the plotting of small thefts, to break free and wreak havoc among the bastards. Make them lose without losing herself. I wanted more direction. I wanted the flashes of hope to last. In short: the author succeeded in making me want what the protagonist wanted. She showed me what it is we should all strive to avoid actively.
An important book, and a good one to boot.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
The Handmaid's Tale.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
September 26, 2016
–
Started Reading
September 26, 2016
– Shelved
September 30, 2016
–
21.6%
"Nothing much is happening so far, the setting is being created at a very leisurely pace."
page
70
October 13, 2016
–
Finished Reading
October 16, 2016
– Shelved as:
my-reviews
Comments Showing 1-32 of 32 (32 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Lisa
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Oct 15, 2016 05:19AM

reply
|
flag



I have yet to read this book, though it's received acclaim for years. As a woman and a feminist, I don't need a book to convince me of the power imbalances in cultures, having had many examples around me at home, growing up, and in my working life.
This book, however, keeps getting cited as an interesting extrapolation of many present situations, so I suppose I should give it a read.



Thank you Lisa! I had a difficult time writing a review for this one as well to be honest, but I'm glad it didn't show too much. It's a book that describes situations often talked about but seldomly truly acknowledged, and it's a paradox that's difficult to put your finger on. Atwood pokes the finger right in it and twists it around a bit.

Thanks Matthew! It was the first Atwood for me, but definitely not the last. I've got the Oryx and Crake series already on my shelves and got my eye on a certain blind assassin as well. Looking forward to read your thoughts on this one.

This part really struck me: You hear of households where tiny kings use their phyical power to terrorise their tiny kingdoms.
And I was telling ..."
Thank you Kavita! I loved that quote as well. I wonder if this is the book where it came from originally, but even if it didn't, Atwood used it to very great effect. As you rightly said, there's a lot of strenght to be gotten out of it.

Thanks Lizzy! Any understanding that I show in this review was greatly augmented by this book, so credit to Atwood for that for sure. I hope you'll enjoy the book.

That's exactly what it is Lata! You won't be disappointed if you go in reading this book with that expectation in mind.

Thank you Dolors. I read your own review and think your own articulations prove it wasn't impossible after all ;-) The thought that the scenario is indeed a dangerous and very real possibility is what struck me about this book as well. I just hope that in describing it, Atwood helped make it more difficult for this dystopia to ever arise for real.

It's scary how easy it is to show how relevant dystopias still are in relation to current affairs.

Thank you Jean! Yes, I wouldn't be surprised if that were true, the things described in this book never felt far fetched but were on the contrary quite familiar to me. It's like a condensed version of a particular branch of reality we prefer in watered down doses because it's easier to swallow in that form.

Thanks Justine! And enjoy the re-read, may it be an inspiration!


Even before reading the book you show great understanding of it Seemita! That is exactly what this story does with regards to spades. Your reviewing powers seem boundless! And so are your powers of leaving kind and encouraging comments. Thank you.

Make them lose without losing herself.
I was glad to read this book along with you. I hope sometime we have a buddy reading that isn't coincidental. :)
Thank you!

Make them lose without losing herself.
I was glad to ..."
Haha, I remember when we started reading this book around the same time. Seems like such a long time ago. You finished it in a couple of days but for me it took weeks. That partially explains my initial 3-star rating, I kind of held it against this book that it didn't grip me in the way some pageturners do, but after letting it set in I decided for an additional star because I don't think that was what Atwood was aiming for. She was more into the creation of an atmosphere in which you would truly feel the desperation and isolation of the protagonist, and through that atmosphere make the central message hit home. And there she succeeded very well.
On to more buddy reads, buddy! I'll try to keep up the pace next time ;-)

I enjoyed your take on one of my favorite books. I read this book when I was fifteen...the year after it was published and it had a profound effect on me in terms of burgeoning feminist consciousness. Thanks for this lovely reminder and I love the comments from our goodreads community !!

I enjoyed your take on one of my favorite books. I read this book when I was fifteen...the year after it was published and it had a p..."
Thank you Jaidee! Good to see you again indeed! :-)



What a lucky meeting! Even though I have only met her through this book so far I'm already glad to have made her acquaintance. Continue to cherish your copy with all its annotations through time. Sounds like a fantastic way to look back on your own past all the while enjoying the book all over again.

That's very good and sensible advice Hanneke, thank you very much. I'll start with her award-winning "The Blind Assassin" in that case! Consider "The Robber Bride" and "Alias Grace" also on my radar :-)


Thanks Ivana, those are some relevant observations you made there. It's true that also in the so-called West we've got a thing or two to learn from this book.

true...I feel a bit worried about all these new 'traditional' movements...I'm not anti-tradition and I can even understand why some people might be nostalgic about the past, but the truth is that there is no going back. It is not possible. We can all see that there are problems in Western societies but anti-feminism and overly traditional and fanatical religious movements won't change that.....If there was or there is a problem connected with feminism, it must be adressed, figured out and solved. I think this book is very brave in examing all of that, if you look at it closely, it is quite complex and it is not pro anything really...not pro- feminism certainly...
Basicially, I think that the main problem with feminism is that it tried to make women believe they had to be like men in order to have any value, in order to count at all...and that is just wrong. Having choice is what it should have been about, but somehow it turned out into endless complaints about men, followed by imitation of men....and I can see why men are annoyed with this kind of behaviour, but it is hard on woman as well...because being made to feel worthless because one choses to care or focus on one's child and family is not only morally wrong but it is catastrofic for the development of the sociey as well...if nobody wants to take care of children, what happens to them?
I don't know why as a society we always must pick the most extreme way to go....either we must hate the traditional family and the very idea of having kids and getting married...or we must create this rigid and unjust social structures to protect it...to kill and imprison everyone who wants to get a divorce and remarry (as in this novel). What is so wrong about admitting that different things work for different people?
I think that ultimately, we are all afraid of admitting to it because it would mean that we're all accountable for our actions. It would mean we have a responsibility for our own choices and happiness...and nobody seems to want that...or at least that is what the majority doesn't want, hence we always end up with extreme social movements and ideas that play on emotions and don't require an individual to use his head.
