欧宝娱乐

Cecily's Reviews > The Handmaid's Tale

The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1199525
I first read this in the late 80s: shocking, though a little far-fetched, I thought. When I joined GR in 2008, I gave it 4* from memory, but reread a year later with GR book group and gave it the full 5*.

In 2019, I skimmed it again before reading the follow-up, The Testaments (see my review HERE). Gilead no longer feels far-fetched.


Review from 2009

A wonderful hybrid: a book that is eminently readable, but packed with fascinating and thought-provoking ideas and symbolism.

It's set in the near future in a dystopian totalitarian theocratic state where many are infertile, so there has been a backlash against permissiveness and women are subjugated to the point where they are not allowed to read or write (even shop signs are just icons). Of course, the regime never considers that men could be at fault in any way, including their fertility or lack of.

Offred tells the story of how she became a handmaid, assigned to one of the elite, purely for breeding purposes.

Truer than you want to think

All the many and varied restrictions, practices, divisions and penalties imposed by the regime have really been applied somewhere in the world, albeit not all at the same time and place. One of the things that stops the book being gloomy is the resilience of the human spirit: there is a resistance movement among the lower classes and even amongst the elite, illicit things go on. The fear of being caught creates a good sense of tension.

Faith and ritual

Faith and ritual are important, both to the regime as a means of control and, in a different way, to individuals as a way of making life bearable.


Image: A game of Scrabble (.)

Symbolism

The symbolism is rich, especially tulips and the colour red. The handmaids' sole purpose is procreation, their cycles are closely monitored, everything they wear is red and other important red items (such as a path) are pointed out. Whilst the shape of tulip flowers clearly echoes genitalia, they are also likened to a wound and teeth, and they and other flowers are described in different ways to indicate fertility or sterility. Serena Joy's knitting is a compulsive form of reproduction with sinister echoes of Dickens' Madame Defarge in A Tale of Two Cities.

Themes and questions

The big questions are around ownership of oneself and one's body, and about motherhood (biological versus adoption).

The state is patriarchal, but an army of matriarchal "aunts" enforce rituals and build a hive mentality to support each other and hence the regime. Are the handmaids prostitutes (is Nick too)? No, because they have no choice. They are slaves. They "sell" their bodies for the survival of themselves as individuals and of the human race. The aim is (supposedly) solely procreation, not anyone's pleasure (the wife is always present).

Do the ends justify the means, and should the handmaids accept some responsibility for going along with it? The more you read (including the follow-up, The Testaments), the more you realise that's not possible. And if "context is all", what is truth? You could read this several times and never come up with exactly the same answer.

See also

* The Testaments, obviously, which Atwood wrote 30 years later, to show how Gilead fell and how Aunt Lydia came to be Aunt Lydia: see my review HERE.

* The 1990 film of Handmaid, which many dislike (and I don't really remember). However, the screenplay was by Harold Pinter, and it starred Natasha Richardson, Faye Dunaway, Robert Duvall and Aidan Quinn. See .

* The 2017-2019 TV series. Series 1 was a pretty good adaptation of Handmaid, but series 2 and 3 took the story further, with new material. See .

* When She Woke has many parallels, but I didn't like it: see my review HERE.

* Fahrenheit 451: see my review HERE.


228 likes ·  鈭� flag

Sign into 欧宝娱乐 to see if any of your friends have read The Handmaid's Tale.
Sign In 禄

Quotes Cecily Liked

Margaret Atwood
“Nolite te bastardes carborundorum.”
Margaret Atwood, The Handmaid鈥檚 Tale

Margaret Atwood
“Ignoring isn鈥檛 the same as ignorance, you have to work at it.”
Margaret Atwood, The Handmaid's Tale

Margaret Atwood
“Better never means better for everyone... It always means worse, for some.”
Margaret Atwood, The Handmaid鈥檚 Tale

Margaret Atwood
“Nothing changes instantaneously: in a gradually heating bathtub you'd be boiled to death before you knew it.”
Margaret Atwood, The Handmaid鈥檚 Tale

Margaret Atwood
“I believe in the resistance as I believe there can be no light without shadow; or rather, no shadow unless there is also light.”
Margaret Atwood, The Handmaid鈥檚 Tale

Margaret Atwood
“Nolite te bastardes carborundorum. Don't let the bastards grind you down.”
Margaret Atwood, The Handmaid鈥檚 Tale

Margaret Atwood
“As all historians know, the past is a great darkness, and filled with echoes.”
Margaret Atwood, The Handmaid鈥檚 Tale


Reading Progress

June 7, 2008 – Shelved
June 9, 2008 – Shelved as: scifi-future-speculative-fict
Started Reading
February 4, 2009 – Finished Reading
July 25, 2009 – Shelved as: dystopian-apocalyptic
August 9, 2009 – Shelved as: usa-and-canada
February 23, 2016 – Shelved as: god-religion-faith
March 20, 2024 – Shelved as: series-and-sequels

Comments Showing 1-44 of 44 (44 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Emma I was going to do my own review of this but I find I have no need, you have said everything :)


Cecily Thanks/sorry.

I feel I can't take all the credit though because I reread it for a (欧宝娱乐) book group, so analysed it more thoroughly than previously and bounced ideas off others.


Will Byrnes I loved the telling details in your review.

A recent book, When She Woke, combines THT with The Scarlet Letter to create a modern take on women in society.


switterbug (Betsey) Wonderful review, Cecily. I, too, loved this book.


Cecily Sounds interesting; thanks, Will.


Gary  the Bookworm It's always reassuring when a book from our past turns out better than we remembered it.


Joselito Honestly and Brilliantly Has this been made into a movie?


message 8: by Cecily (last edited May 18, 2014 11:03AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Cecily Joselito Honestly wrote: "Has this been made into a movie?"

Yes, more than 20 years ago. Here is its IMDB page:

Many fans of the book dislike it, but it's so long ago that I saw the film (which was probably 10 years before my first reading of the book), that I can't make a meaningful comparison.

However, the screenplay was by Harold Pinter, and it starred Natasha Richardson, Faye Dunaway, Robert Duvall and Aidan Quinn.


Lewis Weinstein Thanks for a thoughtful review ... LEW ...


Suzanne Arcand What a great review! I always avoided reading this book but now I think that I will give it a chance.


Cecily Suzanne wrote: "What a great review! I always avoided reading this book but now I think that I will give it a chance."

I hope it justifies the chance, though that rather depends on why you were avoiding it and what changed your mind. Fingers crossed.


message 12: by Deirdre (new) - added it

Deirdre Bermingham You've inspired me to re read this book again - I may even finish it this time 'round.


Cecily I'm so glad, Deirdre. I just hope you enjoy it this time!


message 14: by Deirdre (new) - added it

Deirdre Bermingham Thanks Cecily. Its on my bedside table, so as soon as I'm finished my current read, I'll get stuck back in.


Kevin Ansbro As expected, you make some excellent points, Cecily.
I deliberately avoided reading reviews of this much-beatified novel, so as not to spoil my enjoyment.
Personally, I find your writing to be conspicuously better than the author's.
I really find the whole thing confusing and I perhaps need to lie down and have a rest.


Cecily Kevin wrote: "As expected, you make some excellent points, Cecily.
I deliberately avoided reading reviews of this much-beatified novel, so as not to spoil my enjoyment."


Thank you, Kevin, for liking this old review. It does at least have the advantage of (relative) brevity. I agree it's best not to read review shortly before embarking on a book, but I'm sorry that in this case, such caution wasn't sufficient for you to enjoy the book.


Kevin wrote: "I really find the whole thing confusing and I perhaps need to lie down and have a rest."
description


Carol Your review is thoughtful and articulate...as always, Cecily. The novel's suffocating world unnerved this old feminist.


Angela M Cecily, what a terrific review. I read this quite some time ago and you reminded what a great book this is . Thanks .


Adina (notifications back, log out, clear cache) "Truer than you want to think" Exactly! Interesting you mention a Tale of Two Cities as I was planning to make it one of my next reads. I will keep an eye on Madame Defarge.


Cecily Carol wrote: "Your review is thoughtful and articulate...as always, Cecily. The novel's suffocating world unnerved this old feminist."

Thanks, Carol. I fear that 18 months on, you may be even more unnerved.

(I can't have seen a notification for this, so didn't come here, so didn't see subsequent comments.)


Cecily Angela M wrote: "Cecily, what a terrific review. I read this quite some time ago and you reminded what a great book this is . Thanks ."

Thanks, Angela, and apologies for not seeing this earlier (see my comment to Carol). Many people are being reminded of its importance now, and a new film adaptation is imminent.


Cecily Lada Fleur wrote: "Tempting And the title invokes Chaucer I can't jelp it"

Yep. Good spot.


Cecily Adina wrote: ""Truer than you want to think" Exactly! Interesting you mention a Tale of Two Cities as I was planning to make it one of my next reads. I will keep an eye on Madame Defarge."

What a coincidence! That connection might warp your view of Dickens' novel a little but not too much, I hope.


William A book of testosterone gone mad ("madder", actually).

Thank you for the review!


Cecily William wrote: "A book of testosterone gone mad ("madder", actually).
Thank you for the review!"


A one-sentence review! Good stuff.


message 26: by Tara (new) - rated it 4 stars

Tara I may also have to reread this someday. I really liked your point that the book is 鈥淎 wonderful hybrid: a book that is eminently readable, but packed with fascinating and thought-provoking ideas and symbolism.鈥� Sums it up nicely! Terrific review.


Cecily Tara wrote: "I may also have to reread this someday. I really liked your point that the book is 鈥淎 wonderful hybrid: a book that is eminently readable, but packed with fascinating and thought-provoking ideas..."

I strongly recommend it, both because you've read some slightly dystopian books, and because it's so relevant now. If you haven't seen the TV adaptation, I recommend that, too. Series two is new territory, but still close to the spirit of the book.


message 28: by Tara (new) - rated it 4 stars

Tara Cecily wrote: "Tara wrote: "I may also have to reread this someday. I really liked your point that the book is 鈥淎 wonderful hybrid: a book that is eminently readable, but packed with fascinating and thought-provo..."

I did see the first season, and quite enjoyed it, but haven鈥檛 yet gotten around to watching season two. I鈥檝e heard mixed reviews for it, but since you say it鈥檚 close to the spirit of the book, I鈥檒l be sure to give it a try.


Cecily Tara wrote: "I did see the first season, and quite enjoyed it, but haven鈥檛 yet gotten around to watching season two. I鈥檝e heard mixed reviews for it, but since you say it鈥檚 close to the spirit of the book, I鈥檒l be sure to give it a try."

Eek. The responsibility! ;)
It's just my opinion. Early on in series two I had a few doubts about sticking with it, but I think it's got better and better since. I don't know what Atwood thinks about it, or to what extent she's been involved.


Lady An  鈽� Atwood isn't a good people. She wants the abortion law in Argentina, she didn't have to put her nose in the Legislation from another country. She have to put attention in her own country and business..


message 31: by Tara (new) - rated it 4 stars

Tara Cecily wrote: "Tara wrote: "I did see the first season, and quite enjoyed it, but haven鈥檛 yet gotten around to watching season two. I鈥檝e heard mixed reviews for it, but since you say it鈥檚 close to the spirit of t..."

Yep, the pressure鈥檚 on now :P

I鈥檒l let you know how it goes. It鈥檚 good to hear that it gets better as the season progresses...I felt the same way about the first season, and ended up very glad I stuck with that. Plus, I think Elisabeth Moss is a wonderful actress, so even if the story is slow at times, I鈥檒l enjoy watching her :)


Cecily Saga Nor茅n wrote: "Atwood isn't a good people. She wants the abortion law in Argentina, she didn't have to put her nose in the Legislation from another country. She have to put attention in her own country and business..."

I don't know the context in which Atwood expressed an opinion on legislation in Argentina. Given her fame, and her passion about women's issues, she may have been asked her opinion. But even if not, she's entitled to her opinion, as are you. The fact you disagree doesn't make her a bad person!


Cecily Tara wrote: "...I felt the same way about the first season, and ended up very glad I stuck with that. Plus, I think Elisabeth Moss is a wonderful actress..."

She's also a Scientologist, which puts an interesting slant on the role. (I don't know enough about Scientology to put much weight on that, but merely note the fact.)


message 34: by Whiskey (new) - added it

Whiskey Tango Great review.


Cecily Bishop wrote: "Great review."

Thanks. I'd firmly recommend it, but even if you haven't or won't read it, have a look at the TV adaptation. It's very dark, but very relevant.


message 36: by Ms. Smartarse (last edited Aug 14, 2018 12:27AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Ms. Smartarse Such a lovely and well-rounded review! In comparison mine seems so superficial. I need to read more.
Noted the suggestion for Fahrenheit 451, which has been idling on my shelf for a year now. :D


Cecily Ms. Smartarse wrote: "Such a lovely and well-rounded review! In comparison mine seems so superficial..."

Thanks, but yours isn't superficial. It's very different and more personal, but variety like that is why we write, read, and discuss reviews here.

Ms. Smartarse wrote: "Noted the suggestion for Fahrenheit 451, which has been idling on my shelf for a year now. :D"

Give it a go. It's brilliant.


message 38: by Alex (new)

Alex Hi Cecily, great review! A re-read! The book must be really fascinating then! I'm adding it to my ever growing TBR!


message 39: by PinkieBrown (new) - added it

PinkieBrown I鈥檝e been listening to a lot of atheist podcasts; which in part help the recently religiously deconverted to cope with the difficulties of losing their faith; fear of death is the primary one. It also deals with people鈥檚 beliefs; which they seem to find almost impossible to explain in any rational, evidence-based way. Yet those beliefs are the foundation of judgments which can affect others lives when they are politicised. The central problem (since people can believe what they want) is that belief is antithetical to skepticism and critical thinking; they do what they are told by those they choose to believe. Ironic when all the information is laid out before you.
I鈥檇 recommend Mockingbird by Walter Tevis as another book where people have stopped being curious and questioning, as a survival mechanism.


William Congratulations, Pinkie. The feeling of responsibility for all your actions and life, is more than matched by the sense of freedom and wonder.


Cecily Alex wrote: "Hi Cecily, great review! A re-read! The book must be really fascinating then! I'm adding it to my ever growing TBR!"

Thanks, Alex. It is a landmark book, despite (because of?) its age. Definitely worth reading.


Cecily PinkieBrown wrote: "I鈥檝e been listening to a lot of atheist podcasts; which in part help the recently religiously deconverted to cope with the difficulties of losing their faith; fear of death is the primary one...."

I'm glad you're finding them helpful. The inevitability of death is one thing we all share, and one subject all religions focus on in different ways.

I was raised religious, and earnestly tried to believe in my late teens and early twenties, but when I gave up, I was fortunate to be happy in my agnosticism, then atheism, but I know that's not the case for everyone.

PinkieBrown wrote: "Yet those beliefs are the foundation of judgments which can affect others lives when they are politicised...."

Yes, that's the danger Atwood portrays so well. Others can believe in whatever God(s) and rituals they like, but when their beliefs judge me, that's not good, and when that extends to legislation that limits my life, that's way worse.

PinkieBrown wrote: "I鈥檇 recommend Mockingbird by Walter Tevis ...."

Thanks, Pinkie.


Rebecca Read about the Laundries and Mother and Baby homes, wanted babies were kidnapped en masse by religious zealots, their mothers kept prisoner and forced to work as slaves, and then sold to rich American families, thousands of them, just a few decades ago

"what if the same thing happened somewhere else" is as far as the book goes as far as speculative fiction


Cecily Rebecca wrote: "Read about the Laundries and Mother and Baby homes..."

Terrible, wasn't it? And in living memory.

Rebecca wrote: "... "what if the same thing happened somewhere else" is as far as the book goes as far as speculative fiction"

I see it more as all the things in the book have happened, just not in the same place at the same time - that's where the "speculative" applies.


back to top