ŷ

Michael Finocchiaro's Reviews > Conversation in the Cathedral

Conversation in the Cathedral by Mario Vargas Llosa
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
48483884
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: fiction, favorites, classics, peruvian-20th-c, nobel-lit, post-modern

Mario Vargas Llosa's third book is a marvelously terrorising romp through Peru of the 50s and 60s and yet all told in a bar called La Cathedral in the space of a few hours over a couple of beers and several packets of cigarettes. The narration of the first chapter is particularly confusing with each sentence being associated with a different narrator and timeline with sometimes no contextual help as to where they fit. And yet, the reader is carried along on these rapidly moving words as on a whitewater raft. The second chapter and fourth chapters are slightly more linear whereas the third chapter describes a coup kind of like in chapter one with events and actors changing every other sentence. At the heart of all of this are the aristocrat and friend of the Odria regime Don "Gold Ball" Fermin, his son "Skinnny" "Superbrain" Santiago, Don Fermin's chauffeur (et plus si affinité) Ambroisio - these last two are the ones who are speaking in the present reminiscing the past in the bar. There is also a series of prostitutes - la Quetita and "La Musa" Hortensia, Ambrosio's true love Amelia, Santiago's brother "Sparky", his sister "Teté", his brother-in-law "Popeye" - the names are all quite confusing. And who could forget Don Cayo "Shithead" Bermudez and his nefarious origin. The rise and fall of a regime, lovers quarrels in brothels, theater massacres...I could never work out who Lorenzo or Ludovico or some of the other drivers and henchmen were. And it was not clear to me who really killed Hortensia (don't worry, that's not a spoiler.)

If it sounds too heady, maybe read Feast of the Goat first as the narration is more straightforward.

In the same style, The Green House by Vargas Llosa is equally complex in narrative structure. Gaddis tried this kind of narration in several chapters of The Recognitions, but IMHO, he did not come close to pulling it off as successfully as Vargas Llosa!

In summary, a confusing but extremely well-written book about Peruvian politics seen through the lenses of the aristocracy and its detractors over beer - a fascinating book.

Note that some of the origins of this book were explained in MVL's autobiography, A Fish in the Water. This is really a fascinating read.

Fino's Mario Vargas Llosa Reviews:
Fiction
The Cubs and Other Stories (1959) TBR
The Time of the Hero (1963)
The Green House (1966)
Conversation in the Cathedral (1969)
Captain Pantoja and the Special Services (1973)
Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter (1977)
The War of the End of the World (1981)
The Real Life of Alejandro Mayta (1985)
Who Killed Palomino Molero? (1987)
The Storyteller (1989)
In Praise of the Stepmother (1990)
Death in the Andes (1996)
The Notebooks of Don Rigoberto (1998)
The Feast of the Goat (2001)
The Way to Paradise (2003)
The Bad Girl (2007)
The Dream of the Celt (2010)
The Discrete Hero (2015)
The Neighborhood (2018)
Harsh Times (2021) TBR

Non-Fiction
The Perpetual Orgy (1975)
A Fish Out of Water (1993)
Letters to a Young Novelist (1998)
142 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Conversation in the Cathedral.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

November 26, 2016 – Shelved as: to-read
November 26, 2016 – Shelved
February 23, 2017 – Started Reading
February 23, 2017 –
page 20
3.33%
February 25, 2017 –
page 74
12.31% "Hard to follow (makes my narration style look like Tom Sawyer) but fascinating"
February 25, 2017 –
page 126
20.97% "On a scale of 1-10 in terms of narrative simplicity vs complexity where Harry Potter would be a 1 and, say, Gravity's Rainbow by Pynchon or Ulysses by Joyce would be a 10, this book is probably an 11."
February 26, 2017 –
page 170
28.29%
February 26, 2017 –
page 207
34.44% "Intense"
February 26, 2017 –
page 255
42.43% "Narration in Ch 2 much easier than Ch 1. And still fabulous writing!"
February 26, 2017 –
page 304
50.58% "Can't put it down now!"
February 26, 2017 –
page 337
56.07%
February 26, 2017 –
page 405
67.39% "3.2 was very confusing, but then palace coups usually are..."
February 26, 2017 –
page 405
67.39%
March 1, 2017 – Finished Reading
March 20, 2017 – Shelved as: fiction
March 20, 2017 – Shelved as: favorites
March 20, 2017 – Shelved as: classics
March 20, 2017 – Shelved as: peruvian-20th-c
March 20, 2017 – Shelved as: nobel-lit
March 20, 2017 – Shelved as: post-modern

Comments Showing 1-5 of 5 (5 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Lea (new) - added it

Lea Davey Thanks Fino for the review it sounds interesting.


Michael Finocchiaro It was awesome Lea!


message 3: by Franziska (new)

Franziska Thanx. I’m currently reading the book and your review helped me understand the content a bit better.


message 4: by Federico (new)

Federico Steven Who killed Hortensia? (May be a spoiler) Ambrosio did. That is why, at the end of the first chapter, Santiago asks “Did my father send you?� Ambrosio reacts angrily. “Go to hell� (vayase a la mierda, niño in the original). In fact, the end of the first chapter is the end of the story, but as you rightly point out, you don’t have the context. It is Vargas Llosa most ambitious literary experiment. Good review!


Michael Finocchiaro Thank you Federico! I should have reread the first chapter again! I guess it is sort of like Infinite Jest or Gravity’s Rainbow in that respect


back to top