Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

BlackOxford's Reviews > Eclipse

Eclipse by John Banville
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
17744555
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: irish

Interrupting the Voice in Your Head

Self-improvement isn’t just an industry, it’s an ethos, arguably the most central in modern society. We owe it to ourselves as well as to society to realise our potential, to develop our talents, to discover our true selves. What could be more self-evident? But self-improvement requires, at some point or another, self-diagnosis. And therein lies a problem that is the subject of John Banville’s Eclipse.

Self-improvement is founded on an implicit and verifiable principle: There is no man without his other. The other is there even when one is entirely alone, especially when one is alone. There are always two selves involved, one who acts, thinks, feels and the other who reflects on acting, thinking, feeling. It’s called consciousness and it is an abiding enigma of being human. It also undermines the very principle of its own existence, and with that the prospects for self-improvement. The point of John Banville’s Eclipse is that neither one of the selves, the acting or the reflecting, knows the other very well. Alex, the protagonist is well aware of the problem. “I was an unknown�, he confesses,� unknown even to myself.�

And that situation isn’t helped at all by trying to mould, shape, fix, improve or otherwise transform one or other of the parts of oneself. Alex has spent most of his life as an actor in self-improvement of one type or another - diction, performance, carriage, dance. The result of course is that he has learned how to act, a worthwhile skill in itself but not if one thinks it makes a better person: “The self-made man has no solid ground to stand on,� he has come to realise. He suffers from "...an insupportable excess of self...a malady of selfness." How then to unravel oneself, this most profound of mysteries, if the mystery itself arises and is compounded from trying to manipulate, heal, improve or otherwise modify oneself?

This is where the idea of grace comes from: if either of the two parts of a person is going to change, that change will be initiated from somewhere or someone else - God perhaps, or another human being like a therapist or an unwanted houseguest, or an event as prosaic as children singing. Or, as most notably in Eclipse, an unexplained apparition, sometimes called a ghost.

Whatever it is and wherever it comes from, a ghost interrupts the conversation between self and self. Alex is at first confused about this ephemeral source of help: “So if the purpose of the appearance of this ghost is to dislocate me and keep me thrown off balance, am I indeed projecting it out of my own fancy, or does it come from some outside source? Both, somehow, it seems…� But he eventually understands the new rules of the game; something is real about the ghostly: “…they are not in my head, they are outside.� Ghosts, as Dickens knew, stop the flow of reality so that “The actual has taken on a tense tumbling quality.�

Eclipse for me has echoes of the Oxford Inklings, particularly of the lesser known Charles Williams. Wiliams's novels The Place of the Lion and The Greater Trumps employ similar devices and tropes to Banville to the same end: enlightenment, insight, authentic consciousness. Banville is a much better writer of English prose than Williams ever was. Nowhere in Williams will you find anything like the lovely, lilting, laconic Irishisms such as "The day is damp and fresh as a peeled stick." Nevertheless, the alternative ethos to self-improvement, namely self-abandonment, is something they largely share, and something needed in a world dominated by Trumpian self-will masquerading as morality.
70 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Eclipse.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

December 7, 2016 – Started Reading
December 7, 2016 – Shelved
December 8, 2016 – Finished Reading
December 27, 2016 – Shelved as: irish

Comments Showing 1-25 of 25 (25 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

David An Absolutely beautiful review. Thanks Michael.


BlackOxford And to you David.


message 3: by Fionnuala (last edited Feb 02, 2017 01:57AM) (new)

Fionnuala You always send me off on some google search or other, Michael. This time, it was the Inklings that caught my attention and they led me to Amanda McKittrick Ros (1860-1939) whose writings they considered so hilarious that they held competitions in their local pub, The Bird and Baby, or The Lamb and Flag opposite (possibly when they got thrown out of The Bird and Baby), to see who could read it aloud for longest without laughing. I imagine they'd have loved reading The Tay Bridge Disaster by Knight of the White Elephant William McGonnagall!
A sample from McKittrick's 'Visiting Westminster Abbey':
Holy Moses! Take a look!
Flesh decayed in every nook!
Some rare bits of brain lie here,
Mortal loads of beef and beer.

It's not unlike McGonnagall's mixture of the lofty and the low:
Oh! ill-fated Bridge of the Silv’ry Tay,
I must now conclude my lay
By telling the world fearlessly without the least dismay,
That your central girders would not have given way,
At least many sensible men do say,
Had they been supported on each side with buttresses�


You can blame this digression on the word Inklings..


BlackOxford Yes a very unusual woman indeed. The Donald Trump of 19th century literature in the sense that she was able to ignore criticism entirely, remaining oblivious to her unintentional humour, and just kept on truckin'. I have spent many lunchtimes in the Bird and Babe, less in the Lamb and Flag (which I think is owned by the C of E, hence the sign). Tolkein's daughter still comes to church at Blackfriars so the historical connections are still, if not fresh, at least maintained. I must thank you again: it is so satisfying to know that someone actually reads the stuff I scribble.


message 5: by Jean (new)

Jean Enjoyed your interesting review and also Fionnuala comments. I learn something every time I read one of your reviews.


BlackOxford Thanks Jean. I learn something every time I write one, and every time someone takes the time to comment. I hadn't thought of Ms Ros in decades for example until Fionnuala brought my failing memory wall crashing down! Oh the suffering. Holy Moses take a look...


Cecily I find your self-improvement lens fascinating. But do you think Alex wants grace? I fear he just wants peace, which is unlikely to be possible for him without grace as well.


BlackOxford Thanks Cecily. You are right. But it could be that in this case peace and grace are the same. Given Banville's background, I'm guessing there is some religious allusion here. I'm reminded of John's gospel where Jesus refers to his 'raising up' which, contrary to popular belief doesn't mean his resurrection but his raising up on the cross. At the precise moment of giving up the ghost (which can be translated as giving up to the ghost), he loses his self and thus the battle within himself that has been raging for some days. He receives 'hesed' the grace of repair. As I said: only a guess.


Cecily A religious allusion is entirely likely, but I never knew that interpretation of Jesus referring to his "raising up". Fascinating.


Cecily Thanks!


BlackOxford Cecily wrote: "A religious allusion is entirely likely, but I never knew that interpretation of Jesus referring to his "raising up". Fascinating."

The clue is in the verse following in John 12:32,33:
32 And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all people to myself.� 33 He said this to show the kind of death he was going to die.
'Lifting up' was a euphemism for crucifixion.


Cecily But why the need for a euphemism, I wonder? The NT descriptions of the actual crucifixion don't shy away from the horror of it.


BlackOxford Cecily wrote: "But why the need for a euphemism, I wonder? The NT descriptions of the actual crucifixion don't shy away from the horror of it."
Jesus is using it ironically, evidently not to avoid the term crucifixion but to allow the double entendre. Purely literary therefore.


Cecily Oh. Thanks. (I wish GR had a "like" button to acknowledge a comment when one doesn't have any worthwhile words to add.)


David Such an enjoyable review!!!


BlackOxford David wrote: "Such an enjoyable review!!!"

Thanks once again David.


BlackOxford Manuel wrote: "If I restrict my attention to things that are new or change and can react and think about them in an instant doesn't mean that previous experiences and thoughts do not exist except as fabrications ..."

Blame Jung. Thanks back.


message 18: by Nick (new)

Nick Grammos On the dangers of self examination, a psychiatrist once told me (socially) that depression was caused by too much focus on the self. That is now my focus when I'm at a low point.


BlackOxford Nick wrote: "On the dangers of self examination, a psychiatrist once told me (socially) that depression was caused by too much focus on the self. That is now my focus when I'm at a low point."

God help us all in quarantine. 40 days in lockdown does tend to grate.


Cecily Nick wrote: "On the dangers of self examination, a psychiatrist once told me (socially) that depression was caused by too much focus on the self..."

They may be right, and I understand it was a comment made socially, but it also sounds like the sort of statement that anyone prone to depression would take to mean they were selfish and to blame for their illness.


BlackOxford Cecily wrote: "Nick wrote: "On the dangers of self examination, a psychiatrist once told me (socially) that depression was caused by too much focus on the self..."

They may be right, and I understand it was a co..."


The self-referential character of thought is probably where all our psychological problems arise. Briefly: thinking too much can derive you mad.


message 22: by Nick (new)

Nick Grammos Not sure how to quote here, Cecily. I knew the comment would be controversial but the context was a contemporary internalisation of thought - the self turned inwards rather than looking to participate in social good. The psyciatrist was very socially minded. We turn away from caring for others end up tearing ourselves apart with self reflection and neuroses


Cecily BlackOxford wrote: "Briefly: thinking too much can derive you mad."

And too little thinking prevents one ever being wise. 😉

Nick wrote: "... the context was a contemporary internalisation of thought - the self turned inwards rather than looking to participate in social good...."

That makes more sense, and is less troubling, but I expect those inclined to depression might still take it the wrong way (not a criticism of your quoting it). I don't know what the solution would be.

Nick wrote: "Not sure how to quote here, Cecily..."

Easy in a browser (click Reply, beneath the relevant comment), but too much hassle on a phone app.


message 24: by Nick (last edited Apr 22, 2020 04:22AM) (new)

Nick Grammos Cecily wrote: "BlackOxford wrote: "Briefly: thinking too much can derive you mad."

And too little thinking prevents one ever being wise. 😉

Nick wrote: "... the context was a contemporary internalisation of thou..."

How good, I learned something. Thank you.

It would take a lot of wisdom to sort out the other matters.


BlackOxford Nick wrote: "Cecily wrote: "BlackOxford wrote: "Briefly: thinking too much can derive you mad."

And too little thinking prevents one ever being wise. 😉

Nick wrote: "... the context was a contemporary internal..."


I stand with Qoholeth on wisdom.


back to top