Trish's Reviews > Waltz With Bashir: A Lebanon War Story
Waltz With Bashir: A Lebanon War Story
by
by

Trish's review
bookshelves: art, classics, debut-author, film, foreign-affairs, government, gritty, history, horror, journalism, literature, nonfiction, one-for-the-ages, political-science, psychology, religion, social-science, totally-unexpected, true-crime, war
Apr 22, 2017
bookshelves: art, classics, debut-author, film, foreign-affairs, government, gritty, history, horror, journalism, literature, nonfiction, one-for-the-ages, political-science, psychology, religion, social-science, totally-unexpected, true-crime, war
The 2008 animated documentary of the same name by Ari Folman and David Polonsky took four years to complete. The frames of this graphic novel may have come from the film itself, and the sense of the film is uncannily captured without the sound or movement. Both book and film are so powerful I could not make it through in one sitting. A tremendous sense of anxiety and foreboding is generated by white/brown/black monochrome washed with an acid, chemical yellow, the slavering wild dogs, and the dissociative reality of war on a beach.
For anyone who hasn’t seen this film or read the graphic novel, I urge you to put aside anything else you have on your plates the minute you obtain a copy of either. It probably won’t take more than an evening to read/watch this remarkable act of witnessing, and you will remember it for the rest of your lives. Folman was a nineteen-year old recruit in the Israeli army when he was sent to Lebanon in 1982 to stop PLO rocket attacks and to retaliate for an assassination attempt on the life of Israeli ambassador to the United Kingdom.
At the time, many displaced Palestinians were living in refugee camps in southern Lebanon in permanent structures like houses. Their lives did not look temporary, but there was always agitation because their refugee status did not change. In Lebanon, the sectarian Christian leader (some might say crushed) the rights of Palestinians and Muslims, and shortly after he became president-elect in the 1982 presidential election in Lebanon, he was assassinated.
Gemayel’s party, the Christian Phalangists, took their revenge on two refugee camps, Sabra and Shatila. Israeli forces were slow to recognize and respond to an unfolding massacre. It appears they simply did not recognize the evil for what it was--it was too monstrous. The scars of those days left many men unable to understand what had actually happened in September 1982 and their role in it. Forman and Polonsky managed to show us that paralysis that comes over someone, even a group, when something bad is happening. The men protested up to their leaders, but not loudly, confidently, definitively enough. This phenomenon is not unknown. It may even have happened to us.
Much of the story is about the elusive nature of memory, and what scars the trauma of war leaves. The authors decided not to try and give voice to the other participants in this extraordinary event, but to just focus on the point of view of someone who was there but not directly implicated in the killing and who retained no memory of the time. We can forget these times of trauma, which is why the Holocaust is constantly referred to and memorialized. One must remember in order to forestall similar atrocities in the future.
The art in the film and the book is exceptional for its originality. The drawings are a certain kind of primitive and for that reason are all that we can project onto them. It may be the horror is something we bring because objectively speaking, until real photographs appear at the very end, events are only hinted at: we have the blank stares of the affected soldiers and the bizarrely horrible sudden deaths of soldiers playing on a beach—and this all from the point of view of what might be called the Israeli bystanders.
They were part of the army, and they had ordnance, but they had little passion for battle, the Israeli participants. The Palestinians and the Phalangists were locked in what became a battle to the death, giving and receiving no quarter. The whole record of the movie and the book should go down with oral histories of ancient battles not at all heroic but horrible and instructive and something forever to be avoided.
After making this film, Ari Folman said he no longer has interest in simply shooting actors in traditional filmmaking. There was something even more exciting to him about the art of David Polonsky, who tried using his non-dominant hand to draw so that the smoothness of caricatures did not distract from the roughness of the subject matter. Animation was a relatively new industry in Israel when they began, and since they had no infrastructure, they made decisions that more practiced and wealthier studios may not have made.
Both the film and the graphic novel are for grown-ups, or for people who want to be grown-ups.
For anyone who hasn’t seen this film or read the graphic novel, I urge you to put aside anything else you have on your plates the minute you obtain a copy of either. It probably won’t take more than an evening to read/watch this remarkable act of witnessing, and you will remember it for the rest of your lives. Folman was a nineteen-year old recruit in the Israeli army when he was sent to Lebanon in 1982 to stop PLO rocket attacks and to retaliate for an assassination attempt on the life of Israeli ambassador to the United Kingdom.
At the time, many displaced Palestinians were living in refugee camps in southern Lebanon in permanent structures like houses. Their lives did not look temporary, but there was always agitation because their refugee status did not change. In Lebanon, the sectarian Christian leader (some might say crushed) the rights of Palestinians and Muslims, and shortly after he became president-elect in the 1982 presidential election in Lebanon, he was assassinated.
Gemayel’s party, the Christian Phalangists, took their revenge on two refugee camps, Sabra and Shatila. Israeli forces were slow to recognize and respond to an unfolding massacre. It appears they simply did not recognize the evil for what it was--it was too monstrous. The scars of those days left many men unable to understand what had actually happened in September 1982 and their role in it. Forman and Polonsky managed to show us that paralysis that comes over someone, even a group, when something bad is happening. The men protested up to their leaders, but not loudly, confidently, definitively enough. This phenomenon is not unknown. It may even have happened to us.
Much of the story is about the elusive nature of memory, and what scars the trauma of war leaves. The authors decided not to try and give voice to the other participants in this extraordinary event, but to just focus on the point of view of someone who was there but not directly implicated in the killing and who retained no memory of the time. We can forget these times of trauma, which is why the Holocaust is constantly referred to and memorialized. One must remember in order to forestall similar atrocities in the future.
The art in the film and the book is exceptional for its originality. The drawings are a certain kind of primitive and for that reason are all that we can project onto them. It may be the horror is something we bring because objectively speaking, until real photographs appear at the very end, events are only hinted at: we have the blank stares of the affected soldiers and the bizarrely horrible sudden deaths of soldiers playing on a beach—and this all from the point of view of what might be called the Israeli bystanders.
They were part of the army, and they had ordnance, but they had little passion for battle, the Israeli participants. The Palestinians and the Phalangists were locked in what became a battle to the death, giving and receiving no quarter. The whole record of the movie and the book should go down with oral histories of ancient battles not at all heroic but horrible and instructive and something forever to be avoided.
After making this film, Ari Folman said he no longer has interest in simply shooting actors in traditional filmmaking. There was something even more exciting to him about the art of David Polonsky, who tried using his non-dominant hand to draw so that the smoothness of caricatures did not distract from the roughness of the subject matter. Animation was a relatively new industry in Israel when they began, and since they had no infrastructure, they made decisions that more practiced and wealthier studios may not have made.
Both the film and the graphic novel are for grown-ups, or for people who want to be grown-ups.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Waltz With Bashir.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
April 21, 2017
–
Started Reading
April 21, 2017
– Shelved
April 21, 2017
–
64.06%
"1982, Beirut. TV journalist Ben-Yishai shows up, walking down the main street with RPGs whizzing by. Civilians stood on their balconies watching the shelling as if it were a movie."
page
82
April 22, 2017
– Shelved as:
art
April 22, 2017
– Shelved as:
classics
April 22, 2017
– Shelved as:
debut-author
April 22, 2017
– Shelved as:
film
April 22, 2017
– Shelved as:
foreign-affairs
April 22, 2017
– Shelved as:
government
April 22, 2017
– Shelved as:
gritty
April 22, 2017
– Shelved as:
history
April 22, 2017
– Shelved as:
horror
April 22, 2017
– Shelved as:
journalism
April 22, 2017
– Shelved as:
literature
April 22, 2017
– Shelved as:
nonfiction
April 22, 2017
– Shelved as:
one-for-the-ages
April 22, 2017
– Shelved as:
political-science
April 22, 2017
– Shelved as:
psychology
April 22, 2017
– Shelved as:
religion
April 22, 2017
– Shelved as:
social-science
April 22, 2017
– Shelved as:
totally-unexpected
April 22, 2017
– Shelved as:
true-crime
April 22, 2017
– Shelved as:
war
April 22, 2017
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)
date
newest »


It is pretty much an exact replica of the movie, but there's something wonderful about seeing it as still images, b..."
Fatima, I am so grateful you recommended it to me. I had meant to get to it when it was given awards, but I never realized what the story was. This was huge in helping me to grasp some of the complexity of religious animosity in the region: I knew there were Christians there, but I didn't see how they fit in.
Gemayel sounds a little like the Turkish president Erdogan. He intends to create space for religious worship but ends up being repressive, even brutal.
Yes, this was something special. Thanks.
It is pretty much an exact replica of the movie, but there's something wonderful about seeing it as still images, beautiful and eerie snapshots. The images really are unforgettable with their dreariness and blank stares.
You wrote that the novel is about, "the elusive nature of memory." That's it, huh? That's why the POV character is perfect.
Did I mention I'm really happy you liked it? :-)