Clare Richardson's Reviews > Twilight
Twilight (The Twilight Saga, #1)
by
by

I hate this book. I will probably end up reading the rest of them, because if I don't, people that love this thing will think they can convert me if I just keep reading. (ETA (Jan. 2013): Never even remotely bothered to finish the series. I said that as a joke to begin with, and I did not finish the series. Did not finish them, not for irony's sake or for amusement's sake or as some kind of amulet to ward off kind-hearted Twimoms that would encourage me with "they get better!" I hope that clears that up for some folks that seem to have had a tough time with "I did not finish them." One last time for posterity: I can pretty much be defined as a Person That Would Be Caught Dead in a Dumpster Before Reading the Rest of These Damn Books. So long as we're all clear on that now, ONWARD!)
In short: the writing mechanics are atrocious. The dialogue is stilted and absolutely wretched. The characterization is bad-- loose, jumpy, and the progression is occasionally senseless. The main characters themselves are not compelling: selfish, shallow, lacking the deep thought that comes with true passion and love and instead leaping recklessly into stupid and deadly situations when anyone with a brain could see sixty other possibilities that should have been tried first.
I can't express my disgust for the relationship between Edward and Bella. It's not romance, it's not passion, it's not love. It's selfish idiocy at best. Bella as a character is insufferable: her self-sacrificing streak is not compassion, it's sheer stupidity. It's hormones. It's a bad, bad example for the teenage girls who read it. Bella's whole life is tied up in her boyfriend. She has no goals, passions, ambitions, or dreams besides wanting to be with Edward, who could kill her.
Edward's element of danger is occasionally compelling, but it's totally overshadowed by the fact that Bella is completely oblivious to it. She doesn't fear him at all, and that doesn't come off like love: once again, it comes off as total stupidity.
Edward. What can I say about Edward. There is nothing lovable about him except that he is apparently the most beautiful thing in existence. He's selfish: he stays near Bella when he knows he could lose control and kill her at any second. He's a creepy stalker: he watches her while she sleeps, before she even really knows him. He's volatile: his mood swings are insane and ridiculous. He's immature: for someone who's been alive for a hundred years, he doesn't seem to have gained much experience. He's controlling: he doesn't want to let her out of his sight for two seconds. (Granted, she's dumb enough to get herself killed if he does.) He's insulting: he treats Bella like an incapable, silly little girl. (Which he's right to, but I digress. It's still insulting.)
I understand that Bella's smell and that Bella herself are irresistible to him. But if he wanted the best for her, he'd stay away from her, period, the end. The story is stupid, the love story is bad, and if that's what Stephenie Meyer is preaching to teenage girls, I think it's pretty questionable. It's not just "a fun read". There are girls out there who want to be Bella and who want to find an Edward.
Anyway.
I think I might enjoy the story a lot more if Bella's head was not the one I had to spend time in while reading it. If I had to read one more description of how beautiful Edward is, I was going to choke a kitten. If it had focused more on the vampire family I would have been a lot more willing to forgive its faults. I thought Carlisle's and Alice's stories were really compelling, and Edward was finally accessible to me when he talked about Carlisle turning him into a vampire and how his family came to be formed, his life before Bella, etc. Some aspects of the vampirism were truly awesome: I found the idea that vampires can never sleep completely terrifying. That they never, ever get a break and never, ever get to rest... that is a wonderful and ghastly idea.
Entirely overshadowed by their flowery breath and the fact that they sparkle. Mothereffing ridiculous.
This is hardly the tip of the iceberg, but I'm trying to spare you at least a little.
In short: the writing mechanics are atrocious. The dialogue is stilted and absolutely wretched. The characterization is bad-- loose, jumpy, and the progression is occasionally senseless. The main characters themselves are not compelling: selfish, shallow, lacking the deep thought that comes with true passion and love and instead leaping recklessly into stupid and deadly situations when anyone with a brain could see sixty other possibilities that should have been tried first.
I can't express my disgust for the relationship between Edward and Bella. It's not romance, it's not passion, it's not love. It's selfish idiocy at best. Bella as a character is insufferable: her self-sacrificing streak is not compassion, it's sheer stupidity. It's hormones. It's a bad, bad example for the teenage girls who read it. Bella's whole life is tied up in her boyfriend. She has no goals, passions, ambitions, or dreams besides wanting to be with Edward, who could kill her.
Edward's element of danger is occasionally compelling, but it's totally overshadowed by the fact that Bella is completely oblivious to it. She doesn't fear him at all, and that doesn't come off like love: once again, it comes off as total stupidity.
Edward. What can I say about Edward. There is nothing lovable about him except that he is apparently the most beautiful thing in existence. He's selfish: he stays near Bella when he knows he could lose control and kill her at any second. He's a creepy stalker: he watches her while she sleeps, before she even really knows him. He's volatile: his mood swings are insane and ridiculous. He's immature: for someone who's been alive for a hundred years, he doesn't seem to have gained much experience. He's controlling: he doesn't want to let her out of his sight for two seconds. (Granted, she's dumb enough to get herself killed if he does.) He's insulting: he treats Bella like an incapable, silly little girl. (Which he's right to, but I digress. It's still insulting.)
I understand that Bella's smell and that Bella herself are irresistible to him. But if he wanted the best for her, he'd stay away from her, period, the end. The story is stupid, the love story is bad, and if that's what Stephenie Meyer is preaching to teenage girls, I think it's pretty questionable. It's not just "a fun read". There are girls out there who want to be Bella and who want to find an Edward.
Anyway.
I think I might enjoy the story a lot more if Bella's head was not the one I had to spend time in while reading it. If I had to read one more description of how beautiful Edward is, I was going to choke a kitten. If it had focused more on the vampire family I would have been a lot more willing to forgive its faults. I thought Carlisle's and Alice's stories were really compelling, and Edward was finally accessible to me when he talked about Carlisle turning him into a vampire and how his family came to be formed, his life before Bella, etc. Some aspects of the vampirism were truly awesome: I found the idea that vampires can never sleep completely terrifying. That they never, ever get a break and never, ever get to rest... that is a wonderful and ghastly idea.
Entirely overshadowed by their flowery breath and the fact that they sparkle. Mothereffing ridiculous.
This is hardly the tip of the iceberg, but I'm trying to spare you at least a little.
1687 likes · Like
�
flag
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Twilight.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Started Reading
April 1, 2008
–
Finished Reading
April 29, 2008
– Shelved
April 29, 2008
– Shelved as:
read-in-2008
Comments Showing 1-50 of 327 (327 new)
message 1:
by
C
(new)
May 01, 2008 03:01PM

reply
|
flag

I'm vaguely curious about if Edward will ever make Bella a vampire, but not enough to suffer through hundreds of pages of ridiculousness to find out.



Differences of opinion are a part of life; it doesn't mean we "take ourselves too seriously".
Have you enjoyed every single book you've ever read?



All that you said and more. Don't read the rest, life is too short.

Yuck! Poor role model for sure. That relationship was idiotic and I never saw any progression in character. Bella was not very interesting, just like she kept saying. So it must be a fulfilling fantasy for ordinary girls to think that some "perfect" man/monster will sweep them off their feet.
Yuck!

... and if I ever hear "dazzling" to describe anyone ever again, I might implode...
Appreciated your critique, made me laugh.




Yes, Edward wanted to kill her but he was a vimpere. Fantasy part of this world that Meyer created. So I wouldn't take so seriously. I like also the way that Meyer wrote this book - her style of writing. I didn't really want to put down this book and this is the most importing thing that you would like to achieve when you're a writer.
I agree that it could be wrong 'love model' for really young girls but then what about Harry Potter? His also a perfect boy and has supernatural power...
So in my opinion if you have distance to every fiction world it's good. But when you start to want to have everything like characters have in any book then it's just bad.


Monika said, "Yes, Edward wanted to kill her but he was a [vampire:]." Let's try that again. "Yes, Edward wanted to kill her but he was a murderer." "Yes Edward wanted to rape her but he was a rapist." Kind of weird right. Actually kind of totally f-ed up I think.

Unclench, y'all.

*quietly dying inside*


I am ashamed to share the same age group as some of the girls who gush over how hot and how sweet Edward is. He is a jerk who can't seem to grow up now matter how old he freaking gets.
And every time Bella describes his beauty using overly-fluffed words, or heck, anytime she SPEAKS makes me want to peel my skin off!
Agh, I really want to kick something.....

DONT BE A HATER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
there we go, thats about it, but seriously chelsey. ur review is just 9 paragraphs of hate! the part about 'reading just to back up how much u hate it', thats just retarded! i get u want an opinion, but still! if u hate it stop reading!!!!! i mean come on! duh!!!!!!! seriously!
watever, i dont get why im letting ur review bug me, i love twilight so i shouldnt be bothered by other peoples thoughts on it. its just infuriating!grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr...............



Love should never be placed in a restricting box and labled to be a certain way. People love differently. Thats the beauty of it. In the first chapter of New Moon, Bella states that she cannot believe how fortunate she is to have Edward of all people in her life. When Love is restricted it often goes to the extreme when it is finally released. I don't know the character Bella well enough but if she was intended to be the girl that never got a date or never had someone else to love in that way before, then that begins to justify her actions.
I agree however with the comment made about the descriptions of his 'beauty'. I read one chapter of New Moon online and I noticed how many descriptions there where.
When Stephenie Meyer chose the name for Edward she was thinking about Mr Rochester in Jane Eyre by Charelotte Bronte, which I am coincedently reading at the moment. Mr Rocheste tells Jane at one point in Chapter 27 that he wold love her even if she was as mad as Bertha:
"Jane, my little darling (so I will call you, for so you are), you
don't know what you are talking about; you misjudge me again: it is
not because she is mad I hate her. If you were mad, do you think I
should hate you?"
"I do indeed, sir."
"Then you are mistaken, and you know nothing about me, and nothing
about the sort of love of which I am capable. Every atom of your
flesh is as dear to me as my own: in pain and sickness it would
still be dear. Your mind is my treasure, and if it were broken, it
would be my treasure still: if you raved, my arms should confine
you, and not a strait waistcoat--your grasp, even in fury, would
have a charm for me: if you flew at me as wildly as that woman did
this morning, I should receive you in an embrace, at least as fond
as it would be restrictive. I should not shrink from you with
disgust as I did from her: in your quiet moments you should have no
watcher and no nurse but me; and I could hang over you with untiring
tenderness, though you gave me no smile in return; and never weary
of gazing into your eyes, though they had no longer a ray of
recognition for me.
Maybe this is exactly how Bella feels.



But enough of this, your review was excellent. Well-written and interesting (especially for sworn enemies of S. Meyer). Thanks for it! And sorry about my english... improvement in progress.


The only reason the character is empty was because Stephenie did that on purpose so you put your own personal traits into Bella. That way when you read it you feel like you are the character and you get more into the books.
Fist off, I would defiantly 100% recommend these books to young girls. It’s a great book, very well written about a strong 17 year old girl who falls in love. (Wow I didn’t know that a simple book could upset someone so much)
Secondly, I don’t know why it bothered you so much that she wanted to have sex, really, she was 19 years old that’s on adult, I think she should be allowed to do adult activities. Plus she was engaged to her boyfriend of 2 years and a virgin. Bella and Edward didn’t end up even sleeping together until they where married that’s more then most 16 year olds can say for them self’s. I think that’s a very good example of responsibility and self control (on Edward part especially). That teaches girls that it’s good to wait for the one you love.
As for, the relationship, between Edward and Bella. It was on of the most romantic love stories i have ever read, heard or seen. It was pure love and adoration; they both are will to risk everything including their own lives for each other. I think that is the most compassionate, selfless, loving things anyone could do for another human being. I have only met one couple like that I n my entire life and that’s my mother and father, they to meet when they were seventeen have me when they were nineteen , and look, they are still together. That’s a lot more then a lot of teens can say about their parents who have waited until they where In their twenties and thirties to get married and have a family.
Bella Swan, I don’t even know how to describe how well written she was. She is well, well just an ordinary girl who happens to find an amazing guy. What is so wrong about that? Just because you think everyone should be miserable dose not mean that because a make-believe character is happy you have to diss an entire series. Don’t you think it’s reasonable to too have your whole life tied up in your husband? She does have goals, did you read the books? Like one whole book her and Edward are look for collages. Goal? I think so. Passions, well how about her husband, daughter, best friend, and family, not those don’t seem like reasonable passions for a married woman! Not at all! Ambitions? Do you even know what ambitions are? Ambitions are an eager or strong desire to achieve something, is it just me or is Bella eager to marry Edward and have a strong desire to go be a vampire?, and dreams well I guess she doesn’t have any dreams even though the book talks about all her dreams! You put other than Edward but I don’t think she needs anything other then her family. Have you ever heard the saying “All you need is love�?
Edward, well yes he does have mood swings, but don’t you think you would too if you had to go through all that pain. (Read midnight sun and you will know what I mean) It is like shoving a red flaming hot metal bar down your throat every time she’s around. He loves her so much the goes through unbearable pain just to be with her. I think its romantic that he watches her sleep. Imagine if someone loved you so much that they thought watching you sleep was fascinating. I want to find my Edward.
I liked the story a lot and would never want to change one little bit of it. I do agree with you thought Carlisle’s and Alice’s stories are very compelling and they would make good main characters.
Last of all there is no reason in hell why, you, a little nobody with a sheer lack of creativity should be criticising a woman who is making billions of dollars on the books you are say are so horrible. Obviously they are not. So next time you want to criticise that much think, Stephenie Meyer-you-Stephenie Meyer-you.
Kay?
Thanks.

I am a writer myself and when I read Twilight I did not read it because I like fantasy and vampires but because I like to read books. I gave the book te judgment it deserved.
Yes, teir are things I do not like about the book but I have decided not to take sides and be a 'Twilight lover" or 'Twilight hater'
Instead I let others know what I thought of the book without sounding like a complete snob!


Some of the comments above from the fans are ridiculous, "very well written" You're kidding, right?


I wish I could have put all that into words that you did. Thank you for taking the time to do so.


The movie is even more of a joke


You claim the appeal of Edward is that he's a gorgeous dream-come-true, and then say that it's awesome how he doesn't care about Bella's looks...
do looks matter or don't they?