Nandakishore Mridula's Reviews > The Name of the Rose
The Name of the Rose
by
by

This is one humdinger of a book - medieval history, Gothic noir and classic whodunit rolled into one. It's very slow - but taking your time to read it slowly provides rich dividends, IMO. This is a book to be savoured.
Brother William of Baskerville - the name, as well as his appearance marks him as a sort of medieval Sherlock Holmes - is the detective par excellence, and Adso of Melk is the perfect Watson. The story unfolds in the fashion of the classic mystery. The secret, when it is revealed, is sufficiently shocking - and points a finger to a real historic puzzle.
A word of advice: please don't watch the movie before you read the book.
-----------------
PS: Umberto Eco incidentally passed away the day I originally posted this review. So let this be my tribute to a great writer.
Brother William of Baskerville - the name, as well as his appearance marks him as a sort of medieval Sherlock Holmes - is the detective par excellence, and Adso of Melk is the perfect Watson. The story unfolds in the fashion of the classic mystery. The secret, when it is revealed, is sufficiently shocking - and points a finger to a real historic puzzle.
A word of advice: please don't watch the movie before you read the book.
-----------------
PS: Umberto Eco incidentally passed away the day I originally posted this review. So let this be my tribute to a great writer.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
The Name of the Rose.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-22 of 22 (22 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Kavita
(new)
Feb 19, 2016 06:14AM

reply
|
flag


I also saw the movie before reading the book - but it was eminently forgettable. So the book was fresh (almost).

It is.
(view spoiler)

It is.
[spoilers removed]"
Fixed! :)


The book is infinitely more better, IMO.

Tremendous loss. :(


Don't see the film first. It concentrates more on the Gothic aspect, and ignores the fine historical nuances. The book, IMO, is much better.

Nandakishore is right about not seeing the movie first.
I feel sad this author is gone. I loved his books. Time for re-reads, I think.

A great loss to the intellectual sphere.


An irreparable loss.

I also loved it. :D

I'm currently reading this book, the telling of the story is fascinating, but I'm struggling with it due to my business with work. As much as I want to continue reading it, I feel like I'd be losing a lot if I'm not giving it my full attention. Any advice as to whether I should leave it for now or whether it gets less condensed later on?

I'm currently reading this book, the telling of the story is fascinating, but I'm struggling with it due to my business with work. As much as I want to continue reading it, I feel like I'd..."
You want to take this one really slowly, savour it, research the historical nuances - then only will you derive the full benefit.