ŷ

BlackOxford's Reviews > Oryx and Crake

Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
17744555
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: canadian

One Generation Away

I find it difficult to tell whether Atwood’s dystopian fantasies are meant as constructive social criticism or as sarcastic prophecy. Recent headlines suggest that her prophetic skills dominate, and with them her anticipatory sarcasm.

In the wake of the Harvey Weinstein scandal and the MeToo movement, for example, the British actress Joanna Lumley is reported to be fervently hoping that “not all men are bad� []. As Spencer Tracey said in the 1955 film, Inherit the Wind, when told by the trial judge in the Scopes monkey case that he hoped that Tracey wasn’t mocking the court, “Your Honor has every right to hope.� So, no Joanna, it’s hard to find a good one; but please go on hoping.

I think it’s fair to say that there is little hope for males in Oryx and Crake. Certainly not for the protagonists of Jimmy/Snowman nor the eponymous Crake who are both thoroughly misogynistic from puberty onwards. They humiliate females in their fascination with kiddie-porn and their fantasy of women as either saints or incompetents. But the oblique references to male oppressors goes far beyond the characters of the story. If I interpret Atwood correctly, she includes Adam Smith, Moses, Freud, Darwin, Gandhi, and perhaps even the genetic scientists Watson and Crick as symbols of a male-dominated corporatocracy.

And she’s undoubtedly right: The XY genetic make-up is clearly defective. After all how does one otherwise explain the recent tragedy in Toronto in which ten people were killed and another fifteen seriously injured []? This insane atrocity was carried out by a so-called ‘incel�, that is, an involuntarily celibate male. His murderous grievance was against women because they found him sexually unattractive. His considered strategy for revenge was random homicide by motor vehicle. One such nut-case would be embarrassing for man-kind; but it is reported that more than 40,000 men subscribe to a Facebook account which promotes an Incel Movement.

Atwood’s anticipation of the Incels is remarkable. Crake is a Jim Jones-type of scientific genius who is responsible for a world-wide genetic make-over. Part of the Crakian genetic re-design for humanity - thereby creating the ‘children of Crake� - is the ritualization of sexual activity so that males don’t feel bad when rejected by prospective female mates. Otherwise the world would continue to be plagued by �... the single man at the window, drinking himself into oblivion to the mournful strains of the tango. But such things could escalate into violence. Extreme emotions could be lethal. If I can’t have you nobody will, and so forth. Death could set in.�

As a solution, the losers in courtship rituals in Crake’s new world immediately lose all sexual desire - as well as their glowing blue penises - as soon as they receive the negative news. Men are pigs and are in need of fundamental reconstruction in other words - even by their own assessment.

Or more accurately, men are ‘pǴDzԲ� according to Atwood’s story-line. Pigoons are one of the many new species created by modern genetic ٱԲ�. In this case: of pigs and raccoons. Other varieties include rakunks, snats, wolvogs, bobkittens, spoat/ giders, and rabbits that glow with the genes of jellyfish. These invasive and predatory animals are mis-attributed as the ‘Children of Oryx�. This is another misogynistic swipe since Oryx is an Asian girl sold into slavery who becomes both a porn-star and Jimmy’s feminine muse (a dig at Jung?) whenever he has enough booze to stimulate alcoholic hallucinations.

One might think that Atwood’s literary reach might have exceeded her intellectual grasp in conceiving such strange creatures as pigoons. But in today’s news appears the astounding announcement that pigs� brains are now being kept alive outside their bodies []. The scientists involved (apparently all of them men) believe that it is possible to repeat this remarkable feat with any mammal. And that, therefore, inter-species splicing is indeed feasible. Human immortality, some believe, is at hand. The children of Crake indeed: �... human beings hope they can stick their souls into someone else, some new version of themselves, and live on forever.�

It is not just their genes that are questionable. Male minds are philosophically harmful in their rationalization of male power as beneficial in an Invisible Hand sort of way. The benign logic of competitive personal ambition - for advancement, for reputation, for wealth, for making the world better - is a mere excuse for power-seeking. The male mind is warped in its essential isolationism: “He [Jimmy] wanted to be himself, alone, unique, self-created and self-sufficient.�

The quest for power ensures only one thing: an increase in the destructiveness of power. Another way of saying the same thing: an increase in power requires exploitation - of the environment, of animals, and of other people, particularly of women. Someone or something always loses in the competitive hormonal struggle. “Crake made the Great Emptiness,� say the men.

The zero-sum game in the male-dominated world is enshrined by the children of Crake in its creational mythology:
“Crake made the bones of the Children of Crake out of the coral on the beach, and then he made their flesh out of a mango. But the Children of Oryx hatched out of an egg, a giant egg laid by Oryx herself. Actually she laid two eggs: one full of animals and birds and fish, and the other one full of words. But the egg full of words hatched first, and the Children of Crake had already been created by then, and they’d eaten up all the words because they were hungry, and so there were no words left over when the second egg hatched out. And that is why the animals can’t talk.�


Crake, in other words, not only eliminated sexual rivalry, he also destroyed the possibility of intelligent conversation. Even Jimmy, his disciple and quondam advertising copywriter, recognizes the profundity of the loss: ‘“Hang on to the words,� he tells himself. The odd words, the old words, the rare ones. Valance. Norn. Serendipity. Pibroch. Lubricious. When they’re gone out of his head, these words, they’ll be gone, everywhere, forever. As if they had never been.”�

Crake’s debasing of language is actually part of an ideology: “The whole world is now one vast uncontrolled experiment � the way it always was, Crake would have said � and the doctrine of unintended consequences is in full spate.� This ideology is, I think, the central theme of Oryx and Crake. It is an ideology of chaos, of irrational rationalistic inquiry and technological development, an ideology which conforms to the competitive, driven strangeness of masculine ‘nature�.

The latest headlines from California about Bill Cosby’s conviction make it difficult to disagree with Atwood at any point. [].
271 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Oryx and Crake.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

April 19, 2018 – Started Reading
April 19, 2018 – Shelved
April 26, 2018 – Shelved as: canadian
April 26, 2018 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-50 of 57 (57 new)


Monica Fantastic review!!!


BlackOxford Monica wrote: "Fantastic review!!!"

Thanks Monica. A prescient, wild book.


message 3: by Hanneke (last edited Apr 26, 2018 01:50PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Hanneke Wonderful review, Michael. You have to admire Margaret Atwood to create this world which doesn't feel that far away from our reality. Are you considering to read the two other novels in the series?


BlackOxford Hanneke wrote: "Wonderful review, Michael. You have to admire Margaret Atwood to create this world which doesn't feel that far away from our reality. Are you considering to read the two other novels in the series?"

Thanks Hanneke. Indeed, it seems a world just a generation away, as she says. I’ve got the other two volumes downloaded but I think I’ll recover a bit before continuing.


Hanneke The second book has quite an interesting story, I thought. No doubt you will enjoy it. But you are right, it is too much to read all three in a row.


BlackOxford Hanneke wrote: "The second book has quite an interesting story, I thought. No doubt you will enjoy it. But you are right, it is too much to read all three in a row."

🤢


BlackOxford Marita wrote: "Excellent review!"

Thank you, Marita.


message 8: by Jose (new) - added it

Jose Moa Great review that brings this book nearer in my seading schedule.


BlackOxford Jose wrote: "Great review that brings this book nearer in my seading schedule."

Thanks Jose. It's worth the effort.


message 10: by Mary (new) - rated it 5 stars

Mary Terrific review!


BlackOxford Mary wrote: "Terrific review!"

Thanks Mary.


message 12: by Fionnuala (new)

Fionnuala I'm grateful that there is no shortage of words in our world as yet - and that there are still many people who know how to use them well.
Thank you for this fine assemblage of meaningful words, B.


BlackOxford Fionnuala wrote: "I'm grateful that there is no shortage of words in our world as yet - and that there are still many people who know how to use them well.
Thank you for this fine assemblage of meaningful words, B."


Thank you, Fionnuala. The intention is, in however an insignificant way, compensatory.


H (no longer expecting notifications) Balikov Your review reflects Atwood's sexually dystopian visions, BO. I anticipate some kind of "parthenogenic" solution in the future.


BlackOxford HBalikov wrote: "Your review reflects Atwood's sexually dystopian visions, BO. I anticipate some kind of "parthenogenic" solution in the future."

I am informed that within the next 2 million years or so the XY condition will become extinct. Perhaps the world is improving after all.


BlackOxford Manuel wrote: "When evil is presented fiction-wise without the "moral" counterpoint (excepting the readers own reaction) of a character fighting against evil, then what difference is there between this and someth..."
I was completely unaware of the Turner Diaries before your post. I will check it out. But in any case your point is an interesting one. Clearly this type of fiction depends on an audience which recognizes its significance without explicit explanation. Perhaps because it articulates what is unconsciously present already - waiting as it were for recognition. This would reflect its prophetic character and demand an interpretation by the reader to be comprehensible at all.


message 17: by Anni (new)

Anni Back to patriarchal religion again: surely the male ego is vastly boosted by the idea of supposedly being created in God's image? Whereas, biologically speaking - the male is an adaptation of the female. We all start off as a female foetus, as proved by the fact that males have redundant nipples.


BlackOxford Anne wrote: "Back to patriarchal religion again: surely the male ego is vastly boosted by the idea of supposedly being created in God's image? Whereas, biologically speaking - the male is an adaptation of the f..."

Males as deformed females. Makes sense. Explains a great deal.


message 19: by Anni (new)

Anni But the world would be a much less interesting place with just one gender!


BlackOxford Anne wrote: "But the world would be a much less interesting place with just one gender!"

You’re right. I prefer a spectrum.


message 21: by Caterina (new) - added it

Caterina Ha! Enjoyed your own satirical and ironic review -- ironic in the sense that, being written by one of "those people" (the XYs) how can we trust it? How do we know you didn't just write this to get a bunch of "likes" from women? Far be it from me to reject your review ... :D Anyway I'd like to hope Atwood is hoping something constructive will come from her satirical prophetic writing.

Without necessarily buying into Atwood's construction of the sexes (genders?) I can definitely see her point, and you've made the book sound really interesting.


BlackOxford Caterina wrote: "Ha! Enjoyed your own satirical and ironic review -- ironic in the sense that, being written by one of "those people" (the XYs) how can we trust it? How do we know you didn't just write this to get ..."

Caterina, you twigged my masculine duplicity. 😇 I must say that judging solely from her writing, I don’t have a clue what Atwood’s politics are.


Cecily Anticipatory sarcasm, eh? Now there's a thought. You certainly make a persuasive case, though the details are a little vague in my mind (I've read it twice but neither recently).


BlackOxford Cecily wrote: "Anticipatory sarcasm, eh? Now there's a thought. You certainly make a persuasive case, though the details are a little vague in my mind (I've read it twice but neither recently)."

It might be her intention to keep things a bit vague about the details. Two more parts to go yet.


Cecily The second part is a parallel story, told in a very different way. I expect you'll enjoy the religious angle - even if only to take it apart. Sermons and hymns pepper the narrative.

The third felt unnecessary.


Hanneke Cecily is right about the third novel. In my opinion too it was unnecessary, but the ending was, in contrast, very optimistic and heart warming. But we are talking about some 5 pages!


BlackOxford Hanneke wrote: "Cecily is right about the third novel. In my opinion too it was unnecessary, but the ending was, in contrast, very optimistic and heart warming. But we are talking about some 5 pages!"

What? Optimism by Margaret Atwood? That alone intrigues me about the third book.


BlackOxford Cecily wrote: "The second part is a parallel story, told in a very different way. I expect you'll enjoy the religious angle - even if only to take it apart. Sermons and hymns pepper the narrative.

The third fel..."

Thanks for the warning Cecily. I shall steel myself.


message 29: by david (new)

david Very tough on men, Blackie. But perhaps, many of us deserve it.


BlackOxford david wrote: "Very tough on men, Blackie. But perhaps, many of us deserve it."

It’s not me, it’s Margaret. I just can’t see where she might have gone wrong. Certainly not based on the things I see reported. So although I’m not a big fan of self-hate, I really think there is an XY problem, a design flaw that the Big Guy or Evolution hadn’t really anticipated. Or perhaps he/she/it has and we won’t have to wait 2 million years for XY extinction.


message 31: by david (new)

david I don't know, Blackie, if the design flaw is unique to men. Possibly, the whole lot of us, men and women, are flawed and broken, an entire lifetime. Perhaps, some of us are more adept at masquerade than others. But I would not put all my shekels on the extinction of the xy. Maybe the xx and the xy are equally culpable and proportionately the same in their misdeeds. I see it, and most things, as a human problem, seldom unique to only one sex. If a man does not defend men, once in a while, who do we have left? And, it is very possible that not all men are bad, I think.


message 32: by MihaElla (new)

MihaElla << Once there was a mother monkey who had a philosophic turn of mind. This would make her forgetful and often inattentive to her baby whose name was Charles. Like many modern mothers, she just did not take enough care, distracted as she was by her thoughts. Nevertheless, she went through the routine as her mother had done before her, but not in the same spirit. She just hitched him on her back and absently scaled the palms. So there it was. And as she rummaged amongst the more midding nuts, revolving matters in her mind, baby just slipped off, with all his young life before him too.
On the way down, Charles, who also tended to brood, called up, 'Mother, why are we here?'
'We are here,' she observed, 'to hang on.' <<


BlackOxford david wrote: "I don't know, Blackie, if the design flaw is unique to men. Possibly, the whole lot of us, men and women, are flawed and broken, an entire lifetime. Perhaps, some of us are more adept at masquerade..."

Your honor has every right to hope. 🤪


BlackOxford Mihaella wrote: "<< Once there was a mother monkey who had a philosophic turn of mind. This would make her forgetful and often inattentive to her baby whose name was Charles. Like many modern mothers, she just did ..."

Remember the graffiti in the Men’s Room: ‘My Mother made me a homosexual.� Followed in a different handwriting by: ‘If I give her the wool will she make me one as well?


message 35: by MihaElla (new)

MihaElla Before my mind's eyes develops the film of Sigmund Freud saying that there is no hope for happiness [it cannot happen by the very nature of things] and all this is wish-fulfilments [hoping for happiness is hoping for impossible]. By observing thousands of human beings, getting deeper into their being, Freud realized that man/woman is made in such a way that has a built-in process of being miserable. At the most a human being can be in comfort, but never in ecstasy. At the most we can make life a little more convenient - through scientific technology, through social change, through better economy, and through other things - but humans will remain miserable all the same.
And the miracle is that everybody wants to be happy.


BlackOxford Mihaella wrote: "Before my mind's eyes develops the film of Sigmund Freud saying that there is no hope for happiness [it cannot happen by the very nature of things] and all this is wish-fulfilments [hoping for happ..."

I’m afraid that I am much more of a Jungian, Mihaella. Happiness is integration of opposites and their dissolution. Tomato, tomayto.


message 37: by MihaElla (new)

MihaElla I'm neither :-) or better said I am for the 'felix culpa' and the discipline of transcendence. I liked Carl Gustav Jung visionary theories [the fact of bisexuality, that no man is pure man and no woman is pure woman. In each man a woman exists, and in fact every man is searching for that woman somewhere outside. Same for woman. The problem is that after search is done, one starts immediately changing the man and the woman according to something that one also doesn't know what... The urge to change is for a real necessity: you try to change the other to fit some vague image inside yourself.. .]
So, Michael, I feel that the ultimate is certainly empty of all the meanings that you can imagine, all the meanings that you would like it to have [just like when two zeros meet] :-)


BlackOxford I think I agree. See: /review/show...


message 39: by MihaElla (new)

MihaElla Liked! :-)


Jocelyn Admittedly I am only 6 chapters in but I don't see how you get misogyny out of this novel.


BlackOxford Mihaella wrote: "Liked! :-)"

Thanks.


message 42: by BlackOxford (last edited Jun 04, 2018 12:47PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

BlackOxford Jocelyn wrote: "Admittedly I am only 6 chapters in but I don't see how you get misogyny out of this novel."

Oh wait. Margaret Atwood with an underlying theme of misogyny? How could that possibly be? Snowman and Crake are clearly virtuous men who consider women their equals. Well then again, perhaps not. 🤷‍♂�


Cecily Jocelyn wrote: "Admittedly I am only 6 chapters in but I don't see how you get misogyny out of this novel."

Some of Oryx's backstory is pretty troubling, and doesn't paint men in a good light.


BlackOxford Cecily wrote: "Jocelyn wrote: "Admittedly I am only 6 chapters in but I don't see how you get misogyny out of this novel."

Some of Oryx's backstory is pretty troubling, and doesn't paint men in a good light."

An understatement I think, Cecily.


message 45: by Lisa (new) - rated it 5 stars

Lisa Oh, you make me want to reread Oryx and Crake, Michael! Excellent review! I hope you go on to read The Year Of The Flood as well, andmy favourite (which apparently nobody else liked!): MaddAddam.


BlackOxford Manuel wrote: "Men: Fight, eat, make love and make money - or one can devote oneself to the arts or furthering the cause of liberalism..."

So femme don’t you think? 🤭


Paula K Brilliant review, Michael! Quite interesting.


Adina (notifications back, log out, clear cache) Excellent review and parallel between the novel and the news. Atwood sometimes scares me with her prophecies. I read an article and an interview about those Incels. we are living in crazy world.


BlackOxford Adina wrote: "Excellent review and parallel between the novel and the news. Atwood sometimes scares me with her prophecies. I read an article and an interview about those Incels. we are living in crazy world."

Thanks Adina. She is authentically prophetic, I agree. The incels are about as wacky as it gets. One wonders where things go from here.


Ms.pegasus Often, when I read one of your reviews, I wonder if we've read the same book -- that is to say, you go so much deeper and find so much that I've missed. That's the case with this book. The deep-seated misogyny you cite is yet another dark trajectory in our society that Atwood's prescience captures in this book. Fantastic review.
Pat


« previous 1
back to top