Lyndz's Reviews > Delirium
Delirium (Delirium, #1)
by
by

Around page 30(ish) there is a line in the book that I really could not get past and I nearly put the book down because of it. “His eyes are literally dancing with light, burning as though on fire.� This is what I pictured:

I am positive that eyeballs (literally) doing a cha-cha with light bulbs is not is not what Oliver meant to portray. I am also pretty sure, given the context, that this statement was not intended as hyperbole. Now see here, I am normally not a grammar stickler, but this lapse in judgment, I think calls for a public flogging of either the author or the editor. Possibly both.
Have I mentioned before that I really hate writing negative reviews? It is so much easier to rant and rave about how wonderful a book is, than it is to point out all the problems I had with it. Just saying.
The original concept of this book was at first compelling and interesting. The idea that love is a disease that has, in the near future, been cured. The fact that love has been classified as "the most deadly of deadly things" and that the government is sanctioning and actually requiring all citizens to undergo a lobotomy at the age of 18. After which they will be assigned a mate. The original concept is a bit incredible, but I am actually ok with “incredible� as long as it is portrayed in a believable way. And for the most part, it was. As the book progressed however, I kept finding undeniable parallels to Matched and Uglies.
I found Lena, our protagonist and narrator, mostly weak, annoying, and infuriating. For example, there is a point in the book where (view spoiler) At this point Lena actually compares herself to (paraphrased) ’the princesses in the fairytales � waiting for her prince to rescue her�. Sorry, but, that about induced vomiting. -And I mean that in the best possible way.
The narrative voice is flowing, steady, and easy to follow. It was just interesting enough to keep you reading to find out what happens next.
Believe it or not I actually really liked the ending. If there is a single redeeming virtue in Delirium, this is it. I am not sure if I liked the ending because (view spoiler) or more likely, because it seemed somewhat fitting with the whole Romeo and Juliet theme that the author kept hinting at. It was also marginally unexpected, which is always a good thing.
I have put the next book on hold at the library, I am not sure if I will read it or not at this point.
I can see how some people would really like this book, but it just wasn’t for me. I couldn’t possibly give it a higher rating than a 3.
If you are a fan of sappy teenage romance books you would probably enjoy Delirium.
EDIT: I want to add, because this review is getting so many “likes� that if you want to read something that is very good by Oliver; please check out Liesl and Po. It is stellar.
["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>

I am positive that eyeballs (literally) doing a cha-cha with light bulbs is not is not what Oliver meant to portray. I am also pretty sure, given the context, that this statement was not intended as hyperbole. Now see here, I am normally not a grammar stickler, but this lapse in judgment, I think calls for a public flogging of either the author or the editor. Possibly both.
Have I mentioned before that I really hate writing negative reviews? It is so much easier to rant and rave about how wonderful a book is, than it is to point out all the problems I had with it. Just saying.
The original concept of this book was at first compelling and interesting. The idea that love is a disease that has, in the near future, been cured. The fact that love has been classified as "the most deadly of deadly things" and that the government is sanctioning and actually requiring all citizens to undergo a lobotomy at the age of 18. After which they will be assigned a mate. The original concept is a bit incredible, but I am actually ok with “incredible� as long as it is portrayed in a believable way. And for the most part, it was. As the book progressed however, I kept finding undeniable parallels to Matched and Uglies.
I found Lena, our protagonist and narrator, mostly weak, annoying, and infuriating. For example, there is a point in the book where (view spoiler) At this point Lena actually compares herself to (paraphrased) ’the princesses in the fairytales � waiting for her prince to rescue her�. Sorry, but, that about induced vomiting. -And I mean that in the best possible way.
The narrative voice is flowing, steady, and easy to follow. It was just interesting enough to keep you reading to find out what happens next.
Believe it or not I actually really liked the ending. If there is a single redeeming virtue in Delirium, this is it. I am not sure if I liked the ending because (view spoiler) or more likely, because it seemed somewhat fitting with the whole Romeo and Juliet theme that the author kept hinting at. It was also marginally unexpected, which is always a good thing.
I have put the next book on hold at the library, I am not sure if I will read it or not at this point.
I can see how some people would really like this book, but it just wasn’t for me. I couldn’t possibly give it a higher rating than a 3.
If you are a fan of sappy teenage romance books you would probably enjoy Delirium.
EDIT: I want to add, because this review is getting so many “likes� that if you want to read something that is very good by Oliver; please check out Liesl and Po. It is stellar.

1285 likes · Like
�
flag
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Delirium.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
December 5, 2011
– Shelved
March 12, 2012
– Shelved as:
mypod-audiobook
April 26, 2012
–
Started Reading
April 26, 2012
–
5.67%
"Quote from book: “His eyes are literally dancing with light, burning as though on fire.�
I just about LITERALLY put down the book because of that line.
In a bad Spanish accent: “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.�"
page
25
I just about LITERALLY put down the book because of that line.
In a bad Spanish accent: “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.�"
April 30, 2012
–
Finished Reading
June 25, 2012
– Shelved as:
reviewed
Comments Showing 1-30 of 30 (30 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Jesus
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Apr 27, 2012 01:14PM

reply
|
flag



The ending was a bit predictable, but at the same time different enough that you still wanted to see exactly how it played out.





You would think they would! I mean, it IS their job after all.


i pictured flames in his pupils ehich i thought looked eally sexy!

/rant
Have to say, I've always found it far easier to criticize books than praise them--maybe just because I'm not a gushing type.








Glad I'm not the only one getting tired of the dystopian teen worlds where 16 is a magic number. In the New Zealand world of TV Almighty Johnsons aka Norse gods, 21 rules. Also, isn't there a chinese method that counts nine months gestation as an extra year? How about hex base 8? Just saying, calendar numbers seem arbitrary.



It was good overall. If you're looking for for a masterful piece of literature, you'll be disappointed. But if you want to satisfy a giddy craving for some teen dystopian romance, then this is the book for you.
Happy reading!

You are absolutely right about a "giddy craving". I'm beginning to believe that bubble-gum for the brain is a necessity, chewing that exercises (jaw) muscles for life sustainability i.e. eating, enjoyment i.e. talking. Cotton candy fluff that nourishes more than the body.
All I remember from the Twilight series is vampires twinkling. Maybe quantity is more important than quality? Serious (?) researcher says long books are good for growing brains. Linguistic anthropologist Shirley Brice Heath of Stanford University: "reading longer novels habituates the brain toward a greater capacity for sustained attention to visual material".