Anita Pomerantz's Reviews > Milkman
Milkman
by
by

The word that springs to mind upon finishing this book is torturous. There is no doubt that this book joins, if not tops, my list of top ten worst works of literary fiction. To be honest, there is an interesting novel in here somewhere, but the voice, the voice is just completely annoying and overshadows everything else in the book. It’s original. It’s just not original in a good way.
Let’s focus on the good for a moment. The central character, Middle Sister, is narrating the tale. Her character is well developed, and the novel has some astute observations on the dangers of false rumors and innuendo. And about fear. In addition, there are several sections about Middle Sister’s mother, and these are wittily rendered. A LOT happens in this book; characters lie, die, and cry; it should have been so much more interesting than it was. The plotline was completely overshadowed by the repetitious, oddly voiced storytelling.
The problem is that is just feels like one long, tedious story about people you don’t care about. It is very repetitive, and these repetitive sections have some poetic rhythms to them which I would have appreciated had they been in much smaller doses. Much, much smaller. Instead, it took me more than a week to read this relatively short novel, and I was seriously trying. I never DNF, but I came so close. The last 20% was an improvement, but not enough to endure the first 80%. All that being said, watch this one win . . .
UPDATE: And now, this book that I absolutely hated has won the 2018 Man Booker. *gag*
Let’s focus on the good for a moment. The central character, Middle Sister, is narrating the tale. Her character is well developed, and the novel has some astute observations on the dangers of false rumors and innuendo. And about fear. In addition, there are several sections about Middle Sister’s mother, and these are wittily rendered. A LOT happens in this book; characters lie, die, and cry; it should have been so much more interesting than it was. The plotline was completely overshadowed by the repetitious, oddly voiced storytelling.
The problem is that is just feels like one long, tedious story about people you don’t care about. It is very repetitive, and these repetitive sections have some poetic rhythms to them which I would have appreciated had they been in much smaller doses. Much, much smaller. Instead, it took me more than a week to read this relatively short novel, and I was seriously trying. I never DNF, but I came so close. The last 20% was an improvement, but not enough to endure the first 80%. All that being said, watch this one win . . .
UPDATE: And now, this book that I absolutely hated has won the 2018 Man Booker. *gag*
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Milkman.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
July 23, 2018
– Shelved as:
to-read
July 23, 2018
– Shelved
August 19, 2018
–
Started Reading
August 26, 2018
–
47.0%
"I feel like a child on a road trip; "are we there yet? are we there yet?" when we are only halfway there. Sigh."
August 28, 2018
–
67.0%
"Feels like a homework assignment I may never complete. This book will be in my top 10 most disliked works of literary fiction."
August 31, 2018
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-28 of 28 (28 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Susie
(new)
-
rated it 2 stars
Aug 31, 2018 01:32PM

reply
|
flag


Thanks for chiming in, Paul. I look forward to sharing my full review (hopefully next week), but I will confess that I really struggled to understand what made this book great. Maybe I didn't have the historical context to truly appreciate that aspect. The voice just overwhelmed everything for me.

So interesting. I did get a better feel for the style as the book progressed, but I never clicked with it (lol, obviously).

It will probably win now . . .you were smart to spread it out!

Fascinating to me . . .what did you love the most about it? Curious - - did you feel that it was suspenseful in a way that propelled you through the story?

You read it faster than I did, I believe, but I really felt in danger of a DNF every single page. I can't recall the last book I DNFed. I even finished The Pale King which was similarly torturous (and also would make my list of worst literary fiction; though I gave that two stars).

Don't say that Anita, that can't happen - please no! *panic mode*

I loved the inventiveness, the sense of time and place in what was a dark chapter in the UK which took place during my childhood, the distinct and so evocative voice, the absurdity and the originality.
And a narrator that walks while reading (i struggle to relate to people that don't do this) was a final bonus.
I think I was one of the first to review it and although I loved it I suggested in my review that I would completely understand people hating it, and really did not think it was for everyone. And I think that has proven so.
Although when 1 star reviews say the book reminds them of Proust I take that as backing my personal liking of the book.
I would not panic though, I would be surprised to see this short listed, let alone win. It seems an anomaly among the books chosen.

I loved the inventiveness, the sense of time and place in what was a dark chapter in the UK which..."
That's a great explanation. I probably can't relate to the time, place, and historical context which might have hurt my enjoyment to some extent. Also, it sounds as though you really liked the voice, and I do believe it's a voice guaranteed to generate polarized reactions. Clearly some people are loving it and others are not . . .it's hard for me to imagine someone feeling just ho-hum. I have not read Proust so can't say if I see that similarity, but it did remind me of Pynchon. A lot. Also, not my fave.

So glad you are loving it, Sunita! I guess that's truly what makes reading so so fascinating - - how a given work impacts different individuals. I spent the day at the National Book Festival (U.S.) yesterday, and it was amazing to see how reading brings us all together and yet also how very varied our tastes can be!
Honestly, I will not be one bit surprised if this gets shortlisted. I have seen many folks who absolutely were crazy about the book. I need to confess that I didn't care for The Sellout at all either, and that won. So not sure my personal preferences align with those of the judges. I was pleased with last year's selection I will admit.
It just astounds me though that people who all clearly like literary fiction very much differ so much on a book . . .so interesting . . .


Don't say that Anita, that can't happen - please no! *panic mode*"
Well, I feel like I haven't read the best of the list thus far so hopefully I'm wrong. I just worry because I've seen some books I really quite disliked end up winning in the past (The Sellout, Possession). But nothing held a candle to this one . . .

Don't say that Anita, that can't happen - please no! *panic mode*"
Well, I feel like I haven't read the..."
This is not going to be any consolation ... I ALSO had Flanagan and James down at the bottom of my rankings in the years they both won!! :-( So I am absolutely expecting Burns to walk away with the win!

Don't say that Anita, that can't happen - please no! *panic mode*"
Well, I feel like I ha..."
Doug, let me know the next time you hate one of the nominees. Because a) it probably will win and b) I'm not reading it no matter what.


Ha ha, I do think that is quite witty!! I love ice cream so not sure where I went wrong, but it is very unusual for me to feel soooo negatively about a piece of literature. Genre books, yes. Literary fiction, that's usually my sweet spot. I am sure I will calm down in a few days.
