Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Jane Stewart's Reviews > Alone

Alone by Lisa Gardner
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
3789528
's review

it was ok
bookshelves: mystery-suspense-thriller

I did not enjoy the characters, the plot, or the narrator. I wanted it to be over.

Gunshots are heard. Neighbors call the police who surround the house. Inside Jimmy is pointing a gun at his wife Catherine. Bobby is a sniper and member of the police SWAT team. He sees Jimmy’s face change, and he believes Jimmy will shoot, so Bobby shoots and kills Jimmy. Now Jimmy’s father James is suing Bobby. If James wins Bobby goes to jail. If James loses, he will repeatedly appeal because he is wealthy. He can afford to. The problem is that the city and union will not pay Bobby’s legal fees because James is filing suit through a clerk magistrate which is not the normal process. Bobby did what he was trained to do. If he didn’t shoot Jimmy, then he believed Jimmy would have killed Catherine. Now Bobby has to pay $5000 to a defense attorney. I was furious. Policemen should not be forced to pay their own legal feels for following orders and doing their job. I don’t know if this exists in real life, but if it does, then something is very wrong. This part of the plot made me so angry that I had a hard time enjoying the rest. This legal-issue-stress hangs over Bobby until the last few pages of the book.

Was the rest of the story good? Parts of it maybe. Catherine was kidnaped and raped by Richard when she was twelve. When her only child Nathan was born, Catherine had some mental problems and did not appear to be a good mother. The child has been raised by nannies. Nathan is frequently sick and the doctors don’t know why. Some fear it is Münchausen syndrome by proxy, which means the mother is purposely doing things to make the child sick to get attention for herself. For most of the book, the reader wonders if Catherine is good or bad for her son. James is also suing Catherine for custody of Nathan.

Richard has been in jail for twenty-five years. James uses his influence to get Richard released on parole. Someone is now paying Richard to murder people connected to Catherine or the case.

I did not enjoy the characters. I felt anxiety and depression rather than sympathy. I didn’t feel fun anticipation rooting for someone. We don’t know if Catherine is good or bad, but she’s not likeable. James and Richard are too one-dimensional, powerful, and evil. Bobby spends too much time suffering and second guessing himself, wondering if he did the right thing. He was having problems with the concept of killing someone. He talks to a psychiatrist several times about this as well as troubles from his early life. Some of this was ok, but it seemed a bit much. He also did some illogical and stupid things which made him less sympathetic. Regarding the plot, I had questions unanswered at the end. But maybe part of those were necessary. I understand Catherine has some kind of role in the sequel “Hide� which I have not read.

NARRATOR:
I did not like the narrator Anna Fields. The voice she used for Bobby and some of the men was so deep that it sounded like a mentally slow person who is groggy and slurring his words. Some of her general third party narration was too sharp and hurried, almost like she was reading a report and not thinking about what she was reading. When talking about a sniper she said “he breathed in, he breathed out.� That phrase should have been read slowly and calmly, yet the narrator’s voice was sharp, staccato, and fast.

DATA:
Unabridged audiobook reading time: 10 hrs and 12 mins. Swearing language: strong, including religious swear words. Sexual content: some references to sexual activity but no details shown. References include the rape of Catherine when she was 12. Setting: current day Boston, Massachusetts. Copyright: 2005. Genre: mystery suspense thriller. Ending: Good guys win.

OTHER BOOKS:
This is the first book in the D.D. Warren series. D.D. is a female cop. She has a small part in this book. In the sequels I believe she and Bobby work together as a team.
27 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Alone.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
March 19, 2012 – Shelved
March 19, 2012 – Shelved as: mystery-suspense-thriller
March 19, 2012 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-22 of 22 (22 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Hal (new)

Hal Evergreen I'm sorry you didn't like the narrator. I actually love Anna Fields. I like the southern drawl she often gives heroes.

I'm a bit confused by your synopsis, because you can't go to jail for losing a lawsuit. It sounds like Lisa Gardner should have done more research on the legal aspects of this book.


Jane Stewart This lawsuit was weird. The DA was investigating and would decide whether to charge Bobby with murder (for doing his sniper duty). But James, a judge, found a way to charge Bobby with murder through a civil process using a clerk magistrate which had nothing to do with the DA process. I don’t know if that exists. I’m still angry about it.

I don’t know if I’ve heard Anna Fields do something else, but boy was she off on this book - at least to me. Right now I’m listening to Lorelei King do Moon Called by P. Briggs. She is wonderful - especially when compared to Fields. I’m so impressed with her variety of voices. And she doesn’t make the male voices sound weird the way Fields did.

Thanks Hannah.


message 3: by Norma (new)

Norma Is Anna Fields the one who does the SEP books? I'm not familiar with her, but I know Carrie is a fan of hers. This book sounds weird. I'm all for poetic license, but the plot has to make sense. Sorry it was a bummer for you Jane.


message 4: by Hal (new)

Hal Evergreen What state is this book set in? I want to do some research.


message 5: by Norma (new)

Norma Hannah, at the end of the review Jane says it's set in current day Boston, Mass. I'm curious to hear what you discover. I've only read one book by this author, but I dont remember hearing that she wasn't good about her research. Maybe she just had a hard time getting her point across.


Jane Stewart I can’t believe you’re going to look into this Hannah. But wow, I’ll be interested in what you find. Thanks Ms eagle-eyes Norma for the location. For me, if a fictional story is enjoyable, I don’t mind errors in facts or getting things wrong like historical timing. But if the author did make this up, it’s such a horrible thought that it’s no fun. Of course, if it’s not made up, that makes it even worse.


message 7: by Norma (new)

Norma Jane, I've heard from others that her characters are often not likable. Have you read other books by her? I realize I've only tried a book by her but did not finish it. Hannah looking into this sounds like something you'd do Jane! I'm a little surprised you didn't research it when it bothered you this much. :)


Jane Stewart Who knows... Some things move me to research and spend time, others don’t. This author was recommended to me by someone I did not know who was talking to me at the hairdressers. I’ve got to remember not to trust strangers! My best source is Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ Friends. All others need to be looked at with skepticism. I was in a phase of trying different nonromance mystery authors. I’m done with that. Too many disappointments. I still may try some occasionally, but less than I’ve been doing recently.


message 9: by Norma (new)

Norma I've noticed you've been reading some mysteries lately. I used to read TONS of Patterson and Dean Koontz, but after a while there was nothing new. I think I prefer romantic suspense over general suspense because--when done well--there is more character development. I like the mystery/suspense aspect of it, but I also like getting to know people who I read about. I'm spending a good deal of time with them. I need to know them and like them (or sometimes want to see them come to justice) and feel like my investment in them was a worthy one.

Another reason I moved away from straight mystery is I feel like so many plots are based on violence against women. I hate reading about that. And it's often just gratuitous violence. Makes me sick.


message 10: by Jane (new) - rated it 2 stars

Jane Stewart Wow Norma. You make excellent points. I think what you are saying is why romance is the number one selling genre. I agree with you.


message 11: by Norma (new)

Norma I love talking books with you Jane. Someday I'm going to come to Chicago and have lunch with you. :) After I hit the lotto of course because then a day trip to another state to have lunch with a friend will be no big deal. :) We'll invite some other GR friends too (on my tab since I'm filty rich). It'll be fun.


message 12: by Jane (new) - rated it 2 stars

Jane Stewart What a nice thought. You're giving me goosebumps. I'm crossing my Lotto fingers for you!


message 13: by Norma (new)

Norma Well don't keep 'em crossed or you'll get a cramp. So far no matter how much I beg my husband to pick to winning numbers, we never seem to win. And yes, I hold him personally responsible. I dont think asking to win $300 million is too much to ask. :)


message 14: by Jane (new) - rated it 2 stars

Jane Stewart LOL


message 15: by Baba (new)

Baba  Well, your review seems to be way better than the book, Jane! ^__^


message 16: by Jane (new) - rated it 2 stars

Jane Stewart Mmmmore LOL. Thanks Baba :)


Lynda Kelly I didn't notice a narrator unless I somehow missed something but like you I didn't like any of the peeople involeved. I packed it in at 66%. I just wasn't enjoying it in the least.


Lynda Kelly Apologies for spelling appallingly there-was rushing !!


message 19: by Jane (new) - rated it 2 stars

Jane Stewart Lynda wrote: "I didn't notice a narrator unless I somehow missed something but like you I didn't like any of the peeople involeved. I packed it in at 66%. I just wasn't enjoying it in the least."

I'm talking about the narrator of the Audiobook, not the physical book POV type narrator. Is that what you are referring to?

Hey, my fingers mess up all the time typing - no prob :)

Thanks for the comment - glad we agree.


Lynda Kelly Oh, got you ! I thought maybe she'd altered the style after adverse comments !! Never even occurred to me you were listening to it ! What a fool ! It's quite interesting that the story was no better whether read or heard, though !


message 21: by Cynthia (new)

Cynthia Nelson I actually loved this book, and it says it's Boston many, many times in the book. I don't think you were paying attention if you missed even that. I cannot stand audio books, but that's just me :) I like to be able to use my imagination. And this book has so many twists and turns it's so awesome!!!


Ellen  E Vanderstarre Why suffer through, if you did not like the story?


back to top