Madeleine's Reviews > A Void
A Void
by
by

Madeleine's review
bookshelves: head-in-the-clouds-nose-in-a-book, our-libeary, maybe-it-s-time-to-live, 2013, blogophilia
Jun 19, 2012
bookshelves: head-in-the-clouds-nose-in-a-book, our-libeary, maybe-it-s-time-to-live, 2013, blogophilia
Okay. Let's all take a second to appreciate that this was both written and translated without a single instance of the letter "e." You have to respect that kind of lipogrammic dedication on both the author's and translator's parts (translating the puns to be relevant in another language deserves additional kudos). Its effect on the dialogue, narrative and story itself is a wonder to behold in its own right.
This is a hard one to review because most of what I want to say would divulge too many spoilers and I just can't ruin something this good. Y'all need to experience this wonder firsthand to appreciate how mind-bogglingly fantabulous it is. Cop out? Perhaps. Cheap ploy to encourage even one other person to read this? Hell. Yes.
The back-cover blurb calls this "a metaphysical whodunnit"; Wikipedia posits that its total absence of the fifth letter acts as "a metaphor for the Jewish experience during the Second World War"; the author states in his postscript that this novel and its constraint were borne of a haphazard bet; I say that it is proof of how my life had no real meaning before my introduction to Georges Perec. And possibly that this is the book Pynchon would have written if he were a crazy-haired French dude (seriously, stop and take a gander at GP's photo on his profile page -- this is exactly the kind of book one ought to expect from a bloke who looks like the very personification of mad genius). His trademark paranoia, obscure allusions and hysterical-antics-hiding-a-deep-melancholy are all but oozing from these pages of another man's work.
In the first 24 pages alone, references are made to (among other things) various operas, international political figures, Warner Bros. cartoons, James Joyce, biblical parables, Franz Kafka, Monty Python, Malcolm Lowry, Moby Dick, Gone with the Wind and Virginia Woolf (specifically Orlando); the rest of the book is just about as schizophrenic and far-reaching as the allusions and parallels it invokes in just its first two chapters.
At the heart of this, underscoring the madcap detective story, is an unfolding revenge plot that, like Moby Dick, is thoroughly Shakespearean in its unrelenting quest for so-called justice, and is driven by a deep understanding of the extent that both self-preservation and familial, friendly and romantic love can all impel individuals to the same degree of action (or in-), much like The Bard so masterfully demonstrated so many centuries before. The rendering of Willy Shakes's "To Be, Or Not to Be" speech as "Living, or Not Living" is as inspired as the novel to its very end, where those left standing even extend some closure to the audience as the curtains fall.
It's worth nothing that the body count is downright nihilistic but the detours necessary to sidestep any use of "e" (as well as Perec's adeptly applied sense of humor in detailing God-awful tragedies, which is apparent just halfway through the novel's preface) as if the second vowel were a strategically placed turd create such finely tuned hilarity that I couldn't help but laugh when I should have been nursing a punch in the gut. I like my humor like I like my coffee (i.e.: almost too black to be palatable), so witnessing gallows humor used to an awe-inspiring extent was an unexpected bonus appealing specifically to my dark and demented tastes. That's not to say that the truly sad moments aren't drenched in heartache, because they do try to rip the reader's heart out through the most painful means necessary.
Whether this is novel is brilliantly insane or insanely brilliant, the ride is an absolutely incredible one that is brimming with breakneck twists and meticulous construction, both in its language and its plot. And it's made me absolutely certain that, if all of Perec's stuff is as tight and compelling and beautiful as this, I need to stuff my head with all of his works I can find. You should consider doing the same.
This is a hard one to review because most of what I want to say would divulge too many spoilers and I just can't ruin something this good. Y'all need to experience this wonder firsthand to appreciate how mind-bogglingly fantabulous it is. Cop out? Perhaps. Cheap ploy to encourage even one other person to read this? Hell. Yes.
The back-cover blurb calls this "a metaphysical whodunnit"; Wikipedia posits that its total absence of the fifth letter acts as "a metaphor for the Jewish experience during the Second World War"; the author states in his postscript that this novel and its constraint were borne of a haphazard bet; I say that it is proof of how my life had no real meaning before my introduction to Georges Perec. And possibly that this is the book Pynchon would have written if he were a crazy-haired French dude (seriously, stop and take a gander at GP's photo on his profile page -- this is exactly the kind of book one ought to expect from a bloke who looks like the very personification of mad genius). His trademark paranoia, obscure allusions and hysterical-antics-hiding-a-deep-melancholy are all but oozing from these pages of another man's work.
In the first 24 pages alone, references are made to (among other things) various operas, international political figures, Warner Bros. cartoons, James Joyce, biblical parables, Franz Kafka, Monty Python, Malcolm Lowry, Moby Dick, Gone with the Wind and Virginia Woolf (specifically Orlando); the rest of the book is just about as schizophrenic and far-reaching as the allusions and parallels it invokes in just its first two chapters.
At the heart of this, underscoring the madcap detective story, is an unfolding revenge plot that, like Moby Dick, is thoroughly Shakespearean in its unrelenting quest for so-called justice, and is driven by a deep understanding of the extent that both self-preservation and familial, friendly and romantic love can all impel individuals to the same degree of action (or in-), much like The Bard so masterfully demonstrated so many centuries before. The rendering of Willy Shakes's "To Be, Or Not to Be" speech as "Living, or Not Living" is as inspired as the novel to its very end, where those left standing even extend some closure to the audience as the curtains fall.
It's worth nothing that the body count is downright nihilistic but the detours necessary to sidestep any use of "e" (as well as Perec's adeptly applied sense of humor in detailing God-awful tragedies, which is apparent just halfway through the novel's preface) as if the second vowel were a strategically placed turd create such finely tuned hilarity that I couldn't help but laugh when I should have been nursing a punch in the gut. I like my humor like I like my coffee (i.e.: almost too black to be palatable), so witnessing gallows humor used to an awe-inspiring extent was an unexpected bonus appealing specifically to my dark and demented tastes. That's not to say that the truly sad moments aren't drenched in heartache, because they do try to rip the reader's heart out through the most painful means necessary.
Whether this is novel is brilliantly insane or insanely brilliant, the ride is an absolutely incredible one that is brimming with breakneck twists and meticulous construction, both in its language and its plot. And it's made me absolutely certain that, if all of Perec's stuff is as tight and compelling and beautiful as this, I need to stuff my head with all of his works I can find. You should consider doing the same.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
A Void.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
June 19, 2012
– Shelved
January 17, 2013
–
Started Reading
January 18, 2013
–
3.95%
"Go take a look at the photo on Georges Perec's author profile. This book is already as insane as Homeboy's hairdo. AND I LOVES THEM BOTH."
page
12
February 1, 2013
–
19.08%
"I'm still entirely sure if this is awesomely insane or insanely awesome."
page
58
February 18, 2013
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-20 of 20 (20 new)
date
newest »


I wanted to try that so badly but I am laaaazy.

Thanks for this terrific review! Off to procure

Thanks for this terrific review! Off to procure"
Thanks for the terrific comment! You're always the bee's knees, Mark.
Oh man, I loooooved that show so much. Hubs and I still get lost in the rabbit hole of its reruns. I do believe I recall that episode, which, if I'm right, I lifted a line from for one of the best ledes I ever cribbed during my too-short journalism career.
By the way! You're the one who likened this to 'Gadsby,' which is an informational nugget that I much appreciated when a minor character sharing that name popped up. :)


You were a jouro for a bit? Neato!!! Which paper/magazine?
There's a Gadsby character? Badass, again! These Oulipo folks were well versed in their medium :) In case you'd like a copy, here's a PDF for Gadsby:

If that's the case, I was waiting 'til your birthday bookening was over to send you a super-secret birthday package for fear of duplicates, sooooooo I can certainly include this gem in the box o' goodies that will be hurtling your way by the end of the week.

Aw, thanks so much! I seriously enjoyed the face off this book and just want to spread the word of its majesty to all who'd appreciate it.
It's truly awesome in so many ways.

MARK. YOU RULE SO IMPOSSIBLY EPICALLY. IN ALL THE POSSIBLE WAYS.

Allow me to assist, most excellent sir!
Behold:
I will happily add more if so desired.



I was so busy being distracted by how awesome you are that I totally missed the rest of your comment.
I've worked for three newspapers, all pretty hyper-local. Two were for the same Princeton-based outlet (The Princeton Packet), which served a small pocket of Central Jersey. One was a Gannett paper (they own USA Today) in South Jersey. I miss working for newspapers so freaking much but the industry is in such shambles that I couldn't stick around to watch something I love die.
These Oulipo folks were well versed in their medium :)
Oh man, tell me about it! One of the things for which I will always be grateful to ŷ is the way it's introduced me to genres and authors I would have never discovered on my own, like the wondrous beast that is Oulipo. So crazy good!

It IS mind-blowing! Like, most past-tense verbs? NOPE, CAN'T USE 'EM. "The"? HAHA, DREAM ON. Pretty much all forms of "to be"? OFF LIMITS. It takes a freaking master to make such an arduous effort look so seamless as a final product.

It's a truncation he does employ from time to time, just like characters getting cut off or stopping themselves at a convenient point in a word; for example, no one actually can come out and say "dead," like it's too awful or emotionally harrowing of a truth to be spoken of. To Perec's credit, he employs that shortcut (as well as replacing "-ed" endings with "-'d") rather infrequently for an almost-300-page book.

I'm glad you didn't try writing the whole review sans "e". It would have taken forever to do, and it might have fried whatever part of your brain that Infinite Jest hasn't already incinerated. The only justification I could see for it is that you'd still have been able to use some of the same great words and phrases (e.g., mind-bogglingly fantabulous, brilliant, brimming with twists, and lipogrammic).

Hehe, thank you so much!
I had originally wanted to try my hand at writing this review in Perec's no-e style but quickly realized that I am just not up for that kind of task. The whole taking-forever component just didn't appeal to me when I have two other reviews I want to get out of my head already. Though it's definitely a quiet-day project I'm considering for when my thesaurus needs some rigorous exercise. :)
It would have taken forever to do, and it might have fried whatever part of your brain that Infinite Jest hasn't already incinerated.
Ha! Yeah. That book just toyed with my emotions in ways fictional works probably shouldn't. Not that I minded all that much, honestly.

Jessica and I both did that!
I should add that the "To Be, or Not to Be" speech is just one of six highly identifiable works that get the sans-e treatment here. "The Raven" is reworked to especially wondrous results.