Joyzi's Reviews > The Giver
The Giver (The Giver, #1)
by
by

Joyzi's review
bookshelves: ya-books, own, classics, fiction, sci-fi, reviewed, disappointing-books, dystopia, political-intrigue, banned, author-was-possessed, don-t-judge-me, book-series, author-american, 100-books-tfg
Oct 20, 2008
bookshelves: ya-books, own, classics, fiction, sci-fi, reviewed, disappointing-books, dystopia, political-intrigue, banned, author-was-possessed, don-t-judge-me, book-series, author-american, 100-books-tfg
My Reaction After Reading This:
2 stars
Whoa?
Why?
Really?
SO FIRST OFF I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT I REALLY REALLY REALLY WANTED TO LIKE THIS BOOK SINCE MANY HUMAN BEINGS READ AND LOVE THIS BOOK AND MANY HAVE CONSIDERED THIS AS ONE OF THEIR FAVORITE BOOKS OF ALL TIME AND BEFORE I POSTED MY RATING I BROWSE THE RATINGS OF OTHER GR MEMBERS SO THAT I KNOW THAT I'M NOT THE ONLY ABNORMAL HUMAN BEING WHO DOESN'T THINK THAT THIS BOOK IS GOOD OR GREAT OR WHATEVER!!!
(*coughs* sorry I forgot to turn off the CAPSLOCK, I'm not shouting or anything *coughs* just please don't judge me *coughs* if you like the book, I respect you for that, but I really can't force myself into believing I like this book _(>.<)V)
Okay I'll try to explain what I don't like about it:
1. The book is boring.
2. The book is weird.
3. I don't feel any emotions at all towards the character.
4. I don't really understand the book.
5. I don't really understand the ending.
6. I don't really understand why this Utopia world should have no colors, no feelings and no music so that the people would live *coughs* decently.
7. I don't really understand why the children at age whatever should be given ribbons, what's the purpose of that?
8. I don't really understand why the characters should tell about their dreams to their parents.
9. I don't understand why Johnas has to take medications because he was having Stirrings. So stirrings for those who haven't read the book is somewhat closer to wet dreams.
10. I don't understand why the memories of war, loss etc. would make someone want to end his/her life or give up on life. I know that life is imperfect but it seems that the characters have no backbone, like idk I don't buy the logic of that one.
11. In short I don't really understand this at all!
If you're wondering whether I've read this one because it's a school requirement, the answer is NO. I buy this book because I've seen it on the list of best YA book here on Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ so many times. And if these book is bombarded with symbolism then please explain this to me(since I don't have brains for symbolism PEOPLE!), especially the ending (What the Fudge is that?) and I might change my rating, I repeat might.
2 stars
Whoa?
Why?
Really?
SO FIRST OFF I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT I REALLY REALLY REALLY WANTED TO LIKE THIS BOOK SINCE MANY HUMAN BEINGS READ AND LOVE THIS BOOK AND MANY HAVE CONSIDERED THIS AS ONE OF THEIR FAVORITE BOOKS OF ALL TIME AND BEFORE I POSTED MY RATING I BROWSE THE RATINGS OF OTHER GR MEMBERS SO THAT I KNOW THAT I'M NOT THE ONLY ABNORMAL HUMAN BEING WHO DOESN'T THINK THAT THIS BOOK IS GOOD OR GREAT OR WHATEVER!!!
(*coughs* sorry I forgot to turn off the CAPSLOCK, I'm not shouting or anything *coughs* just please don't judge me *coughs* if you like the book, I respect you for that, but I really can't force myself into believing I like this book _(>.<)V)
Okay I'll try to explain what I don't like about it:
1. The book is boring.
2. The book is weird.
3. I don't feel any emotions at all towards the character.
4. I don't really understand the book.
5. I don't really understand the ending.
6. I don't really understand why this Utopia world should have no colors, no feelings and no music so that the people would live *coughs* decently.
7. I don't really understand why the children at age whatever should be given ribbons, what's the purpose of that?
8. I don't really understand why the characters should tell about their dreams to their parents.
9. I don't understand why Johnas has to take medications because he was having Stirrings. So stirrings for those who haven't read the book is somewhat closer to wet dreams.
10. I don't understand why the memories of war, loss etc. would make someone want to end his/her life or give up on life. I know that life is imperfect but it seems that the characters have no backbone, like idk I don't buy the logic of that one.
11. In short I don't really understand this at all!
If you're wondering whether I've read this one because it's a school requirement, the answer is NO. I buy this book because I've seen it on the list of best YA book here on Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ so many times. And if these book is bombarded with symbolism then please explain this to me(since I don't have brains for symbolism PEOPLE!), especially the ending (What the Fudge is that?) and I might change my rating, I repeat might.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
The Giver.
Sign In ?
Reading Progress
October 20, 2008
– Shelved
September 18, 2010
– Shelved as:
ya-books
October 14, 2010
–
Started Reading
October 14, 2010
– Shelved as:
own
October 14, 2010
– Shelved as:
classics
October 14, 2010
– Shelved as:
fiction
October 14, 2010
– Shelved as:
sci-fi
November 8, 2010
–
47.6%
"Okay is this just me or this is really getting weirder and weirder"
page
99
November 9, 2010
– Shelved as:
reviewed
November 9, 2010
– Shelved as:
disappointing-books
November 9, 2010
–
Finished Reading
December 23, 2010
– Shelved as:
dystopia
December 23, 2010
– Shelved as:
political-intrigue
January 25, 2011
– Shelved as:
banned
February 2, 2011
– Shelved as:
author-was-possessed
February 2, 2011
– Shelved as:
don-t-judge-me
February 3, 2011
– Shelved as:
book-series
November 13, 2011
– Shelved as:
author-american
December 18, 2011
– Shelved as:
100-books-tfg
Comments Showing 1-50 of 111 (111 new)
message 1:
by
Fraffee
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Oct 31, 2010 08:35PM

reply
|
flag



Edit: Read KD's review.






I agree. Big let down.






1. The book is boring.
I agree Lowry could've made her prose livelier.
2. The book is weird.
It is, and for me that's part of its charm. For us living in the 21st century, Jonas' society is weird. But for them, it is *our* society which is weird!
3. I don't feel any emotions at all towards the character.
I agree I had limited emotional investment towards Jonas, only rooting for him near the end of the book. But I thought the book was concerned more about describing life in the Community as a whole, not just Jonas.
4. I don't really understand the book.
Maybe looking at it from a different perspective could help you? It's not a straightforward story where a hero fights the bad guys and saves the day. What if society was controlled so perfectly that hunger, discontentment, pain, and suffering had become obsolete? Imagine yourself as a member of the community. It's a stark contrast to the reality we have today. I think the reason why this book is popular is that it makes you think outside the box. And just thinking about the repercussions of such a Utopian society is enough to fill pages and pages of required book reports LOL.
5. I don't really understand the ending.
The ending took me by surprise. I agree it's not easy to understand. I had to mull about it for a while. It is beautiful, but frustrating! Stylistically, I understand why Lowry gave it that ending, but I still wish for more closure.
6. I don't really understand why this Utopia world should have no colors, no feelings and no music so that the people would live *coughs* decently.
The very things that bring us great happiness (LOVE, for example) also bring us great pain and sorrow. That is why it had to be done away with. I also wonder what color and music perception have to do with utopia, and the only thing that comes to mind is that Lowry chose it to show that the Community may be living in prosperity without pain, but their lives are incomplete and devoid of life. (Colors and music make me think of the word 'lively' -- my subjective interpretation).
7. I don't really understand why the children at age whatever should be given ribbons, what's the purpose of that?
The community is governed by rules each having their own purpose. I am not sure what symbolic meaning the ribbons have (they were unexplained, unlike the bikes at 9). Maybe it's one of the ways the community controls childhood.
8. I don't really understand why the characters should tell about their dreams to their parents.
That way the community and family members can spy on each other's private lives down to their subconscious desires, which manifest in dreams. There is no personal privacy (remember there are no locks either).
9. I don't understand why Johnas has to take medications because he was having Stirrings. So stirrings for those who haven't read the book is somewhat closer to wet dreams.
Sexuality in the Community is repressed. Remember family units are not even related by blood-- they are assigned. It means even married couples do not have intercourse. It makes sense if you think about how sex, one of life's greatest pleasures, also bring about the greatest pain if uncontrolled (rape, sexual abuse, inadequacy issues, etc.)
10. I don't understand why the memories of war, loss etc. would make someone want to end his/her life or give up on life. I know that life is imperfect but it seems that the characters have no backbone, like idk I don't buy the logic of that one.
People have been known to end their lives based on more mundane reasons such as failing in school (true story from my college years). I agree that Rosemary's 'release' seems surprising at first --she seems so weak-- until you realize what a 'perfect,' sheltered life she had until she became the Receiver. For me the worst of it is that she had to bear all this suffering by herself -- nobody else in the community save for the Giver could understand. It's probably enough to bring someone over the edge.
11. In short I don't really understand this at all
I agree it's complex for a YA book. It probably would've gone over my head if I read it when I was 10 years younger. I understand the accolades, but I don't think it's child-friendly. And it's not entertaining in the way most YA and genre books are. It's in a different league.







I understand the message it wants to give. I understand all of it. But I just don't see what's so special about this book. I've read other Utopian/Dystopian novels with similar themes, which were actually better. The plot was better worked out, the character's better exploited. So I just really don't see what's so special about this one (I know I've said it before, but I just really don't).
Maybe it was the fact that the book was so vague. Maybe people think when they've read a book that's a bit more difficult to understand, that it's immediately better, more ingenious or something. Maybe they feel like the book is cleverer because it's more difficult to find out it's meaning, and that it makes them cleverer as well.
I don't know, I just don't understand

6. I don't really understand why this Utopia world should have no colors, no feelings and no music so that the people would live *coughs* decently.
You know that all things all being controlled just to make their living a perfect one. Their world actually has colors like us, however, it's as if that the community is colorblind for they only perceive black and white. Just to make the community obey the rules, the choices have to be taken away from them. So instead of choosing different colors, they are just only opted to choose black and white. No confusion, no options, just one rule to be obeyed. And all the people there perceive black and white to obtain Sameness except for the receiver, for he/she will be the one who'll suffer the community shall.


I understand the message it wants to give. ..."
When I read this book, it was my very first look at a dystopian world. It was sort of my introduction to the dystopian universe. In that sense, even though the book is relatively vague and confusing, it is particularly a good read for those who are starting out and want to imagine a world that is so similar to their own yet so different.


I totally DISAGREES!
This story makes you think. And thinking is good.
@Joyzi: Why do you keep coughing anyway?
