欧宝娱乐

Cecily's Reviews > Flatland

Flatland by Edwin A. Abbott
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1199525
's review

liked it
bookshelves: maths, humour, politics, film-good-or-better-than-book

Imagine losing or gaining a spatial dimension

Living in a 3D world, my mind was pleasingly warped when I watched this 7-minute , explaining what a 4D ball would look like in 3D. I sent it to Apatt who likened it to And He Built a Crooked House, which in turn, reminded me of a book I鈥檇 heard of, Flatland.

Reading them one after the other was enjoyably challenging. This is a review, and star rating, of both.

And He Built a Crooked House, by Robert Heinlein

This is an early short story (1941) by a big name in sci-fi. It's about a 4D construction.

Quintus Teal is a young architect who thinks of a house as 鈥�a machine for living, a vital process, a live dynamic thing鈥�. His big idea is to use the fourth spatial dimension to 鈥�put an eight-room house on the land now occupied by a one-room house. Like a tesseract鈥�. He goes on to explain a lot of geometry, and I would have been bemused if I hadn鈥檛 already seen illustrations of what a tesseract, aka hypercube, would look like.

We鈥檙e all familiar with a and its net:


Then add a dimension for a and its net:


For more of an explanation, see video links at the end of this review.

Teal achieves his dream 鈥�by using strong girders and folding money鈥� and takes his friends, Mr and Mrs Bailey to see it.
鈥�That's the grand feature about a tesseract house, complete outside exposure for every room, yet every wall serves two rooms and an eight-room house requires only a one-room foundation.

But four dimensions don鈥檛 fit easily into a three dimensional world, and things become strange. Stranger than any staircases or buildings that drew.

Flatland, by Edwin A Abbott

About a 2D world and published in 1884.

This short book uses geometry as an analogy for a socio-political satire of Victorian attitudes to class and social mobility; gender (in)equality; biological determinism, evolution, and eugenics; religion and the supernatural. It probably works better for those with more knowledge of and interest in the period than I have. Fortunately, my edition had lots of notes, and Abbot included several illustrations.

The key concept is that in a two-dimensional world, a three-dimensional figure is observed as a cross-section. If it's moving, it is seen as a series of cross-sections, and can appear to appear and disappear out of nowhere.

In the first half, the narrator, A Square, explains the very hierarchical social system of the two-dimensional Flatland. The more sides a shape has, and the more regular it is, the higher up the scale it is. 鈥�Delicate females鈥� are are mere lines, 鈥�wholly devoid of brain-power, and have neither reflection, judgement, nor forethought, and hardly any memory鈥�, but Abbot himself was a priest and headmaster who believed in women鈥檚 education, including at university.

The second half has more of a story: 鈥�my initiation into the mysteries of Space鈥� and 鈥�the Gospel of Three Dimensions鈥�. A Square develops a theoretical and then practical understanding of other spatial dimensions. The trouble is, that鈥檚 unimaginable and heretical in Flatland.

The progression of understanding of different spatial dimensions is well explained, with a few illustrations: A square is 鈥�a Line of Lines鈥� and a sphere is 鈥�many Circles in one鈥�. However, Abbott鈥檚 love of initial capital letters was a little distracting, and in part of the second section the language becomes overly Biblical and deferential (thee, thou, My Lord etc).


Image: 鈥淭he Weeping Woman鈥�, in which 鈥淧icasso used cubist forms of fragmentation to depict the face in a series of angular planes鈥�. ()

Clearly explained information about 2D and 4D

To understand the fourth dimension, you need a firm grasp of the zeroth, first, second, and third dimensions. Unless you have a mathematical background, I strongly suggest you watch one or two of these videos before reading either story. I found it helpful to see the same ideas explained in slightly different ways.

鈥� The fourth dimension explained, via second and third, in six minutes, .

鈥� Hypercubes explained and illustrated, without sound, in five minutes, .

鈥� Five-minute TED animation, summarising the story of Flatland and explaining 2D and 4D, .

鈥� Animation of the story of Flatland, narrated by Carl Sagan, in four minutes, .

鈥� Animation of the story of Flatland, made in 1965, eleven minutes, .

鈥� Carl Sagan explains Flatland and goes on to the fourth dimension, in nine minutes, .

The two stories

鈥� You can read Flatland, free, in a variety of digital formats, on Gutenberg, .

鈥� You also can find the text of And He Built a Crooked House online.


Image: 鈥淢r Osborne, may I be excused? My brain is full.鈥� (The Far Side, by Gary Larson)

See also

鈥� If it鈥檚 all too much, there鈥檚 Norton Juster鈥檚 delightful picture book, The Dot and the Line, which I reviewed HERE. I included illustrations and a link to an Oscar-winning animation.

鈥� Malcolm wrote two short stories about very high-tech homes in The Martian Chronicles, which I reviewed HERE. Usher II is a subversive dystopian comedy that's also a tribute to Poe's Fall of the House of Usher. There Will Come Soft Rains starts off almost slapstick, but takes a very tragic turn.
108 likes ·  鈭� flag

Sign into 欧宝娱乐 to see if any of your friends have read Flatland.
Sign In 禄

Reading Progress

May 24, 2021 – Started Reading
May 24, 2021 – Shelved
May 24, 2021 – Shelved as: maths
May 24, 2021 – Finished Reading
May 30, 2021 – Shelved as: humour
May 30, 2021 – Shelved as: politics
April 22, 2023 – Shelved as: film-good-or-better-than-book

Comments Showing 1-26 of 26 (26 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Apatt Wonderful review Mrs! No assessment of Crooked House though? Still, love your analysis of Flatland. And the Far Side is always great!


Oblomov Excellent review, which took me too long to read because everything you mentioned had me pausing to do some rabid googling.


message 3: by Cecily (last edited May 30, 2021 10:42AM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Cecily Apatt wrote: "Wonderful review Mrs! No assessment of Crooked House though? Still, love your analysis of Flatland. And the Far Side is always great!"

Thanks, and the 3* applies to Crooked House as well as to Flatland, as I've now clarified in my review.


Cecily Swaroop wrote: "Cecily,
Wonderful and insightful review - so much to learn - thank you for sharing your notes and thoughts!"


Thanks, Swaroop, and yes, there is much to learn and - the bigger hurdle - understand. Quite a challenge, but I enjoyed it.


Cecily Oblomov wrote: "Excellent review, which took me too long to read because everything you mentioned had me pausing to do some rabid googling."

Ha ha, and the Googling is a large part of the fun. At least, it was for me, and I hope it was for you, too.


Oblomov Cecily wrote: "Ha ha, and the Googling is a large part of the fun. At least, it was for me, and I hope it was for you, too"

t'was, and I got my to-read list slightly more bloated with that Heinlein story, thank you :)


Cecily Oblomov wrote: "... I got my to-read list slightly more bloated with that Heinlein story..."

That's very short. On the other hand, it's not one you can read quickly. Or at least, I couldn't.


Denis That was a fantastic review. Wonderful.


H (no longer expecting notifications) Balikov Wow, Cecily........you delighted me with your insights.


Cecily Denis wrote: "That was a fantastic review. Wonderful."

Thanks, Denis. As you put it more succinctly, and with a bonus pun, in your Flatland review, it's all about perspective.


Cecily HBalikov wrote: "Wow, Cecily........you delighted me with your insights."

Thanks. People with a more mathematical background will probably quibble, but I think I got enough of the gist to enjoy them both.


Cecily bluewizard wrote: "very insightful review!!"

Thanks, and I hope you clicked one or two of the links: they're far more insightful and fun.


Sahil I always love your discerning reviews, and the further studies you've included. What I liked most about this book was how when it was published, in the 18th Century, several of the concepts mentioned in the book 鈥� both mathematical and societal, weren't particularly brought up in literature. I especially liked how he tried to fit in several social norms and built a complete society in his study of the 3-dimensional folks. A lot of the specifics about the culture (for example, the history regarding the banning of paint) were quite illuminating when it came to our own lives and the events in our society.


Cecily Sahil wrote: "I always love your discerning reviews, and the further studies you've included. What I liked most about this book was how when it was published, in the 18th Century, several of the concepts mentioned in the book 鈥� both mathematical and societal, weren't particularly brought up in literature..."

Thanks, and yes, Abbott was way ahead of his time. It's a book that those studying history, sociology, and politics should read, but I wonder if they do.


message 15: by Mir (new) - added it

Mir There's also Flatterland: Like Flatland Only More So, which I've not read.


Cecily Mir wrote: "There's also Flatterland: Like Flatland Only More So, which I've not read."

Thanks, I'm aware of it, but friends' reviews don't tempt me, and I've had enough geometry for a little while.


Adrian I didn鈥檛 rate Flatland highly when I first read it, but found I kept thinking about it (and still do) so I eventually upped it to five stars. One memorable thing is the women, swaying around and making noise so they don鈥檛 pierce the gentlemen. And the holy circles of course.

Your video on the fourth dimension was brilliant and equally stays in my mind - the being can see a sphere in a box just as we can see a circle in a square - amazing! Haven鈥檛 seen the tesseract one yet - I鈥檓 saving it for a rainy day.


Cecily Adrian wrote: "I didn鈥檛 rate Flatland highly when I first read it, but found I kept thinking about it (and still do) so I eventually upped it to five stars..."

I can relate to that. I didn't really enjoy it, especially not part one, but yes, it does burrow away and linger in one's mind, and it was clearly ahead of it's time in many ways.

Adrian wrote: "... Your video on the fourth dimension was brilliant and equally stays in my mind... Haven鈥檛 seen the tesseract one yet - I鈥檓 saving it for a rainy day"

I spent a lot of time, very enjoyably, watching videos, and posted those I thought most relevant, but I've since seen a couple of better ones on friends' reviews. Enjoy the tesseract one when it rains.


message 19: by Gaurav (new) - added it

Gaurav Great review, Cecily. The book seems to take a fresh narrative on socio-political issues, I have not read something like it. Looks intriguing, adding it. Thanks for sharing :)


Cecily Gaurav wrote: "Great review, Cecily. The book seems to take a fresh narrative on socio-political issues, I have not read something like it. Looks intriguing, adding it. Thanks for sharing :)"

It is a very unusual book. Maybe unique. Even though I thought the first part a little longer and more detailed than it needed to be, it's well worth reading. I hope you enjoy it, but I do advice reading a copy with notes and/or brushing up on your understanding of spatial dimensions. It explains itself quite well, but even so, it helps make the book more understandable and thus more enjoyable.


Tamar...playing hooky for a few hours today Ms. Cecily, my brain is full with work right now, but I loved this review and I'm going to do a little 鈥淧icasso鈥� myself while I pretend to expand space within the canvass of time I have, and enjoy all your links this afternoon馃槉 Thank you馃槉


Cecily Tamar...light at the end of the tunnel? wrote: "Ms. Cecily, my brain is full with work right now, but I loved this review and I'm going to do a little 鈥淧icasso鈥� myself while I pretend to expand space within the canvass of time I have, and enjoy your links this afternoon..."

LOL. Not too many tears, I hope. The videos are fun: a bit hard to grasp at first, but by watching several, I came to feel I had a useful and entertaining degree of understanding of dimensional geometry.


Tamar...playing hooky for a few hours today I am totally loving the links.....and will only then move on to the book!


Cecily Tamar...light at the end of the tunnel? wrote: "I am totally loving the links.....and will only then move on to the book!"

If you're not a mathematician, I think that's the best approach. Have fun!


Squib This review could be an introduction to a reprint of the book; it's very detailed.


Cecily Squib wrote: "This review could be an introduction to a reprint of the book; it's very detailed."

Brevity is never my strong point, and with this, I had to cast my net wider to understand it. If that helps other people, that's a bonus. Thanks for letting me know, Squib.


back to top