David Sasaki's Reviews > Around the World in Eighty Days
Around the World in Eighty Days
by
by

Whether or not you've read the novel or watched the movie, Jules Verne's
is so embedded in Western culture that just about everyone knows the basic plot premise: wealthy and reticent Englishman Phileas Fogg makes gentlemanly bet with his chums that he can travel around the world in 80 days and then sets off with his temperamental French servant to do just that.
The idea for the story from the actual journey of eccentric Bostonian . (Who liked to refer to himself as "Citizen Train" - check out the .)
What I hadn't expected of Verne's novel is that it is such a blatant reminder of how far we've come in the last 135 years since colonialist superiority was treated as unquestioned fact:
"The steamer passed along near the shores, but the savage Papuans, who are in the lowest scale of humanity, but are not, as has been asserted, cannibals, did not make their appearance."
Similar descriptions applied to Punjabis, Chinese, and Native Americans are littered throughout the book. It's also clear that, at the time of writing the novel, Verne was an . Not only is the book a celebration of the British empire at its peak, but Verne is constantly praising Fogg's alleged English qualities (honor, stoicism, courage) and jabbing at his servent Passepartout's Frenchness (temperamental, impetuous, chatty).
What I found fascinating about Around the World in 80 Days has nothing to do with the book itself, but rather how Jules Verne wrote it. When he was a young boy, , he ran away from home and attempted to sail out to sea to follow the adventures of . Having failed, he promised his mother that "henceforth I will travel only in dream." For the rest of his writing career Verne rarely traveled. Rather he would surround himself with books and research the landscapes of his novels without ever setting foot there himself.
In the , Jules Verne might be what you consider an OG bridgeblogger. If you have even the most remote interest in African issues then you probably follow Ethan's blog. He is incredibly talented at consuming and digesting large volumes of information about a complicated topic and then presenting that information in an easy-to-follow narrative that doesn't simplify its complexity. But in all my years of following Ethan's blog I think he's only traveled to Africa for two short conference-related trips.
The obvious difference between Ethan and Jules (apart from the fact that Ethan is both nicer and more empathetic) is the number of research and communication tools that we now have at our disposal. Verne had his local library, letters, and the telegraph. Today, apart from being able to glimpse the front pages of hundreds of newspapers from around the world at the , we are also able to learn about the world around us in real time thanks to , , , , and . What's more, we can - and often do - develop real and meaningful friendships from our interactions on those sites.
Still, there is something about being on the ground, there in person, that allows you to soak in and understand new lands, cultures, and customs in a way that even the most advanced virtual worlds . I doubt that Ethan would be such an impassioned Africaphile were it not for . And , if he really wants to understand the Middle East, the best thing to do is move there. (Though would have been a brave gesture of sincerity.)
I do understand that increased international travel is neither good for our environment nor our budgets. But, done responsibly, it is good for humanity. The more we experience other cultures the more we understand about ourselves and our place in the world. Which is why I wholly support initiatives like Abby Falik's (which hopefully won't be bogged down by the bureaucracy, legacy, and politics of Peace Corps).
As notes in a , Verne's novel celebrated the technological advances of the industrial era. Thanks to the steam engine, railways, and global colonialism, it was possible for the first time to circumnavigate the globe in just 80 days. Today we're still at the dawn of a new era of technological advances: pervasive networked and structured data. These tools will lead to a new era of exploration. There are no longer new lands, tribes, and cities to discover. Just by starting up Google Earth we can cast our eyes on every hidden corner of the world. The curiosity that inspires exploration, however, remains. Something keeps traveling and dancing around the world and keeps daydreaming about his next trip to Guyana or Venezuela or Argentina. Something inspired to travel around the world in 800 days. But exploration today isn't about discovering the so-called undiscovered. It's about understanding what has been there all along.
The idea for the story from the actual journey of eccentric Bostonian . (Who liked to refer to himself as "Citizen Train" - check out the .)
What I hadn't expected of Verne's novel is that it is such a blatant reminder of how far we've come in the last 135 years since colonialist superiority was treated as unquestioned fact:
"The steamer passed along near the shores, but the savage Papuans, who are in the lowest scale of humanity, but are not, as has been asserted, cannibals, did not make their appearance."
Similar descriptions applied to Punjabis, Chinese, and Native Americans are littered throughout the book. It's also clear that, at the time of writing the novel, Verne was an . Not only is the book a celebration of the British empire at its peak, but Verne is constantly praising Fogg's alleged English qualities (honor, stoicism, courage) and jabbing at his servent Passepartout's Frenchness (temperamental, impetuous, chatty).
What I found fascinating about Around the World in 80 Days has nothing to do with the book itself, but rather how Jules Verne wrote it. When he was a young boy, , he ran away from home and attempted to sail out to sea to follow the adventures of . Having failed, he promised his mother that "henceforth I will travel only in dream." For the rest of his writing career Verne rarely traveled. Rather he would surround himself with books and research the landscapes of his novels without ever setting foot there himself.
In the , Jules Verne might be what you consider an OG bridgeblogger. If you have even the most remote interest in African issues then you probably follow Ethan's blog. He is incredibly talented at consuming and digesting large volumes of information about a complicated topic and then presenting that information in an easy-to-follow narrative that doesn't simplify its complexity. But in all my years of following Ethan's blog I think he's only traveled to Africa for two short conference-related trips.
The obvious difference between Ethan and Jules (apart from the fact that Ethan is both nicer and more empathetic) is the number of research and communication tools that we now have at our disposal. Verne had his local library, letters, and the telegraph. Today, apart from being able to glimpse the front pages of hundreds of newspapers from around the world at the , we are also able to learn about the world around us in real time thanks to , , , , and . What's more, we can - and often do - develop real and meaningful friendships from our interactions on those sites.
Still, there is something about being on the ground, there in person, that allows you to soak in and understand new lands, cultures, and customs in a way that even the most advanced virtual worlds . I doubt that Ethan would be such an impassioned Africaphile were it not for . And , if he really wants to understand the Middle East, the best thing to do is move there. (Though would have been a brave gesture of sincerity.)
I do understand that increased international travel is neither good for our environment nor our budgets. But, done responsibly, it is good for humanity. The more we experience other cultures the more we understand about ourselves and our place in the world. Which is why I wholly support initiatives like Abby Falik's (which hopefully won't be bogged down by the bureaucracy, legacy, and politics of Peace Corps).
As notes in a , Verne's novel celebrated the technological advances of the industrial era. Thanks to the steam engine, railways, and global colonialism, it was possible for the first time to circumnavigate the globe in just 80 days. Today we're still at the dawn of a new era of technological advances: pervasive networked and structured data. These tools will lead to a new era of exploration. There are no longer new lands, tribes, and cities to discover. Just by starting up Google Earth we can cast our eyes on every hidden corner of the world. The curiosity that inspires exploration, however, remains. Something keeps traveling and dancing around the world and keeps daydreaming about his next trip to Guyana or Venezuela or Argentina. Something inspired to travel around the world in 800 days. But exploration today isn't about discovering the so-called undiscovered. It's about understanding what has been there all along.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Around the World in Eighty Days.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Started Reading
January 3, 2009
–
Finished Reading
January 11, 2009
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-31 of 31 (31 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Melissa
(new)
Jan 12, 2009 01:05PM

reply
|
flag









- An article dedicated to debunking common Jules Verne myths by an authority on Verne and well-known translator of his works
Also,






Seen the movie havent read the book.
Predicting by the movie, I agree with everyone else. Its has a great story line to it??



I've been doing a lot of research later on various artists and goodreads has been one of the places I've been using to gauge reader's reaction to the books I was interested in.
Your reviews are very well written, I have to admit, I finally joined the site just to be able to keep up with my favorite reviewers (you being one of them. :-))
The only comment I have on this review is that Jules Verne was actually very well traveled. As soon as he became financially able to (he was forty years old then) he bought his own yacht. He owned a total of three throughout his life. He visited many places in Europe, North Africa, and even made it as far as Niagara Falls in the US.
Other than that little piece of info, I will only say again that I find your reviews very well written and fun. I like your website also. :-)

A book like this does not deserve 1 star because it fully acomplishes what he was intended for- he entertains its (many) readers and gives them an interesting picture of the world and the times the story takes place.
The characters are will described and the story has a satisfactory end, when everything is conveniently explained. I see no reason, therefore, to give a one star review to a book like this, especially when the reasons for disliking it (as demonstrated by your review) have little to do with the contents or the quality of the book, but much to do with the reviewer's political, philosophical or religious perspectives.
I do believe this kind of review [so to speak] should be DELETED, because it gives the impression the book is bad, when in fact it barely talks about the book itself.





Do yourself a favor and avoid historical fiction books. You have judged this book based on your sentiments, not on its quality.




Was the one that got me. Guess what we are still here you couldn’t delete us all. It hurts because while you are reading an enjoyable book sometimes it reaches out randomly and slaps you in the face randomly. People who who don’t have empathy for that, well, I don’t know. Guess they have have the same mentally and again, no empathy. I liked your review and appreciated the heads up of the more distasteful sentences. Always good to know in advance.