ŷ

David Sasaki's Reviews > Around the World in Eighty Days

Around the World in Eighty Days by Jules Verne
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
880021
's review

did not like it

Whether or not you've read the novel or watched the movie, Jules Verne's is so embedded in Western culture that just about everyone knows the basic plot premise: wealthy and reticent Englishman Phileas Fogg makes gentlemanly bet with his chums that he can travel around the world in 80 days and then sets off with his temperamental French servant to do just that.

The idea for the story from the actual journey of eccentric Bostonian . (Who liked to refer to himself as "Citizen Train" - check out the .)

What I hadn't expected of Verne's novel is that it is such a blatant reminder of how far we've come in the last 135 years since colonialist superiority was treated as unquestioned fact:

"The steamer passed along near the shores, but the savage Papuans, who are in the lowest scale of humanity, but are not, as has been asserted, cannibals, did not make their appearance."

Similar descriptions applied to Punjabis, Chinese, and Native Americans are littered throughout the book. It's also clear that, at the time of writing the novel, Verne was an . Not only is the book a celebration of the British empire at its peak, but Verne is constantly praising Fogg's alleged English qualities (honor, stoicism, courage) and jabbing at his servent Passepartout's Frenchness (temperamental, impetuous, chatty).

What I found fascinating about Around the World in 80 Days has nothing to do with the book itself, but rather how Jules Verne wrote it. When he was a young boy, , he ran away from home and attempted to sail out to sea to follow the adventures of . Having failed, he promised his mother that "henceforth I will travel only in dream." For the rest of his writing career Verne rarely traveled. Rather he would surround himself with books and research the landscapes of his novels without ever setting foot there himself.

In the , Jules Verne might be what you consider an OG bridgeblogger. If you have even the most remote interest in African issues then you probably follow Ethan's blog. He is incredibly talented at consuming and digesting large volumes of information about a complicated topic and then presenting that information in an easy-to-follow narrative that doesn't simplify its complexity. But in all my years of following Ethan's blog I think he's only traveled to Africa for two short conference-related trips.

The obvious difference between Ethan and Jules (apart from the fact that Ethan is both nicer and more empathetic) is the number of research and communication tools that we now have at our disposal. Verne had his local library, letters, and the telegraph. Today, apart from being able to glimpse the front pages of hundreds of newspapers from around the world at the , we are also able to learn about the world around us in real time thanks to , , , , and . What's more, we can - and often do - develop real and meaningful friendships from our interactions on those sites.

Still, there is something about being on the ground, there in person, that allows you to soak in and understand new lands, cultures, and customs in a way that even the most advanced virtual worlds . I doubt that Ethan would be such an impassioned Africaphile were it not for . And , if he really wants to understand the Middle East, the best thing to do is move there. (Though would have been a brave gesture of sincerity.)

I do understand that increased international travel is neither good for our environment nor our budgets. But, done responsibly, it is good for humanity. The more we experience other cultures the more we understand about ourselves and our place in the world. Which is why I wholly support initiatives like Abby Falik's (which hopefully won't be bogged down by the bureaucracy, legacy, and politics of Peace Corps).

As notes in a , Verne's novel celebrated the technological advances of the industrial era. Thanks to the steam engine, railways, and global colonialism, it was possible for the first time to circumnavigate the globe in just 80 days. Today we're still at the dawn of a new era of technological advances: pervasive networked and structured data. These tools will lead to a new era of exploration. There are no longer new lands, tribes, and cities to discover. Just by starting up Google Earth we can cast our eyes on every hidden corner of the world. The curiosity that inspires exploration, however, remains. Something keeps traveling and dancing around the world and keeps daydreaming about his next trip to Guyana or Venezuela or Argentina. Something inspired to travel around the world in 800 days. But exploration today isn't about discovering the so-called undiscovered. It's about understanding what has been there all along.
90 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Around the World in Eighty Days.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
January 3, 2009 – Finished Reading
January 11, 2009 – Shelved

Comments Showing 1-31 of 31 (31 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Melissa (new)

Melissa Mann David... I read through the review, mistakenly thinking another friend had posted, and was preparing to pass along OSO's blog in my response comment... DOH! Naturally, this would be a post by Oso. Wonderful review. Be well.


David Sasaki Thanks Melissa. Great to hear from you - and I've been digging your reviews. I hope that all is well.


message 3: by Niu (new) - rated it 5 stars

Niu This is a bad review. You use the premise that this book is colonialist; steeped in racist thinking etc. to give it one star. Yet all books are to be viewed in their historical and cultural context, if for example, a book from 19th century America used the then common n word, would you condemn it to a 1 star review as well?


David Sasaki No, you're mistaken. I think it's a poorly written book -- and it represents the colonialist views o the time.


message 5: by Tyler (last edited Dec 02, 2014 08:46AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Tyler I think you don't understand well written literature, if you only give this one star. I am curious to know what you think is great literature. Because I saw this book as very forward thinking and phenomenal. Did he use stereotypes? Of course, but so do we today when referring to cultures and races we do not understand. Is it always bad to view stereotypes? Maybe, but it is human nature, and we do the best we can. Verne's writing was outstanding and the plot was unexpected and great. He was leagues above the other writers of the day with the exception of Dumas. Sorry bro, maybe you're the one who hasn't really seen the world. I have traveled a great deal and understand cultures better than most. But to demean the book and the writer, I think it shows your limited viewpoint more than anything...


Eric Weisenhorn 1 star, really? I think you're hung up on the author and not the work. This review seems very critical of the period and the author and not so much about the literature. I agree that it is not what we would consider to be politically correct by today's standards but it wasn't written for today's readership. It is reminiscent of colonial England and their perspective of the world and its people. Its a wonderful adventure written during a time when the world was much less known than today. It has a fine collection of the ingredients for a whirlwind adventure; confident, unflappable protagonist, faithful sidekick, damsel in distress, daring-do, time is of the essence, and cleverness. I think your review is more of a rant than a review of the work. 1 star...pshaw.


message 7: by Shayla (new)

Shayla Huh, there are a ton of links to things not having a lot or anything at all to do with the book. Not sure why you gave it one star since you didn't talk about the book and its characters and plot much at all...


Samantha Why a one star? So you don't like Verne. Big deal. What about the book and the plot itself? Ironically, many characters in books coming out after this one, were based off Passepartout. As "stereotyped" as you calim he is, he was one of the best characters and one of the ones most sympathized with. His sense of wonder and curiosity at everything captures the whole essence of a true, appreciative world traveler. How about telling us how you really feel instead of advertising for all your buddies?


message 9: by Eric (new)

Eric I'm surprised to find such a poor review rise to the number 1 spot. I've decided to flag the review as inappropriate since it does not seem to have enough to do with the book itself.


message 10: by jj (new)

jj Contrary to popular belief, Jules Verne did not travel "only in his imagination". He owned a yacht, the Saint-Michel III, which he sailed to many places included through the Mediterranean and even reaching the United States.


- An article dedicated to debunking common Jules Verne myths by an authority on Verne and well-known translator of his works

Also,



message 11: by Emma (new) - rated it 5 stars

Emma If i may-- the author is French. So why criticize him for making Passepartout so 'chatty, et al...' And Fogg for being so perfect?


TheArtExperienceNYC Gavriel Maman In my opinion, this is a very cliched point of view, mixed with a sense of being a sort of "Social Justice Warrior". Jules Verne was not describing the work through his sight of colonial values, but rather describing the world as it was at the time. Much was not known about the Papuans, and he was not describing the Indonesians as a whole but rather a portion of the more savage of them. "English qualities", such as honor and courage also find themselves imbedded in the center of eastern cultures as well, and Verne very much pays respect to the cultures of the world. This review is a blatant form of commercialism, and no amount of fancy words in the review describe the book. Why not go after Victor Hugo, who shows his disdain for specific people of his culture? Or for Mark Twain? Why even the Greek writers themselves! Yes, this may be your opinion, but it is a poor one at that, and reflects no qualities of a person who sits to enjoy a book, rather one who sits to pick at what doesn't exist in it


message 13: by Steven (new)

Steven Well, I can totally understand why Vierne had a very racist view. However I don't care about it since his books are awesome.


Nancy What the heck is your review about? The book? Too bad Fogg didn't take a balloon and you were there with him. He could have filled the balloon with your pompous hot air!


Menion What a useless review! Instead of wasting all your time exalting the virtues of going to foreign lands and 'understanding' the people better, try concentrating on whether the book was good or bad.


Isabelle Stravens This book seems so cool!
Seen the movie havent read the book.
Predicting by the movie, I agree with everyone else. Its has a great story line to it??


message 17: by John (new) - added it

John Have not read the book yet. I agree with much in your essay about colonialism, the internet and racism.


message 18: by Paul (new) - rated it 5 stars

Paul Mares I sence a SJW... That book was meant for entertainment and entertain it did - as seen by it's popularity then and up to now


message 19: by Bianca (new)

Bianca Aguglia Hi David,

I've been doing a lot of research later on various artists and goodreads has been one of the places I've been using to gauge reader's reaction to the books I was interested in.

Your reviews are very well written, I have to admit, I finally joined the site just to be able to keep up with my favorite reviewers (you being one of them. :-))

The only comment I have on this review is that Jules Verne was actually very well traveled. As soon as he became financially able to (he was forty years old then) he bought his own yacht. He owned a total of three throughout his life. He visited many places in Europe, North Africa, and even made it as far as Niagara Falls in the US.

Other than that little piece of info, I will only say again that I find your reviews very well written and fun. I like your website also. :-)


Nisus Typically, one star reviews on anything are either from people who don't understand/know what they are reviewing or are just simply trolling.

A book like this does not deserve 1 star because it fully acomplishes what he was intended for- he entertains its (many) readers and gives them an interesting picture of the world and the times the story takes place.

The characters are will described and the story has a satisfactory end, when everything is conveniently explained. I see no reason, therefore, to give a one star review to a book like this, especially when the reasons for disliking it (as demonstrated by your review) have little to do with the contents or the quality of the book, but much to do with the reviewer's political, philosophical or religious perspectives.

I do believe this kind of review [so to speak] should be DELETED, because it gives the impression the book is bad, when in fact it barely talks about the book itself.


Nicolas Actually had the opposite impression. There are very few negative comments about other cultures in the book and you can often distinguish Verne's fascination for other cultures from Passepartout's intolerance and close-mindness (and yeah, let's put things back into context because Verne here is talking about worlds and cultures that aren't very well known at the time). His anglophilia is quite tamed by a permanent sense of irony. He's having a lot of fun with his character Fogg but never does he seem to embrace his way of life.


message 22: by Michelle (new) - added it

Michelle You poor thing. You must have read a rewrite or something. This doesn't describe the wonderful book by Jules Verne at all.


message 23: by Mery (new) - rated it 5 stars

Mery books like this are for intelligent people....


message 24: by Aman (new) - rated it 5 stars

Aman Jha I laughed when it read ' India is English soil',I was like Oh! Boy we have really come a long long way.


Lance Caselman What this reviewer criticizes is, in essence, Verne's inability to see Papuans et al. as anything other than savages. But Mr. Sasaki is guilty of the same sort of reductivism. Rather than understand Verne and his characters, he's just judged them to be bigots without attempting to understand them. Phileas Fogg and Passepartout are, to Mr. Sasaki, savages.


message 26: by ParisianIrish (last edited Aug 30, 2023 05:21AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

ParisianIrish Reviewing a book written in 1872 through the moral lens of today and picking bones about cultural cliches while getting hung up on the morals of someone from nearly 137 years ago screams of attention seeking.
Do yourself a favor and avoid historical fiction books. You have judged this book based on your sentiments, not on its quality.


Leyssandra Thanks for the interesting tidbit about George Francis Train! Though when I read the article I noticed his 67 days beat the previous record of one Nellie Bly. Who was this woman? After reading about her incredible life, she says that she was inspired to make her world record journey from this book! Wait... When was Train's journey then? This book is from 1872, and he completed his trip in 1890, so yeah, its actually the other way around! Thanks for opening up that rabbit hole though! Absolutely fascinating!


BoatsAgainstTheCurrent Lance's comment is fantastic and insightful. David gave a 1-star review to a classic because he views the world differently than people over 150 years ago did (shocker!). Other aspects of David's review (his weird lamentations about the pros and cons of modern international travel) make it clear he's not to be taken seriously


Randy Lowe what an inane, juvenile, and 'privileged' take on this. it's pulp entertainment from the 1800s for god's sake. It's an interesting and quirky artifact that's fun and dumb and a window back in time. It's not Mein Kampf! and its not meant to be Shakespeare either. Just stop reading anything outside of whatever political echo-chamber you're siloed in.


Eduard LMAO you got triggered! soy


Amelia Durham ““still infested by Indians and wild beasts�

Was the one that got me. Guess what we are still here you couldn’t delete us all. It hurts because while you are reading an enjoyable book sometimes it reaches out randomly and slaps you in the face randomly. People who who don’t have empathy for that, well, I don’t know. Guess they have have the same mentally and again, no empathy. I liked your review and appreciated the heads up of the more distasteful sentences. Always good to know in advance.


back to top