Cecily's Reviews > Bartleby the Scrivener
Bartleby the Scrivener
by
by

Cecily's review
bookshelves: kafka-and-kafkaesque, humour, unreliable-narrators, usa-and-canada, mental-health-victorian-madness, solitary-protagonist, short-stories-and-novellas, autism-maybe
Dec 18, 2021
bookshelves: kafka-and-kafkaesque, humour, unreliable-narrators, usa-and-canada, mental-health-victorian-madness, solitary-protagonist, short-stories-and-novellas, autism-maybe
Read 2 times. Last read June 5, 2022.
�Ah, happiness courts the light, so we deem the world is gay; but misery hides aloof, so we deem that misery there is none.�
� You know that colleague who doesn’t do their fair share, leaving you and others to pick up the slack?
� And the one who is too good at what they do and makes everyone else look bad?
� What about the alcoholic who doesn’t pull their weight after a daily liquid lunch?
� Or the inscrutable one who may be battling mental illness or other issues, but is nevertheless infuriating?
� How should management juggle compassion and fairness amid such diversity?
� How much carelessness, laziness, and insubordination should they tolerate?
This short novella about a small office, way back in 1853, is remarkably pertinent, decorated with some charmingly antiquated turns of phrase.
It is both funnier and more tragic than I expected.
The setup
The unnamed narrator is pushing sixty:
�I am one of those unambitious lawyers who never addresses a jury, or in any way draws down public applause; but in the cool tranquility of a snug retreat, do a snug business among rich men's bonds and mortgages and title-deeds�.
He employs two scriveners and an office boy, known by nicknames: Turkey, Nippers, and Ginger Nut. His grotty chambers are described with amusing understatement:
�My windows commanded an unobstructed view of a lofty brick wall, black by age and everlasting shade.�

Image: The view ()
He portrays himself as a benevolent, but ineffectual, boss: anyone else would long ago have fired Turkey for his “eccentricities�, thus, an additional scrivener is required:
�In answer to my advertisement, a motionless young man one morning, stood upon my office threshold, the door being open, for it was summer. I can see that figure now—pallidly neat, pitiably respectable, incurably forlorn! It was Bartleby.�
At first, Bartleby is very industrious. He’s also silent, pale, and mechanical. “On the third day� (such a weighted phrase), the boss asks Bartleby to do a minor task, within his duties:
�Bartleby in a singularly mild, firm voice, replied, ҵ would prefer not to.��
And he sticks to that.
WWYD?
� What would you do if you were the boss?
� How would you feel if you were Turkey, Nippers, and Ginger Nut?
� And why is Bartleby behaving this way?
The story progresses, with humour and tragedy, but very few answers. It’s brilliant.
�Up to a certain point the thought or sight of misery enlists our best affections; but, in certain special cases, beyond that point it does not.�
If Bartleby worked for me, I’m unsure what I would do. I’d certainly be curious, and I’d have sympathy for some of the revelations and assumptions about his life. However, I don’t think I’d be as lenient as the boss says he was.
It explores work, duty, charity, mental ill-health, fate and free will, and the power of the word “prefer�.

Image: Bartleby would prefer not to ()
Quotes
� “He was a man whom prosperity harmed.�
� “When a man is browbeaten in some unprecedented and violently unreasonable way, he begins to stagger in his own plainest faith. He begins, as it were, vaguely to surmise that, wonderful as it may be, all the justice and all the reason is on the other side.�
� “Nothing so aggravates an earnest person as a passive resistance.�
� “His cadaverously gentlemanly nonchalance.�
“His mildly cadaverous reply.�
� “But he answered not a word; like the last column of some ruined temple, he remained standing mute and solitary in the middle of the otherwise deserted room.�
� “‘You will Դdz?�
ҵ prefer Դdz.’�
See also
� You can read the novella free, online, on Gutenberg, .
� For a contemporary take on a similar situation and themes, see Jonas Karlsson’s The Room, and my review HERE.
� Gogol's The Overcoat. See my review HERE.
� Kafka in general, and a specific story of his. See my Kafka shelf HERE.
� Towards the end, I thought more of JL Borges. See my overview review of his works HERE.
Short story club
I reread this as one of the stories in The Art of the Short Story, by Dana Gioia, from which I'm aiming to read one story a week with The Short Story Club, starting 2 May 2022.
You can read this story .
You can join the group here.
� You know that colleague who doesn’t do their fair share, leaving you and others to pick up the slack?
� And the one who is too good at what they do and makes everyone else look bad?
� What about the alcoholic who doesn’t pull their weight after a daily liquid lunch?
� Or the inscrutable one who may be battling mental illness or other issues, but is nevertheless infuriating?
� How should management juggle compassion and fairness amid such diversity?
� How much carelessness, laziness, and insubordination should they tolerate?
This short novella about a small office, way back in 1853, is remarkably pertinent, decorated with some charmingly antiquated turns of phrase.
It is both funnier and more tragic than I expected.
The setup
The unnamed narrator is pushing sixty:
�I am one of those unambitious lawyers who never addresses a jury, or in any way draws down public applause; but in the cool tranquility of a snug retreat, do a snug business among rich men's bonds and mortgages and title-deeds�.
He employs two scriveners and an office boy, known by nicknames: Turkey, Nippers, and Ginger Nut. His grotty chambers are described with amusing understatement:
�My windows commanded an unobstructed view of a lofty brick wall, black by age and everlasting shade.�

Image: The view ()
He portrays himself as a benevolent, but ineffectual, boss: anyone else would long ago have fired Turkey for his “eccentricities�, thus, an additional scrivener is required:
�In answer to my advertisement, a motionless young man one morning, stood upon my office threshold, the door being open, for it was summer. I can see that figure now—pallidly neat, pitiably respectable, incurably forlorn! It was Bartleby.�
At first, Bartleby is very industrious. He’s also silent, pale, and mechanical. “On the third day� (such a weighted phrase), the boss asks Bartleby to do a minor task, within his duties:
�Bartleby in a singularly mild, firm voice, replied, ҵ would prefer not to.��
And he sticks to that.
WWYD?
� What would you do if you were the boss?
� How would you feel if you were Turkey, Nippers, and Ginger Nut?
� And why is Bartleby behaving this way?
The story progresses, with humour and tragedy, but very few answers. It’s brilliant.
�Up to a certain point the thought or sight of misery enlists our best affections; but, in certain special cases, beyond that point it does not.�
If Bartleby worked for me, I’m unsure what I would do. I’d certainly be curious, and I’d have sympathy for some of the revelations and assumptions about his life. However, I don’t think I’d be as lenient as the boss says he was.
It explores work, duty, charity, mental ill-health, fate and free will, and the power of the word “prefer�.

Image: Bartleby would prefer not to ()
Quotes
� “He was a man whom prosperity harmed.�
� “When a man is browbeaten in some unprecedented and violently unreasonable way, he begins to stagger in his own plainest faith. He begins, as it were, vaguely to surmise that, wonderful as it may be, all the justice and all the reason is on the other side.�
� “Nothing so aggravates an earnest person as a passive resistance.�
� “His cadaverously gentlemanly nonchalance.�
“His mildly cadaverous reply.�
� “But he answered not a word; like the last column of some ruined temple, he remained standing mute and solitary in the middle of the otherwise deserted room.�
� “‘You will Դdz?�
ҵ prefer Դdz.’�
See also
� You can read the novella free, online, on Gutenberg, .
� For a contemporary take on a similar situation and themes, see Jonas Karlsson’s The Room, and my review HERE.
� Gogol's The Overcoat. See my review HERE.
� Kafka in general, and a specific story of his. See my Kafka shelf HERE.
� Towards the end, I thought more of JL Borges. See my overview review of his works HERE.
Short story club
I reread this as one of the stories in The Art of the Short Story, by Dana Gioia, from which I'm aiming to read one story a week with The Short Story Club, starting 2 May 2022.
You can read this story .
You can join the group here.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Bartleby the Scrivener.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
December 10, 2021
–
Started Reading
December 10, 2021
– Shelved
December 10, 2021
–
Finished Reading
December 18, 2021
– Shelved as:
kafka-and-kafkaesque
December 18, 2021
– Shelved as:
humour
December 18, 2021
– Shelved as:
unreliable-narrators
December 18, 2021
– Shelved as:
usa-and-canada
December 18, 2021
– Shelved as:
mental-health-victorian-madness
December 18, 2021
– Shelved as:
solitary-protagonist
December 18, 2021
– Shelved as:
short-stories-and-novellas
June 5, 2022
–
Started Reading
June 5, 2022
–
Finished Reading
September 21, 2024
– Shelved as:
autism-maybe
Comments Showing 1-45 of 45 (45 new)
date
newest »



This was my first time! But yes, it's brilliant.


OMG! Me too Apatt!

I would prefer not to!


I had the advantage of coming to it cold: I had no idea of the plot at all, and just knew it was by the author of Moby Dick, which I've not read. Without knowing the impression you currently have, it's hard to know how a reread would compare.
Kathleen wrote: "... Your comparison to Borges is intriguing!"
It was mood and symbolism towards the end. Nothing very specific.


Thanks, and he is. Infuriating, fascinating, disturbing, and increasingly disturbed.
Lea wrote: "... I did not read the novel yet but he made quite an impression on me..."
It's a short novella (or long short story?), so doesn't take long, but don't be tempted to rush through it.

It's good to be intrigued! And this story is not long, and free to read. I hope that if your interest is piqued that you enjoy it.


Thanks, although my comment was based on his stories: I have read his essays. Evidently I should.


Thanks for the tip, Jim. I've added it.

Yes, it was that one specifically, but also Kafka in general. However, I'm more wary of spoilers in a review than a comment, so chose not to mention it, and didn't bother to do so in a spoiler tag.

Thanks, Petra - especially as it's not a book I'd have expected you to like so much.


Although I wouldn't want to pressure you to read this, it's short, free online, and I'd be fascinated to read your thoughts on it. No pressure... well, only a little. 😉


It's certainly memorable in the best way. Thanks for your kinds words, and may you also have a happy and healthy 2022, filled with good books and other joys.

Thanks, Maureen, and I'm glad you enjoyed this story too.


Thanks, Laura, and I'm glad to see you have now read - and enjoyed - the story, and reviewed it so well.
Laura wrote: "... I like the moral conundrum of how far charity should go..."
Exactly. I generally prefer it when an author lets me make up my own mind.

Melville does it very well. Thanks, Connie.

Thank you, Kenny. I was surprised how relevant it still was, and the combination of humour and tragedy is well done.

I have not yet attempted Moby Dick, but this was very good. I suspect they're not much alike. Thanks, David.


That's very kind of you to say, thank you.
So nice to see you reading this Melville - I will look forward to your thoughts!"
This was a short and easy introduction to Melville, but I enjoyed it, and I will explain why in my eventual review.