Faith's Reviews > Hatchet
Hatchet (Brian's Saga, #1)
by
by

Though the story was compelling, very compelling, compelling enough that I finished it despite the compelling urge to throw it out the window, I don't think I could ever read it again. The window, oh the shiny window, the shiny open window was very tempting. This book was so repetitious, why so repetitious, I know not why this book was so repetitious, but the repetitions made me want to pull my hair out. My brown hair, the brown hair on my head, the hair that was brown that was on my head.
I did listen to it on CD, which might have been part of the problem. Bruce said he didn't notice it as much when he read the book, but when you read it, your mind kind of skips over things, things that might be repetitious, the repetitious things might have been skipped over that make you want to pull your hair out and throw the book out the window.
I did listen to it on CD, which might have been part of the problem. Bruce said he didn't notice it as much when he read the book, but when you read it, your mind kind of skips over things, things that might be repetitious, the repetitious things might have been skipped over that make you want to pull your hair out and throw the book out the window.
1007 likes · Like
鈭�
flag
Sign into 欧宝娱乐 to see if any of your friends have read
Hatchet.
Sign In 禄
Reading Progress
Started Reading
February 1, 2009
–
Finished Reading
February 14, 2009
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-50 of 174 (174 new)
message 1:
by
Karen
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Feb 17, 2009 01:05PM

reply
|
flag











- repetition is evident in this quote haha




Then every person who has ever swam in a lake populated with fish is insane. They weren't pariahs, just normal fish.



I wondered if I would notice it as much in print. Glad I'm not the only one!






Please. I love reading Act Without Words by Beckett. This book is trash. The author probably had a word count to meet in order for the publisher to publish it. If Paulsen was so ingenious in his use of repetition, he would have written a much shorter work and everyone would agree that the repetition was necessary. In Act Without Words, repetition is necessary to show the futility of doing anything. Since things get accomplished in Hatchet, that certainly can't be the reason Paulsen used it. You say the repetition is "real-to-life" but that is not true. Most sane people do not continuously brood over thoughts for 208 pages. So what is it? To show his anger? Then it is not necessary because we already get that. To build suspense? Then Paulsen did a bad job because most people are not riveted to the book because he is repeating himself.
Repetition has a place in literature, but only if it is used properly. When it is used properly, people who are literary minded will say, "Ah, yes, that is why he did it" and 90% of them will agree. In this case, everyone believes he used the repetition for a reason, but no one can agree on why he used it. The result is that they come up with about 20 different reasons that are general reasons an author would use repetition. However, none of them fit this book, except mine- he needed to reach a publisher's word count. That doesn't make a book amazing.

Then every person who has ever swam in a lake populated with fish is insane. They weren't pariahs, just normal fish."
Normal fish eat dead humans only as a last resort if there is no other source of food.