Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

[Name Redacted]'s Reviews > American Gods

American Gods by Neil Gaiman
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
287915
's review

it was ok
bookshelves: urban-fantasy, religion, mythology, horror, fantasy, dark-fantasy, neil-gaiman
Read 2 times. Last read September 1, 2004.

Neil Gaiman is my favorite author, and I have loved the study of comparative religions since I first learned to read, so I expected to love this book. Instead I found myself constantly disappointed by what amounted to little more than a prose re-hash of everything he had done in his far-superior "The Sandman" graphic novel series (but with more "grit", which I suspect he added to ensure he would be taken seriously as a prose-writer for adults) filtered through the lens of Pratchett's vastly superior "Small Gods".

Even the novel's basic premise (that America is a land unfit for gods because only the land itself could attract worship) flies in the face of history, as i can think of at least three major world religions that have thrived and given birth to new sects here -- several of which have since spread to become massive international sects. Likewise, his reductionist approach to Native American religion is remarkably offensive, in that it dismisses every aspect of every Native American religious tradition which is not connected to Earth-worship.

I think the only portion I really enjoyed was the reveal of the goblin at the end, in large part because I had not expected it and it felt like a return to vintage Gaiman.

This is the only work by Gaiman I have ever actively disliked, and I have put off reading the sequel as a result.
30 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read American Gods.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
September 1, 2004 – Finished Reading
October 1, 2004 – Started Reading (Mass Market Paperback Edition)
November 1, 2004 – Finished Reading (Mass Market Paperback Edition)
August 17, 2007 – Shelved
November 11, 2010 – Shelved as: urban-fantasy
November 11, 2010 – Shelved as: religion
November 11, 2010 – Shelved as: mythology
November 11, 2010 – Shelved as: horror
November 11, 2010 – Shelved as: fantasy
November 11, 2010 – Shelved as: dark-fantasy
November 12, 2010 – Shelved as: neil-gaiman
August 11, 2011 – Shelved (Mass Market Paperback Edition)

Comments Showing 1-10 of 10 (10 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Traveller (last edited Mar 21, 2012 03:57AM) (new) - added it

Traveller I'm giving this a like because I agree with your sentiments re the Native American tradition. I read the book about half-way, I must really make a plan to finish it.

Btw, I'm not liking the Sandman comic. I hate rating or reviewing books before I've finished them, though I'm very tempted to put up a preliminary review of it - either that or I should force myself to continue on with it a bit...


[Name Redacted] Part of the problem with The Sandman, i think, is that it is a 11 volume work that must be taken as a whole.


message 3: by Traveller (new) - added it

Traveller Ian wrote: "Part of the problem with The Sandman, i think, is that it is a 11 volume work that must be taken as a whole."

Ok... since I detest it when other people only read and rate part of a work that only comes into it's right when read as a whole, maybe I should just take a rain-check with Sandman until I'm more in the mood for it, to be fair towards it.


[Name Redacted] Ha ha, that might be for the best. It tells a single overarching story, planned from the moment he first started working on the draft back in the mid-to-late 80s. To read only a portion and judge that portion alone would be like judging Richard III entirely on its opening soliloquoy or The Orestia solely on "Agamemnon" ;)


message 5: by Traveller (last edited Mar 21, 2012 11:29AM) (new) - added it

Traveller Well, I'm glad I mentioned it, and that you gave input on it. Now I know, and can avoid erring in this regard. :)


Leemaslibros Curiously similar to my own opinion.


Nataliya Wait - there is a sequel to this one?


[Name Redacted] Ayup. "Anansi Boys".


Nataliya I read that one. I didn't think it was considered a sequel to AG. The only relationship it has to AG is Anansi, who briefly appears in both books. Besides that, the two books have a very different feel and are not otherwise related.


[Name Redacted] It followed on from the preceding novel, so i consider it a sequel in the same way that each Discworld novel is a sequel (or prequel) to the book before it.


back to top