Nataliya's Reviews > Sunrise on the Reaping
Sunrise on the Reaping (The Hunger Games, #0.5)
by
by

You can gasp all you want, but for me, despite loving The Hunger Games trilogy, it was only after seeing him on screen impeccably played by Woody Harrelson that Haymitch Abernathy - the misanthropic alcoholic mentor of District 12 tributes - came to life in all his sardonic glory.
I was never among those who thought the prequel with his story was necessary. After all, we know that whatever happened in his Hunger Games, it still took a quarter of a century and Katniss Everdeen to finally destroy the system that created those games. In the grand scheme of things, the last prequel - the one about the rise of President Snow - was actually giving more of an interesting new perspective. I mean, how many times can we see the same formula play out � kids killing each other on screen for entertainment of the depraved rich viewers?
And I still don’t think it was that necessary, but that’s not to say I regret reading it.
Yes, the same formula from the original series is still here - the Reaping (again from District 12), the surreal prep for the bloodbath presented as a show in the Capitol, and finally the Arena and the games. Same as we have seen before, even narrated in the same first person present tense voice. And to add to the strange familiarity, the galore of Easter eggs as well as references left for even the most casual fans of the series. Any named character from the original series and Snow/Lucy Gray prequel seems to have made it in here as a cameo of themselves or at least their descendants or ancestors in the odd Easter egg hunt; the same songs and artifacts and even pieces of clothing. The world of the Hunger Games universe seems like a tiny fanservice village at best. Difficult choices were conveniently disposed of ((view spoiler) ), and Haymitch’s girlfriend seemed little but a throwback to Lucy Gray.
And yet, despite all the cameos and the usual formula, it still scratched the right spot. Suzanne Collins never really went for subtle in her books, and here she megaphones it (maybe because the unfortunate live triangle overshadowed her point for many fans in the first trilogy). There is something very relevant to our society about what is happening � the focus on how easy it is to manipulate the narrative for your own means, and how important appearances are for creating convenient - or inconvenient - versions of reality. And how terrifyingly easy it can be to rewrite history not only after the fact but also in real time.
Perhaps this book is not quite necessary to advance the story, but it does add a few more layers to it, changing a few perspectives � and if it’s done through a bit of retconning and name-dropping and a parade of cameos, then so be it. And it’s not even Haymitch that gets that extra layer, as it had been clear that behind seemingly callous exterior there is a heart of gold deeply traumatized by events that for him continued on and on for a quarter of a century. It’s the other smaller things - like Beetee and his bombs making more sense in their seeming cruelty, or the evidence that the work behind the rebellion was starting way before Katniss was even born, with the final revolution being the result of years of work rather than one Hunger Games � even if it was edited out of television and memory for Panem for years.
(Now, Plutarch seems to be deserving of a book of his own, to say the least. It may break us out of the comfortable formula, just like Snow’s book briefly did).
But hey, Maysilee was great. I would have cut out 90% of Lenore references to have more of her, and the entirety of at least one Edgar Allan Poe poem. (And I’d have Effie out of the book as well, because who the hell needs more Effie, ever???) Let’s take a moment of silence for Maysilee, shall we?
I wouldn’t mind reading book from an adult point of view in this series, just to get some life experience on page and perhaps the lack of first love coloring the perspective � but that’s asking something of a book like this that it’s not built to be. I wonder what I’d think had I been still a young adult reading it � but I’m still going to follow this series regardless of graying hairs.
3.5 stars.
—ĔĔĔĔ�
Also posted on .["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>
I was never among those who thought the prequel with his story was necessary. After all, we know that whatever happened in his Hunger Games, it still took a quarter of a century and Katniss Everdeen to finally destroy the system that created those games. In the grand scheme of things, the last prequel - the one about the rise of President Snow - was actually giving more of an interesting new perspective. I mean, how many times can we see the same formula play out � kids killing each other on screen for entertainment of the depraved rich viewers?
“It’s on all of us stupid, clawed district piglets. Animals for their entertainment. Expendable for their pleasure. Too dumb to deserve to live.�
And I still don’t think it was that necessary, but that’s not to say I regret reading it.
Yes, the same formula from the original series is still here - the Reaping (again from District 12), the surreal prep for the bloodbath presented as a show in the Capitol, and finally the Arena and the games. Same as we have seen before, even narrated in the same first person present tense voice. And to add to the strange familiarity, the galore of Easter eggs as well as references left for even the most casual fans of the series. Any named character from the original series and Snow/Lucy Gray prequel seems to have made it in here as a cameo of themselves or at least their descendants or ancestors in the odd Easter egg hunt; the same songs and artifacts and even pieces of clothing. The world of the Hunger Games universe seems like a tiny fanservice village at best. Difficult choices were conveniently disposed of ((view spoiler) ), and Haymitch’s girlfriend seemed little but a throwback to Lucy Gray.
And yet, despite all the cameos and the usual formula, it still scratched the right spot. Suzanne Collins never really went for subtle in her books, and here she megaphones it (maybe because the unfortunate live triangle overshadowed her point for many fans in the first trilogy). There is something very relevant to our society about what is happening � the focus on how easy it is to manipulate the narrative for your own means, and how important appearances are for creating convenient - or inconvenient - versions of reality. And how terrifyingly easy it can be to rewrite history not only after the fact but also in real time.
Perhaps this book is not quite necessary to advance the story, but it does add a few more layers to it, changing a few perspectives � and if it’s done through a bit of retconning and name-dropping and a parade of cameos, then so be it. And it’s not even Haymitch that gets that extra layer, as it had been clear that behind seemingly callous exterior there is a heart of gold deeply traumatized by events that for him continued on and on for a quarter of a century. It’s the other smaller things - like Beetee and his bombs making more sense in their seeming cruelty, or the evidence that the work behind the rebellion was starting way before Katniss was even born, with the final revolution being the result of years of work rather than one Hunger Games � even if it was edited out of television and memory for Panem for years.
“We could’ve at least done some damage,� I tell Ringina.
“At least a little. Possibly a considerable amount,� someone says behind me. I turn to see Plutarch. He waves his camera crew over to record the knife training, but his attention stays on me. “The question is, why didn’t you?�
(Now, Plutarch seems to be deserving of a book of his own, to say the least. It may break us out of the comfortable formula, just like Snow’s book briefly did).
But hey, Maysilee was great. I would have cut out 90% of Lenore references to have more of her, and the entirety of at least one Edgar Allan Poe poem. (And I’d have Effie out of the book as well, because who the hell needs more Effie, ever???) Let’s take a moment of silence for Maysilee, shall we?
“Shut up,� says Maysilee. “Listen, Louella, if you let them treat you like an animal, they will. So don’t let them.�
I wouldn’t mind reading book from an adult point of view in this series, just to get some life experience on page and perhaps the lack of first love coloring the perspective � but that’s asking something of a book like this that it’s not built to be. I wonder what I’d think had I been still a young adult reading it � but I’m still going to follow this series regardless of graying hairs.
3.5 stars.
—ĔĔĔĔ�
Also posted on .["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Sunrise on the Reaping.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
February 19, 2025
– Shelved
March 18, 2025
–
Started Reading
March 19, 2025
–
21.0%
"Well, here goes my prediction that Haymitch would be forced to fight Louella."
March 19, 2025
–
44.0%
"I am starting to wonder whether the point of this book is to cram as many characters from the previous four books in preparation for some sort of Hunger Games Easter egg hunt? 🫤"
March 19, 2025
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-35 of 35 (35 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Amina
(new)
-
rated it 2 stars
Mar 20, 2025 07:59AM

reply
|
flag



And while “the message� is as valid as ever, I feel like I’ve been bonked on the head with it throughout most of the book.

Thank you, Amina! It is not perfect, but I still found it interesting to read.

Yeah, I am not sure that a few added bit justified an entire book or that they added much to Haymitch’s character, but it wasn’t a bad book either. What I liked about Snow prequel was a different point of view that allowed us to see more of the world; with Haymitch it was overall similar. I’d b happy to read a book with Plutarch, for instance, to see a perspective different from that of a tribute and to see how the rebellion actually was orchestrated.

Honestly, unless you are a huge fan, a library may be a good choice, although I imagine that the wait will be quite long, given the series popularity.

I really think she tried to be extra explicit because in the first trilogy people seemed to focus on the atrocious love triangle, and it seems that in the prequel with Snow people again focused on the “romance� over things more important, and so she went all out to spell it out. I half-suspect that this was why we even needed Lenore Dove who was off-page for most of the book � so that readers stop trying to read romance into the interactions between Haymitch and Maysilee.


Most of your reservations are mine too, still I think this book is a notch better than the Trilogy, although not as good as Ballad. And Beetee, oh. The fact that he managed to keep it together for all these years, and I am somewhat happy that he lived to see the payback.

Thanks, Alexandra! Have you seen the movies?

Most of your reservations are mine too, still I think this book is a no..."
I suspect that’s true. We are reading it with much older eyes � but I suppose that’s what eventually is going to happen in a series that is being released over the period of many years (and I was already out of the YA age range when the first one was out, so that makes it even worse).
I liked that here was less emphasis was put on the stylists and clothes than in original series; that drove me nuts even back then.

No idea if she’s done with this series or if she wants to explore this world more, but I’d advise you to read them in publication order because otherwise you won’t get that much out of Easter eggs and cameos in either of the prequels. And some significance of certain events will be lost.


Thanks, Alexand..."
No, I haven't seen the movies either! I am not even late to the party, it seems I wasn't invited :D

No idea if she’s done with this series or if she wants to explore this world more, but I..."
I already know about the franchise through pop culture osmosis but one of my dearest friends will have a conniption once I start with Songbirds and Snakes. And that's exactly what I intend to give her.

Hehe, perhaps! Although as I’ve said, I’ll still read whatever she pumps out in this series. Even if there’s not much new, it’s still addictive. And I’m sure she knows that there are millions old fans like me 😬

Ooooh, you’ll have so much fun! The movies are actually very good as well, and movie characters quickly replaced my inner idea of what the characters were.

You are a good friend 😆
I’ll keep an eye out for your thoughts on the series!

What can I say, us old fans are the best fans 🤷♀�

Thank you, Nicole!

He was indeed! I think he played the character perfectly. I can’t even recall how I imagined Haymitch before the movies came out. Hunger Games is one of those series for me where the actors were pretty spot-on and replaced book characters appearance-wise in my mind.


Thank you, Alyssa. And I’m very glad you loved this book! Maybe Collins� next offering will get 5 stars from me as well 🤞



My worry about having a stylist being the next book’s subject is the inevitable increase in the focus on clothes/dressing up. I suffered through the glamorization process in each book, and selfishly I’d love to see less of the makeover.

I didn’t know there even was a fan film. But in Collins� defense, she had previously given us the outline of Haymitch’s story, and since we already know the Reaping/Makeover/Arena formula, it probably is rather easy to come up with stories that are similar. Which is why I wish she had given us a less predictable viewpoint.


One thing this book tempted me to do is to consider revisiting the series, especially the first book. I’m curious to read about adult Haymitch again and compare him to his adolescent self in this book, and then rewatch the movie.
