欧宝娱乐

Madeline's Reviews > Never Let Me Go

Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
111921
's review

did not like it
bookshelves: science-fiction, the-list, ugh

** spoiler alert ** You know those random stock characters in sci-fi/action movies, the ones who never get names or any lines? They're always spending their precious few minutes of screen time getting shoved out of the way as the hero hurtles desperately down a hallway, or watching from a safe distance as a climactic fight goes on, or diving out of the way whenever a murderous cyborg smashes through their office window. Have you ever wondered what those people's lives were like? Have you ever thought to yourself, "Man, this movie's interesting and all, but I want to know more about that guy who owned the hotel where Sarah Conner hid from the Terminator. I bet he leads a fascinating life." (believe me, he doesn't.)

Imagine if someone decided to write a book about this kind of person. The result is Never Let Me Go.

(semi-spoilers ahoy, you've been warned) So the book is about a sort of alternate-universe England, where people are cloned and the resulting kids are raised in isolated boarding schools, spending all their time painting and playing sports and getting vague hints about how when they get older they'll have to make "donations." We learn (eventually and with no drama whatsoever) that these kids were created specifically as future organ donors, and that's all they're meant for. Ishiguro introduces us to Kathy, the narrator, and her friends who lived at one of these schools with her - Ruth and Tommy. As I said, we gradually and laboriously learn about the school's real purpose, but it seems almost like a subplot, because the majority of the book is just Kathy nattering on about her school and how she and Ruth got into a fight this one time and also she had a crush on Tommy but he and Ruth were dating so Kathy had sex with some other random guys and oh my god can we get back to the organ donor thing? Seriously the whole book is like that - we get the sense that there's some creepy futuristic stuff going on in the background, but our protagonists don't care because they're too busy telling us about that one time Kathy lost her favorite cassette tape and it was very upsetting.

Even when it seems like a plot's about to start, it's always a false alarm. The trip to a nearby town that the three characters take to find a woman they think may be Ruth's "possible" (a person she may have been cloned from) doesn't pan out, and we realize that the real point of the trip was an attempt to convince the reader that Tommy and Kathy have some sort of romantic attraction to each other. Ruth's possible, and everything it might have meant, is abandoned so that Ishiguro can have another chance to demonstrate his astonishing inability to create any kind of chemistry between two characters.

And the end. Without giving anything away, I'll just say that Kathy and Tommy finally get all the answers about their school and what was actually going on, and they respond by...going about their lives in the exact same way as before.

I mean, good God. Even though this is supposed to be some sort of more intellectual science fiction, I don't care. There's cloning and dystopian undertones; ergo it is sci-fi. And I like my sci-fi loud, shiny, and dramatic, with lots of explosions and computers that talk.

There's a reason Harry Potter starts when he gets his Hogwarts letter, folks. Because no one wants to hear about ordinary people being ordinary - that's kind of the whole point of fiction.
1639 likes ·  鈭� flag

Sign into 欧宝娱乐 to see if any of your friends have read Never Let Me Go.
Sign In 禄

Reading Progress

Started Reading
December 1, 2009 – Finished Reading
December 4, 2009 – Shelved
December 4, 2009 –
page 106
36.81%
December 7, 2009 –
page 156
54.17%
December 8, 2009 – Shelved as: the-list
December 8, 2009 – Shelved as: science-fiction
December 29, 2009 – Shelved as: ugh

Comments Showing 1-50 of 180 (180 new)


Patricia it felt like eating glass to read that book!


message 2: by El (new) - rated it 4 stars

El Haha, I liked this book, but still a great review!


Madeline I can certainly see how people would enjoy it, but I just couldn't appreciate the characters' total lack of outrage or curiosity about their situation. My problem was that as soon as I figured out that the book was about cloned organ donors, I couldn't get away from the sci-fi/dystopian mindset. And for me, those kind of stories are only good when someone is actively fighting or at least questioning the system.


message 4: by El (new) - rated it 4 stars

El I think Ishiguro was trying to make a point about the horrors of an apathetic society, but that's just one idea.

Hey, did you know a movie version is coming out next year or I am just the only one who lives under a rock?




Madeline But...we can't really see how terrible it is that the society is apathetic until someone decides to start giving a damn. And no one in this book ever does.

And I had heard that about the movie, mostly on other discussions for this book. I'm not sure how it's going to work: either they'll drastically change the story so the characters actually do something about their situation, or they'll stay loyal to the book and it'll be the most boring movie ever.


message 6: by Mary JL (new)

Mary JL An excellent review. It certain makes me feel like I will not take too much time looking for this book.


message 7: by Moira (new) - added it

Moira AMEN, yeah. I couldn't understand why people raved about this -- I couldn't get through the first 25 pages.


treehugger Madeline, thanks for confirming my own experience with this giant, waste-of-time-book. I listened to it on my commute to and from work, and that's about 11 hours of my life I'd like to charge Ishiguro for, since I'll never be able to get them back. Complete rubbish. And nattering is EXACTLY what Kath did throughout the whole book...and WHAT was the point of the cassette??? ARgh.


Nicole El wrote: "I think Ishiguro was trying to make a point about the horrors of an apathetic society, but that's just one idea.

Hey, did you know a movie version is coming out next year or I am just the only one..."


But the reason these kids where at this elite Boarding School was because some people had convinced society that they were more than just spare parts. The only reason society stopped contributing to institutions such as Hailsham was because they were scared they would start creating a breed of superhumans, I think that denotes more fear of the unknown than apathy. And the fact that they went ahead with their lives and never even tried to run away after they realized that they could never change their fate, to me, shows that Ishiguro meant to make them soulless and inhuman.


message 10: by Sharon (new)

Sharon Excellent review. It sums up everything I felt about this book -- and the movie too, incidentally.


message 11: by Olga (new) - rated it 1 star

Olga Podobed >Even when it seems like a plot's about to start, it's always a false alarm.
That! you are so right :)


message 12: by Joyzi (new) - added it

Joyzi I agree, great review


Halimah I loved the movie alot! But now that I've read your review, I feel somewhat disheartened.. D: I don't want to feel like I'm eating glass like Patricia said lol I like to enjoy what I read, and am sincerely disappointed when it sucks!


Ju$tin damnit, haha I have to read this book for English class, I'll let you know what I think!


message 15: by [deleted user] (new)

I'm not even done with this book and I can promise you that this is the perfect review. I really ought to read your reviews before I read books, no?


message 16: by Robyn (new) - rated it 1 star

Robyn Great review, I felt exactly the same. so much unnecessary inane crap and mind bogglingly boring characters.


message 17: by [deleted user] (new)

THIS SO MUCH.


Incitanemxx There are so many stories about people in dystopian worlds who rebell against the system. It's obvious why the clones could do that, but isn't it more interesting why they would NOT do that? Why do people just accept things even though they know it's wrong and unfair? Why don't people take the initiative to change things? I actually think these are more interesting questions and make the book more believable and realistic, instead of a heroine with superpowers who manages to overthrow a country. Just my opinion. I liked your review, though ;)


Madison Redington I enjoyed the book but you're review is good anyhow. You made some valid points that many other reviewers fail to explain when bashing the book.


Hinke Van you are so right about the response from Kathy and Tommy when they find out. It irritated me so much. And then also, they didn't have any chemistry. Nor did either of them have chemistry with Ruth. This is why I really wonder if these clones are indeed not 100% human...


Cecily "that guy who owned the hotel where Sarah Conner hid"

LOL - but I fear that somewhere there's fan-fic in the pipeline...


Angelina Orlicky You said everything I felt about this book and you said it in a way that made me laugh.


message 23: by Sonia (new) - rated it 1 star

Sonia Levy I wish I could Donate all of the time it took to read this rubbish to a better cause. Sigh


message 24: by Dena (new)

Dena Cooper Whenever I come across a book that seems overhyped I turn to your reviews and it all becomes so clear...you should be paid for this service :)


Jefferson Lam This review sums up my thoughts exactly in a hilarious little package. Great review :D


Soozblooz I'm reading NEVER LET ME GO now. I will keep an eye out for the cassette, if I ever make it that far. It is eminently obvious something evil/sinister is going on (and I read all the spoiler alerts so I know what it is--bad sooz) and I wonder if I should plug along to the end. I agree with the commenters who said unless the protagonist is going to DO something about the evil, the book is pointless. Thanks for making me laugh aloud. Great review.


Karlene Perfect review


adeline You're missing the entire point of the novel; it's a metaphor for life. We are all donors trying to come to terms with the fact that we only have so much time here. The children from Hailsham never question their fate because that is all they know. They don't have the perspective to rebel. Similarly, we accept the life given to us by society: high school, college, work, work, work, retire, die. What is there to rebel against? All of the wrongs we suffer as a result of this system are purely 'part of life'- just as donating was part of theirs. Look beyond the sci-fi. As Ishiguro said himself, it's not about the clone thing. It's about transcending fate, feelings, hopes, fears, and memories.


Chiyeung Lau Well said @Adeline


Andrew This review sums this book up for me perfectly. Hats off to you. I was being generous with my own 2-star rating


message 31: by Katya (new) - rated it 1 star

Katya @Adeline, but we HAVE perspective, and we DO rebel. There are plenty of people who escape from wars and unjust regimes, flee abroad, live as refugees, just so they don't have to endure their fate. There are people who start debates, unions, rebellions, revolutions. People who stand up for what they believe in at great personal risk. People who challenge the status quo. People who at the very least, question whether the model high school, college, work, work, work, retire, die, is really the best we can come up with - or whether there's more and better. Politicians. Philanthropists. Philosophers. I just don't think Ishiguro managed to create characters that react to things the way real-life humans would, and have, reacted throughout history to having their livelihoods threatened. Maybe his point really was that clones are fundamentally inhuman, but then, what was the point of the story? That everything we read is perfectly OK because they seem fine with it?


Valerie Anderson Agreed, I am not as articulate as you but couldn鈥檛 agree more.


message 33: by Rachel (new)

Rachel I know you wrote this review many years ago, but I could not agree more. I'm about halfway through the book and considering jumping ship...


Babette YES! Love your Terminator analogy, on point!


Myersakrawiec This is a funny and well written review! Wish the book was more like this review!


message 36: by Lesley (new) - added it

Lesley Hard to believe this book was waitlisted for a prestigious literary award. Your review is right on; this book was plodding, dreadful and simply boring. So disappointing.


Assma Agreed with this review. The book drove me nuts! It鈥檚 one of those novels where the mundane is supposed to be incredibly significant given the context but I just never got into it.


Eleanor @Adeline the entire narrative 鈥榯ension鈥� is the relationships between Kathy, Tommy, and Ruth. There is nothing on the 鈥榙onations鈥� aka organized murder for organ harvesting. There is no agency in the characters, they go asking for a deferment of a couple years not 鈥榥o it isn鈥檛 okay to kill me鈥�. The characters are *okay* with being murdered for parts and that is structurally treated as being the resolution of the story.
This book was trash, was well written and well reviewed enough that I expected better, and was an utter waste of my time.
Even the 鈥榥o one wants to care/know鈥� is *told* rather than shown.


message 39: by Kaitlin (new) - added it

Kaitlin Phillips I just read this book and I really wish I read your review first!


Selin K枚ksal I completely agree with the 鈥渃an we get back to the organ donor part鈥�. The author was trying to draw the attention away from the main thing the whole time! I was annoyed and kept reading just to see whether something exciting would finally happen - which did not


Lectus Ahhh! So this is what this book is about...


message 42: by Jessica (new) - added it

Jessica Lyon Yesssss!!! Thank you!


Michelle Kaster The only interesting thing related to this book is your review...Thank you !!!!


message 44: by Jayme (new)

Jayme Gauthier YES!!!! I love your review. I was way more interested in the cloning/donor issue than pretty much everything else that happened in this book


message 45: by Marc (new) - rated it 1 star

Marc Heyvaert Very good review. There is no point in reading this book. It starts by feeding the reader some mystery to keep the interest going but somewhere towards the end of the novel it all peters out into nothing. The cloned persons in the book seem to be held in line by something but how this is done is never properly explained while a lot of attention is given to all the other details. Why there is not the least inclination by the clones to reject their fate or at least question it is a mystery to me. They speculate a lot about the other aspects of their lives but never about what the ultimate reason for their existence is. I just don't get why so many people praise this novel for its literary qualities.


Rembrandt Alexander Stick to reading YA garbage about heroes fighting 'murderous cyborgs'. This is beyond you, obviously.


Madeline Murderous cyborgs was actually a Terminator reference but I guess that was beyond you.


message 48: by j (new)

j f


message 49: by Sonjia Boyd (new)

Sonjia Boyd l


pp


message 50: by Sonjia Boyd (new)

Sonjia Boyd 嗒�


芦 previous 1 3 4
back to top